Bioinformatics for the genomic sciences and towards systems biology. Japanese activities in the post-genome era

Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology

Volumn 80, Issue 1-2, 2002, Pages 23-42

  Yao, Toru ^a  

^a RIKEN YOKOHAMA INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Genome; Japan; Protein; RIKEN; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; GENOME; GENOMICS; HISTORY; HUMAN; JAPAN; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOMICS; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; JAPAN; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PROTEOMICS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 0036630105     PISSN: 00796107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6107(02)00011-1     Document Type: Review

References (93)

1. Aloy P., Sternberg M. et al. Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 311:2001;395-408.
2. Aravind L. et al. Conserved domains in DNA repair proteins and evolution of repair systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:1999;1223-1242.
3. Bajorath J. Rational drug discovery revisited. interfacing experimental programs with bio- and chemo-informatics Drug Discovery Today. 6:2001;989-995.
4. Baker D. A surprising simplicity of protein folding. Nature. 405:2000;39042.
5. Baker D., Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science. 294:2001;93-96.
6. Bansal A. An automated comparative analysis of 17 complete microbial genomes. Bioinformatics. 15:1999;900-908.
7. Bassett D., Eisen M., Boguski M. Gene expression informatics? It's all in your mine. Nature Genet. Suppl. 21:1999;51-55.
8. Blundell, T., et al., 1987. Nature 326, 347.
9. Bono H. et al. FANTOM DB. database of functional annotation of RIKEN Mouse cDNA Clones Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;116-118.
10. Bono H. et al. READ: RIKEN expression array database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;211-213.
11. Bowie J., Luthy R., Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 253:1991;164-170.
12. Brenner S. Target selection for structural genomics. Nature Struct. Biol. 7(Suppl.):2000;967-969.
13. Carninci, P., Hayashizaki, Y., 1999. High-Efficiency of Full-Length cDNA Cloning. Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 303. Academic Press, Inc. San Diego, pp. 19-44.
14. Covert M., Palsson B. et al. Metabolic modeling of microbial strains in Silico. Trends Biosci. 26:2001;179-186.
15. Cyranoski D. Japan opens access to mouse cDNA data. Nature. 407:2000;279.
16. Cyranoski D. Japan's ape sequencing effort set to unravel the brain's secrets. Nature. 409:2001;651-652.
17. Dassow G., Odell G. et al. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature. 406:2000;613-615.
18. Davidson E. et al. A genomic regulatory network for development. Science. 295:2002;1669-1678.
19. Davului R., Grosse I., Zhang M. Computational identification of promoters and first exons in the human genome. Nature Genet. 29:2001;412-417.
20. Dhand R. et al. Nature insight. functional genomics Nature. 405:2000;819-865.
21. Drews J. Drug discovery. a historical perspective Science. 287:2000;1960-1964.
22. Edwards J., Palsson B. et al. In Silico predictions of E. coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nature Biotechnol. 19:2001;125-130.
23. Endy D., Brent R. Modelling cellular behavior. Nature. 409:2001;391-395.
24. Fleischmann H., Venter C. et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science. 269:1995;496-512.
25. Foe, V., Field, C., Odell, G., 2000. Microtubules and mitotic cycle phase modulate spatio temporal distributions of F-Actin and Myosin 2 in Drosophila syncytial blastderm embryos. Development 127, 1767.
26. Fujiyama A. et al. Construction and analysis of a human-chimpanzee comparative clone map. Science. 295:2002;131-134.
27. Fukuda Y., Washio T., Tomita M. Comparative study of overlapping genes in the genomes of Mycoplasma genetalium and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:1999;1847-1853.
28. Ginsbug G., McCarthy J. Personalized medicine. revolutionizing drug discovery and patient care Trends Biotechnol. 19:2001;491-496.
29. Greer J. Comparative model-building of the mammalian serine proteases. J. Mol. Biol. 153:1981;1027-1042.
30. Guigo R. et al. An assessment of gene prediction accuracy in large DNA sequences. Genome Research. 10:2000;1631-1642.
31. Hattori Y., Sakaki Y. et al. The DNA sequence of human chromosome 21. Nature. 405:2000;311-319.
32. Hogenesch J. et al. A comparison of the Celera and Ensembl predicted gene sets reveals little overlap in novel genes. Cell. 106:2001;413-415.
33. Hutchinson C., Venter C. et al. Global transposon mutagenesis and a minimal mycoplasma genome. Science. 286:1999;2165-2169.
34. Ideker T., Hood L. et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science. 292:2001;929-933.
35. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860-921.
36. International Human Genome Mapping Consortium, 2001. A physical map of the human genome. Nature 409, 934-941.
37. Jones D., Taylor W., Thornton J. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature. 358:1992;86-89.
38. Jones D. Protein structure prediction in the post-genomic era. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:2000;371-379.
39. Karp P. Pathway databases. a case study in computational symbolic theories Science. 293:2001;2040-2044.
40. Kigawa T. et al. Cell-free production and stable-isotope labeling of milligram quantities of proteins. FEBS Lett. 442:1999;15-19.
41. Kihara D., Kanehisa M. Tandem clusters of membrane proteins in complete genome sequences. Genome Res. 10:2000;731-743.
42. Kihara D., Skolnick J. et al. TOUCHSTONE. an ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threading-based tertiary restraints PNAS. 98:2001;10125-10130.
43. Kitano H. Systems biology. a brief overview Science. 295:2002;1662-1664.
44. Ko M.S.H. Embryogenomics. developmental biology meets genomics Trends Biotechnol. 19:2001;511-518.
45. Kondo S. et al. Computational analysis of full-length mouse cDNA compared with human genome sequences. Mamm. Genome. 12:2001;673-677.
46. Koonin E. Editorial; the emerging paradigm and open problems in comparative genomics. Bioinformatics. 15:1999;265-266.
47. Kyoda, K., Kitano, H., 2000. Construction of a Generalized Simulator for Multi-Cellular Organisms and it's Application to SMAD Signal Transduction. PSB-2000, 317-328.
48. Liu J., Rost B. Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes. Protein Sci. 10:2001;1970-1979.
49. Makarova K. et al. Comparative genomics of the archea. evolution of conserved protein families, the stable core and the variable shell Genome Res. 9:1999;608-628.
50. Miki R. et al. Delineating developmental and metabolic pathways in vivo by expression profiling using the RIKEN set of 18,816 full-length enriched mouse cDNA arrays. PNAS. 98:2001;2199-2204.
51. Moult, J., Hubbard, T., et al., 1999. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): Round 3. Proteins, 3 (Suppl.) 2-6.
52. Murzin A. Progress in protein structure prediction. Nature Struct. Biol. 8:2001;110-112.
53. Murzin A., Brenner S., Hubbard T., Chothia C. SCOP. a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures J. Mol. Biol. 247:1995;536-540.
54. Nature News, 1996. Superconductivity spurs Japanese plan for NMR research. Nature 381, 105.
55. Nature News, 2000. Autumn annotation. Nature Genetics 25, 371.
56. Noble D. Modeling the heart-from genes to cells to the whole organ. Science. 295:2002;1678-1682.
57. O'Brien S. et al. The premise of comparative genomics in mammals. Science. 286:1999;458-480.
58. Ohler U., Niemann H. Identification and analysis of eukaryotic promoters. recent computational approaches TRENDS Genet. 17:2001;56-60.
59. Orengo C., Todd A., Thornton J. From protein structure to function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:1999;374-382.
60. Perriere G., Duret L., Gouy M. HOBACGEN. database system for comparative genomics in bacteria Genome Res. 10:2000;379-385.
61. Peterson S., Fraser C. The complexity of simplicity. Genome Biol. 2:2001;1-8.
62. Pilpel Y. et al. Identifying regulatory networks by combinatorial analysis of promoter elements. Nature Genet. 29:2001;153-159.
63. Quackenbush J. Viva la revolution! a report from the FANTOM meeting. Nature Genet. 26:2000;255-256.
64. Sanchez R., Sali A. ModBase. a database of comparative protein structure models Bioinformatics. 15:1999;1060-1061.
65. Sanseau P. Impact of human genome sequencing for in silico target discovery. Drug Discovery Today. 6:2001;316-322.
66. Seki M., Shinozaku K. et al. Monitoring the Expression pattern of 1300 Arabidopsis genes under drought and cold stresses using full-length cDNA microarray. Plant Cell. 13:2001;61-72.
67. Shibata K., Hayashizaki Y. et al. RIKEN integrated sequence analysis (RISA) system - 384-format sequencing pipeline with 384 multicapillary sequencer. Genome Res. 10:2000;1757-1771.
68. Simon, A., Baker, D., 1999. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP-3 targets using Rosetta. Proteins 3 (Suppl.) 171-176.
69. Staudt L. Gene expression physiology and pathophysiology of the immune system. Trends Immunol. 22:2001;35-40.
70. Stevens R., Yokoyama S., Wilson I. Global efforts in structural genomics. Science. 294:2001;89-92.
71. Stormo G. et al. Gene-finding approaches for eukaryotes. Genome Res. 10:2000;394-397.
72. Strogatz S. Exploring complex networks. Nature. 410:2001;268-276.
73. Suzuki H. et al. Protein-protein interaction panel using mouse full-length cDNAs. Genome Res. 11:2001;1758-1765.
74. Suzuki Y., Sugano S. et al. Identification and characterization of the potential promoter regions of 1031 kinds of human genes. Genome Res. 11:2001;677-684.
75. Swinbanks D. Japanese plans to sequence human genome. Nature. 326:1987;323.
76. Takahashi S., Kambara H. et al. Multiple sheath-flow gel capillary-array electrophoresis for multicolor fluorescent DNA detection. Anal. Chem. 66:1994;1021-1026.
77. Tatusov R., Koonin E., Lipman D. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 278:1997;631-637.
78. The International SNP Map Working Group, 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Science, 409, 928-933.
79. The RIKEN Genome Exploration Research Group Phase II Team and the FANTOM Consortium, 2001. Functional annotation of a full-length mouse cDNA collection. Nature 409, 685-690.
80. Tomita M. Whole-cell simulation. a grand challenge of the 21st century Trends Biotechnol. 19:2001;205-210.
81. Ueda H. et al. Robust oscillations within the interlocked feedback model of Drosophila circadian rhythm. J. Theoret. Biol. 210:2001;401-406.
82. Venter C. et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 291:2001;1304-1351.
83. Vitkup D., Melamud E., Moult J., Sander C. Completeness in structural genomics. Nature Struct. Biol. 8:2001;559-566.
84. Voit E., Radivoyevitch T. Biochemical systems analysis of genome-wide expression data. Bioinformatics. 16:2000;1023-1037.
85. Wada A. Automated high-speed DNA sequencing. Nature. 325:1987;771-772.
86. Wada A. Editorial; bioinformatics - the necessity of the quest for 'first principle in life'. Bioinformatics. 16:2000;663-664.
87. Wada A. Genomic sciences center (RIKEN). Science Technol. Japan. 77:2001;19-23.
88. Weir M., Swindells M., Overington J. Insights into protein function through large-scale computational analysis of sequence and structure. TIBT. 19:2001;S61-S66.
89. Yamanaka I. et al. Mapping of 19032 mouse cDNAs on mouse chromosomes. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics. 2:2001;L72-L86.
90. Yokoyama S. et al. Structural genomics projects in Japan. Nature Struct. Biol. 7(Suppl.):2000;943-945.
91. Yokoyama S., Matsuo Y. et al. Structural genomics projects in Japan. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 73:2000;363-376.
92. Yudate H. et al. Hunt. launch of a full-length cDNA database from Helix Research Institute Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2001;185-188.
93. Zhang B., Godzik A. et al. From fold prediction to function predictions. automation of functional site conservation analysis for functional genome predictions Protein Sci. 8:1999;1104-1115.