History, rhetoric, and reality: Analysis of the inclusion debate

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 279-296

  Kavale, Kenneth A ^a   Forness, Steven R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034340099     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074193250002100505     Document Type: Article

References (191)

1. Abeson, A., Burgdorf, R. L., Casey, P. J., Kunz, J. W., & McNeil, W. (1975). Access to opportunity. In N. Hobbs (Ed.), Issues in the classification of children (Vol. 2, pp. 270-292). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Albinger, P. (1995). Stories from the resource room: Piano lessons, imaginary illness, and broken-down cars. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 615-621.
3. Alexander, C., & Strain, P. S. (1978). A review of educators' attitudes toward handicapped children and the concept of mainstreaming. Psychology in the Schools, 15, 390-396.
4. Alves, A. J., & Gottlieb, J. (1986). Teacher interactions with mainstreamed handicapped students and their nonhandicapped peers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 77-83.
5. Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. (1992, July). CEC slips back; ASCD steps forward. TASH Newsletter, 18, 1.
6. Bacon, E. H., & Schulz, J. B. (1991). A survey of mainstreaming practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 144-149.
7. Bain, A., & Dolbel, S. (1991). Regular and special education principals' perceptions of an integration program for students who are intellectually handicapped. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 33-42.
8. Baker, J. M., & Zigmond, N. (1990). Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities? Exceptional Children, 56, 515-526.
9. Baker, J. M., & Zigmond, N. (1995). The meaning and practices of inclusion for students with learning disabilities: Implications from the five cases. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 163-180.
10. Banerji, M., & Dailey, R. A. (1995). A study of the effects of an inclusion model on with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 511-522.
11. Barnett, C., & Monda-Amaya, L. E. (1998). Principals' knowledge of and attitudes toward inclusion. Remedial one Special Education, 19, 181-192.
12. Bateman, B., & Chard, D. J. (1995). Legal demands and constraints on placement decisions. In J. M. Kauffman, J. W. Lloyd, P. Hallahan, & T. A. Astuto (Eds.), Issues in educational placement: Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 285-316). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Bauman, Z. (1987). Legislators and interpreters: Modernity, post-modernity, and intellectuals. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14. Bear, G. G., Clever, A., & Proctor, W. A. (1991). Self-perceptions of nonhandicapped children and children with learning disabilities in integrated classes. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 409-429.
15. Bender, W. N., Vail, C. O., & Scott, K. (1995). Teachers' attitudes toward increased mainstreaming: Implementing effective instruction for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 87-94.
16. Bennett, T., DeLuca, D., & Bruns, D. (1997). Putting inclusion into practice: Perspectives of teachers and parents. Exceptional Children, 64, 115-131.
17. Berryman, J. D. (1989). Attitudes of the public toward educational mainstreaming. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 44-49.
18. Biklen, D. (Ed.). (1985). Achieving the complete school: Strategies for effective mainstreaming. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Blanton, L. P., Blanton, W. E., & Cross, L. S. (1994). An exploratory study of how general and special education teachers think and make instructional decisions about students with special needs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 62-73.
20. Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Palmer, D. S., & Lane, K. L. (1996). One size doesn't fit all: Full inclusion and individual differences. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 311-329.
21. Brantlinger, E. (1997). Using ideology: Cases of nonrecognition of the politics of research and practice in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67, 425-459.
22. Brown v. Board of Education, 74 S. Ct. 686. (1954).
23. Brucker, P. O. (1994). The advantages of inclusion for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 581-582.
24. Bryan, J. H., & Bryan, T. H. (1988). Where's the beef? A review of published research on the Adaptive Learning Environments Model. Learning Disabilities Focus, 4, 9-14.
25. Carlberg, C., & Kavale, K. A. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 14, 295-309.
26. Carlson, E., & Parshall, L. (1996). Academic, social, and behavioral adjustment for students declassified from special education. Exceptional Children, 63, 89-100.
27. Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. In J. Lloyd, E. Kameenui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 363-373). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Carr, M. N. (1993). A mother's thoughts on inclusion. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 590-592.
29. Cartwright, W. J., & Burtis, T. R. (1968). Race and intelligence: Changing opinions in social science. Social Science Quarterly, 49, 603-618.
30. Center, Y., Ward, J., Parmenter, T., & Nash, R. (1985). Principals' attitudes towards the integration of disabled children into regular schools. The Exceptional Child, 32, 149-160.
31. Chow, V. T., & Kasari, C. (1999). Task-related interactions among teachers and exceptional, at-risk, and typical learners in inclusive classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 226-232.
32. Christopolos, F., & Renz, P. (1969). A critical examination of special education programs. The Journal of Special Education, 3, 371-379.
33. Cline, R. (1981). Principals' attitudes and knowledge about handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 48, 172-174.
34. Coates, R. D. (1989). The Regular Education Initiative and opinions of regular classroom teachers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 532-536.
35. Cohen, M. (1993). The politics of special ed. The Special Educator, 8, 266.
36. Contas, M. A. (1998). The changing nature of educational research a critique of postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 27, 26-33.
37. Cook, B. G., Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I. (1997). Are effective school reforms effective for all students? The implications of joint outcome production for school reform. Exceptionality, 7, 77-95.
38. Cook, B. G., & Semmel, M. I. (1999). Peer acceptance of included students with disabilities as a function of severity of disability and classroom composition. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 50-61.
39. Cook, B. G., Semmel, M. I., & Gerber, M. M. (1999). Attitudes of principals and special education teachers toward the inclusion of students with mild disabilities: Critical differences of opinion. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 199-207, 243.
40. Cornoldi, C., Terreni, A., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Teacher attitudes in Italy after twenty years of inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 350-356.
41. Council for Exceptional Children. (1993, April). Statement on inclusive schools and communities. Reston, VA: Author.
42. Council of Chief State School Officers. (1992, March). Special education and school restructuring. Concerns, 35, 1-7.
43. Danforth, S. (1997). On what basis hope? Modern progress and postmodern possibilities. Mental Retardation, 35, 93-106.
44. Danforth, S., & Rhodes, W. C. (1997). Deconstructing disability: A philosophy for inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 357-366.
45. Danielson, L. C., & Bellamy, G. T. (1989). State variation in placement of children with handicaps in segregated environments. Exceptional Children, 55, 448-455.
46. Davis, J. C., & Maheady, L. (1991). The Regular Education Initiative: What do three groups of education professionals think? Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 211-220.
47. Davis, W. E. (1980). Public schools principals' attitudes toward mainstreaming retarded pupils. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 15, 174-178.
48. de Bettencourt, L. V. (1999). General educators' attitudes toward students with mild disabilities and their use of instructional strategies. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 27-35.
49. Deno, E. (1970). Special education as developmental capital. Exceptional Children, 37, 229-237.
50. Deno, E. (1994). Special education as developmental capital revisited: A quarter-century appraisal of means versus ends. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 375-392.
51. Deno, S. L., Foegen, A. M., Robinson, S., & Espin, C. A. (1996). Commentary: Facing the realities of inclusion: Students with mild disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 62, 497-514.
52. Deutsch, M. (1969). Happenings on the way back from the forum: Social science, IQ, and race revisited. Harvard Educational Review, 39, 523-554.
53. Donaldson, J. (1980). Changing attitudes toward handicapped persons: A review and analysis of research. Exceptional Children, 46, 504-514.
54. Dorn, S., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1996). A historical perspective on special education reform. Theory Into Practice, 35, 12-19.
55. Downing, J. E., Eichinger, J., & Williams, L. J. (1997). Inclusive education for students with severe disabilities: Comparative views of principals and educators at different levels of implementation. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 133-142, 165.
56. Dunn, L. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded - Is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children, 35, 5-22.
57. Eagleton, T. (1996). Illusion of postmodernism. London: Blackwell.
58. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq.
59. Ellet, L. (1993). Instructional practices in mainstreamed secondary classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 57-64.
60. Espin, C. A., Deno, S. L., & Albayrak-Kaymak, D. (1998). Individualized Education Programs in resource and inclusive settings: How "individualized" are they? The Journal of Special Education, 32, 164-174.
61. Esposito, B. G., & Reed, T. M. (1986). The effects of contact with handicapped persons on young children's attitudes. Exceptional Children, 53, 224-229.
62. Evans, I. M., Salisbury, C. L., Palombaro, M. M., Berryman, J., & Hollowood, T. M. (1992). Peer interactions and social competence of elementary-age children with severe disabilities in an inclusive school. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 205-217.
63. Eysenck, H. J. (1971). The IQ argument: Race, intelligence, and education. New York: Library Press.
64. Ferguson, D. L. (1996). Is it inclusion yet? Bursting the bubbles. In M. S. Berres, D. L. Ferguson, P. Knoblock, & C. Woods (Eds.), Creating tomorrow's schools today: Stories of inclusion, change, and renewal (pp. 16-37). New York: Teachers College Press.
65. Fisher, J. B., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1995). Searching for validated inclusive practices: A review of the literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28, 1-20.
66. Fox, N. E., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1997). Implementing inclusion at the middle school level: Lessons from a negative example. Exceptional Children, 64, 81-98.
67. Fryxell, D., & Kennedy, C. (1995). Placement along the continuum of services and its impact on students' social relationships. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 259-269.
68. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1988). An evaluation of the Adaptive Learning Environments Model. Exceptional Children, 55, 115-127.
69. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1991). Framing the REI debate: Abolitionists versus conservationists. In J. W. Lloyd, A. C. Repp, & N. N. Singh (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 241-255). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
70. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294-309.
71. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1995a). Special education can work. In J. M. Kauffman, J. W. Lloyd, D. P. Hallahan, & T. A. Astuto (Eds.), Issues in educational placement: Students with emotional and behavior disorders (pp. 363-377). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1995b). What's "special" about special education? Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 22-30.
73. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Fernstrom, P. (1993). A conservative approach to special education reform: Mainstreaming through transenvironmental programming and curriculum-based measurement. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 149-177.
74. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., & Karns, K. (1995). General educators' specialized adaptation for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61, 440-459.
75. Gallagher, J. J. (1994). The pull of societal forces on special education. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 521-530.
76. Gans, K. D. (1987). Willingness of regular and special educators to teach students with handicaps. Exceptional Children, 54, 41-45.
77. Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D. K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 367-390.
78. Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D. K. (1989). The yoke of special education: How to break it. Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.
79. Garvar-Pinhas, A., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1989). Administrators' and teachers' attitudes toward mainstreaming. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 38-43.
80. Gerard, H. B. (1983). School desegregation: The social science role. American Psychologist, 38, 869-877.
81. Gerber, M. M. (1996). Reforming special education: "Beyond inclusion." In C. Christensen & F. Rizvi (Eds.), Disability and the dilemmas of education and justice (pp. 156-174). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
82. Gersten, R., Walker, H., & Darch, C. (1988). Relationships between teachers' effectiveness and their tolerance for handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 54, 433-438.
83. Giangreco, M. F., Dennis, R., Cloninger, C., Edelman, S., & Schattman, R. (1993). "I've counted Jon": Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 359-372.
84. Gibb, G. S., Young, J. R., Allred, K. W., Dyches, T. T., Egan, M. W., & Ingram, C. F. (1997). A team-based junior high inclusion program: Parent perceptions and feedback. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 243-249, 256.
85. Glicking, E. E., & Theobald, J. T. (1975). Mainstreaming: Affect or effect? The Journal of Special Education, 9, 317-328.
86. Goldstein, H. (1967). The efficacy of special classes and regular classes in the education of educable mentally retarded children. In J. Zubin & G. A. Jervis (Eds.), Psychopathology of mental development (pp. 580-602). New York: Grune & Stratton.
87. Goldstein, H., Moss, J. W., & Jordan, L. S. (1965). The efficacy of special class training on the development of mentally retarded children (U.S. Office of Education, Cooperative Research Project No. 619). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Institute for Research on Exceptional Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 002 907)
88. Gottlieb, J. (1981). Mainstreaming: Fulfilling the promise? American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 115-126.
89. Gottlieb, J., & Corman, L. (1975). Public attitudes toward mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 72-80.
90. Green, S. K., & Shinn, M. R. (1994). Parent attitudes about special education and reintegration: What is the role of student outcomes? Exceptional Children, 61, 269-281.
91. Griffin, D. R. (Ed.). (1988). The reenchantment of science: Postmodern proposals. Albany: State University of New York Press.
92. Gross, P. R., & Levitt, N. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
93. Grove, K. A., & Fisher, D. (1999). Entrepreneurs of meaning: Parents and the process of inclusive education. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 208-215, 256.
94. Guskin, S. L., & Spicker, H. H. (1968). Educational research in mental retardation. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 3, pp. 217-278). New York: Academic Press.
95. Guterman, B. R. (1995). The validity of categorical learning disabilities services: The consumer's view. Exceptional Children, 62, 111-124.
96. Hall, L. J. (1994). A descriptive assessment of social relationships in integrated classrooms. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 280-286.
97. Hallahan, D. P., Keller, C. E., McKinney, J. D., Lloyd, J. W., & Bryan, T. (1988). Examining the research base of the Regular Education Initiative: Efficacy studies and the Adaptive Learning Enviornments Model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 29-35, 55.
98. Hammill, D. D., & Wiederholt, J. L. (1972). The resource room: Rationale and implementation. Philadelphia: JSE Press.
99. Hannah, M. E., & Pliner, S. (1983). Teacher attitudes toward handicapped children. A review and syntheses. School Psychology Review, 12, 12-25.
100. Harwood, J. (1976). The race-intelligence controversy: A sociological approach I - External factors. Social Studies of Science, 6, 369-394.
101. Harwood, J. (1977). The race-intelligence controversy: A sociological approach II - External factors. Social Studies of Science, 7, 1-30.
102. Heller, K., Holtzman, W., & Messick, S. (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press.
103. Heller, W. H., & Schilit, J. (1987). The Regular Education Initiative: A concerned response. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20, 1-6.
104. Helmstetter, E., Peck, C. A., & Giangreco, M. F. (1994). Outcomes of interactions with peers with moderate or severe disabilities: A state-wide survey of high school students. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 263-276.
105. Hendrickson, J. M., Shokoohi-Yekta, M., Hamre-Nietupski, S., & Gable, R. A. (1996). Middle and high school students' perceptions on being friends with peers with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 19-28.
106. Hirsch, J. (1975). Jensenism: The bankruptcy of "science" without scholarship. Educational Theory, 25, 3-28.
107. Hernstein, R. J. (1973). IQ in the meritocracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
108. Hirshoren, A., & Burton, T. E. (1979). Willingness of regular teachers to participate in mainstreaming handicapped children. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 93-100.
109. Home, M. D. (1985). Altitudes toward handicapped students: Professional, peer, and parent reactions. Hilisdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
110. Houck, C. K., & Rogen, C. J. (1994). The special/general education integration initiative for students with specific learning disabilities: A "snapshot" of program change. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 58-62.
111. Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (1997). Research on inclusive educational programs, practices, and outcomes for students with severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 3-29.
112. Idol, L. (1997). Key questions related to building collaborative and inclusive schools. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 384-394.
113. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.
114. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Regulations of 1992, 34 C.F.R., § 300.533.
115. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq.
116. Janney, R. E., Snell, M. E., Beers, M. K., & Raynes, M. (1995). Integrating students with moderate and severe disabilities into general education classes. Exceptional Children, 61, 425-439.
117. Jenkins, J. R., & Keinen, A. (1989). Students' preferences for service delivery: Pull-out, in-class, or integrated models. Exceptional Children, 60, 6-16.
118. Jenkins, J. R., Pious, C. G., & Jewell, M. (1990). Special education and the Regular Education Initiative: Basic assumptions. Exceptional Children, 56, 479-491.
119. Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123.
120. Johnson, G. O. (1962). Special education for the mentally handicapped: A paradox. Exceptional Children, 19, 62-69.
121. Johnson, L. J., & Pugach, M. C. (1990). Classroom teachers' views of intervention strategies for learning and behavior problems: Which are reasonable and how frequently are they used? The Journal of Special Education, 24, 69-84.
122. Jordan, A., Lindsay, L., & Stanovich, P. J. (1997). Classroom teachers' instructional interactions with students who are exceptional, at risk, and typically achieving. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 82-93.
123. Katsiyannis, A., Conderman, G., & Franks, D. J. (1995). State practices on inclusion: A national review. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 279-287.
124. Kauffman, J. M. (1989). The Regular Education Initiative as Reagan-Bush educational policy: A trickle-down theory of education of the hard-to-teach. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 256-278.
125. Kauffman, J. M. (1993). How we might achieve the radical reform of special education. Exceptional Children, 60, 6-16.
126. Kauffman, J. M. (1995). Why we must celebrate a diversity of restrictive environments. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 225-232.
127. Kauffman, J. M. (1999). Commentary: Today's special education and its messages for tomorrow. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 244-254.
128. Kauffman, J. M., Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I. (1988). Arguable assumptions underlying the Regular Education Initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 6-11.
129. Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (Eds.). (1995). The illusion of full inclusion: A comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
130. Kaufman, M. J., Agard, J. A., & Semmel, M. I. (1986). Mainstreaming: Learners and their environment. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
131. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1999). Efficacy of special education and related services. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
132. Kavale, K. A., & Glass, G. V. (1984). Meta-analysis and policy decisions in special education. In B. K. Keogh (Ed.), Advances in special education (Vol. 4, pp. 195-248). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
133. Kearny, C. A., & Durand, V. M. (1992). How prepared are our teachers for mainstreamed classroom settings? A survey of postsecondary schools of education in New York State. Exceptional Children, 58, 8-11.
134. King-Sears, M. E. (1997). Best academic practices for inclusive classrooms. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29, 1-22.
135. King-Sears, M. E., & Cummings, C. S. (1996). Inclusive practices of classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 217-225.
136. Kirk, S. A. (1964). Research in education. In H. A. Stevens & R. Heber (Eds.), Mental retardation: A review of research (pp. 57-99). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
137. Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Cohen, P., & Forgan, J. W. (1998). Inclusion or pull-out: Which do students prefer? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 148-158.
138. Koertge, M. (Ed.). (1998). A house built on sand: Exposing postmodernist myths about science. New York: Oxford University Press.
139. Korinek, L., McLaughlin, V., & Walther-Thomas, C. S. (1995). Least restrictive environment and collaboration: A bridge over troubled waters. Preventing School Failure, 39, 6-12.
140. Kozleski, E. B., & Jackson, L. (1993). Taylor's story: Full inclusion in her neighborhood elementary school. Exceptionality, 4, 153-176.
141. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
142. Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programs. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
143. Landesman, S., & Butterfield, E. C. (1987). Normalization and deinstitutionalization of mentally retarded individuals: Controversy and facts. American Psychologist, 42, 809-816.
144. Larrivee, B., & Cook, L. (1979). Mainstreaming: A study of the variables affecting teacher attitude. The Journal of Special Education, 13, 315-324.
145. Lazar, A. L., Stodden, R. L., & Sullivan, N. V. (1976). A comparison of attitudes held by male and female future school administrators toward instructional goals, personal adjustment, and the handicapped. Rehabilitation Literature, 37, 198-222.
146. Learning Disabilities Association. (1993, January). Position paper on full inclusion of all students with learning disabilities in the regular education classroom. LDA Newsbriefs, 28, 1-2.
147. Leinhardt, G., & Pallay, A. (1982). Restrictive educational settings: Exile or haven? Review of Educational Research, 52, 557-578.
148. Lewontin, R. C. (1970). Race and intelligence. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist, 26, 2-8.
149. Lieberman, L. M. (1985). Special education and regular education: A merger made in heaven? Exceptional Children, 51, 513-516.
150. Lieberman, L. M. (1996). Preserving special education . . . for those who need it. In W Stainback & S. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education (pp. 16-27). Needham Heights, PA: Allyn & Bacon.
151. Lilly, M. S. (1970). Special education: A teapot in a tempest. Exceptional Children, 37, 43-49.
152. Lilly, M. S. (1988). The Regular Education Initiative: A force for change in general and special education. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 253-260.
153. Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1987). Capable of achievement and worthy of respect: Education for handicapped students as if they were full-fledged human beings. Exceptional Children, 54, 69-74.
154. Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (Eds.). (1989). Beyond separate education: Quality education for all. Baltimore: Brookes.
155. Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1991). Restructuring for quality. In J. W. Lloyd, A. C. Repp, & N. N. Singh (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 43-56). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
156. Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1996). Equity requires inclusion: The future for all students with disabilities. In C. Christensen & F. Rizvi (Eds.), Disability and the dilemmas of education and justice (pp. 144-155). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
157. Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (Eds.). (1997). Inclusion and school reform: Transforming American classrooms. Baltimore: Brookes.
158. Loehlin, J. C., Lindzey, G., & Spuhler, J. N. (1975). Race differences in intelligence. San Francisco: Freeman.
159. Lovitt, T. C., & Cushing, S. (1999). Parents of youth with disabilities: Their perceptions of school programs. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 134-142.
160. Lovitt, T. C., Plavins, M., & Cushing, S. (1999). What do pupils with disabilities have to say about their experience in high school? Remedial and Special Education, 20, 67-76, 83.
161. MacMillan, D. L. (1971). Special education for the mildly retarded: Servant or savant? Focus on Exceptional Children, 2, 1-11.
162. MacMillan, D. L., Gresbam, F. M., & Forness, S. R. (1996). Full inclusion: An empirical perspective. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 145-159.
163. MacMillan, D. L., & Hendrick, I. G. (1993). Evolution and legacies. In J. I. Goodlad & T. C. Lovitt (Eds.), Integrating general and special education (pp. 23-48). New York: Merrill.
164. MacMillan, D. L., & Semmel, M. I. (1977). Evaluation of mainstreaming programs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 9, 1-14.
165. MacMillan, D. L., Semmel, M. I., & Gerber, M. M. (1994). The social context of Dunn: Then and now. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 466-480.
166. Madden, N. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1983). Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 53, 519-569.
167. Mamlin, N. (1999). Despite best intentions: When inclusion fails. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 36-49.
168. Mandell, C. J., & Strain, P. S. (1978). An analysis of factors related to the attitudes of regular classroom teachers toward mainstreaming mildly handicapped children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 154-162.
169. Manset, G., & Semmel, M. I. (1997). Are inclusive programs for students with mild disabilities effective? A comparative review of model programs. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 155-180.
170. Margolis, H., & McGettigan, J. (1988). Managing resistance to instructional modifications in mainstreamed environments. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 15-21.
171. Marston, D. (1996). A comparison of inclusion only, pull-out only, and combined service models for students with mild disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 121-132.
172. Martin, E. W. (1995). Case studies on inclusion: Worst fears realized. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 192-199.
173. McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Haager, D., & Lee, O. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60, 249-261.
174. McLesky, J., & Pugach, M. C. (1995). The real sellout: Failing to give inclusion a chance. A response to Roberts and Mather. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 233-238.
175. Meredith, B., & Underwood, J. (1995). Irreconcilable differences? Defining the rising conflict between regular and special education. Journal of Law and Education, 24, 195-226.
176. Minke, K. M., Bear, G. G., Deemer, S. A., & Griffin, S. M. (1996). Teachers' experiences with inclusive classrooms: Implications for special education reform. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 152-186.
177. Morsink, C. V., Lenk, L. L. (1992). The delivery of special education programs and services. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 33-43.
178. Munson, S. M. (1986-1987). Regular education teacher modifications for mainstreamed mildly handicapped students. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 490-499.
179. Myles, B. S., & Simpson, R. L. (1989). Regular educators' modification preferences for mainstreaming mildly handicapped children. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 479-489.
180. Naor, M., & Milgram, R. (1980). Two preservice strategies for preparing regular classroom teachers for mainstreaming. Exceptional Children, 47, 126-129.
181. National Association of State Boards of Education. (1992, October). Winners all: A call for inclusive schools. Washington, DC: Author.
182. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1993). A reaction to full inclusion: A reaffirmation of the right of students with learning disabilities to a continuum of services. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 596.
183. O'Neil, J. (1994-1995). Can inclusion work? A conversation with Jim Kauffman and Mara Sapon-Shevin. Educational Leadership, 52, 7-11.
184. Osborne, A. G., & DiMattia, P. (1994). The IDEA's least restrictive environment mandate: Legal implications. Exceptional Children, 61, 6-14.
185. Padeliadu, S., & Zigmond, N. (1996). Perspectives of students with learning disabilities about special education placement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 15-23.
186. Ysseldyke, J. E., Thurlow, M. L., Wotruba, J. W., & Nania, P. A. (1990). Instructional arrangements: Perceptions from general education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22, 4-7.
187. Yuker, H. E. (Ed.). (1988). Attitudes toward persons with disabilities. New York: Springer-Verlag.
188. Zigmond, N. (1997). Educating students with disabilities: The future of special education. In J. Lloyd, E. Kameenui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 377-390). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
189. Zigmond, N., & Baker, J. M. (1994). Is the mainstream a more appropriate educational setting for Randy? A case study of one student with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 108-117.
190. Zigmond, N., Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S., Fuchs, D., Baker, J. M., Jenkins, L., & Couthino, M. (1995). Special education in restructured schools: Findings from three multi-year studies. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 531-541.
191. Zirkel, P. (1996). Inclusion: Return of the pendulum? The Special Educator, 12, 1, 5.