Phylogenetic relationships of fig wasps pollinating functionally dioecious Ficus based on mitochondrial DNA sequences and morphology

Systematic Biology

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 243-267

  Weiblen, George D ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Maximum likelihood; Mutualism; Parametric bootstrapping; Pollination

Indexed keywords

AGAONIDAE; CHALCIDOIDEA; FICUS (ANGIOSPERM); HYMENOPTERA; MORACEAE; VESPIDAE;

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; LEUCINE TRANSFER RNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FICUS; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MALE; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL; WASP;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOMETRY; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FICUS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; PHYLOGENY; RNA, TRANSFER, LEU; WASPS;

EID: 0035527359     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/50.2.243     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. ANSTETT, M. C., M. HOSSAERT-MCKEY, AND F. KJELLBERG. 1997. Figs and fig pollinators: Evolutionary conflicts in a coevolved mutualism. TREE 12:94-98.
2. BARRETT, M., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND E. SOBER. 1991. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:486-493.
3. BERG, C. C., AND J. T. WIEBES. 1992. African fig trees and fig wasps. North Holland, Amsterdam.
4. BOUCEK, Z. 1988. Australasian Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). C.A.B. International, Wallingford, Oxon, U. K.
5. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42:795-803.
6. BROWER, A. V. Z. 1994. Phylogeny of Heliconius butterflies inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3:159-174.
7. BROWER, A. V. Z., AND R. DESALLE. 1994. Practical and theoretical considerations for choice of a DNA sequence region in insect molecular systematics, with a short review of published studies using nuclear gene regions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:702-716.
8. BROWN, J. M., O. PELLMYR, J. N. THOMPSON, AND R. G. HARRISON. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of the Prodoxidae (Lepidoptera: Incurvarioidea) indicates rapid ecological diversification of yucca moths. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:795-804.
9. BRUES, C. T. 1910. The parasitic Hymenoptera of the Tertiary of Florissant, Colorado. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 54:1-125.
10. CAMERON, S. A., J. N. DERR, A. D. AUSTIN, J. B. WOOLEY, AND R. A. WHARTON. 1992. The application of nucleotide sequence data to phylogeny of the Hymenoptera: A review. J. Hymenop. Res. 1:63-79.
11. CLARY, D. O., AND D. R. WOLSTENHOLME. 1985. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: Nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. J. Mol. Evol. 22:252-271.
12. CORNER, E. J. H. 1955. Revision of Ficus. Flora Indo-Australiana Bull. 11:428-430.
13. CORNER, E. J. H. 1965. Check-list of Ficus in Asia and Australasia with keys to identification. Gard. Bull. (Singapore) 21:1-186.
14. CORNER, E. J. H. 1985. Ficus (Moraceae) and Hymenoptera (Chalcidoidea): Figs and their pollinators. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 25:187-195.
15. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1997a. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 46:464-478.
16. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1997b. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:733-740.
17. DE QUEIROZ, A., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:657-681.
18. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1996. Including the characters of interest during tree reconstruction and the problems of circularity and bias in studies of character evolution. Am. Nat. 148:700-708.
19. DERR, J. N., S. K. DAVIS, J. B. WOOLEY, AND R. 'A. WHARTON. 1992. Variation in the phylogenetic utility of the large ribosomal subunit of mitochondrial DNA from the insect order Hymenoptera. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:136-147.
20. DONOGHUE, M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79:333-345.
21. DOWTON, M., AND A. D. AUSTIN. 1994. Molecular phylogeny of the insect order Hymenoptera: Apocritan relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:9911-9915.
22. DOYLE, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:144-163.
23. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
24. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-410.
25. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
26. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phytogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
27. FUTUYMA, D. J., M. C. KEESE, AND S. J. SCHEFFER. 1993. Genetic constraints and the phylogeny of insect-plant associations: Responses of Ophraella communa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to host plants of its congeners. Evolution 47:888-905.
28. GIFT, N., AND P. F. STEVENS. 1997. Vagaries in the delimitation of character states in quantitative variation - an experimental study. Syst. Biol. 46:112-125.
29. GOLDMAN, N. 1993. Simple diagnostic tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 37:650-661.
30. GRAFEN, A., AND H. C. J. GODFRAY. 1991. Vicarious selection explains some paradoxes in dioecious fig-pollinator systems. Proc. R. Soc. London Sci. B 245: 73-75.
31. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 21:160-174.
32. HERRE, E. A. 1985. Sex ratio adjustment in fig wasps. Science 228:896-898.
33. HERRE, E. A., C. A. MACHADO, E. BERMINGHAM, J. D. NASON, D. M. WINDSOR, S. S. MCCAFFERTY, W. V. HOUTEN, AND K. BACHMANN. 1996. Molecular phytogenies of figs and their pollinator wasps. J. Biogeogr. 23:521-530.
34. HOELZER, G. 1997. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: Mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees revisited. Evolution 51:622-626.
35. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1997. Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap? Syst. Biol. 46:69-74.
36. HUELSENBECK, J. P., J. J. BULL, AND C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. TREE 11:152-157.
37. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: Applications and performance. Pages 19-45 in Molecular zoology: Advances, strategies, and protocols (J. D. Ferraris and S. R. Palumbi, eds.). Wiley-Liss, New York.
38. JUKES, T. H., AND C. R. CANTOR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pages 21-132 in Mammalian protein metabolism (H. N. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
39. KERDELHUE, C., I. L. CLAINCHE, AND J.-Y. RASPLUS. 1999. Molecular phytogeny of the Ceratosolen species pollinating Ficus of the subgenus Sycomorus sensu stricto: Biogeographical history and origins of the species-specificity breakdown cases. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11:401-414.
40. KERDELHUE, C., AND J. Y. RASPLUS. 1996. The evolution of dioecy among Ficus (Moraceae): An alternate hypothesis involving non-pollinating fig wasp pressure on the fig-pollinator mutualism. Oikos 77:163-166.
41. KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
42. KJELLBERG, F., P. H. GOUYON, M. IBRAHIM, M. RAYMOND, AND G. VALDEYRON. 1987. The stability of the symbiosis between dioecious figs and their pollinators: A study of Ficus carica L. and Blastophaga psenes L. Evolution 41:693-704.
43. KLUGE, A. J. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
44. LARSON, A. 1994. The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic systematics. Pages 371-390 in Molecular ecology and evolution: Approaches and applications (B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle, eds.). Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland.
45. LILJEBLAD, J., AND F. RONQUIST. 1998. A phylogenetic analysis of higher-level gall wasp relationships (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Syst. Enomol. 23:229-252.
46. LIU, H., AND A. T. BECKENBACH. 1992. Evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene among ten orders of insects. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:41-52.
47. MACHADO, C. A. 1998. Molecular natural history of fig wasps. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. California, Irvine.
48. MACHADO, C. A., E. A. HERRE, S. S. MCCAFFERTY, AND E. BERMINGHAM. 1996. Molecular phylogenies of fig pollinating and non-pollinating wasps and the implications for the origin and evolution of the fig-fig wasp mutualism. J. Biogeogr. 23:531-542.
49. MADDISON, W. P. 1995. Phylogenetic histories within and between species. Monogr. Syst. Bot. 53:272-288.
50. MADDISON, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
51. MASON-GAMER, R., AND E. A. KELLOGG. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45:524-545.
52. MCDADE, L. A. 1995. Hybridization and phylogenetics. Monogr. Syst. Bot. 53:305-331.
53. MOORE, W. S. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: Mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 49:718-726.
54. MUNRO, S. L., AND H. P. LINDER. 1998. The phylogenetic position of Prionium (Juncaceae) within the order Juncales based on morphological and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 23:43-55.
55. NAYLOR, G. J. P., AND W. M. BROWN. 1998. Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on comparison of sequences. Syst. Biol. 47:61-76.
56. PATEL, A., M. ANSTETT, M. HOSSAERT-MCKEY, AND F. KJELLBERG. 1995. Pollinators entering female dioecious figs: Why commit suicide? J. Evol. Biol. 8:301-313.
57. PELLMYR, O. 1997. Pollinating seed eaters: Why is active pollination so rare? Ecology 78:1655-1660.
58. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
59. RAMBAUT, A., AND N. C. CRASSLY. 1997. Seq-Gen: An application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238.
60. RAMIREZ, W. B. 1974. Coevolution of Ficus and Agaonidae. Ann. MO. Bot. Gard. 61:770-780.
61. RAMIREZ, W. B. 1978. Evolution of mechanisms to carry pollen in Agaonidae (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea). Tijdschr. Entomol. 121:279-293.
62. RAMIREZ, W. B. 1980. Evolution of the monoecious and dioecious habit in Ficus (Moraceae). Brenesia 18:207-215.
63. RAMIREZ, W. B. 1991. Evolution of the mandibular appendage in fig wasps (Hymenoptera: Agaonidae). Rev. Biol. Trop. 39:87-95.
64. RODRIGUEZ, F. J., J. L. OLIVER, A. MARIN, AND J. R. MEDINA. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theor. Biol. 142:485-501.
65. ROEHRDANZ, R. L. 1993. An improved primer for PCR amplification of mitochondrial DNA in a variety of insect species. Insect Mol. Biol. 2:89-91.
66. SIMON, C., F. FRATI, A. BECKENBACH, B. CRESPI, H. LIU, AND P. FLOOR. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:651-701.
67. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
68. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. L. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics (D. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
69. TAMURA, K., AND M. NEI. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:512-526.
70. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1993. The "Eve" hypothesis: A genetic critique and reanalysis. Am. Anthropol. 95:51-72.
71. VAN NOORT, S., AND S. G. COMPTON. 1996. Convergent evolution of agaonine and sycoecine (Agaonidae, Chalcidoidea) head shape in response to the constraints of host fig morphology. J. Biogeogr. 23:415-424.
72. WEIBLEN, G. D. 1999. Phylogeny and ecology of dioecious fig pollination. Ph. D. Thesis, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
73. WEIBLEN, G. D. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of functionally dioecious Ficus (Moraceae) based on ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Am. J. Bot. 87:1342-1357.
74. WIEBES, J. T. 1963. Taxonomy and host preferences of Indo-Australian fig wasps of the genus Ceratosolen (Agaonidae). Tijdschr. Entomol. 106:1-112.
75. WIEBES, J. T. 1979. Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:1-12.
76. WIEBES, J. T. 1982a. The phylogeny of the Agaonidae (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea). Neth. J. Zool. 32:395-411.
77. WIEBES, J. T. 1982b. Fig wasps (Hymenoptera). Pages 735-755 in Biogeography and ecology of New Guinea (J. L. Gressitt, ed.). W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.
78. WIEBES, J. T. 1987. Coevolution as a test of the phylogenetic tree. Pages 309-314 in Systematics and evolution: A matter of diversity (P. Hovenkamp, eds.). Utrecht Univ., Utrecht.
79. WIEBES, J. T. 1994a. The Indo-Australian Agaoninae (pollinators of figs). North Holland, Amsterdam.
80. WIEBES, J. T. 1994b. Agaonidae (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea) and Ficus (Moraceae): Fig wasps and their figs, XIII (Ceratosolen & additions). Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. C Biol. Med. Sci. 97:123-136.
81. WIEBES, J. T. 1995a. The New World Agaoninae (pollinators of figs). North Holland, Amsterdam.
82. WIEBES, J. T. 1995b. Agaonidae (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea) and Ficus (Moraceae): Fig wasps and their figs, XV (Meso-American Pegoscapus). Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. C Biol. Med. Sci. 98:167-183.
83. YANG, Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
84. YOKOYAMA, J. 1995. Insect-plant coevolution and speciation. Pages 115-130 in Biodiversity and evolution (R. Arai, M. Kato, and Y. Doi, eds.). National Science Museum Foundation, Tokyo.
85. ZHANG, J. 1999. Performance of likelihood ratio tests of evolutionary hypotheses under inadequate substitution models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:868-875.
86. ZHARKIKH, A. 1994. Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 9:315-329.