Studies in the assessment of folding quality for protein modeling and structure prediction

Journal of Proteome Research

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 115-133

  Robson, Barry ^a   Mordasini, Tiziana ^b   Curioni, Alessandro ^b  

^a IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b IBM RESEARCH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

"Fold diagnostic"; "Fold quality"; "Protein structure"; Conformation; Fold; Folding; Prediction; Protein; Threading

Indexed keywords

ALPHA LACTALBUMIN; AMINO ACID; BACTERIOCIN AS 48; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SIMULATION;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; HUMANS; LACTALBUMIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS;

EID: 0036523793     PISSN: 15353893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/pr0155228     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Robson, B.; Garnier, J. Introduction to Proteins and Protein Engineering; Elsevier Press: New York, 1988.
2. Garnier, J.; Osguthorpe, D. J.; Robson, B. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1978, 120, 97-120.
3. Abagyan, R.; Frishman, D.; Argos, P. Recognition of distantly related proteins through energy calculations. Proteins 1994, 19, 132-140.
4. (a) Bairoch, A.; Apweiler, R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its new supplement TREMBL. Nucl. Acids Res. 1996, 24, 21-25.
5. (b) Bairoch, A.; Boeckmann, B. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank: Current status. Nucl. Acids Res. 1994, 22, 3578-3580.
6. Bernstein, F. C.; Koetzle, T. F.; Williams, G. J.; Meyer, E. E.; Brice, M. D.; Rodgers, J. R.; Kennard, O.; Shimanouchi, T.; Tasumi, M. The Protein Data Bank: A computer based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1977, 112, 535-542.
7. Bowie, J. U.; Clarke, N. D.; Pabo, C. O.; Sauer, R. T. Identification of protein folds: Matching hydrophobicity patterns of sequence sets with solvent accessibility patterns of known structures. Proteins 1990, 7, 257-264.
8. Bowie, J. U.; Lüthy, R.; Eisenberg, D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991, 253, 164-169.
9. Bryant, S. H.; Altschul, S. F. Statistics of sequence-structure threading. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1995, 5, 236-244.
10. Chothia, C. One thousand protein families for the molecular biologist. Nature 1992, 357, 543-544.
11. Dujon, B. The yeast genome project: what did we learn? Trends in Genetics 1996, 12, 263-270.
12. Fischer, D.; Eisenberg, D. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Prot. Sci. 1996, 5, 947-955.
13. Fischer, D.; Elofsson, A.; Rice, D.; Eisenberg, D. Assessing the performance of fold recognition methods by means of a comprehensive benchmark. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputting, Hawaii, 1996; Hunter, L., Klein, T., Eds.; World Scientific: Singapore, 1996; pp 300-318,
14. Fleischmann, R. D.; Adams, M. D.; White, O.; Clayton, R. A.; Kirkness, E. F.; Kerlavage, A. R.; Bult, C. J.; Tomb, J.-F.; Dougherty, B. A.; Merrick, J. M.; McKenney, K.; Sutton, G.; FitzHugh, W.; Fields, C.; Gocaybe, J. D.; Scott, J.; Shirley, R.; Liu, L.-I.; Glodek, A.; Kelley, J. M.; Weidman, J. F.; Phillips, C. A.; Spriggs, T.; Hedblom, E.; Cotton, M. D.; Utterback, T. R.; Hanna, M. C.; Nguyen, D. T.; Saudek, D. M.; Brandon, R. C.; Fine, L. D.; Fritchman, J. L.; Fuhrman, J. L.; Small, K. V.; Fraser, C. M.; Smith, H. O.; Venter, J. C. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 1995, 269, 496- 512.
15. Flöckner, H.; Braxenthaler, M.; Lackner, P.; Jaritz, M.; Ortner, M.; Sippl, M. J. Progress in fold recognition. Proteins 1995, 23, 376-386.
16. Gerstein, M.; Levitt, M. Comprehensive assessment of automatic structural alignment against a manual standard, the scop classification of proteins. Protein Sci. 1998, 7 (2), 445-456.
17. Greer, J. Comparative modeling of homologous proteins. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 202, 239-252.
18. Henikoff, S.; Henikoff, J. G. Amino acid substitution matrixes from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992, 89, 10915-10919.
19. Holm, L.; Ouzounis, C.; Sander, C.; Tuparev, G.; Vriend, G. A database of protein structure families with common folding motifs. Prot. Sci. 1993, 1, 1691-1698.
20. Holm, L.; Sander, C. The FSSP database of structurally aligned protein fold families. Nucl. Acids Res. 1994, 22, 3600-3609.
21. Jones, D. T.; Miller, R. T.; Thornton, J. M. Successful protein fold recognition by optimal sequence threading validated by rigorous blind testing. Proteins 1995, 23, 387-397.
22. Jones, D. T.; Taylor, W. R.; Thornton, J. M. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992, 358, 86-89.
23. Kabsch, W.; Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983, 22, 2577-2637.
24. Kuhlman, B.; Baker, D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 10383-10388.
25. Kelley L. A.; MacCallum, R. M.; Sternberg M. J. Enhanced Genome Annotation using Structural Profiles in the Program 3D-PSSM. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 299 (2), 501-522
26. Lemer, C. M.-R.; Rooman, M. J.; Wodak, S. J. Protein structure prediction by threading methods: Evaluation of current techniques. Proteins 1995, 23, 337-355.
27. Lesk, A. M.; Boswell, R. D. Homology modelling: Inferences from tables of aligned sequences. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1992, 2, 242-247.
28. Lüthy, R.; Bowie, J. U.; Eisenberg, D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 1992, 356, 83-85.
29. Lüthy, R.; McLachlan, A. D.; Eisenberg, D. Secondary structure-based profiles: Use of structure-conserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities. Proteins 1991, 10, 229-239.
30. May, A. C. W.; Blundell, T. L. Automated comparative modelling of protein structures. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 1994, 5, 355-360.
31. McLachlan, A. D.; Staden, R.; Boswell, D. R. A method for measuring the non-random bias of a codon usage table. Nucl. Acids Res. 1984, 12, 9567-9575.
32. Moult, J.; Pedersen, J. T.; Judson, R.; Fidelis, K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 1995, 23, ii-iv.
33. Oliver, S.; van der Aart, Q. J. M.; Agostoni-Carbone, M. L.; Aigle, M.; Alberghina, L. et al. The complete DNA sequence of yeast chromosome III. Nature 1992, 357, 38-46.
34. Reva, B. A.; Finkelstein, A. V.; Skolnick, J. Derivation and testing residue-residue mean-force potentials for use in protein structure recognition. Methods Mol. Biol. 2000, 143, 155-174.
35. Reva, B. A.; Skolnick, J.; Finkelstein, A. V. Averaging interaction energies over homologs improves protein fold recognition in gapless threading. Proteins 1999, 35, 353-359.
36. Rost, B. Fitting 1-D predictions into 3-D structures. In Protein Folds: A Distance Based Approach; Bohr, H., Brunak, S., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1995; pp 132-151.
37. Rost, B. TOPITS: Threading one-dimensional predictions into three-dimensional structures. In Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology; Menlo Park, CA, Rawlings, C., Clark, D., Altman, R., Hunter, L., Lengauer, T., et al., Eds.; AAAI Press: Cambridge, England, 1995; pp 314-321.
38. Rost, B.; Sander, C. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins 1994, 19, 55-72.
39. Rost, B.; Sander, C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins 1994, 20, 216-226.
40. Rost, B.; Schneider, R.; Sander, C. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 270, 471-80.
41. Russell, R. B.; Copley, R. R.; Barton, G. J. Protein fold recognition by mapping predicted secondary structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 259, 349-365.
42. Sander, C.; Schneider, R. Database of homology-derived structures and the structurally meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 1991, 9, 56-68.
43. Shortle, D. Protein fold recognition. Nature Struct. Biol. 1995, 2, 91-92.
44. Simons, K.; Bonneau, R.; Rucszinski, I.; Baker, D. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, Suppl. 1999, 3, 171-176.
45. Sippl, M. J. On the Problem of Comparing Protein Structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 156, 359-388.
46. Sippl, M. J. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1995, 5, 229-235.
47. Sippl, M. J.; Smith, T. F.; Lo Conte, L.; Bienkowska, J.; Gaitatzes, C.; Rogers, R. G. Jr.; Lathrop, R. Current limitations to protein threading approaches. J. Comput. Biol. 1997, 4, 217-25.
48. Suyama, M.; Matsuo, Y.; Nishikawa, K. Comparison of protein structures using 3D profile alignment. J. Mol. Evol. 1997, 44, Suppl. 1, S163-73.
49. Smith, T. F.; Waterman, M. S. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 1981, 147, 195-197.
50. Taylor, W. R. Multiple sequence threading: an analysis of alignment quality and stability. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 269, 902-43.
51. Taylor, W. R.; Munro, R. E. Multiple sequence threading: Conditional gap placement. Fold. Des. 1997, 2, S33-9.
52. Vingron, M.; Waterman, M. S. Sequence alignment and penalty choice. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 235, 1-12.
53. Zu-Kang, F.; Sippl, M. J. Optimum superimposition of protein structures: Ambiguities and implications. Folding Design 1996, 1, 123-132.
54. Levinthal, C. Are there pathways for protein folding? J. Chim. Phys, 1968, 65, 44-45.
55. Wille, L. T.; Vennik, J. Computational complexity of the ground state determination of atomic clusters. J. Phys. A Math., General 1988, 18, L419-L422.
56. Li, J.; Platt, E.; Waszkowycz, B.; Cotterill, R.; Robson B. Exploration of the phase space of molecular systems: Assessment of established and new methods. Biophys. Chem. 1992, 43, 221-238.
57. Chothia, C.; Lesk, A. M. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 1986, 5, 823-826.
58. Robson, B.; Osguthorpe, D. J. Refined models for computer simulation of protein folding, applications to the study of conserved secondary structure and flexible hinge points during the folding of pancreatic Trypsin inhibitor. J. Mol. Biol. 1979, 132, 19-51.
59. Simmerling, C.; Lee, M. R.; Ortiz, R. A.; Kilinski, A.; Skolnick, J.; Kollman, P. K. To be submitted.
60. CASP4 Structural Prediction Results, circulated report, 2000.
61. Skolnick, J. Kolinski, A.; Ortiz, A. R. Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 2000, 38, 3-16.
62. Skolnick, J. Derivation of and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct? Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 676-688.
63. Levitt, M.; Warshel, A. Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 1975, 253, 694-698.
64. Robson, B. Simplified models of protein folding exploiting the Lagrange radius of gyration of the hydrophobic component. Parallel Computing 2000, 26, 977-998.
65. Galvez, A.; Maqueda, M.; Martinez-Bueno, M.; Valdivia, E. Bactericidal and bacteriolytic action of peptide antibiotic AS-48 against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and other organisms. Res. Microbiol, 1989, 140, 57-68.
66. Gonzales, C.; Langdon, M, G.; Bruix, M.; Galvez, A.; Valdivia, E.; Maqueda, M.; Rico, M. Bacteriocin As-48, a microbial cyclic polypeptide structurally and functionally related to mammalian NK-lysin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 11221-11226.
67. Liepinsh, E.; Andersson, M.; Ruysschaert, J. M.; Otting, G. Saposin fold revealed by the NMR structure of NK-lysin. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1997, 4, 793.
68. Robson, B. Analysis of the code relating sequence to conformation in globular proteins: Theory and application of expected information. Biochem. J. 1974, 141, 853-867.
69. Crampin, J.; Nicholson, B. H.; Robson, B. Protein folding and heterogeneity inside globular proteins, Nature 1978, 272, 558-560.
70. Robson, B. Fastfinger: A study into the use of compressed residue pair separation matrixes for protein sequence comparison. IBM Syst. J. 2001, 40, 442-463.
71. Robson, B.; Platt, E. Refined models for computer calculations in protein engineering. Calculation and testing of atomic potential functions compatible with more efficient calculations. J. Mol. Biol. 1986, 188, 259-281.
72. Van Gunsteren, W. F.; Billeter, S. R.; Eising, A. A.; Hünenberger, P. H.; Krüger, P.; Mark, A. E.; Scott, W. R. P.; Tironi, I. G. Biomolecular Simulation: The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide; Biomos b.V.: Zürich and Groningen, 1996.
73. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; DiNola, A.; Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 3684-3690.
74. Ryckaert, J.-P.; Ciccotti, G.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23, 327-341.
75. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Hermans, J. Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. In Intermolecular Forces; Pullman, B., Ed.; Reidel: Dordrecht, 1981; pp 331-342.
76. Berendsen, H. J. C. Treatment of Long-Range Forces in Molecular Dynamics. In Molecular Dynamics and Protein Structure; Hermans, J., Ed.; Polycrystal Book Service: Western Springs, IL, 1985; pp 18-22.
77. Tironi, I. G.; Sperb, R.; Smith, P. E.; van Gunsteren, W. F. A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 5451-5459.
78. Noble, M. E.; Musacchio, A.; Saraste, M.; Courtneidge, S. A.; Wierenga, R. K. Crystal structure of the SH3 domain in human Fyn; comparison of the three-dimensional structures of SH3 domains in tyrosine kinases and spectrin. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 2617.
79. Siew, N.; Elofsson, A.; Rychlewski, L.; Fischer, D. MaxSub: An automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 2000, 16, 776-785.
80. Di Francesco, V.; Garnier, J.; Munson, P. J. Improving protein secondary structure prediction with aligned homologous sequences. Prot. Sci. 1996, 5, 106-113.