Phylogenetic analysis under reticulate evolution

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 897-907

  Xu, Shizhong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic drift; Heterozygosity; Hybridization; Mutation; Phylogeny; Reticulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC DRIFT; HETEROZYGOSITY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; SPECIES; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034119304     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026370     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ATCHLEY, W. R., and W. M. FITCH. 1991. Gene trees and the origins of inbred strains of mice. Science 254:554-558.
2. _. 1993. Genetic affinities of inbred mouse strains of uncertain origin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1150-1169.
3. BOLLYKY, P. L., A. RAMBAUT, P. H. HARVEY, and E. C. HOLMES. 1996. Recombination between sequences of hepatitis B virus from different genotypes. J. Mol. Evol. 42: 97-102.
4. CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L., and A. W. F. EDWARDS. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19:233-257.
5. COCKERHAM, C. C. 1984. Drift and mutation with a finite number of allelic states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:530-534.
6. DROUIN, G., and G. A. DOVER. 1990. Independent gene evolution in the potato actin gene family demonstrated by phylogenetic procedure for resolving gene conversions and the phylogeny of angiosperm actin genes. J. Mol. Evol. 31:132-150.
7. FESTING, M. F. W. 1989. Inbred strains of mice. Pp. 636-648 in M. F LYON and A. G. SEARLE, eds. Genetic variants and inbred strains of mice. Oxford University Press, New York.
8. FITCH, W. M., and W. R. ATCHLEY. 1985. Evolution in inbred strains of mice appears rapid. Science 228:1169-1175.
9. _. 1989. Divergence in inbred strains of mice: a comparison of three different types of data. Pp. 203-216 in C. PATTERSON, ed. Molecules and morphology in evolution: conflict or compromise? Cambridge University Press, London.
10. FUNK, V. A. 1985. Phylogenetic patterns and hybridization. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:681-715.
11. GRASSLY, N. C., and E. C. HOLMES. 1997. A likelihood method for the detection of selection and recombination using nucleotide sequences. Mol Biol. Evol. 14:239-247.
12. HEDRICH, H. J. 1990. Genetic monitoring of inbred strains of rats. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.
13. HEIN, J. 1990. Reconstructing evolution of sequences subject to recombination using parsimony. Math. Biosci. 98:185-200.
14. _. 1993. A heuristic method to reconstruct the history of sequences subject to recombination. J. Mol. Evol. 36:396-405.
15. HUDSON, R. R. 1990. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:1-44.
16. MCDADE, L. 1990. Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. I. Patterns of character expression in hybrids and their implications for cladistic analysis. Evolution 44:1685-1700.
17. _. 1992. Hybrid and phylogenetic systematics. 11. The impact of hybrids on cladistic analysis. Evolution 46:1329-1346.
18. _. 1995. Hybridization and phylogenetics. Pp. 305-331 in P. C. HOCH and A. G. STEPHENSON, eds. Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden.
19. MAYNARD SMITH, J. 1992. Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J. Mol. Evol. 34:126-129.
20. NEI, M., and W.-H. LI. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:5269-5273.
21. RIESEBERG, L. H. 1991. Homoploid reticulate evolution in Helianthus (Asteraceae) evidence from ribosomal genes. Am. J. Bot. 78:1218-1237.
22. RIESEBERG, L. H., and N. C. ELLSTRAND. 1993. What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12:213-241.
23. RIESEBERG, L. H., and J. D. MOREFIELD. 1995. Character expression, phylogenetic reconstruction, and the detection of reticulate evolution. Pp. 333-353 in P. C. HOCH and A. G. STEPHENSON, eds. Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden.
24. RIESEBERG, L. H., C. VANFOSSEN, and A. M. DESROCHERS. 1995. Hybrid speciation accompanied by genomic reorganization in wild sunflowers. Nature 375:313-316.
25. RIESEBERG, L. H., J. WHITTON, and C. R. LINDER. 1996. Molecular marker incongruence in plant hybrid zones and phylogenetic trees. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45:143-262.
26. RITLAND, K., and J. E. ECKENWALDER. 1992. Polymorphism, hybridization, and variable evolutionary rate in molecular phylogenies. Pp. 404-429 in D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, and J. J. D. ROOTLEDGE, eds. Molecular systematics of plants. Chapman and Hall, New York.
27. SPENCE, J. R. 1990. Introgressive hybridization in Heteroptera: the example of Limnoporus Stal (Gerridae) species in western Canada. Can. J. Zool. 68:1770-1782.
28. SYTSMA, K. J. 1990. DNA and morphology: inference of plant phylogeny. TREE 5:104-110.
29. 2 from two segregating populations. J. Hered. 86:477-480.
30. XU, S., W. R. ATCHLEY, and W. M. FITCH. 1994. Phylogenetic inference under the pure drift model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11: 949-960.