On assumptions of, relations between, and evaluations of some process dissociation measurement models

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 581-594

  Buchner, Axel ^a   Erdfelder, Edgar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; COGNITION; HUMAN; NOTE; PSYCHOMETRY; RECALL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AWARENESS; COGNITION; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PSYCHOMETRICS;

EID: 0030342311     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0034     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Steffens, M., & Martensen, H. (in press). The nature of memory processes underlying recognition judgments in the process dissociation procedure. Memory and Cognition.
2. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
3. Buchner, A., & Wippich, W. (1996). Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments? Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 197-220.
4. Cowan, N., & Stadler, M. A. (1996). Estimating unconscious processes: Implications of a general class of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 195-200.
5. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1995). Process dissociation measurement models: Good versus better (Berichte aus dem Psychologischen Institut der Universität Bonn No. 21-3). Bonn, Germany: Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität.
6. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-48.
7. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
8. Joordens, S., & Merikle, P. M. (1993). Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 462-467.
9. Komatsu, S.-I., Graf, P., & Uttl, B. (1995). Process-dissociation procedure: Core assumptions fail, sometimes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 19-40.
10. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
11. Verfaellie, M., & Treadwell, J. R. (1993). Status of recognition memory in amnesia. Neuropsychology, 7, 5-13.
12. Wainwright, M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1996). Response-bias correction in the process dissociation procedure: Approaches, assumptions, and evaluation. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 232-254.
13. Yonelinas, A. P., Regehr, G., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). Incorporating response bias in a dual-process theory of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 821-835.