Snapshots of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 320-325

  Buratowski, Stephen ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL ENZYME; RNA POLYMERASE II;

ENZYME STRUCTURE; GENE EXPRESSION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION;

EID: 0034065955     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00095-8     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Orphanides G., Lagrange T., Reinberg D. The general transcription factors of RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev. 10:1996;2657-2683.
2. Hampsey M., Reinberg D. RNA polymerase II as a control panel for multiple coactivator complexes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 9:1999;132-139.
3. ••], leads to an emerging model of the transcription elongation complex. The polymerase is 'crab claw' shaped, with four channels for entering DNA, exiting DNA, NTPs, and the existing transcript.
4. ••] leads to an emerging model of the transcription elongation complex.
5. Zhang G., Campbell E.A., Minakhin L., Richter C., Severinov K., Darst S.A. Crystal structure of Thermus aquaticus core RNA polymerase at 3.3 A resolution. Cell. 98:1999;811-824. A high resolution structure of bacterial RNA polymerase. This structure is likely to present an excellent model of conserved features within eukaryotic polymerases.
6. Coulombe B., Burton Z.F. DNA bending and wrapping around RNA polymerase: a 'revolutionary' model describing transcriptional mechanisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 63:1999;457-478.
7. Mooney R.A., Landick R. RNA polymerase unveiled. Cell. 98:1999;687-690.
8. Asturias F.J., Jiang Y.W., Myers L.C., Gustafsson C.M., Kornberg R.D. Conserved structures of mediator and RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Science. 283:1999;985-987. Electron microscopic imaging of the mediator complex, both alone and complexed to pol II, begins to reveal the shape of the mediator and suggest it undergoes a major conformation change upon pol II-binding.
9. Patikoglou G.A., Kim J.L., Sun L., Yang S.H., Kodadek T., Burley S.K. TATA element recognition by the TATA box-binding protein has been conserved throughout evolution. Genes Dev. 13:1999;3217-3230. This paper presents a series of crystal structures that demonstrates that TBP has a remarkable ability to accommodate a wide range of nonconsensus binding sites.
10. Littlefield O., Korkhin Y., Sigler P.B. The structural basis for the oriented assembly of a TBP/TFB/promoter complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:1999;13668-13673.
11. Xie X., Kokubo T., Cohen S.L., Mirza U.A., Hoffmann A., Chait B.T., Roeder R.G., Nakatani Y., Burley S.K. Structural similarity between TAFs and the heterotetrameric core of the histone octamer. Nature. 380:1996;316-322.
12. Nikolov D.B., Chen H., Halay E.D., Usheva A.A., Hisatake K., Lee D.K., Roeder R.G., Burley S.K. Crystal structure of a TFIIB-TBP-TATA element ternary complex. Nature. 377:1995;119-128.
13. Tan S., Hunziker Y., Sargent D.F., Richmond T.J. Crystal structure of a yeast TFIIA/TBP/DNA complex. Nature. 381:1996;127-151.
14. Geiger J.H., Hahn S., Lee S., Sigler P.B. Crystal structure of the yeast TFIIA/TBP/DNA complex. Science. 272:1996;830-836.
15. Gangloff Y.G., Werten S., Romier C., Carre L., Poch O., Moras D., Davidson I. The human TFIID components TAF(II)135 and TAF(II)20 and the yeast SAGA components ADA1 and TAF(II)68 heterodimerize to form histone-like pairs. Mol Cell Biol. 20:2000;340-351. Several TAFs are components of both TFIID and histone acetyltransferase complexes. This paper suggests that the histone H2B-like TAF may contact different proteins within each complex.
16. Birck C., Poch O., Romier C., Ruff M., Mengus G., Lavigne A.C., Davidson I., Moras D. Human TAF(II)28 and TAF(II)18 interact through a histone fold encoded by atypical evolutionary conserved motifs also found in the SPT3 family. Cell. 94:1998;239-249.
17. •] detail the first low resolution picture of TFIID structure using electron microscopy. A central domain containing TBP is flanked by two other domains in a roughly horse shoe shaped complex.
18. •], this paper shows low resolution structures of both TFIID and a TAF-containing HAT complex. The two structures are remarkably similar.
19. Brand M., Yamamoto K., Staub A., Tora L. Identification of TATA-binding protein-free TAFII-containing complex subunits suggests a role in nucleosome acetylation and signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 274:1999;18285-18289.
20. Ranish J.A., Yudkovsky N., Hahn S. Intermediates in formation and activity of the RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex: holoenzyme recruitment and a postrecruitment role for the TATA box and TFIIB. Genes Dev. 13:1999;49-63. The authors performed an in vitro analysis of transcription complex assembly using an immobilized template assay and various yeast transcription factor mutants and make a case for two kinetically stable intermediates. The first intermediate consists of TFIID and TFIIA bound to the promoter, the second is a fully assembled transcription complex.
21. Chou S., Chatterjee S., Lee M., Struhl K. Transcriptional activation in yeast cells lacking transcription factor IIA. Genetics. 153:1999;1573-1581.
22. Ellwood K., Huang W., Johnson R., Carey M. Multiple layers of cooperativity regulate enhanceosome-responsive RNA polymerase II transcription complex assembly. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;2613-2623.
23. Coleman R.A., Taggart A.K., Burma S., Chicca J.J.I.I., Pugh B.F. TFIIA regulates TBP and TFIID dimers. Mol Cell. 4:1999;451-457. Although TBP can dimerize in vitro, there was substantial skepticism about whether this has any physiological relevance. This paper and others from the same laboratory make a case for dimerization being important in vivo. In addition to its role in stabilization of TBP at the promoter, TFIIA is found to affect TBP's monomer-dimer transition.
24. Liu Q., Gabriel S.E., Roinick K.L., Ward R.D., Arndt K.M. Analysis of TFIIA function in vivo: evidence for a role in TATA-binding protein recruitment and gene-specific activation. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;8673-8685.
25. Orlando V. Mapping chromosomal proteins in vivo by formaldehyde-crosslinked-chromatin immunoprecipitations. Trends Biochem Sci. 25:2000;99-104.
26. Cosma M.P., Tanaka T., Nasmyth K. Ordered recruitment of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors to a cell cycle- and developmentally regulated promoter. Cell. 97:1999;299-311. This remarkable paper describes the uses of chromatin immunoprecipitation to monitor the dynamics of transcription-factor association following induction of the yeast HO gene. A clear, ordered arrival of activators, chromatin remodeling machinery, and histone acetyltransferase complexes allows a strong prediction of the events required to turn on expression of a gene.
27. ••], the authors monitored the association of TBP with promoters using chromatin immunoprecipitation. Crosslinking of TBP to promoters correlates strongly with transcription levels and is generally dependent upon activators and the mediator complex.
28. •], but they also show that TBP crosslinking is dependent upon TFIIB. TBP crosslinking shows promoter-specific effects of a TAF mutation. Furthermore, the Mot1 protein is shown to reduce levels of TBP crosslinking at uninduced genes and at nonpromoter sequences.
29. Auble D.T., Steggerda S.M. Testing for DNA tracking by MOT1, a SNF2/SWI2 protein family member. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;412-423.
30. Muldrow T.A., Campbell A.M., Weil P.A., Auble D.T. MOT1 can activate basal transcription in vitro by regulating the distribution of TATA binding protein between promoter and nonpromoter sites. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;2835-2845.
31. Mittal V., Ma B., Hernandez N. SNAP(c): a core promoter factor with a built-in DNA-binding damper that is deactivated by the Oct-1 POU domain. Genes Dev. 13:1999;1807-1821.
32. Kuhlman T.C., Cho H., Reinberg D., Hernandez N. The general transcription factors IIA, IIB, IIF, and IIE are required for RNA polymerase II transcription from the human U1 small nuclear RNA promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;2130-2141. Most snRNA genes of higher eukaryotes are transcribed by pol II but use a TBP-complex distinct from TFIID (see [31]). This paper shows that they still require most, if not all, of the basal factors used by more typical TATA-containing promoters.
33. Teichmann M., Wang Z., Martinez E., Tjernberg A., Zhang D., Vollmer F., Chait B.T., Roeder R.G. Human TATA-binding protein-related factor-2 (hTRF2) stably associates with hTFIIA in HeLa cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:1999;13720-13725.
34. Upadhyaya A.B., Lee S.H., DeJong J. Identification of a general transcription factor TFIIAalpha/beta homolog selectively expressed in testis. J Biol Chem. 274:1999;18040-18048.
35. Moore P.A., Ozer J., Salunek M., Jan G., Zerby D., Campbell S., Lieberman P.M. A human TATA binding protein-related protein with altered DNA binding specificity inhibits transcription from multiple promoters and activators. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;7610-7620.
36. Rabenstein M.D., Zhou S., Lis J.T., Tjian R. TATA box-binding protein (TBP)-related factor 2 (TRF2), a third member of the TBP family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:1999;4791-4796.
37. Guzman E., Lis J.T. Transcription factor TFIIH is required for promoter melting in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;5652-5658.
38. Moreland R.J., Tirode F., Yan Q., Conaway J.W., Egly J.M., Conaway R.C. A role for the TFIIH XPB DNA helicase in promoter escape by RNA polymerase II. J Biol Chem. 274:1999;22127-22130.
39. Tirode F., Busso D., Coin F., Egly J.M. Reconstitution of the transcription factor TFIIH: assignment of functions for the three enzymatic subunits, XPB, XPD, and cdk7. Mol Cell. 3:1999;87-95. The remarkable technical feat of reconstituting the multisubunit TFIIH complex is documented here; it will open the door to interesting mutational analyses of the individual subunits.
40. Lei L., Ren D., Burton Z.F. The RAP74 subunit of human transcription factor IIF has similar roles in initiation and elongation. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;8372-8382.
41. Ren D., Lei L., Burton Z.F. A region within the RAP74 subunit of human transcription factor IIF is critical for initiation but dispensable for complex assembly. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;7377-7387.
42. Yan Q., Moreland R.J., Conaway J.W., Conaway R.C. Dual roles for transcription factor IIF in promoter escape by RNA polymerase II. J Biol Chem. 274:1999;35668-35675.
43. Bangur C.S., Faitar S.L., Folster J.P., Ponticelli A.S. An interaction between the N-terminal region and the core domain of yeast TFIIB promotes the formation of TATA-binding protein-TFIIB-DNA complexes. J Biol Chem. 274:1999;23203-23209.
44. Cho E.J., Buratowski S. Evidence that transcription factor IIB is required for a post-assembly step in transcription initiation. J Biol Chem. 274:1999;25807-25813.
45. Pardee T.S., Bangur C.S., Ponticelli A.S. The N-terminal region of yeast TFIIB contains two adjacent functional domains involved in stable RNA polymerase II binding and transcription start site selection. J Biol Chem. 273:1998;17859-17864.
46. Hawkes N.A., Roberts S.G. The role of human TFIIB in transcription start site selection in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem. 274:1999;14337-14343.
47. Pinto I., Ware D.E., Hampsey M. The yeast SUA7 gene encodes a homolog of human transcription factor TFIIB and is required for normal start site selection in vivo. Cell. 68:1992;977-988.
48. Wu W.H., Pinto I., Chen B.S., Hampsey M. Mutational analysis of yeast TFIIB. A functional relationship between Ssu72 and Sub1/Tsp1 defined by allele-specific interactions with TFIIB. Genetics. 153:1999;643-652.
49. Roberts S.G., Green M.R. Activator-induced conformational change in general transcription factor TFIIB. Nature. 371:1994;717-720.
50. Wu W.H., Hampsey M. An activation-specific role for transcription factor TFIIB in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:1999;2764-2769.
51. Bentley D. Coupling RNA polymerase II transcription with pre-mRNA processing. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 11:1999;347-351.
52. Reines D., Conaway R.C., Conaway J.W. Mechanism and regulation of transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 11:1999;342-346.
53. •] and references therein, a growing body of evidence indicates that activators work not only through cooperative binding with the basal transcription machinery, but also by recruiting chromatin remodeling factors and histone acetyltransferases that act in a highly localized fashion.
54. •].
55. •].
56. •].
57. •].
58. •].
59. •].
60. Berk A.J. Activation of RNA polymerase II transcription. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 11:1999;330-335.
61. •], as well as mammalian mediator studies summarized in [2,60], a strong case is made that specific mediator subunits are the direct targets of specific activators.
62. •].
63. Lee D., Kim S., Lis J.T. Different upstream transcriptional activators have distinct coactivator requirements. Genes Dev. 13:1999;2934-2939. The Cup1 promoter in yeast is unusual in its apparent lack of requirement for several coactivators, such as TAFs and the mediator component Srb4. Using an isogenic set of activator fusions, this paper shows that this independence from coactivators maps to the activation domain of upstream regulators. This provides a clear demonstration that not all activation domains are equivalent, and they are likely to target different components of the transcription reaction.
64. •].
65. Natarajan K., Jackson B.M., Rhee E., Hinnebusch A.G. yTAFII61 has a general role in RNA polymerase II transcription and is required by Gcn4p to recruit the SAGA coactivator complex. Mol Cell. 2:1998;683-692.
66. Massari M.E., Grant P.A., Pray-Grant M.G., Berger S.L., Workman J.L., Murre C. A conserved motif present in a class of helix-loop-helix proteins activates trasncription by direct recruitment of the SAGA complex. Mol Cell. 4:1999;63-73.
67. Wu S.Y., Thomas M.C., Hou S.Y., Likhite V., Chiang C.M. Isolation of mouse TFIID and functional characterization of TBP and TFIID in mediating estrogen receptor and chromatin transcription. J Biol Chem. 274:1999;23480-23490.