Crystal Structure of an Ephrin Ectodomain

Developmental Cell

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 83-92

  Toth, Joseph ^a   Cutforth, Tyler ^b   Gelinas, Amy D ^a   Bethoney, Kelley A ^a   Bard, Joel ^a   Harrison, Celia J ^a  

^a BOSTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Ctr Neurbio Behav Columbia Univ ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VERTEBRATA;

EPHRIN B2; LIGAND; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NODULIN; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MISSENSE MUTATION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOUSE; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; EPHRIN-B2; LIGANDS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MICE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION, MISSENSE; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 0035409126     PISSN: 15345807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00002-8     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adams R.H., Diella F., Hennig S., Helmbacher F., Deutsch U., Klein R. The cytoplasmic domain of the ligand ephrinB2 is required for vascular morphogenesis but not cranial neural crest migration. Cell. 104:2001;57-69.
2. Bruckner K., Pablo Labrador J., Scheiffele P., Herb A., Seeburg P.H., Klein R. EphrinB ligands recruit GRIP family PDZ adaptor proteins into raft membrane microdomains. Neuron. 22:1999;511-524.
3. Brünger A., Adams P., Clore G., DeLano W., Gros P., Grosse-Kunstleve R., Jiang J., Kuszewski J., Nilges M., Pannu N.et al. Crystallography & NMR system. A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination Acta Crystallogr. D. 54:1998;905-921.
4. The CCP4 (Collaborative Computational Project 4) suite. programs for protein crystallography Acta Crystallogr. D. 50:1994;760-763.
5. Cerretti D., Nelson N. Characterization of the genes for mouse LERK-3/Ephrin-A3 (Epl3), mouse LERK-4/Ephrin-A4 (Epl4), and human LERK-6/Ephrin-A2 (EPLG6). conservation of intron/exon structure Genomics. 47:1998;131-135.
6. Chin-Sang I., George S., Ding M., Moseley S., Lynch A., Chisholm A. The ephrin VAB-2/EFN-1 functions in neuronal signaling to regulate epidermal morphogenesis in C. elegans. Cell. 99:1999;781-790.
7. Cremata J., Montesino R., Quintero O., Garcia R. Glycosylation profiling of heterologous proteins. Higgins D., Cregg J. Pichia Protocols. 1998;Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. 95-106.pp.
8. Dalva M.B., Takasu M.A., Lin M.Z., Shamah S.M., Hu L., Gale N.W., Greenberg M.E. EphB receptors interact with NMDA receptors and regulate excitatory synapse formation. Cell. 103:2000;945-956.
9. Davis S., Gale N., Aldrich T., Maisonpierre P., Lhotak V., Pawson T., Goldfarb M., Yancopoulos G. Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. Science. 266:1994;816-819.
10. Davy A., Gale N., Murray E., Klinghoffer R., Soriano P., Feuerstein C., Robbins S. Compartmentalized signaling by GPI-anchored ephrin-A5 requires the Fyn tyrosine kinase to regulate cellular adhesion. Genes Dev. 13:1999;125-135.
11. de Blank C., Mylona P., Yang W.C., Katinakis P., Bisseling T., Franssen H. Characterization of the soybean early nodulin cDNA clone GmENOD55. Plant Mol. Biol. 22:1993;1167-1171.
12. Feldheim D.A., Kim Y.I., Bergemann A.D., Frisen J., Barbacid M., Flanagan J.G. Genetic analysis of ephrin-A2 and ephrin-A5 shows their requirement in multiple aspects of retinocollicular mapping. Neuron. 25:2000;563-574.
13. Flanagan J., Vanderhaeghen P. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2:1998;309-345.
14. Flenniken A.M., Gale N.W., Yancopoulos G.D., Wilkinson D.G. Distinct and overlapping expression patterns of ligands for Eph-related receptor tyrosine kinases during mouse embryogenesis. Dev. Biol. 179:1996;382-401.
15. Fruhling M., Hohnjec N., Schroder G., Kuster H., Puhler A., Perlick A.M. Genomic organization and expression properties of the VfENOD5 gene from broad bean (Vicia faba L.). Plant Sci. 155:2000;169-178.
16. Gale N.W., Yancopoulos G.D. Ephrins and their receptors. a repulsive topic? Cell Tissue Res. 290:1997;227-241.
17. Gale N., Holland S., Valenzuela D., Flenniken A., Pan L., Ryan T., Henkemeyer M., Strebhardt K., Hirai H., Wilkinson D.et al. Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis. Neuron. 17:1996;9-19.
18. Gram H., Schmitz R., Ridder R. Secretion of scFv antibody fragments. Higgins D., Cregg J. Pichia Protocols. 1998;Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. 179-192.pp.
19. Greene E., Erard M., Dedieu A., Barker D. MtENOD16 and 20 are members of a family of phytocyanin-related early nodulins. Plant Mol. Biol. 36:1998;775-783.
20. Guss J., Merritt E., Phizackerley R., Freeman H. The structure of a phytocyanin, the basic blue protein from cucumber, refined at 1.8 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 262:1996;686-705.
21. Hart P.J., Nersissian A.M., Herrmann R.G., Nalbandyan R.M., Valentine J.S., Eisenberg D. A missing link in cupredoxins. crystal structure of cucumber stellacyanin at 1.6 A resolution Protein Sci. 5:1996;2175-2183.
22. Hattori M., Osterfield M., Flanagan J. Regulated cleavage of a contact-mediated axon repellent. Science. 289:2000;1360-1365.
23. Henikoff J., Henikoff S. Blocks database and its applications. Methods Enzymol. 266:1996;88-105.
24. Himanen J., Henkemeyer M., Nikolov D. Crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of the receptor tyrosine kinase EphB2. Nature. 396:1998;486-491.
25. Hirai H., Maru Y., Hagiwara K., Nishida J., Takaku F. A novel putative tyrosine kinase receptor encoded by the eph gene. Science. 238:1987;1717-1720.
26. Holm L., Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233:1993;123-138.
27. Holmberg J., Clarke D., Frisen J. Regulation of repulsion versus adhesion by different splice forms of an Eph receptor. Nature. 408:2000;203-206.
28. Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure. pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features Biopolymers. 22:1983;2577-2637.
29. Kraulis P. Molscript. a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24:1991;946-950.
30. Kullander K., Mather N.K., Diella F., Dottori M., Boyd A.W., Klein R. Kinase-dependent and kinase-independent functions of EphA4 receptors in major axon tract formation in vivo. Neuron. 29:2001;73-84.
31. La Fortelle E.D., Bricogne G. Maximum-likelihood heavy-atom parameter refinement in the MIR and MAD methods. Methods Enzymol. 276:1997;472-494.
32. Lackmann M., Mann R.J., Kravets L., Smith F.M., Bucci T.A., Maxwell K.F., Howlett G.J., Olsson J.E., Vanden Bos T., Cerretti D.P., Boyd A.W. Ligand for EPH-related kinase (LERK) 7 is the preferred high affinity ligand for the HEK receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;16521-16530.
33. Lackmann M., Oates A.C., Dottori M., Smith F.M., Do C., Power M., Kravets L., Boyd A.W. Distinct subdomains of the EphA3 receptor mediate ligand binding and receptor dimerization. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1998;20228-20237.
34. Lambright D.G., Sondek J., Bohm A., Skiba N.P., Hamm H.E., Sigler P.B. The 2.0 A crystal structure of a heterotrimeric G protein. Nature. 379:1996;311-319.
35. Lo Conte L., Chothia C., Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 285:1999;177-198.
36. Madej T., Gibrat J.F., Bryant S.H. Threading a database of protein cores. Proteins. 23:1995;356-369.
37. Mellitzer G., Xu Q., Wilkinson D.G. Control of cell behaviour by signalling through Eph receptors and ephrins. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10:2000;400-408.
38. Nicholls A., Sharp K., Honig B. Protein folding and association. insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons Proteins. 11:1991;281-296.
39. Otwinowski Z., Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276:1997;307-326.
40. Perrakis A., Sixma T., Wilson K., Lamzin V. wARP. improvement and extension of crystallographic phases by weighted averaging of multiple refined dummy atomic models Acta Crystallogr. D. 53:1997;448-455.
41. Roussel A., Cambillau C. Turbo Frodo. In Silicon Graphics Geometry Partners Directory. 1991;Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, CA. p. 86.
42. Scully A.L., McKeown M., Thomas J.B. Isolation and characterization of Dek, a Drosophila eph receptor protein tyrosine kinase. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 13:1999;337-347.
43. Smalla M., Schmieder P., Kelly M., Ter Laak A., Krause G., Ball L., Wahl M., Bork P., Oschkinat H. Solution structure of the receptor tyrosine kinase EphB2 SAM domain and identification of two distinct homotypic interaction sites. Protein Sci. 8:1999;1954-1961.
44. Stapleton D., Balan I., Pawson T., Sicheri F. The crystal structure of an Eph receptor SAM domain reveals a mechanism for modular dimerization. Nat.Struct. Biol. 6:1999;44-49.
45. Stein E., Lane A., Cerretti D., Schoecklmann H., Schroff A., Van Etten R., Daniel T. Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses. Genes Dev. 12:1998;667-678.
46. Suga H., Koyanagi M., Hoshiyama D., Ono K., Iwabe N., Kuma K., Miyata T. Extensive gene duplication in the early evolution of animals before the parazoan-eumetazoan split demonstrated by G proteins and protein tyrosine kinases from sponge and hydra. J. Mol. Evol. 48:1999;646-653.
47. Terwilliger T., Berendzen J. Automated MAD and MIR structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D. 55:1999;849-861.
48. Thanos C., Goodwill K., Bowie J. Oligomeric structure of the human EphB2 receptor SAM domain. Science. 283:1999;833-836.
49. Torres R., Firestein B.L., Dong H., Staudinger J., Olson E.N., Huganir R.L., Bredt D.S., Gale N.W., Yancopoulos G.D. PDZ proteins bind, cluster, and synaptically colocalize with Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands. Neuron. 21:1998;1453-1463.
50. Wang X., Roy P., Holland S., Zhang L., Culotti J., Pawson T. Multiple ephrins control cell organization in C. elegans using kinase-dependent and -independent functions of the VAB-1 Eph receptor. Mol. Cell. 4:1999;903-913.
51. Weeks C., Miller R. Optimizing Shake-and-Bake for proteins. Acta Crystallogr. D. 55:1999;492-500.
52. Wiesmann C., Muller Y.A., de Vos A.M. Ligand-binding sites in Ig-like domains of receptor tyrosine kinases. J. Mol. Med. 78:2000;247-260.
53. Wilkinson D.G. Eph receptors and ephrins. regulators of guidance and assembly Int. Rev. Cytol. 196:2000;177-244.
54. Yoshizaki M., Furumoto T., Hata S., Shinozaki M., Izui K. Characterization of a novel gene encoding a phytocyanin-related protein in morning glory (Pharbitis nil). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 268:2000;466-470.