Adsorption of proteins to hydrophobic sites on mixed self-assembled monolayers

Langmuir

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1861-1872

  Ostuni, Emanuele ^a   Grzybowski, Bartosz A ^a   Mrksich, Milan ^a   Roberts, Carmichael S ^a   Whitesides, George M ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROPHOBIC SITES;

ADSORPTION; HYDROPHOBICITY; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); SELF ASSEMBLY; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE;

PROTEINS;

EID: 0037418426     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la020649c     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Ratner, B. D.; Hoffmann, F. J.; Schoen, J. E.; Lemon, F. Biomaterials Science. An Introduction to Materials in Medicine; Academic Press: New York, 1996.
2. Elwing, H.; Welin, S.; Askendahl, A.; Lundstrom, I. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1988, 123, 306-308.
3. Jennissen, H. P. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1986, 111, 570-586.
4. Norde, W. Driving Forces for Protein Adsorption at Solid Surfaces; Malmsten, M., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1998; Vol. 75, pp 27-54.
5. Duffy, D. C.; McDonald, J. C.; Schueller, O. J. A.; Whitesides, G. M. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 4974-4984.
6. Manz, A.; Becker, H. Microsystem Technology in Chemistry and Life Sciences; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1998.
7. Macbeath, G.; Schreiber, S. L. Science 2000, 289, 1760-1763.
8. Bain, C. D.; Whitesides, G. M. Science 1988, 240, 62-63.
9. Ivarsson, B. A.; Hegg, P. O.; Lundstroem, K. I.; Joensson, U. Colloids Surf. 1985, 13, 169-192.
10. Eckert, R.; Jeney, S.; Horber, J. K. H. Cell Biol. Int. 1997, 21, 707-713.
11. Knoll, W.; Matsuzawa, M.; Offenhausser, A.; Ruhe, J. Isr. J. Chem. 1996, 36, 357-369.
12. Stoner, G. A.; Srinivasan, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1970, 74, 1088-1094.
13. Scheller, F.; Jaenchen, M.; Pruemke, H. J. Biopolymers 1975, 14, 1553-1563.
14. Murray, B. S.; Cros, L. Colloids Surf., B 1998, 10, 227-241.
15. Jackson, D. R.; Omanovic, S.; Roscoe, S. G. Langmuir 2000, 16, 5449-5457.
16. Cabilio, N. R.; Omanovic, S.; Roscoe, S. G. Langmuir 2000, 16, 8480-8488.
17. Williams, D. F.; Askill, I. N.; Smith, R. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1985, 19, 313-320.
18. Sigal, G. B.; Mrksich, M.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3464-3473.
19. Chapman, R. G.; Ostuni, E.; Takayama, S.; Holmlin, R. E.; Yan, L.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8303-8304.
20. Ostuni, E.; Chapman, R. G.; Holmlin, R. E.; Takayama, S.; Whitesides, G. M. Langmuir 2001, 17, 5605-5620.
21. Hook, F.; Rodahl, M.; Kasemo, B.; Brzezinski, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 12271-12276.
22. Chen, X.; Ferrigno, R.; Holmlin, R. E.; Yang, J.; Whitesides, G. M. Langmuir, in press.
23. (a) Hook, F.; Rodahl, M.; Brzezinski, P.; Kasemo, B. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998, 208, 63-67.
24. (b) Hook, F.; Rodahl, M.; Brzezinski, P.; Kasemo, B. Langmuir 1998, 14, 729-734.
25. Luk, Y.-Y.; Kato, M.; Mrksich, M. Langmuir 2000, 16, 9604-9608.
26. Harder, P.; Grunze, M.; Dahint, R.; Whitesides, G. M.; Laibinis, P. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 426-436.
27. Feldman, K.; Hahner, G.; Spencer, N. D.; Harder, P.; Grunze, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10134-10141.
28. Wang, R. L. C.; Kreuzer, H. J.; Grunze, M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 3613-3622.
29. Zolk, M.; Eisert, F.; Pipper, J.; Herrwerth, S.; Eck, W.; Buck, M.; Grunze, M. Langmuir 2000, 16, 5849-5852.
30. Holmlin, R. E.; Chen, X.; Chapman, R. G.; Takayama, S. T.; Whitesides. G. M. Langmuir 2001, 17, 2841-2850.
31. Prime, K. L.; Whitesides, G. M. Science 1991, 252, 1164-1167.
32. Prime, K. L.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10714-10721.
33. Mrksich, M.; Grunwell, J. R.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12009-12010.
34. Roborts, C.; Chen, C. S.; Mrksich, M.; Martichonok, V.; Ingber, D. E.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6548-6555.
35. Sigal, G. B.; Bamdad, C.; Barberis, A.; Strominger, J.; Whitesides, G. M. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 490-497.
36. Lahiri, J.; Isaacs, L.; Grzybowski, B.; Carbeck, J. D.; Whitesides, G. M. Langmuir 1999, 15, 7186-7198.
37. The instrumental limit of detection of our BIAcore 1000 instrument is approximately 10 RU; we consider a monolayer of fibrinogen with ca. 5000 RU approximately complete.
38. Raether, H. Surface Plasma Oscillations and Their Applications; Hass, G., Francombe, M., Huffman, R., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1977; Vol. 9, pp 145-261.
39. Thiel, A. J.; Frutos, A. G.; Jordan, C. E.; Corn, R. M.; Smith, L. M. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 4948-4956.
40. Fluorescence-based techniques require the attachment of dye molecules to the proteins to enable detection; the conjugated molecular systems of dyes add significant hydrophobic character to the surface of proteins and would probably cause dye-conjugated proteins to exhibit a different adsorption isotherm with a hydrophobic surface than unfunctionalized proteins.
41. (a) Morra, M. J. Biomat. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2000, 11, 547-569.
42. (b) Feder, J. J. Theor. Biol. 1980, 87, 237-254.
43. Schaaf, P.; Talbot, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 91.
44. Schaaf, P.; Voegel, J. C.; Senger, B. Ann. Phys. 1998, 23, 1-5.
45. Feder, J.; Giaever, I. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1980, 78, 144-151.
46. Hinrichsen, E. L.; Feder, J.; Jossang, T. J. Stat. Phys. 1986, 44, 793-799.
47. The values of ΧR for which saturation is observed are approximately consistent with those calculated using the excluded volume of each R group.
48. Cohen Stuart, M. A. Macromolecular Adsorption: A Brief Introduction; Malmsten, M., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1998: Vol. 75, pp 1-26.
49. (a) Handbook of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Cleveland, 1976; Vol II.
50. Stenberg, E.; Persson, B.; Roos, H.; Urbaniczky, C. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1991, 143, 513.
51. Houseman, B. T.; Mrksich, M. Mol Biol. Cell 1998, 9, 2494.
52. 2, but we note that the overall trend was reproducible during an independent set of experiments performed with two different batches of both alkanethiols. It is possible that the diphenyl and benzyl derivatives interact with the hydrophobic regions of the binding pocket of CA; ligands with similar structures have been found to bind effectively to CA molecules. See: Gao, J., et al. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 9, 1949-1955 and Avila, L. Z., et al. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 126-133. This hypothesis could potentially be verified by performing the adsorption experiments in the presence of a soluble ligand that interacts specifically with the binding pocket of CA. We have, however, not carried out these experiments.
53. 2, but we note that the overall trend was reproducible during an independent set of experiments performed with two different batches of both alkanethiols. It is possible that the diphenyl and benzyl derivatives interact with the hydrophobic regions of the binding pocket of CA; ligands with similar structures have been found to bind effectively to CA molecules. See: Gao, J., et al. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 9, 1949-1955 and Avila, L. Z., et al. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 126-133. This hypothesis could potentially be verified by performing the adsorption experiments in the presence of a soluble ligand that interacts specifically with the binding pocket of CA. We have, however, not carried out these experiments.
54. The data of Mrksich et al. cannot be compared directly with those we report here because they were obtained with SAMs in which the hydrophobic groups were buried below the interface defined by the protruding inert groups, but they are useful in inferring the effects of the size and density of the ligand.
55. Mrksich, M.; Sigal, G. B.; Whitesides, G. M. Langmuir 1995, 11, 4383-4385.
56. 2 groups is an artifact that we cannot account for.
57. Tilton, R. D. Mobility of Biomolecules at Interfaces; Malmsten, M., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1998; Vol. 75, pp 363-407.
58. Tilton, R. D.; Gast, A. P.; Robertson, C. R. Biophys. J. 1990, 58, 1321-1326.
59. The analysis that we carried out and the experimental data that we have gathered do not allow us to distinguish between films of adsorbed protein that are continuous or films in which individual protein molecules adsorb in discrete islands. The deviation of the measured values of ΔΦ from the predicted ones (Figure 10), however, is strong indication that the proteins do change shape on the surface.
60. Sigal, G. B.; Mrksich, M.; Whitesides, G. M. Langmuir 1997, 13, 2749-2755.
61. Strong, L.; Whitesides, G. M. Langmuir 1988, 4, 546-558.
62. 2 can be used to determined the values of ΔΦ predicted by the RSA model.
63. Norde, W. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1986, 66, 267-340.
64. Norde, W.; Lyklema, J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1978, 66, 257 265.
65. Robeson, J. L.; Tilton, R. D. Biophys. J. 1995, 68, 2145-2155.
66. Robeson, J. L.; Tilton, R. D. Langmuir 1996, 12, 6104-6113.
67. Brash, J. L.; Lyman, D. J. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1969, 3, 175-189.
68. Lahiri, J.; Isaacs, L.; Tien, J.; Whitesides, G. M. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 777-790.