Sonobioreactors: Using ultrasound for enhanced microbial productivity

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 89-93

  Chisti, Yusuf ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCATALYSTS; BIOREACTORS; CELLS; PLANTS (BOTANY); ULTRASONICS;

MICROBIAL PRODUCTIVITY;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

ABSORPTION; BIOCATALYST; BIOREACTOR; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CATALYSIS; CELL; CELL CULTURE; CELL DAMAGE; CELL DENSITY; CELL METABOLISM; ECONOMICS; MASS; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIAL METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PLANT CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; REVIEW; ULTRASOUND;

ABSORPTION; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; BIOREACTORS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELLS, CULTURED; CULTURE MEDIA; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL; ULTRASONICS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0037309891     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)00033-1     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Chisti Y., Moo-Young M. Bioprocess intensification through bioreactor engineering. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 74A:1996;575-583.
2. Mason T.J., Lorimer J.P. Sonochemistry: Theory, Applications and Uses of Ultrasound in Chemistry. 1988;Ellis Horwood.
3. Mason T.J., et al. The uses of ultrasound in food technology. Ultrasonics Sonochem. 3:1996;S253-S260.
4. Povey M.J.W., Mason T.J. Ultrasound in Food Processing. 1998;Blackie, London.
5. Benedito J., et al. Application of low intensity ultrasonics to cheese manufacturing processes. Ultrasonics. 40:2002;19-23.
6. Schläfer O., et al. Ultrasound stimulation of microorganisms for enhanced biodegradation. Ultrasonics. 40:2002;25-29.
7. Williams A.R. Ultrasound: Biological Effects and Potential Hazards. 1983;Academic Press. pp. 177-253.
8. Miura S.-I., et al. In vitro transfer of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides into coronary endothelial cells by ultrasound. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 298:2002;587-590.
9. Joersbo M., Brunstedt J. Sonication: a new method for gene transfer to plants. Physiol. Plant. 85:1992;230-234.
10. Chisti Y., Moo-Young M. Disruption of microbial cells for intracellular products. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 8:1986;194-204.
11. Dakubu S. Cell inactivation by ultrasound. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 18:1976;465-471.
12. Mett H., et al. Ultrasonic disintegration of bacteria may lead to irreversible inactivation of β-lactamase. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 22:1988;293-298.
13. Doulah M.S. Mechanism of disintegration of biological cells in ultrasonic cavitation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 19:1977;649-660.
14. Chisti Y. Shear sensitivity. Flickinger M.C., Drew S.W. Encyclopedia of Bioprocess Technology: Fermentation, Biocatalysis, and Bioseparation. vol. 5:1999;2379-2406 John Wiley.
15. Chisti Y. Animal-cell damage in sparged bioreactors. Trends Biotechnol. 18:2000;420-432.
16. Francko D.A., et al. Effect of low-dose ultrasonic treatment on physiological variables in Anabaena flos-aquae and Selenastrum capricornutum. Biotechnol. Lett. 12:1990;219-224.
17. Francko D.A., et al. Enhancement of nitrogen fixation in Anabaena flos-aquae (Cyanobacteria) via low-dose ultrasonic treatment. J. Appl. Phycol. 6:1994;455-458.
18. Sakakibara M., et al. Effect of ultrasonic irradiation on production of fermented milk with Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Ultrasonics Sonochem. 1:1994;S107-S110.
19. Wang D., et al. Ultrasound-enhanced lactose hydrolysis in milk fermentation with Lactobacillus bulgaricus. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 65:1996;86-92.
20. Radel S., et al. Viability of yeast cells in well controlled propagating and standing ultrasonic plane waves. Ultrasonics. 38:2000;633-637.
21. Chisti Y. Hydrodynamic damage to animal cells. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 21:2001;67-110.
22. Böhn H., et al. Viability of plant cell suspensions exposed to homogeneous ultrasonic fields of different energy density and wave type. Ultrasonics. 38:2000;629-632.
23. Wu J., Lin L. Elicitor-like effects of low-energy ultrasound on plant (Panax ginseng) cells: induction of plant defense response and secondary metabolite production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 59:2002;51-57.
24. Lin L.D., et al. Ultrasound-induced physiological effects and secondary metabolite (saponin) production in Panax ginseng cell cultures. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 27:2001;1147-1152.
25. Lin L., Wu J. Enhancement of shikonin production in single- and two-phase suspension cultures of Lithospermum erythrorhizon cells using low-energy ultrasound. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 78:2002;81-88.
26. Schläfer O., et al. Improvement of biological activity by low energy ultrasound assisted bioreactors. Ultrasonics. 38:2000;711-716.
27. Matsuura K., et al. Acceleration of cell growth and ester formation by ultrasonic wave irradiation. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 77:1994;36-40.
28. Bujons J., et al. Enantioselective enzymatic sterol synthesis by ultrasonically stimulated bakers' yeast. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110:1988;604-606.
29. Chu J., et al. On-line ultrasound stimulates the secretion and production of gentamicin by Micromonospora echinospora. Process Biochem. 35:2000;569-572.
30. Vulfson E.N., et al. Enhancement of subtilisin-catalyzed interesterification in organic solvents by ultrasound irradiation. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 13:1991;123-126.
31. Sinisterra J.V. Applications of ultrasound to biotechnology - an overview. Ultrasonics. 30:1992;180-185.
32. Wood B.E., et al. Ultrasound stimulates ethanol production during the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of mixed waste office paper. Biotechnol. Prog. 13:1997;232-237.
33. Bar R. Ultrasound-enhanced bioprocesses: cholesterol oxidation by Rhodococcus erythropolis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 32:1988;655-663.
34. Chisti Y. Airlift Bioreactors. 1989;Elsevier.
35. Chisti Y. Mass transfer. Flickinger M.C., Drew S.W. Encyclopedia of Bioprocess Technology: Fermentation, Biocatalysis, and Bioseparation. vol. 3:1999;1607-1640 John Wiley.
36. Nyborg W.L. Ultrasonic microstreaming and related phenomena. Br. J. Cancer. 45:1982;156-160.
37. Kilby N.J., Hunter C.S. Repeated harvest of vacuole-located secondary products from in vitro grown plant cells using 1.02 MHz ultrasound. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 33:1990;448-451.
38. Kilby N.J., Hunter C.S. Towards optimization of the use of 1.02 MHz ultrasound to harvest vacuole-located secondary products from in vitro grown plant cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34:1991;478-480.
39. Zabaneh M., Bar R. Ultrasound-enhanced bioprocess. II: dehydrogenation of hydrocortisone by Arthrobacter simplex. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 37:1991;998-1003.
40. Baker N.V. Segregation and sedimentation of red blood cells in ultrasonic standing waves. Nature. 239:1972;398-399.
41. Weiser M.A.H., Apfel R.E. Interparticle forces on red cells in a standing wave field. Acustica. 56:1984;114-119.
42. Kilburn D.G., et al. Enhanced sedimentation of mammalian cells following acoustic aggregation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 34:1989;559-562.
43. Whitworth G., et al. Transport and harvesting of suspended particles using modulated ultrasound. Ultrasonics. 29:1991;439-444.
44. Mandralis Z.I., Feke D.L. Fractionation of suspensions using synchronized ultrasonic and flow fields. AIChE J. 39:1993;197-206.
45. Doblhoff-Dier O., et al. A novel ultrasonic resonance field device for the retention of animal cells. Biotechnol. Prog. 10:1994;428-432.
46. Hawkes J.J., et al. Filtration of bacteria and yeast by ultrasound-enhanced sedimentation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 82:1997;39-47.
47. Chisti Y. Strategies in downstream processing. Subramanian G. Bioseparation and Bioprocessing: A Handbook. vol. 2:1998;3-30 Wiley-VCH.
48. Zhang J., et al. High-density perfusion culture of insect cells with a BioSep ultrasonic filter. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 59:1998;351-359.
49. Gorenflo V.M., et al. Scale-up and optimization of an acoustic filter for 200 L/day perfusion of a CHO cell culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 80:2002;438-444.
50. Chisti Y., Moo-Young M. Bioreactors. Meyers R.A. Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology. vol. 2:2002;247-271 Academic Press.