Solution structure of the receptor tyrosine kinase EphB2 SAM domain and identification of two distinct homotypic interaction sites

Protein Science

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 1954-1961

  Smalla, Maika ^a   Schmieder, Peter ^a   Kelly, Mark ^a   Laak, Antonius Ter ^a   Krause, Gerd ^a   Ball, Linda ^a   Wahl, Martin ^a   Bork, Peer ^b   Oschkinat, Hartmut ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUT FÜR MOLEKULARE PHARMAKOLOGIE   (Germany)

^b EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Eph receptor; Oligomerization; SAM domain; Tyrosine phosphorylation

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CELL PROTEIN; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE; TETRAMER; TYROSINE;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL CONTACT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME STRUCTURE; OLIGOMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

EID: 0032881609     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.8.10.1954     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Barr MM, Tu L, Van Aelst L, Wigler M. 1996. Identification of Ste4 as a potential regulator of Byr2 in the sexual response pathway of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol 16:5597-5603.
2. 1H and 13C spectra of 13C enriched proteins. J Magn Reson 88:425-431.
3. Bork P, Koonin EV. 1998. Predicting functions from protein sequences - where are the bottlenecks. Nature Genet 18:313-318.
4. Braunschweiler L, Ernst RR. 1983. Coherence transfer by isotropic mixing: Application to proton correlation spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 53:521-528.
5. Brückner K, Pasquale EB, Klein R. 1997. Tyrosine phosphorylation of transmembrane ligands for Eph receptors. Science 275:1640-1643.
6. Brünger T. 1992. X-PLOR version 3.1. A system for X-ray crystallography and NMR. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
7. Cavanagh J, Rance M. 1992. Suppression of cross-relaxation effects in TOCSY spectra via a modified DIPSI-2 mixing sequence. J Magn Reson 96:670-678.
8. Clore GM, Gronenborn AM. 1991. Application of three-and four-dimensional heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy to protein structure determination. Prog NMR Spectrosc 23:43-92.
9. Davis S, Gale NW, Aldrich TH, Maisonpierre PC, Lhotak V, Pawson T, Goldfarb M, Yancopoulos GD. 1994. Ligands for Eph-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. Science 266:816-819.
10. Eph Nomenclature Committee. 1997. Cell 90:403.
11. Fletcher CM, Jones DNM, Diamond R, Neuhaus D. 1996. Treatment of NOE constraints involving equivalent or nonstereoassigned protons in calculations of biomacromolecular structures. J Biomol NMR 8:292-310.
12. Gemmecker G, Jahnke W, Kessler H. 1993. MEXICO: Measurement of proton exchange rates in isotropically labeled compounds. J Am Chem Soc 115: 11620-11621.
13. Grzesiek S, Bax A. 1992a. Correlating backbone amide and side chain resonances in large proteins by multiple relay triple resonance NMR. J Am Chem Soc 114:6291-6293.
14. Grzesiek S, Bax A. 1992b. An efficient experiment for sequential backbone assignment of medium sized isotopically enriched proteins. J Magn Reson 99:201-207.
15. 15N enriched proteins. J Biomol NMR 3:185-204.
16. Holland SJ, Gale NW, Mbamalu G, Yancopoulos GD, Henkemeyer M, Pawson T. 1996. Bidirectional signaling through the Eph-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands. Nature 383:722-725.
17. Holm L, Sander C. 1993. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 233:123-138.
18. Jeener J, Meier BH, Bachmann P, Ernst RR. 1979. Investigation of exchange processes by two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. J Chem Phys 71:4546-4553.
19. Kay LE, Ikura M, Bax A. 1990. Proton-proton correlation via carbon-carbon couplings: A three-dimensional NMR approach for the assignment of aliphatic resonances in proteins labeled with carbon-13. J Am Chem Soc 112:888-889.
20. Koradi R, Billeter M, Wüthrich K. 1996. MOLMOL: A program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graphics 14:51-55.
21. 1H two-dimensional NMR spectra by interactive computer graphics. J Magn Reson 84:627-633.
22. Kuo C-F, McRee DE, Fisher CL, O'Handley SF, Cunningham RP, Tainer JA. 1992. Atomic structure of the DNA repair [4Fe-4S] enzyme endonuclease III. Science 258:435-441.
23. Kyba M, Brock HW. 1998. The SAM domain of polyhomeotic, RAE28, and Scm mediates specific interactions through conserved residues. Dev Genet 22:74-84.
24. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. 1993. PROCHECK: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 26:283-291.
25. Montelione GT, Lyons BA, Emerson SD, Tashiro M. 1992. An efficient triple resonance experiment using carbon-13 isotropic mixing for the determining sequence-specific resonance assignment of isotropically-enriched proteins. J Am Chem Soc 114:6291-6293.
26. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Cottina C. 1995. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequence and structures. J Mol Biol 247:536-540.
27. Nilges M, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. 1988. Determination of three-dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by hybrid distance-dynamical simulated annealing calculations. FEBS Lett 239: 129-136.
28. Orioli D, Klein R. 1997. The Eph receptor family: Axonal guidance by contact repulsion. Trends Genet 13:354-359.
29. Piantini U, Sørensen DW, Ernst RR. 1982. Multiple quantum filter for elucidating NMR coupling networks. J Am Chem Soc 104:6800-6801.
30. Ponting CP. 1995. SAM: A novel motif in yeast sterile and Drosophila polyhomeotic proteins. Protein Sci 4:1928-1930.
31. Rafferty JB, Sedelnikova SE, Hargreaves D, Artymiuk PJ, Baker PJ, Sharples GJ, Mahdi AA, Lloyd RG, Rice DW. 1996. Crystal structure of DNA recombination protein RuvA and a model for its binding to the holliday junction. Science 274:415-421.
32. Sawaya MR, Pelletier H, Kumar A, Wilson SH, Kraut J. 1994. Crystal structure of a rat DNA polymerase b: Evidence for a common polymerase mechanism. Science 264:1930-1935.
33. Schultz J, Ponting CP, Hofmann K, Bork P. 1997. SAM as a protein interaction domain involved in developmental regulation. Protein Sci 6:249-253.
34. Stapleton D, Balan I, Pawson T, Sicheri F. 1999 The crystal structure of an Eph receptor SAM domain reveals a mechanism for modular dimerization. Nature Struct Biol 6:44-49.
35. Stein E, Cerretti DP, Daniel TO. 1996. Ligand activation of ELK receptor tyrosine kinase promotes its association with Grb10 and Grb2 in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 271:23588-23593.
36. Stein E, Lane AA, Cerretti DP, Schoecklmann HO, Schroff AD, Van Etten RL, Daniel TO. 1998. Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses. Genes Dev 12:667-678.
37. Thanos CD, Goodwill KE, Bowie JU. 1999. Oligomeric structure of the human EphB2 receptor SAM Domain. Science 283:833-836.