Mapping chromosomal proteins in vivo by formaldehyde-crosslinked-chromatin immunoprecipitation

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 99-104

  Orlando, Valerio ^a  

^a 20132   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY; CESIUM CHLORIDE; CHROMOSOME PROTEIN; DNA; FORMALDEHYDE;

CHROMATIN; CROSS LINKING; DNA CROSS LINKING; GENE CONTROL; GENE MAPPING; HUMAN; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; SHORT SURVEY; SOUTHERN BLOTTING; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0034161329     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01535-2     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. McGhee J.D., von Hippel P.H. Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA structure. I. Reaction with exocyclic amino groups of DNA bases. Biochemistry. 14:1975;1281-1296.
2. McGhee J.D., von Hippel P.H. Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA structure. II. Reaction with endocyclic imino groups of DNA bases. Biochemistry. 14:1975;1297-1303.
3. Solomon M.J., Varshavsky A. Formaldehyde-mediated DNA-protein crosslinking: a probe for in vivo chromatin structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82:1985;6470-6474.
4. Jackson V. Studies on histone organization in the nucleosome using formaldehyde as a reversible crosslinking agent. Cell. 15:1978;945-954.
5. Botquin V.et al. New POU dimer configuration mediates antagonistic control of an osteopontin preimplantaion enhancer by Oct-4 and Sox-2. Genes Dev. 12:1998;2073-2090.
6. Solomon M.J.et al. Mapping protein-DNA interactions in vivo with formaldehyde: evidence that histone H4 is retained on a highly transcribed gene. Cell. 53:1988;937-947.
7. Braunstein M.et al. Transcriptional silencing in yeast is associated with reduced nucleosome acetylation. Genes Dev. 7:1993;592-604.
8. Kuo M.H.et al. Transcription linked acetylation by Gcn5 of histones H3 and H4 of specific lysines. Nature. 383:1996;269-272.
9. Orlando V.et al. Analysis of chromatin structure by in vivo formaldehyde crosslinking. Methods. 11:1997;205-214.
10. Orlando V., Paro R. Mapping Polycomb-repressed domains in the BX-C using in vivo formaldehyde crosslinked chromatin. Cell. 75:1993;1187-1198.
11. Dedon P.C.et al. A simplified formaldehyde-fixation and immunoprecipitation technique for studying protein-DN interactions. Anal. Biochem. 197:1991;83-90.
12. Hecht A.et al. Spreading of transcriptional repressor SIR3 from telomeric heterochromatin. Nature. 383:1996;92-96.
13. Strahl-Bolsingeret al. SIR2 and SIR4 interactions differ in core and extended telomeric heterochromatin in yeast. Genes Dev. 11:1997;83-93.
14. Parekh B.S., Maniatis T. Virus infection leads to localized hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 at the IFN-β promoter. Mol. Cell. 3:1999;125-129.
15. Chen H.et al. Regulation of hormone-induced histone hyperacetylation and gene activation via acetylation of an acetylase. Cell. 98:1999;675-686.
16. Henegariu O.et al. Multiplex PCR: critical parameters and step-by protocol. BioTechniques. 23:1997;504-511.
17. Tanaka T.et al. Loading of an Mcm protein onto DNA replication origins is regulated by Cdc6p and CDKs. Cell. 96:1997;649-660.
18. Kadosh D., Struhl K. Targeted recruitment of the Sin3-rpd3 histone deacetylase complex generates a highly localized domain of repressed chromatin in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1998;5121-5127.
19. Cosma M.P.et al. Ordered recruitment of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors to a cell-cycle- and developmentally regulated promoter. Cell. 97:1999;299-311.
20. Kuras L., Struhl K. Binding of TBP to promoters in vivo is stimulated by activators and requires Pol II holoenzyme. Nature. 399:1999;609-613.
21. Li X.-Y.et al. Enhancement of TBP binding by activators and general transcription factors. Nature. 399:1999;605-609.
22. Strutt H.et al. Co-localization of Polycomb protein and GAGA factor on regulatory elements responsible for the maintenance of homeotic gene expression. EMBO J. 16:1997;3621-3632.
23. Orlando V.et al. Binding of Trithorax and Polycomb proteins to the bithorax complex: dynamic changes during early Drosophila embryogenesis. EMBO J. 17:1998;5141-5150.
24. Walter J.et al. Two homeodomain proteins bind with similar specificity to a wide range of DNA sites in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 8:1994;1678-1692.
25. Tomotsune D.et al. A mouse homologue of the Drosophila tumour-suppressor gene l(2)gl controlled by Hox-C8 in vivo. Nature. 365:1993;69-72.
26. Tanaka T.et al. Identification of cohesin association sites at centromeres and along chromosome arms. Cell. 98:1999;847-858.
27. O'Brien T.et al. Distribution of GAGA protein on Drosophila genes in vivo. Genes Dev. 9:1995;1098-1110.
28. Carr A., Biggin M.D. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro DNA-binding specificities suggests a new model for homeoprotein DNA binding in Drosophila embryos. EMBO J. 18:1999;1598-1608.
29. Strutt H., Paro R. The Polycomb group protein complex of Drosophila melanogaster has different compositions at different target genes. Mol. Cell Biol. 17:1998;6773-6783.
30. Austin R.J.et al. Drosophila ORC specifically binds to ACE3, an origin of DNA replication control element. Genes Dev. 13:1999;2639-2649.
31. Krebs J.E.et al. Cell cycle regulated histone acetylation required for expression of the yeast HO gene. Genes Dev. 13:1999;1412-1421.
32. Zhao K.et al. Visualization of chromosomal domains with boundary element-associated factor BEAF-32. Cell. 81:1995;879-889.