The phylogenetic position of Prionium (Juncaceae) within the order Juncales based on morphological and rbcL sequence data

Systematic Botany

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 43-55

  Munro, Sioban L ^a   Linder, H Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYPERACEAE; EMBRYOPHYTA; JUNCACEAE; JUNCALES; PRIONIUM; THURNIACEAE;

EID: 0031899281     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419573     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ASPLUND, I.1972. Embryological studies in the genus Typha. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 66: 11-17.
2. _. 1973. Embryological studies in the genus Sparganium. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 67: 177-200.
3. BAKER, J. G. 1897. Juncaceae. P. 28 in Flora capensis Vol. 7, ed. T. Thiselton-Dyer. London: L. Reeve and Co., Ltd.
4. BATTAGLIA, E. 1955. A consideration of a new type of meiosis (mis-meiosis) in Juncaceae (Luzula) and Hemiptera. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 82: 383-396.
5. BENTHAM, G. and J. D. HOOKER. 1880. Genera plantarum Vol. 3. London:, L. Reeve and Co., Ltd.
6. BERGER, C. A. 1946. The cytology of Luzula. American Journal of Botany 36: 794.
7. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in Angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
8. BRASELTON, J. P. 1981. The ultrastructure of the meiotic kinetochores of Luzula. Chromosoma 82: 143-151.
9. BRUHL, J. J. 1990. Taxonomic relationships and photosynthetic pathways in the Cyperaceae. Ph.D. Thesis. Canberra: Australian National University.
10. _ 1995. Sedge genera of the world: relationships and a new classification of the Cyperaceae. Australian Systematic Botany 8: 125-305.
11. BRUMMIT, R. K. 1996. In defence of paraphyletic taxa. Pp. 371-384 in The biodiversity of African plants, eds. L. J. G. van der Maasen et al. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. BUCHENAU, F. 1875. Monographie der Juncaceen vom Cap., in Abhandlungen herausgegeben vom naturwis-senschaftlichen Vereine, IV zu Bremen., ed. C. Müller.
13. _. 1888. Juncaceae. Pp. 1-7 in Natürlike Pflanzenfamilien II, band 5, eds. A. Engler and K. Prantl. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.
14. _. 1890. Monographia Juncacearum. Supplement: Engler's Botanischen Jahrbücher 12: 71-74.
15. CAPRENTER, J. 1992. Random cladistics. Cladistics 8: 147-153.
16. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, R. G. OLMSTEAD, D. MORGAN, D. H. LES, B. D. MISHLER, M. R. DUVALL, R. A. PRICE, H. G. HILLS, Y-L. QIU, K. A. KRON, J. H. RETTIG, E. CONTI, J. D. PALMER, J. D. MANHART, K. J. SYTSMA, H. J. MJCHAELS, W. J. KRESS, K. G. KAROL, W. D. CLARK, M. HEDREN, B. S. GAUT, R. K. JANSEN, K-J. KIM, C. F. WIMPEE, J. F. SMITH, G. R. FURNIER, S. H. STRAUSS, Q-Y. XIANG, G. M. PLUNKETT, P. S. SOLTIS, S. M. SWENSON, S. E. WILLIAMS, P. A. GADEK, C. J. QUIN, L. E. EGUIARTE, E. GOLENBERG, G. H. LEARN Jr., S. W. GRAHAM, S. C. H. BARRET, S. DAYANANDAN, and V. A. ALBERT. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
17. _, D. W. STEVENSON, P. WILKIN, and P. J. RUDALL. 1995. Monocot Systematics: a combined analysis. Pp. 497-509 in Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, eds. P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F Cutler and C. J. Humphries. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
18. CHEADLE, V. I. and H. KOSAKAI. (1973). Vessels in Juncales. I. Juncaceae and Thurniaceae. Phytomorphology 23: 80-87.
19. CUTLER, D. F. 1965. Vegetative anatomy of Thurniaceae. Kew Bulletin 19: 431-441.
20. _. 1969. Juncales. In Anatomy of the monocotyledons IV, ed. C. R. Metcalfe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
21. DAHLGREN, R. M. T. and H. T. CLIFFORD. 1982. The monocotyledons: a comparative study. London: Academic Press.
22. _, H. T. CLIFFORD, and P. F. YEO. 1985. The families of monocotyledons. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
23. DAVIS, G. L. 1966. Systematic embryology of the angiosperms. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
24. DE LAHARPE, J. 1825. Essai d'une monographie des vraies Joncées. Mémoires de la société d'histoire naturelle de Paris 3: 92.
25. DUVALL, M. R., M. T. CLEGG, M. W. CHASE, W. D. CLARK, W. J. KRESS, H. G. HILLS, L. E. EGUIARTE, J. F. SMITH, B. S. GAUT, E. A. ZIMMER, and G. H. LEARN, JR. 1993. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the monocotyledons constructed from rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 607-619.
26. ENDLICHER, S. 1836. Genera plantarum. Vindobonae, Apud. Fr. Beck. Universitatus Bibliopalum.
27. FAITH, D. M. 1992. On corroboration: A reply to Carpenter. Cladistics 8: 265-273.
28. _ and P. S. CRANSTON. 1992. Probability, parsimony and Popper. Cladistics 8: 252-257.
29. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
30. GOETGHEBEUR, P. 1985. Studies in Cyperaceae 6. Nomenclature of the suprageneric taxa in the Cyperaceae. Taxon 34: 617-632.
31. HILLIS, D. M. and J. J. BULL. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182-192.
32. JONES, T. R., A. G. KLUGE, and A. J. WOLF. 1993. When theories and methodologies clash: A phylogenetic reanalysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Biology 42: 92-102.
33. KLUGE, A. G. and A. J. WOLF. 1993. Cladistics: what's in a word? Cladistics 9: 183-199.
34. LA COUR, L. F. 1952. The Luzula system analyzed by x-rays. Heredity 6 (Suppl.): 77-81.
35. LINDER, H. P. 1991. Confidence limits in phylogenies: an example from the African Restionaceae. Taxon 40: 253-266.
36. _ and I. K. FERGUSON. 1985. On the pollen morphology and phylogeny of the Restionales and Poales. Grana 24: 65-76.
37. _ and E. A. KELLOGG. 1995. Phylogenetic patterns in the commelinid clade. Pp. 473-496 in Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, eds. P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler and C. J. Humphries. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
38. MABBERLEY, D. J. 1987. The plant book. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
39. MADDISON, W. P. and D. R. MADDISON, 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.0. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
40. MASON-GAMER, R.J. and E. A. KELLOGG. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Systematic Biology 45: 522-543.
41. MUNRO, S. L. and H. P. LINDER. 1997. The embryology and systematic relationships of Prionium serratum (Juncaceae: Juncales). American Journal of Botany 84: 850-860.
42. NORDENSKIÖLD, H. 1961. Tetrad analysis and the course of meiosis in three hybrids of Luznla Campestris. Hereditas 47: 203-238.
43. PENNY, D., M. D. HENDY, E. A. ZIMMER, and R. K. HAMBY. 1990. Trees from sequences: Panacea or Pandora's box? Australian Systematic Botany 3: 21-38.
44. PLUNKETT, G. M., D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, and R. E. BROOKS. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships between the Juncaceae and Cyperaceae: insights from rbcL sequence data. American Journal of Botany 82: 520-525.
45. SANDERSON, M. J. 1995. Objections to bootstrapping phylogenies: a critique. Systematic Biology 44: 299-320.
46. SIMPSON, D. 1995. Relationships within Juncales. Pp. 497-509 in Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, eds. P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler and C. J. Humphries. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
47. SOSEF, M. S. M. 1997. Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa. Taxon 46: 75-85.
48. STEVENSON, D. W. and H. LOCONTE. 1995. Cladistic analysis of monocotyledon families. Pp. 543-578 in Monocotyledons: systeniatics and evolution, eds. P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler and C. J. Humphries. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
49. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
50. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983, Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
51. THORNE, R. F. 1992. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Botanical Review 58: 225-348.
52. TRUEMAN, J. W. H. 1993. Randomization confounded: a response to Carpenter. Cladistics 9: 101-109.
53. WEIMARCK, H. 1946. Studies in Juncaceae, with special reference to the species in Ethiopia and the Cape. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 40: 141-176.
54. WILLIAMS, C. A. and J. B. HARBORNE. 1975. Luteolin and daphnetin derivatives in the Juncaceae and their systematic significance. Biochemical and Systematic Ecology 3: 181-190.
55. WEST, J. G. and D. P. FAITH. 1990. Data, methods and assumptions in phylogenetic inference. Australian Systematic Botany 3: 9-20.
56. ZAVADA, M. S. 1983. Comparative morphology of monocot pollen and evolutionary trends of apertures and wall structures. Botanical Review 49: 331-379.