Direct detection by atomic force microscopy of single bond forces associated with the rupture of discrete charge-transfer complexes

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 124, Issue 50, 2002, Pages 15125-15133

  Skulason, Hjalti ^a   Frisbie, C Daniel ^a  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DONOR-ACCEPTOR COMPLEXES; SINGLE BOND ENERGY;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; DERIVATIVES; HYDROGEN BONDS; SELF ASSEMBLY; SOLVENTS; SURFACE TENSION;

CHARGE TRANSFER;

DIAMINE DERIVATIVE; METAL COMPLEX; METHANE; SILVER;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMICAL BINDING; COMPLEX FORMATION; ELECTRICITY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; HYDROGEN BOND; MEASUREMENT; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; REACTION ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0037132677     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja028089r     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. (a) Israelachvili, J. Intermolecular & Surface Forces; Academic Press: New York, 1992.
2. (b) Ulman, A. Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films; Academic Press: New York, 1991.
3. (c) Fersht, A. Enzyme Structure and Mechanics; W. H. Freeman: New York, 1985.
4. (a) Meiners, J.-C.; Quake, S. R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 5015.
5. (b) Shivashankar, G. V.; Libchaber, A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1997, 71, 3727.
6. (c) Smith, S. B.; Cui, Y.; Bustamante. C. Science 1996, 271, 795.
7. (a) Harada, Y.; Kuroda, M.; Ishida, A. Langmuir, 2000, 16, 708.
8. (b) Hinterdorfer, P.; Baumgartner, W.; Gruber, H. J.; Schilcher, K.; Schindler, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 3477.
9. (c) Dammer, U.; Hegner, M.; Anselmetti, D.; Wagner, P.; Dreier, M.; Huber, W.; Güntherodt, H.-J. Biophys. J. 1996, 70, 2437.
10. (d) Noy, A.; Vezenov, D. V.; Kayyem, J. F.; Meade, T. J.; Liebercher, C. M. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 519-27.
11. (e) Moy, V. T.: Florin, E.-L.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1994, 266, 257.
12. (f) Florin, E.-L.; Moy, V. T.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1994, 264, 415.
13. (g) Lee, G. U.; Chrisey, L. A.; Colton, R. J. Science 1994, 266, 771.
14. (a) Oberhauser, A. F.; Marszalek, P. E.; Erickson, H. P.; Fernandez. J. M. Nature 1998, 393, 181.
15. (b) Marszalek, P. E.; Oberhauser, A. F.; Pang, Y.-P.; Fernandez, J. M. Nature 1998, 396, 661.
16. (c) Rief, M.; Oesterhelt, F.; Heymann, B.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1997, 275, 1295.
17. (d) Rief, M.; Gautel, M.; Oesterhelt, F.; Fernandez, J. M.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1997, 276, 1109.
18. (e) Misui, K.; Hara, M.; Ikai, A. FEBS Lett. 1996, 385, 29.
19. Hoh, J. H.; Cleveland, J. P.; Prater, C. B.; Revel, J.-P.; Hansma, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4917.
20. Grandbois, M.; Beyer, M. Rief, M.; Clausen-Schaumann, H.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1999, 283, 1727.
21. Lantz, M. A.; Hug, H. J.; Hoffmann, R.; van Schendel, P. J. A.; Kappenberger, P.; Martin, S.; Baratoff, A.; Güntherodt, H.-J. Science 2001, 291, 2580.
22. (a) Smith, D. A.; Wallwork, M. L.; Zhang, J.; Kirkham, J.; Robinson, C.; Marsh, A.; Wong, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 8862.
23. (b) Skulason, H.; Frisbie, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9750.
24. (c) Lo, Y.-S.; Huefner, N. D.; Chan, W. S.; Stevens, F.; Harris, J. M.; Beebe, T. P. Langmuir 1999, 15, 1373.
25. (d) Ito, T.; Citterio, D.; Bühlmann, P.; Umezawa, Y. Langmuir 1999, 15, 2788.
26. (e) Clear, S. C.; Nealey, P. F. J. Colloid Intface Sci. 1999, 213, 238.
27. (f) McKendry, R. A.; Theoclitou, M.-E.; Rayment, T.; Abell, C. Nature 1998, 391, 566.
28. (g) van der Vegte, E. W.; Hadziioannou, G. Langmuir 1997, 13, 4357.
29. (h) Noy, A.; Vezenov, D. V.; Lieber, C. M. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1997, 27, 381-427.
30. (i) Sinniah, S. K.; Steel, A. B.; Miller, C. J.; Reutt-Robey, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8925.
31. (j) Green, J.-B. D.; McDermou, M. T.; Porter, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 13342.
32. (k) Noy, A.; Frisbie, C. D.; Rozsnyai, L. F.; Wrighton, M. S.; Lieber, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7943.
33. (l) Han T.; Williams, J. M.; Beebe, T. P. Anal. Chim. Acta 1995, 307, 365.
34. (m) Thomas, R. C.; Houston, J. E.; Crooks, R. M.; Kim, T.; Michalske, T. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3830.
35. (n) Nakagawa, T.; Ogawa, K.; Kurumizawa, T. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1994, 12, 2215.
36. Skulason, H.; Frisbie, C. D. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 3096.
37. Johnson, K. L.; Kendall, K.; Roberts, A. D. Proc. R. Soc. London A. 1971, 324, 301.
38. 12 can be negative. Equation 2 in the text defines work of adhesion completely in terms of interfacial energies because the pull-off experiment is carried out under solvent. Any of the interfacial energy terms in eq 2 can be positive or negative in principle.
39. (a) Ward, M. D. In Electroanalytical Chemistry; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 1991; Vol. 16, p 181.
40. (b) Wheland, R. C.; Gillson, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 3916.
41. (c) Mulliken, R. S.; Person, W. B. Molecular Complexes; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1969.
42. Yamagishi, A.; Masui, T.; Watanabe, F. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1979, 72, 154.
43. Skulason, H.; Frisbie, C. D. Langmuir 1998, 14, 5834.
44. Skulason, H.; Frisbie, C. D., unpublished results.
45. Cleveland, J. P.; Manne, S.; Bocek, D.; Hansma, P. K. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1993, 64, 403.
46. Marchard, P.; Marmet, L. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1983, 54, 1034.
47. Kubinyi, M.; Varsanyi, G.; Grofcsik, A. Spectrochim. Acta 1980, 36A, 265.
48. Takenaka, T. Spectrochim. Acta 1971, 27A, 1735.
49. (a) Girlando, A.; Painelli, A.; Pecile, C. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1984, 112, 325.
50. (b) Bozio, R.; Zanon, I.; Girlando, A.; Pecile, C. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1978, 74, 235.
51. (c) Bozio, R.; Girlando, A.; Pecile, C. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1975, 71, 1237.
52. (d) Kuroda, H.; Hiroma, S.; Akamatu, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1968, 41, 2855.
53. Yamagishi, A.; Masui, T.; Watanabe, F. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1979, 72, 154.
54. Benesi, H. A.; Hildebrand, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 2703.
55. 3 at 538 nm vs 530 nm for [TMPD-TCNQ]. Excitation energies of CT complexes have been shown to decrease with decreased ionization potential of the electron donor. However, I and II are less effective in forming a CT complex (ΔGcomplex = -12kJ/mol vs -14 kJ/mol for [TCNQ-TMPD]). This clearly shows that factors other than the redox properties of the participating molecules affect complex formation.
56. Hanson, A. W. Acta Crystallogr. 1965, 19, 610.
57. (a) Ben-Tal, N.; Sitkoff, D.; Topol, I. A.; Yang, A.-S.; Burt, S. K.; Honig, B. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 450.
58. (b) Dixon, D. A.; Dobbs, K. D.; Valentini, J. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 13435.
59. The force quanta determined from histograms recorded at different load rates were within the quoted experimental error.
60. Rainville, D. P.; Zingaro, R. A.; Ferraris, J. P. Can. J. Chem. 1980, 58, 1133.
61. Somoano, R.; Hadek, V.; Yen, S. P. S.; Rembaum, A.; Deck, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 62, 1061.
62. Michaelis, L.; Granick, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1943, 65, 1747.
63. 2.
64. 2 per bond).
65. In previous AFM studies, the value most commonly used for K is the value for an Au-Au contact (64 GPa, see for example refs 8g and 8k). As the measured rupture force gets smaller, however, the size of the contact area approaches molecular scale dimensions and K approaches the value for the SAM, ∼1 GPa.