Using molecular DNA markers in phylogeny and systematics

Genetika

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 1013-1033

  Grechko, V V ^a  

^a ENGELHARDT INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA MARKER; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; DNA; RIBOSOME RNA;

MITOCHONDRION; PHYLOGENY; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; REVIEW; RIBOSOME; TANDEM REPEAT; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EVOLUTION; GENETIC MARKER; METHODOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC MARKERS; MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; PHYLOGENY; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA TECHNIQUE; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; TANDEM REPEAT SEQUENCES;

EID: 0036688293     PISSN: 00166758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (120)

1. Schmid C.W. Does SINE evolution preclude Alu function? // Nucl. Acids Res. 1998. V. 26. P. 4541-4550.
2. Molecular Systematics / Eds Hillis D.M., Moritz C., Mable B.K. Sinauer Ass. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, 1996. 655 p.
3. Hillis D.M. Molecular versus morphological approach to systematics // Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1987. V. 18. P. 23-42.
4. Huelsenbeck J.P., Nielsen R. Variation in the pattern of nucleotide substitution across sites // J. Mol. Evol. 1999. V. 48. P. 86-93.
5. Purvis A., Quicke D.L.J. Building phylogenies: are the big easy? // Trends Ecol. Evol. 1997. V. 12. P. 49-50.
6. DeJong W.W. Molecular remodel the mammalian tree // Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998. V. 13. P. 203-207.
7. Forterre P., Phillipe H. Where is the root for the universal tree of life // BioEssay. 1999. V. 21. P. 871-879.
8. Adoutte A., Balavoine G., Lartillot N., deRosa R. The end of intermedia taxa? // Animal Evol. 1999. V. 15. P. 104-108.
9. Philippe H., Laurent J. How good are phylogenetic trees? // Curr. Opin. Genet. Develop. 1998. V. 8. P. 616-623.
10. Ayala F.J. Vagaries of the molecular clock // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1997. V. 94. P. 7776-7783.
11. Wolfe K.H., Shields D.C. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome // Nature. 1997. V. 387. P. 708-713.
12. Kordis D., Gubensek F. Unusual horizontal transfer of a long interspersed nuclear element between distant vertebrate classes // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998. V. 95. P. 10704-10709.
13. Avise J.C. Molecular markers, Natural History, and Evolution. N.Y.: Chapman and Hall, 1994.
14. Gerbi S.A. Evolution of ribosomal DNA // Molecular Evolution and Genetics / Ed. MacIntyre R.J. N.Y.; L.: Plenum Press, 1985. P. 419-517.
15. Pennisi E. Genome data shake tree of life // Science. 1998. V. 280. P. 672-674.
16. Wainwright P.O., Hinkle G., Sogin M.L., Stickel S.K. Monophyletic origins of the metazoa: an evolutionary link with fungi // Science. 1993. V. 260. P. 340-342.
17. Aquinaldo A.M., Turbeville J.M., Linford L.S. et al. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals // Nature. 1997. V. 387. P. 489-493.
18. Pawlowski J., Bolinar I., Fahrni J.F. et al. Extreme differences in rates of molecular evolution of Foraminifera revealed by comparison of ribosomal DNA sequences and the fossil record // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1997. V. 14. P. 498-505.
19. Bruno W.J., Socci N.D., Halpern A.L. Weighted neighbor joining: a likelihood-based approach to distance-based phylogeny reconstraction // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000. V. 17. P. 189-197.
20. Hwang U.W., Kim W., Tautz D., Friedrich M. Molecular phylogenetics at the Felsenstein zone: approaching the strepsiptera problem using 5.8S and 28S rDNA sequences // Mol. Phyl. Evol. 1998. V. 9. P. 470-480.
21. Yanq Z. How often do wrong models produce better phylogenies? // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1997. V. 144. P. 105-108.
22. Stiller J.W., Hall B.D. Long-branch attraction and the rDNA model of early eukaryotic evolution // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999. V. 16. P. 1270-1279.
23. Kurland C.G. Something for everyone: horizontal gene transfer in evolution // EMBO Reports. 2000. V. 1. P. 92-95.
24. Xu' S. Phylogenetic analysis under reticulate evolution // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000. V. 17. P. 897-907.
25. Andronico F., De Lucchini S., Graziani F. et al. Molecular organization of ribosomal RNA genes clusters at variable chromosomal sites in Triturus vulgaris meridionalis (Amphibia, Urodela) // J. Mol. Biol. 1985. V. 186. P. 219-229.
26. Wellems T.E., Walliker D., Smith C.L. et al. A histidine rich protein gene marks a linkage group favored strongly in a genetic cross of Plasmodium falciparum // Cell. 1987. V. 49. P. 633-642.
27. Cumming M.P., Otto S.P., Wakeley J. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic studies // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1995. V. 12. P. 814-822.
28. Wallis G.P. Do animal mitochondrial genomes recombine? // Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999. V. 14. P. 209-210.
29. Sheldon F.E., Jones C.E., McCracken K.G. Relative pattern and rates of evolution in heron nuclear and mitochondrial DNA // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000. V. 17. P. 437-450.
30. Arnason U., Gullberg A., Gretarsdottir S. et al. The mitochondrial genome of the sperm whale and a new molecular reference for estimating Eutherian divergence dates //. Mol. Evol. 2000. V. 50. P. 569-578.
31. Avise J.C., Walker D. Species realities and numbers insexual vertebrates: perspectives from asexually transmitted genome // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999. V. 96. P. 992-995.
32. Hedges S.B. Molecular evidence for the origin of birds // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1994. V. 91. P. 2621-2624.
33. Heise P.J., Maxson L.R., Dowling H.G., Hedges S.B. Higher-level snake phylogeny interred from mtDNA sequences of 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1995. V. 12. P. 259-265.
34. Boor J.L., Brown W.M. Mitochondrial genomes of Galathealinum, Helobdella, and Platynereis: sequences and gene arrangement comparisons indicate that Pogonophora is not a phylum and Annelida and Arthropoda are not a sister taxa // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000. V. 17. P. 87-106.
35. Macey J.R., Larson A., Ananjeva N.B., Papenfus T.J. Evolutionary shifts in three major structural features of the mitochondrial genome among Iguanian lizards // J. Mol. Evol. 1997. V. 44. P. 660-674.
36. Le T.H., Blair D., Agatsuma T. et al. Phylogenies inferred from mitochondrial gene orders - a cautionary tale from the parasitic flatworms // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000. V. 17. P. 1123-1125.
37. Hickerson M.J., Canningham C.W. Dramatic mitochondrial gene rearrangement in the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus (Crustacea, Anomura) // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000. V. 17. P. 634-644.
38. Moritz C., Dowling T.E., Brown W.M. Evolution of animal mtDNA: relevance for population biology and systematics // Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1987. V. 18. P. 269-292.
39. Kumasawa Y., Nishida M. Complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the green turtle and blue-tailed mole skink: statistical evidence for archosaurian affinity of turtles // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999. V. 16. P. 784-792.
40. D'Erchia A., Gissi G., Persole G. et al. The quinea pig is not a rodent // Nature. 1996. V. 381. P. 597-600.
41. Slobodyanyuk S.Ya., Kirilchik S.V., Pavlova M.E. et al. The evolutionary relationships of two families of Cottoid fishes of lake Baikal (Eeast Siberia) as suggested by analysis of mitochondrial DNA // J. Mol. Evol. 1995. V. 40. P. 392-399.
42. Fu J. Toward the phylogeny of the family Lacertidae: implication from mitochondrial DNA 12S and 16S gene sequences (Reptilia: Squamata) // Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1998. V. 9. P. 118-130.
43. Buntjer J.B., Lenstra J.A. Phylogeny within families deduced from interspaced repeat PCR fingerprints // DNA repeats in vertebrate genome as probes in phylogeny and species identification. Utrecht: Univ. Utrecht, 1997. P. 25-38.
44. Eyre-Walker A. Evolutionary genomics//Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999. V. 14. P. 176.
45. Rand D. Mitochondrial genomics flies high // Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001. V. 16. P. 2-4.
46. Sorhannus U., Fox M. Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates in Diatoms: a comparison between chloroplast and nuclear genes // J. Mol. Evol. 1999. V. 48. P. 209-212.
47. Nunn G.B., Stanley S.E. Body size effects and rates of cytochrome b evolution in tube-nosed seabirds // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998. V. 15. P. 1360-1371.
48. Hurai S., Hayasaka K., Kondo R. et al. Recent African origin of modern humans revealed by complete sequences of hominid mtDNA // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1995. V. 92. P. 532-536.
49. Gissi C., Reyes A., Pesole G., Saccone C. Lineage specific evolutionary rate in mammalian mtDNA // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000. V. 17. P. 1022-1031.
50. Mundy N.I., Pissinatti A., Woodruff D.S. Multiple nuclear insertion of mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence in callitrichine primates // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000. V. 17. P. 1075-1080.
51. Garsia-Machado E., Pempera M., Donnebony N. et al. Mitochondrial genes collectively suggest the paraphyly of Crustacea with respect to Insecta // J. Mol. Evol. 1999. V. 49. P. 142-149.
52. Schierwater B. Arbitrarily amplified DNA in systematics and phylogenetics // Electrophoresis. 1995. V. 16. P. 1643-1647.
53. Espinasa L., Borowsky R. Evolutionary divergence of AP-PCR (RAPD) patterns // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998. V. 15. P. 408-414.
54. Rabouam C., Comes A.M., Bretagnolle V. et al. Futures of DNA fragments obtained by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assays // Mol. Ecol. 1999. V. 8. P. 493-503.
55. Fukatsu T., Ishikawa H. Differentiation of aphid clones by arbitrary primed polymerase chain reaction (APPAR) DNA fingerprinting // J. Mol. Evol. 1994. V. 3. P. 187-192.
56. Ellegren H., Sheldon B. New tools for sex identification and the study of sex allocation in birds // Trends Ecol. Evol. 1997. V. 12. P. 255-259.
57. Gilbert M., Labuda D. CORE-SINEs: eukaryotic short interspersed retroposing elements with common sequence motifs // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999. V. 96. P. 2869-2874.
58. Singer M.F. SINEs and LINEs: highly repeated short and long interspersed sequences in mammalian genomes // Cell. 1982. V. 28. P. 433-434.
59. Doolittle W.F., Sapienza C. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution // Nature. 1980. V. 284. P. 601-603.
60. Orgel L.E., Crick F.H.C. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite // Nature. 1981. V. 284. P. 604-607.
61. Hillis D.M. SINE of the perfect character // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999. V. 96. P. 9979-9981.
62. Hughes D.S. MIRs as of mammalian gene evolution // Trends Genet. 2000. V. 16. P. 60-62.
63. Serdobova I.M., Kramerov D.A. Short retroposons of the B2 superfamily: evolution and application for the study of Rodent phylogeny // J. Mol. Evol. 1998. V. 46. P. 202-214.
64. Kass D.H., Raynas M.E., Williams T.M. Evolutionary history of B1 retroposons in the genus Mus // J. Mol. Evol. 2000. V. 51. P. 256-264.
65. Sietkiewicz E., Richter C., Labuda D. Phylogenetic affinities of tarsier in the context of primate Alu repeats // Mol. Phyl. Evol. 1998. V. 11. P. 77-83.
66. Armour J.A.L., Monckton D.G., Neil D.L. et al. Mechanisms of mutation at human minisatellite loci // Genome analysis. V. 7. Genome arrangement and stability. N. Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, 1993. P. 43-57.
67. Moyzis R.K., Buckingham J.M., Cram L.S. et al. A highly conserved DNA sequence presented at the telomers of human chromosomes // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1988. V. 85. P. 6622-6626.
68. Grady D.L., Rateiff R.L., Robinson D.L. et al. Highly conserved repetitive DNA sequences are present at human centromeres // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1992. V. 89. P. 1695-1696.
69. Miclos G.L.G. Localized highly repetitive DNA sequences in vertebrate and invertebrate genome // Molecular Evolutionary Genetics / Ed. McIntyre R.J. N.Y.; L.: Plenum Press, 1985. P. 241-321.
70. Elder J.F., Turner B.J. Concerted evolution of the population level: pupfish HindIII satellite DNA sequences // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1994. V. 91. P. 994-998.
71. Varley J.M., Macgregor H.C., Barnett L. Characterization of a short highly repeated and centromerically localized DNA sequences in the crested and marbled newts of the genus Triturus // Chromosoma. 1990. V. 100. P. 15-31.
72. Lorite P., Palomeque T., Garneria I., Petitpierre E. Characterization and chromosome location of satellite DNA in the leaf beetle Chrysolina americana (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) // Genetica. 2001. V. 110. P. 143-150.
73. Castagnone-Sereno P., Leroy H., Semblat J.-P. et al. Unusual and strongly structured sequence variation in a complex satellite DNA family from the nematode Meliodogine chitwoodi // J. Mol. Biol. 1998. V. 46. P. 225-233.
74. Garrido-Ramos M.A., de Herran R., Jamilena M. et al. Evolution of centromeric satellite DNA and its use in phylogenetic studies of the sparide family (Pisces, Perciformes) // Mol. Phyl. Evol. 1999. V. 12. P. 200-204.
75. Goodier J.L., Davidson W.S. Characterization of novel minisatellite repeat loci in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and their phylogenetic distribution // J. Mol. Evol. 1998. V. 46. P. 245-255.
76. Vignali R., Rijili F.M., Batistoni R. et al. The dispersed highly repeated DNA families of Truturus vulgaris meridionales (Amphibia, Urodela) are widely conserved among Salamandridae // Chromosoma. 1991. V. 100. P. 87-96.
77. Olmo E., Odierna G., Capriglione T. The karyology of mediterranean Lacertidae lizards // Lacertid of the mediterranean region / Eds Valakas E.D., Bohme W., Rerer-Mellado V., Maragou P. Athens, Bonn, Alicante, 1993. P. 61-84.
78. Modi W.S., Gallagher D.S., Womack J.E. Evolutionary histories of highly repeated DNA families among the Artiodactyla (Mammalia) // J. Mol. Evol. 1996. V. 42. P. 337-349.
79. Blake R.D., Wang J.Z., Bauregard L. Repetitive sequence families in Alces alces americana // J. Mol. Evol. 1997. V. 44. P. 509-520.
80. Milinkovitch M.C. Molecular phylogeny of cetaceaus prompts revision of morphological transformation // Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995. V. 10. P. 328-334.
81. Seymour J. DNA tells of species links by repeating itself // Ecos. 1982. No 30. P. 21-23.
82. Mullenbach R., Lutz S., Holzmann K. et al. A non-alphoid repetitive DNA sequence from human chromosome 21 // Hum. Genet. 1992. V. 89. P. 519-523.
83. Alves G., Seuanez H.M., Fanning T. A clade of a new world primates with distinctive alphoid satellite DNAs // Mol. Phyl. Evol. 1997. V. 9. P. 220-224.
84. Trifonov E.N. Tuning function of tandem repeating sequences: a molecular device for fast adaptation // Proc. Intern. Conf. Evol. Genomics: Thesis. Costa Rica, 1999. P. 74.
85. Dimitri P., Junakovic N. Revisng the selfish DNA hypothesis. New evidence on accumulation of transposable elements in heterochromatin // Trends Genet. 1999. V. 15. P. 123-124.
86. Martinez-Balbas A., Rodriguez-Campos A., Garcia-Ramirez M. et al. Satellite DNA contain sequences that induce curvature//Biochemistry. 1990. V. 29. P. 2342-2348.
87. Constanzo G., De Muiro E., Salina G., Negri R. Attraction phasing and neighbour effects of histone octamer on curved DNA // J. Mol. Biol. 1990. V. 216. P. 363-374.
88. Romanova L.Y., Deriagin G.V., Mashkova T.D. Evidence for selection in evolution of alpha satellite DNA. The central role of CENP-B/pJα binding region // J. Mol. Biol. 1996. V. 261. P. 334-340.
89. Warburton P.E., Waye J.S., Willard H.F. Nonrandom localization of recombination events in human alpha satellite repeat unit variants: implications for higher order structural characteristics within cantromeric heterochromatin // Mol. Cell Biol. 1993. V. 13. P. 6520-6529.
90. Larin Z., Fricker M.D., Tyler-Smith C. De novo formation of several features of a centromere following induction of a Y alphoid YAC into mammalian cells // Hum. Mol. Genet. 1994. V. 3. P. 689-695.
91. Capriglione T., DeSanto M.G., Odierna G., Olmo E. An alphoid-like satellite DNA sequence is present in the genome of a lacertid lizards // J. Mol. Evol. 1998. V. 46. P. 240-244.
92. Slamovits T., Cook J.A., Lessa E.P., Rossi M.S. Recurrent amplifications and deletions of satellite DNA accompanied chromosomal diversification in South American tuco-tucos (genus Ctenomys, Rodentia: Octodontidae): a phylogenetic approach // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001. V. 18. P. 1708-1719.
93. Saitoh Y., Miyamoto N., Okada T. et al. The RS447 human megasatellite tandem repetitive sequence encode a novel deubiquitinating enzyme with functional promoter // Genomics. 2000. V. 67. P. 291-300.
94. Plohl M., Mistrovic N., Bruvo B., Ugarkovic D. Similarity of structural features and evolution of satellite DNAs from Palorus subdepressus (Coleoptera) and related species // J. Mol. Evol. 1998. V. 46. P. 234-239.
95. Kipling D., Warburton P.E. Centromeres, CENP-B and Tigger too // Trends Genet. 1997. V. 13. P. 141-145.
96. Fedorov A.N., Fedorova L.V., Grechko V.V. et al. Variable and invariable DNA repeats characters revealed by taxonprint approach are useful for molecular systematics // J. Mol. Evol. 1999. V. 48. P. 69-76.