Process-dissociation procedure: A testable model for considering assumptions about the stochastic relation between consciously controlled and automatic processes

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 3-26

  Vaterrodt Plünnecke, Bianca ^a   Krüger, Thomas ^a   Bredenkamp, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conscious and unconscious processes; Levels of processing; Measurement models; Process dissociation procedure

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; EGO DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; READING; RECALL; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STATISTICS;

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; READING; SEMANTICS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY); VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 0036359192     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.49.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Baddeley, A. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice. Erlbaum: Psychology Press.
2. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1980). Separation of storage and retrieval factors in free recall of clusterable pairs. Psychological Review, 87, 375-397.
3. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
4. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial processing tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
5. Boddenberg, S. (2000). Kontrollierte und automatische Gedächtnisprozesse bzgl. traumarelevanter Reize bei PTSD-Patienten. Unpublished thesis: Bonn.
6. Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V.F., & Mojardin, A. H. (1999). Conjoint recognition. Psychological Review, 106, 160-179.
7. Bredenkamp, J., & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (2001). Kontrollierte und automatische Gedächtnisprozesse bei PTSD-Patienten und Gesunden. In R. Dohrenbusch, & F. A. Kaspers (Eds.), Fortschritte der Klinischen Psychologie und Verhaltensmedizin (pp. 89-97). Lengerich: Pabst.
8. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process-dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
9. Buchner, A., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). On assumptions of, relations between, and evaluations of some process-dissociation measurement models. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 581-594.
10. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cowan, N., & Stadler, M. A. (1996). Estimating unconscious processes: Implications of a general class of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 195-200.
12. Crowder, R. G., & Morton, J. (1969). Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS). Perception and Psychophysics, 5, 365-373.
13. Curran, T., & Hintzman, D. L. (1995). Violations of the independence assumption in process-dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 531-547.
14. Debner, J. A., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Unconscious perception: Attention, awareness, and control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 304-417.
15. Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A Contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger, & C. E. Bussenius). New York: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1885)
16. Engelkamp, J., & Dehn, D. (1997). Strategy and consciousness in remembering subject-performed actions. Sprache und Kognition, 16, 94-109.
17. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Stochastic versus functional independence in the process-dissociation procedure. Unpublished manuscript.
18. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28, 1-11.
19. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Process-dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 83-96.
20. Graf, P. (1995). Defining the opposition procedure: A reply to Reingold's and Jacoby's (1995) response to Graf and Komatsu (1994). European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 225-231.
21. Graf, P., & Komatsu, S.-I. (1994). Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution! European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 113-129.
22. Hillstrom, A. P., & Logan, G. D. (1997). Process dissociation, cognitive architecture, and response time: Comments on Lindsay and Jacoby (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1561-1578.
23. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1997). More than one way to violate independence: Reply to Jacoby and Shrout (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 511-513.
24. Hirshman, E. (1998). On the logic of testing the independence assumption in process-dissociation procedure. Memory & Cognition, 26, 857-859.
25. Hu, X. (1991). Statistical inference program for multinomial binary tree models [computer program]. Irvine, CA: University of California at Irvine.
26. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-48.
27. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
28. Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 3-26.
29. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 3-22.
30. Jacoby, L. L., Begg, I. M., & Toth, J. P. (1997). In defense of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 484-495.
31. Jacoby, L. L., & Hay, J. F. (1998). Age-related deficits in memory: Theory and application. In M. A. Conway, S. Gathercole & C. Cornoldi (Eds.), Theories of memory II. London: Psychology Press Ltd.
32. Jacoby, L. L., & Shrout, P. E. (1997). Toward a psychometric analysis of violations of the independence assumption in process-dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 505-510.
33. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
34. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., Yonelinas, A. P., & Debner, J. A. (1994). The relationship between conscious and unconscious influences: Independence or redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 216-219.
35. Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., & Jennings, J. M. (1997). The relationship between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.). Scientific approaches to the question of consciousness (pp. 13-47). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
36. Jones, G. V. (1987). Independence and exclusivity among psychological processes: Implications for the structure of recall. Psychological Review, 94, 229-235.
37. Joordens, S., & Merikle, P. M. (1993). Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 462-467.
38. Krüger, T. (1996). Untersuchungen zur Beziehung bewußter und unbewußter Gedächtnisprozesse [Investigations on the relation between conscious and unconscious memory processes]. (Thesis) Berlin: Logos.
39. Krüger, T. (1998). Eine Normierung der Ergänzungen deutscher Wortanfänge zu Substantiven mit fünf oder sechs Buchstaben [Normative values for the completion of German wordstems]. Sprache & Kognition, 17, 51-72.
40. Krüger, T. (1999). Die Erfassung bewuβter und unbemiβter Gedächtnisprozesse: Die Prozeß-Dissoziations-Prozedur. Probleme und Perspektiven einer neuen Methode. [The measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes: The process-dissociation procedure. Problems and perspectives of a new method]. Lengerich: Pabst.
41. Krüger, T., & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1997). Die stochastische Beziehung bewußter und automatischer Prozesse: Eine Erweiterung der Prozeß-Dissoziations-Prozedur [The stochastic relation between conscious and automatic processes: An extension of the process-dissociation procedure]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 44, 220-245.
42. Krüger, T., Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B., & Bredenkamp, J. (1997). Prozeß-Dissoziations-Modelle: Kritik, Erweiterung und Überprüfung. [Process-dissociation procedure: Critics, extensions, and tests]. In H. Mandl (Ed.), Bericht über den 40.Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in München 1996 (pp. 284-289). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
43. Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Stroop process-dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 219-234.
44. Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1996). Creating illusions of familiarity in a cued recall remember/know paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 197-211.
45. Mecklenbräuker, S., Wippich, W., & Mohrhusen, S. H. (1997). Conscious and unconscious influences of memory in a conceptual task: Limitations of a process-dissociation procedure. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55, 34-48.
46. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
47. Read, T. R. C., & Cressie, N. A. C. (1988). Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. New York: Springer.
48. Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475-543.
49. Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Gardiner, J. M. (1995). Retrieval volition and memorial awareness in stem completion: An empirical analysis. Psychological Research, 57, 166-178.
50. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1994). Involuntary conscious memory and the method of opposition. Memory, 2, 1-29.
51. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1996). Memory: Task dissociation, process-dissociation and dissociations of consciousness. In G. Underwood (Ed.). Implicit cognition, (pp. 85-158). Oxford: University Press.
52. Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Gardiner, J. M. (1998). Depth-of processing effects on priming in stem completion: Tests of the voluntary-contamination, conceptual-processing, and lexical-processing hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 24, 593-609.
53. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
54. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1991). Statistical inference for multinomial processing tree models. In J.-P. Doignon, & J.-P. Falmagne (Ed.). Mathematical psychology. Current Developments (pp. 313-335). New York: Springer.
55. Russo, R., & Andrade, J. (1995). The directed forgetting effect in word fragment completion: An application of the process dissociation procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 405-423.
56. Russo, R., Cullis, A. M., & Parkin, A. J. (1998). Consequences of violating the assumption of independence in a process dissociation procedure: A word fragment completion study. Memory & Cognition, 26, 617-632.
57. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
58. Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: Process-dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 290-303.
59. Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1994). Multinomiale Modellierung impliziter Gedächtnisprozesse: Ein alternativer Ansatz.[Multinomial modeling of implicit memory processes: An alternative approach]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 41, 295-314.
60. Wippich, W. (1994). Unbewußte Effekte und Voreingenommenheiten bei Urteilen zu Personennamen [Unconscious effects and preconceptions in judgments of person names]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 41, 151-172.
61. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). Dissociating automatic and controlled processes in a memory-search task: Beyond implicit memory. Psychological Research, 57, 156-165.
62. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Response bias and the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 422-439.