Systematic plant morphology and anatomy - 50 Years of progress

Taxon

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 401-434

  Endress, Peter K ^a   Baas, Pieter ^b   Gregory, Mary ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN BRANCH   (Netherlands)

^c JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Angiosperms; Classification; Land plants; Morphology; Systematics

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033849978     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1224342     Document Type: Review

References (454)

1. Airy Shaw, H. K. 1965. Diagnoses of new families, new names, etc., for the seventh edition of Willis' "Dictionary". Kew Bull. 18: 249-273.
2. Albert, V. A., Gustafsson, M. H. G. & Di Laurenzio, L. 1998. Ontogenetic systematics, molecular developmental genetics, and the angiosperm petal. Pp. 349-374 in: Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. & Doyle, J. J. (eds.), Molecular systematics of plants, II. Boston.
3. _ , Williams, S. E. & Chase, M. W. 1992. Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. Science 257: 1491-1495.
4. Alverson, W. S., Karol, K. G., Baum, D. A., Chase, M. W., Swensen, S. M., McCourt, R. & Sytsma, K. J. 1998. Circumscription of the Malvales and relationships to other Rosidae: evidence from rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 876-887.
5. _ , Whitlock, B. A., Nyffeler, R., Bayer, C. & Baum, D. A. 1999. Phylogeny of the core Malvales: evidence from ndhF sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 1474-1486.
6. Amelunxen, F., Morgenroth, K. & Picksak, T. 1967. Untersuchungen an der Epidermis mit dem Stereoscan-Elektronenmikroskop. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 57: 79-95.
7. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 531-553.
8. Armbruster, W. S. & Baldwin, B. G. 1998. Switch from specialized to generalized pollination. Nature 394: 632.
9. Ayensu, E. S. 1972. Anatomy of the monocotyledons VI. Dioscoreales. Oxford.
10. Baas, P. 1972. Anatomical contributions to plant taxonomy II. The affinities of Hua Pierre and Afrostyrax Perkins et Gilg. Blumea 20: 161-192.
11. _ 1973. The wood anatomical range in Ilex (Aquifoliaceae) and its ecological and phylogenetic significance. Blumea 21: 311-407.
12. _ 1975. Vegetative anatomy and the affinities of Aquifoliaceae, Sphenostemon, Phelline, and Oncotheca. Blumea 22: 311-407.
13. _ 1982. Systematic, phylogenetic, and ecological wood anatomy - history and perspectives. Pp. 23-58 in: Baas, P. (ed.), New perspectives in wood anatomy. The Hague.
14. _ 1986. Ecological patterns of xylem anatomy. Pp. 327-352 in: Givnish, J. (ed.), On the economy of plant form and function. New York.
15. _ , Esser, P. M., Van der Westen, M. E. T. & Zandee, M. 1988. Wood anatomy of the Oleaceae. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. News Bull. 9: 103-182.
16. _ , Geesink, R., Van Heel, W. A. & Muller, J. 1979. The affinities of Plagiopteron suaveolens Griff. (Plagiopteraceae). Grana 18: 69-89.
17. _ & Gregory, M. 1985. A survey of oil cells in the dicotyledons with comments on their replacement by and joint occurrence with mucilage cells. Israel J. Bot. 34: 167-186.
18. _ , Lee, C.-L., Zhang, X.-Y., Cui, K.-M. & Deng, Y.-F. 1984. Some effects of dwarf growth on wood structure. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. Bull. n. s. 5: 45-63.
19. _ , Van Oosterhoud, E. & Scholten, C. J. L. 1982. Leaf anatomy and classification of the Olacaceae, Octoknema and Erythropalum. Allertonia 3: 155-210.
20. _ , & Wheeler, E.A. 1996. Parallelism and reversibility in xylem evolution - a review. Int. Assoc. Wood. Anat. J. 17: 351-364.
21. _ Wheeler, E. A. & Chase, M. W. In press. Dicotyledonous wood anatomy and the APG system of angiosperm classification. Bol. J. Linn. Soc.
22. Bachmann, K. 1983. Evolutionary genetics and the genetic control of morphogenesis in flowering plants. Evol. Biol. 15: 157-208.
23. _ 1989. Homologie bei Pflanzen. Zool. Beitr. n.F. 32: 479-486.
24. _ 1995. Progress and pitfalls in systematics: cladistics, DNA and morphology. Acta Bot. Neerl. 44: 403-419.
25. Bailey, I. W. 1954. Contributions to plant anatomy. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, Massachusetts.
26. _ 1957. The potentialities and limitations of wood anatomy in the study of the phylogeny and classification of angiosperms. J. Arnold Arbor. 38: 243-254.
27. _ & Swamy, B. G. L. 1951. The conduplicate carpel of dicotyledons and its initial trends of spezialization. Amer. J. Bot. 38: 373-379.
28. _ & Tupper, W. W. 1918. Size variation in tracheary cells. I. A comparison between the seconday xylems of vascular cryptogams, gymnosperms and angiosperms. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts 54: 149-204.
29. Bakker, M. E., Gerritsen, A. F. & Van der Schaaf, P. J. 1991. Development of oil and mucilage cells in Cinnamomum burmanni. An ultrastructural study. Acta Bot. Neerl. 40: 339-356.
30. Baranova, M. 1992. Principles of comparative stomatographic studies of flowering plants. Bot. Rev. 58: 49-103.
31. Barnard, C. 1961. The interpretation of the angiosperm flower. Austral. J. Sci. 24: 64-72.
32. Barthlott, W. 1981. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nord. J. Bot. 1: 345-355.
33. _ & Ehler, N. 1977. Raster-Elektronenmikroskopie der Epidermis-Oberflächen von Spermatophyten. Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt 19: 1-105.
34. _ & Frölich, D. 1983. Mikromorphologie und Orientierungsmuster epicuticularer Wachs-Kristalloide: ein neues systematisches Merkmal bei Monokotylen. Pl. Syst. Evol. 142: 171-185.
35. _ , Neinhuis, C., Cutler, D., Ditsch, F., Meusel, I., Theisen, I. & Wilhelmi, H. 1998. Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 126: 237-260.
36. Bateman, R. M. & DiMichele, W. A. 1994. Heterospory: the most iterative key innovation in the evolutionary history of the plant kingdom. Biol. Rev. 69: 345-417.
37. Battjes, J. & Bachmann, K. 1996. Numerical canalization in asteracean heads. Pp. 185-204 in: Caligari, P. D. S. & Hind, D. J. N. (eds.), Compositae: biology and utilization. Kew.
38. Baum, D. A. 1998. The evolution of plant development. Curr. Opinion Pl. Biol. 1: 79-86.
39. _ , Small, R. & Wendel, J. F. 1998. Biogeography and floral evolution of baobabs (Adansonia, Bombacaceae) as inferred from multiple data sets. Syst. Biol. 47: 181-207.
40. _ & Whitlock, B. A. 1999. Genetic control of petal development. Curr. Biol. 9: R525-R527.
41. Bayer, C., Chase, M. W. & Fay, M. F. 1998. Muntingiaceae, a new family of dicotyledons with malvalean affinities. Taxon 47: 37-42.
42. _ , Fay, M. F., de Bruijn, A. Y., Savolainen, V., Morton, C. M., Kubitzki, K., Alverson, W. S. & Chase, M. W. 1999. Support for an expanded family concept of Malvaceae within a recircumscribed order Malvales: a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL DNA sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 129: 267-303.
43. Bayer, R. J., Hufford, L. & Soltis, D. E. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships in Sarraceniaceae based on rbcL and ITS sequences. Syst. Bot. 21: 121-134.
44. Behnke, H.-D. 1972. Sieve-tube plastids in relation to angiosperm systematics - an attempt towards a classification by ultrastructural analysis. Bot. Rev. 38: 155-197.
45. _ 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: ultrastructure. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 647-663.
46. _ 1976. Ultrastructure of sieve-element plastids in Caryophyllales (Centrospermae), evidence for the delimitation and classification of the order. Pl. Syst. Evol. 126: 31-54.
47. _ 1981. Sieve element characters. Nord. J. Bot. 1: 381-400.
48. _ 1991. Distribution and evolution of forms and types of sieve-element plastids in the dicotyledons. Aliso 13: 167-182.
49. _ 1999. P-type sieve-element plastids present in members of the tribes Triplareae and Coccolobeae (Polygonaceae) renew the links between the Polygonales and the Caryophyllales. Pl. Syst. Evol. 214: 15-27.
50. Bell, A. D. 1991. Plant form. An illustrated guide to flowering plant morphology. Oxford.
51. Bernhard, A. & Endress, P. K. 1999. Androecial development and systematics in Flacourtiaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 215: 141-155.
52. Bharathan, G. 1996. Does the monocot mode of leaf development characterize all monocots? Aliso 14: 271-279.
53. Blackmore, S., McConchie, C. A. & Knox, R. B. 1987. Phylogenetic analysis of the male ontogenetic program in aquatic and terrestrial monocotyledons. Cladistics 3: 333-347.
54. Boesewinkel, F. D. & Bouman, F. 1997. Ovules and seeds of Dirachma socotrana (Dirachmaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 205: 195-204.
55. Bouman, F. & Boesewinkel, F. D. 1997. Ovules and seeds of Barbeya with additional arguments for an urticalean affinity of the Barbeyaceae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 46: 255-261.
56. Bowman, J. L., Brüggemann, H., Lee, J.-Y. & Mummenhoff, K. 1999a. Evolutionary changes in floral structure within Lepidium L. (Brassicaceae). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 160: 917-929.
57. _ , Baum, S. F., Eshed, Y., Putterill, J. & Alvarez, J. 1999b. Molecular genetics of gynoecium development in Arabidopsis. Curr. Topics Developm. Biol. 45: 155-205.
58. Braun, H. J. 1970. Funktionelle Histologie der sekundären Sprossachse. I. Das Holz. Encyclopedia of plant anatomy IX.1. Berlin.
59. Bremer, K. 1976. The genus Relhania (Compositae). Opera Bot. 40: 1-86.
60. _ & Wanntorp, H. E. 1978. Phylogenetic systematics in botany. Taxon 27: 317-329.
61. Briggs, B. G. & Johnson, L. A. S. 1979. Evolution in the Myrtaceae-evidence from inflorescence structure. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 102: 157-256.
62. Burrichter, E., Amelunxen, F., Vahl, J. & Giele, T. 1968. Pollen- und Sporenuntersuchungen mit dem Oberflächen-Rasterelektronenmikroskop. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 59: 226-237.
63. Burtt, B. L. 1994. A commentary on some recurrent forms and changes of form in angiosperms. Pp. 143-152 in: Ingram, D. S. & Hudson, A. (eds.), Shape and form in plants and fungi. London.
64. Buxbaum, F. 1961. Vorläufige Untersuchungen über Umfang, systematische Stellung und Gliederung der Caryophyllales. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 36: 1-56.
65. Cameron, K. M. & Dickison, W. C. 1998. Foliar architecture of vanilloid orchids: insights into the evolution of reticulate leaf venation in monocotyledons. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 128: 45-70.
66. Campbell, C. S., Donoghue, M. J., Baldwin, B. G. & Wojciechowski, M. F. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships in Maloideae (Rosaceae): evidence from sequences of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA and its congruence with morphology. Amer. J. Bot. 82: 903-918.
67. Carlquist, S. 1966. Wood anatomy of Compositae: a summary, with comments on factors controlling wood evolution. Aliso 6(2): 25-44.
68. _ 1969. Morphology and anatomy. Pp. 49-57 in: Ewan, J. (ed.), A short history of botany in the United States. New York.
69. _ 1970. Toward acceptable evolutionary interpretations of floral anatomy. Phytomorphology 19: 332-362.
70. _ 1972. A theory of paedomorphosis in dicotyledonous woods. Phytomorphology 12: 30-45.
71. _ 1975. Ecological strategies in xylem evolution. Berkeley.
72. _ 1988. Comparative wood anatomy. Berlin.
73. _ 1996. Wood anatomy of primitive angiosperms: new perspectives and syntheses, Pp. 68-90 in: Taylor, D. W. & Hickey, L. J. (eds.), Flowering plant origin, evolution, and phylogeny. New York.
74. _ & Schneider, E. L. 1997. Origins and nature of vessels in monocotyledons. 1. Acorus. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 158: 51-56.
75. _ & _ 1998. Origin and nature of vessels in monocotyledons. 5. Araceae subfamily Colocasioideae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 128: 71-86.
76. Chase, M. W., Soltis, D. E., Olmstead, R. G. & al. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580.
77. Cheadle, V. I. 1953. Independent origin of vessels in the monocotyledons and dicotyledons. Phytomorphology 3: 23-44.
78. _ 1968 [1969]. Vessels in Haemodorales. Phytomorphology 18: 412-420.
79. _ 1969. Vessels in Amaryllidaceae and Tecophilaeaceae. Phytomorphology 19: 8-16.
80. _ & Kosakai, H. 1971 [1972]. Vessels in Liliaceae. Phytomorphology 21: 320-333.
81. _ & _ 1982. Occurrence and specialization of vessels in Xyridales. Nord. J. Bot. 2: 97-109.
82. _ & Tucker, J. M. 1961. Vessels and phylogeny of Monocotyledoneae. Rec. Adv. Bot. 1: 161-165.
83. Christensen, K. I. & Hansen, H. V. 1998. SEM-studies of epidermal patterns of petals in the angiosperms. Opera Bot. 135: 1-91.
84. Coen, E. S. & Meyerowitz, E. 1991. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353: 31-37.
85. Cole, G. T. & Behnke, H.-D. 1975. Electron microscopy and plant systematics. Taxon 24: 3-15.
86. Conover, M. V. 1991. Epidermal patterns of the reticulate-veined Liliiflorae and their parallel-veined allies. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 107: 295-312.
87. Constance, L. 1955. The systematics of the angiosperms. Pp. 405-483 in: Kessel, E. L. (ed.): A century of progress in the natural sciences, 1853-1953. San Francisco.
88. Constance, L. 1964. Systematic botany-an unending synthesis. Taxon 13: 257-273.
89. Conti, E., Litt, A. & Sytsma, K. J. 1996: Circumscription of Myrtales and their relationships to other rosids: evidence from rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 221-233.
90. Corner, E. J. H. 1954. The life of plants. London.
91. _ 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons. Cambridge.
92. Crane, P. R. 1985a. Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 72: 716-793.
93. _ 1985b. Phylogenetic relationships in seed plants. Cladistics 1: 329-348.
94. _ & Herendeen, P. (eds.) 1999. The origin of modern terrestrial ecosystems. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard 86: 227-655.
95. _ & Kenrick, P. 1997. Diverted development of reproductive organs: a source of morphological innovation in land plants. Pl. Syst. Evol. 206: 161-174.
96. _ , Friis, E. M. & Pedersen, K. R. 1995. The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 374: 27-33.
97. Crepet, W. L. & Friis, E. M. 1987. The evolution of insect pollination. Pp. 181-201 in: Friis, E. M., Chaloner, W. G. & Crane, P. R. (eds.), The origins of angiosperms and their biological consequences. Cambridge.
98. Crisci, J. V. & Stuessy, T. F. 1980. Determining primitive character states for phylogenetic reconstruction. Syst. Bot. 5: 112-135.
99. Cronquist, A. 1957. Outline of a new system of families and orders of dicotyledons. Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg. 27: 13-40.
100. _ 1968. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. New York.
101. _ 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York.
102. _ 1986. A botanical critique of cladism. Bot. Rev. 53: 1-52.
103. _ 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering plants, ed. 2. New York.
104. Cutler, D. F. 1969. Anatomy of the monocotyledons. IV. Juncales. Oxford.
105. _ & Airy Shaw, H. K. 1965. Anarthriaceae and Ecdeiocoleaceae, two new monocotyledonous families, separated from the Restionaceae. Kew Bull. 19: 489-499.
106. _ & Gregory, M. (eds.). 1998. Anatomy of the dicotyledons, ed. 2. IV. Saxifragales. Oxford.
107. _ , Rudall, P. J., Gasson, P. E. & Gale, R. M. O. 1987. Root identification manual of trees and shrubs. London.
108. Dahlgren, R. 1975. The distribution of characters within an angiosperm system. I. Some embryological characters. Bot. Not. 128: 181-197.
109. _ 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 91-124.
110. _ & Bremer, K. 1985. Major clades of the angiosperms. Cladistics 1: 349-368.
111. _ Clifford, H. T. & Yeo, P. F. 1985. The families of the monocotyledons. Berlin.
112. Damblon, F. 1975. Sputtering, a new method for coating pollen grains in scanning electron microscopy. Grana 15: 137-144.
113. Davis, G. L. 1966. Systematic embryology of the angiosperms. New York.
114. Davis, P. H. & Heywood, V. H. 1963. Principles of angiosperm taxonomy. Edinburgh.
115. Den Outer, R. W. & Schütz, P. R. 1981. Wood anatomy of some Sarcolaenaceae and Rhopalocarpaceae and their systematic position. Meded. Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen 81(8): 1-25.
116. Dickison, W. C. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative anatomy. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 590-620.
117. _ 1982. Vegetative anatomy of Oncotheca macrocarpa, a newly described species of Oncothecaceae. Adansonia 4: 177-181.
118. _ 1986. Wood anatomy and affinities of Alseuosmiaceae. Syst. Bot. 11: 214-221.
119. _ 1989. Steps toward the natural system of the dicotyledons: vegetative anatomy. Aliso 12: 555-566.
120. _ 1990. The morphology and relationships of Medusagyne (Medusagynaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 171: 27-55.
121. _ 1999. A view of the current status of comparative wood anatomy. Bol. Soc. Bot. Mexico 64: 870-891.
122. _ & Rutishauser, R. 1990. Developmental morphology of stipules and systematics of the Cunoniaceae and presumed allies. II. Taxa without interpetiolar stipules and conclusions. Bot. Helv. 100: 75-95.
123. _ , Rury, P. M. & Stebbins, G. L. 1978. Xylem anatomy of Hibbertia (Dilleniaceae) in relation to ecology and evolution. J. Arnold Arbor. 59: 32-49.
124. _ & Sweitzer, E. M. 1970. The morphology and relationships of Barbeya oleoides. Amer. J. Bot. 57: 468-476.
125. Diggle, P. K. 1999. Heteroblasty and the evolution of flowering phenologies. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 160: S123-S134.
126. Dilcher, D. L. 1979. Early angiosperm reproduction: an introductory report. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 21: 291-328.
127. _ & Crane, P. R. 1984. Archaeanthus: an early angiosperm from the Cenomanian of the western interior of North America. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 71: 351-381.
128. Doebley, J. 1993. Genetics, development and plant evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Devel. 3: 865-872.
129. Donoghue, M. J. 1989. Phylogenies and the analyses of evolutionary sequences, with examples from seed plants. Evolution 43: 1137-1156.
130. _ 1992. Homology. Pp. 170-179 in: Keller, E. F. & Lloyd, E. A. (eds.), Keywords in evolutionary biology. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
131. _ 1994. Progress and prospects in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 405-418.
132. _ & Alverson, W.S. 2000. A new age of discovery. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 87: 110-126.
133. _ & Doyle, J. A. 1989. Phylogenetic studies of seed plants and angiosperms based on morphological characters. Pp. 181-193 in: Fernholm, B., Bremer, K. & Jornvall, H. (eds.), The hierarchy of life: molecules and morphology in phylogenetic analysis. Amsterdam.
134. _ & Doyle, J. A. 2000. Seed plant phylogeny: Demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? Curr. Biol. 10: R106-R109.
135. _ & Sanderson, M. J. 1992. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Pp. 340-368 in: Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E. & Doyle, J. J. (eds.), 1992. Molecular systematics of plants. New York.
136. _ , Doyle, J. A., Gauthier, J., Kluge, A. G. & Rowe, T. 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 431-460.
137. Doyle, J. A. 1969. Cretaceous angiosperm pollen of the Atlantic coastal plain and its evolutionary significance. J. Arnold Arbor. 50: 1-35.
138. _ 1978. Origin of angiosperms. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9: 365-392.
139. _ & Donoghue, M. J. 1986. Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: an experimental cladistic approach. Bot. Rev. 52: 321-431.
140. _ & Donoghue, M. J. 1993. Phylogenies and angiosperm diversification. Paleobiology 19: 141-167.
141. _ & Endress, P. In press. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: comparison and combination with molecular data. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 161.
142. _ & Hickey, L. J. 1976. Pollen and leaves from the mid-Cretaceous Potomac Group and their bearing on early angiosperm evolution. Pp. 139-206 in: Beck, C. B. (ed.), Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. New York.
143. _ , Donoghue, M. J. & Zimmer, E. A. 1994. Integration of morphological and ribosomal RNA data on the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 405-418.
144. Doyle, J. J. 1994. Evolution of a plant multigene family: towards connecting molecular systematics and molecular developmental genetics. Syst. Biol. 43: 307-328.
145. Drinnan, A. N. & Ladiges, P. Y. 1988. Perianth development in Angophora and the bloodwood eucalypts (Myrtaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 160: 219-239.
146. _ , Crane, P. R. & Hoot, S. 1994. Patterns of floral evolution in the early diversification of non-magnoliid dicotyledons (eudicots). Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl. 8: 93-122.
147. Duncan, T. 1980. Cladistics for the practicing taxonomist - an eclectic view. Syst. Bot. 5: 136-148.
148. Eames, A. J. 1951. Again: "The new morphology". New Phytol. 50: 17-35.
149. _ 1953. Floral anatomy as an aid in generic delimitation. Chron. Bot. 14: 126-132.
150. _ 1961. Morphology of the angiosperms. New York.
151. Echlin, P. 1968. Pollen. Sci. Amer. 218 (4): 80-90.
152. Eckardt, T. 1955. Nachweis der Blattbürtigkeit ("Phyllosporie") grundständiger Samenanlagen bei Centrospermen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 68: 167-182.
153. _ 1957. Vergleichende Studie über die morphologischen Beziehungen zwischen Fruchtblatt, Samenanlage und Blütenachse bei einigen Angiospermen. Neue Hefte zur Morphologie 3: 1-91.
154. _ 1964a. Zum Blütenbau der Angiospermen im Zusammenhang mit ihrer Systematik. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 76: 38-49.
155. _ 1964b. Das Homologieproblem und Fälle strittiger Homologien. Phytomorphology 14: 79-92.
156. Eckert, G. 1966. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche und blütenanatomische Untersuchungen zum Problem der Obdiplostemonie. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 85: 523-604.
157. Edwards, D., Duckett, J. G. & Richardson, J. B. 1995. Hepatic characters in the earliest land plants. Nature 374: 635-636.
158. Ehrendorfer, F. 1973. Adaptive significance of major taxonomic characters and morphological trends in angiosperms. Pp. 317-327 in: Heywood, V. H. (ed.), Taxonomy and ecology. London.
159. _ 1984. Neuere Methoden der Verwandtschaftsforschung bei höheren Pflanzen. Verh. Deutsch. Zool. Ges. 77: 57-67.
160. Endress, M. E., Sennblad, B., Nilsson, S., Civeyrel, L., Chase, M. W., Huysmans, S., Grafström, E. & Bremer, B. 1996. A phylogenetic analysis of Apocynaceae s.str. and some related taxa in Gentianales: a multidisciplinary approach. Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 59-102.
161. Endress, P. K. 1967. Systematische Studie über die verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Hamamelidaceen und Betulaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 87: 431-525.
162. _ 1970. Die Infloreszenzen der apetalen Hamamelidaceen, ihre grundsätzliche morphologische und systematische Bedeutung. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 90: 1-54.
163. _ 1972. Zur vergleichenden Entwicklungsmorphologie, Embryologie und Systematik bei Laurales. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 92: 331-428.
164. _ 1977. Blütenmorphologie-Rückblick und aktuelle Probleme. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 90: 1-13.
165. _ 1990. Patterns of floral construction in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 39: 153-175.
166. _ 1992. Evolution and floral diversity: the phylogenetic surroundings of Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 153: S106-S122.
167. _ 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge.
168. _ 1997. Evolutionary biology of flowers; prospects for the next century. Pp. 99-119 in: Iwatsuki, K. & Raven, P. H. (eds.), Evolution and diversification of land plants. Tokyo.
169. _ & Igersheim, A. In press. Gynoecium structure and evolution in basal angiosperms. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 161.
170. Erbar, C. 1991. Sympetaly - a systematic character? Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 112: 417-451.
171. _ & Leins, P. 1995. Portioned pollen release and the syndromes of secondary pollen presentation in the Campanulales-Asterales-complex. Flora 190: 323-338.
172. _ & Leins, P. 1996. Distribution of the character states "early sympetaly" and "late sympetaly" within the "Sympetalae tetracydicae" and presumably allied groups. Bot. Acta 109: 427-440.
173. Esau, K. 1953, 1965. Plant anatomy, eds. 1,2. New York.
174. _ 1969. The phloem. Encyclopedia of plant anatomy V, 2. Berlin.
175. Eyde, R. H. 1971. Evolutionary morphology: distinguishing ancestral structure from derived structure in flowering plants. Taxon 20: 63-73.
176. Fahn, A. 1967, 1974, 1982, 1990. Plant anatomy, eds. 1,2,3,4. Oxford.
177. _ & Cutler, D. F. 1992. Xerophytes. Encyclopedia of plant anatomy XIII, 3. Borntraeger, Berlin.
178. Falk, R. H., Gifford, E. M. Jr. & Cutter, E. G. 1970. Scanning electron microscopy of developing plant organs. Science 168: 1471-1474.
179. Foster, A. S. 1952. Foliar venation in angiosperms from an ontogenetic standpoint. Amer. J. Bot. 39: 752-766.
180. _ & Gifford, E. M. 1959. Comparative morphology of vascular plants. New York.
181. French, J. C. & Tomlinson, P. B. 1986. Compound vascular bundles in monocotyledonous stems: construction and significance. Kew Bull. 41: 561-574.
182. Frey-Wyssling, A 1976. The plant cell wall. Encyclopedia of plant anatomy XI. Berlin.
183. Friedman, W. E. 1999. Expression of the cell cycle in sperm of Arabidopsis: implications for understanding patterns of gametogenesis and fertilization in plants and other eucaryotes. Development 126: 1065-1075.
184. Friis, E. M. & Endress, P. K. 1990. Origin and evolution of angiosperm flowers. Advances Bot. Res. 17: 99-162.
185. _ & Skarby, A. 1981. Structurally preserved angiosperm flowers from the upper Cretaceous of southern Sweden. Nature 291: 485-486.
186. _ , Chaloner, W. G. & Crane, P. R. (eds.). 1987. The origins of angiosperms and their biological consequences. Cambridge.
187. _ , Pedersen, K. R. & Crane, P. R. 1999. Early angiosperm diversification: the diversity of pollen associated with angiosperm reproductive structures in early Cretaceous floras from Portugal. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 256-296.
188. Frohlich, M. W. 1999. MADS about Gnetales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 8811-8813.
189. _ & Meyerowitz, E. 1997. The search for flower homeotic gene homologs in basal angiosperms and Gnetales: a potential new source of data on the evolutionary origin of flowers. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 158: S131-S142.
190. Frölich, D. & Barthlott, W. 1988. Mikromorphologie der epicuticularen Wachse und das System der Monokotylen. Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt 63: 1-135.
191. Funk, V. A. & Stuessy, T. F. 1978. Cladistics for the practicing plant taxonomist. Syst. Bot. 3: 159-178.
192. Gamalei, Y. V. 1988. The taxonomical distribution of the leaf minor veins. Bot. Ž. SSSR 73: 1662-1672.
193. Gifford, E. M. & Foster, A. S. 1989. Morphology and evolution of vascular plants. New York.
194. Givnish, T. J. & Sytsma, K. J. (eds.). 1997a. Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation. Cambridge.
195. _ & _ 1997b. Homoplasy in molecular vs. morphological data: the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. Pp. 55-101 in: Givnish, T. J. & Sytsma, K. J. (eds.), Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation. Cambridge.
196. Gleissberg, S. & Kadereit, J. W. 1999. Evolution of leaf morphogenesis: evidence from developmental and phylogenetic data in Papaveraceae. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 160: 787-794.
197. Gómez-Laurito, J. & Gómez P., L. D. 1991. Ticodendraceae: a new family of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 78: 87-88.
198. Graham, L. E., Cook, M. E. & Busse, J. S. 2000. The origin of plants: body plan changes contributing to a major evolutionary radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97: 4535-4540.
199. Graham, S. W. & Olmstead, R. G. In press. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot. 87.
200. Grayum, M. H. 1987. A summary of evidence and arguments supporting the removal of Acorus from Araceae. Taxon 36: 723-729.
201. Green, P. B., Havelange, A. & Bernier, G. 1991. Floral morphogenesis in Anagallis: scanning-electron micrograph sequences from individual growing meristems before, during, and after the transition to flowering. Planta 185: 502-512.
202. Gregory, M. 1994. Bibliography of systematic wood anatomy of dicotyledons. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. J. Suppl. 1.
203. Guédès, M. 1979. Morphology of seed-plants. Vaduz.
204. Guerrant, E. O., Jr. 1988. Heterochrony in plants: the intersection of evolution, ecology and ontogeny. Pp. 111-130 in: McKinney, M. L. (ed.), Heterochrony in evolution: a multidisciplinary approach. New York.
205. Hagemann, W. 1991. What is a root? Pp. 1-6 in: Kutschera, L. (ed.), Root ecology and its practical application -a contribution to the investigation of the whole plant. Klagenfurt.
206. _ 1999. Towards an organismic concept of land plants: the marginal blastozone and the development of the vegetation body of selected frondose gametophytes of liverworts and ferns. Pl. Syst. Evol. 216: 81-133.
207. Hall, B. K. (ed.). 1994. Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. San Diego.
208. _ (ed.). 1999. Homology. Chichester.
209. Hallé, F., Oldeman, R. A. A. & Tomlinson, P. B. 1978. Tropical trees and forests. An architectural analysis. Berlin.
210. Hasebe, M. 1999. Evolution of reproductive organs in land plants. J. Pl. Res. 112: 463-474.
211. Hempel, A. L., Reeves, P., Olmstead, R. G. & Jansen, R. K. 1995. Implications of rbcL sequence data for higher order relationships of the Loasaceae and the anomalous aquatic plant Hydrostachys (Hydrostachyaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 194: 25-37.
212. Herendeen, P. S. & Miller, R. B. In press. The application of wood anatomical characters in cladistic phylogenetic analyses. Int. Assoc. Wood. Anat. J. 21.
213. _ , Wheeler, E. A. & Baas, P. 1999a. Angiosperm wood evolution and the potential contribution of paleontological data. Bot. Rev. 65: 278-300.
214. _ , Magallón-Puebla, S., Lupia. R., Crane, P. R. & Kobylinska, J. 1999b. A preliminary conspectus of the Allon Flora from the Late Cretaceous (Late Santonian) of Central Georgia, U.S.A. Ann. Missouri Bot. Card. 86: 407-471.
215. Heslop-Harrison, Y. 1970. Scanning electron microscopy of fresh leaves of Pinguicula. Science 167: 172-174.
216. _ & Shivanna, K. R. 1977. The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Ann. Bot. 41: 1233-1258.
217. Heywood, V. H. 1974. Systematics - the stone of Sisyphus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 6: 169-178.
218. Hickey, L. J. 1973. Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. Amer. J. Bot. 60: 17-33.
219. _ & Taylor, D. W. 1996. Origin of the angiosperm flower. Pp. 176-231 in: Taylor, D.W. & Hickey, L. J. (eds.), Flowering plant origin, evolution and phylogeny. New York.
220. _ & Wolfe, J. A. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative morphology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 538-589.
221. Hiepko, P. 1965. Vergleichend-morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über das Perianth bei den Polycarpicae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 84: 359-508.
222. Holttum, R. E. 1955. Growth-habits of monocotyledons - variations on a theme. Phytomorphology 5: 399-413.
223. Hoot, S. B., Kadereit, J. W., Blattner, F. R., Jork, K. B., Schwarzbach, A. E. & Crane, P. R. 1997. Data congruence and phylogeny of the Papaveraceae s.l. based on four data sets: atpB and rbcL sequences, trnK restriction sites, and morphological characters. Syst. Bot. 22: 575-590.
224. Huber, H. 1993. Neurada - eine Gattung der Malvales. Sendtnera 1: 7-10.
225. Hufford, L. 1990. Androecial development and the problem of monophyly of Loasaceae. Canad. J. Bot. 68: 402-419.
226. _ 1992. Rosidae and their relationships to other nonmagnoliid dicotyledons: a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Card. 79: 218-248.
227. _ 1995. Patterns of ontogenetic evolution in perianth diversification of Besseya (Scrophulariaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 82: 655-680.
228. Humphries, C. J. 1979. A revision of the genus Anacyclus L. (Compositae: Anthemideae). Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. 7: 83-142.
229. IAWA Committee, 1964. Multilingual glossary of terms used in wood anatomy. Winterthur.
230. IAWA Committee, 1989. IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. Bull., n.s. 10: 219-332.
231. Iltis, H. H. 1999. Setchellanthaceae (Capparales), a new family for a relictual, glucosinolate-producing endemic of the Mexican deserts. Taxon 48: 257-275.
232. _ 2000. Homeotic sexual translocations and the origin of maize (Zea mays, Poaceae): a new look at an old problem. Econ. Bot. 54: 7-42.
233. Irish, V. F. 1999. Petal and stamen development. Curr. Topics Developm. Biol. 41: 133-161.
234. _ & Kramer, E. M. 1998. Genetic and molecular analysis of angiosperm flower development. Advances Bot. Res. 28: 197-230.
235. Janchen, E. 1950. Die Herkunft der Angiospermen-Blüte und die systematische Stellung der Apetalen. Österr. Bot. Z. 97: 129-167.
236. Jansen, S., Smets, E. & Baas, P. 1998. Vestures in woody plants: a review. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. J. 19: 347-382.
237. Janssonius, H. H. 1950. Wood-anatomy and relationship. Taxonomic notes in connection with the key to Javanese woods. Blumea 6: 407-461.
238. Johnson, L. A. S. 1989. Models and reality: doctrine and practicality in classification. Pl. Syst. Evol. 168: 95-108.
239. Johri, B. M., Ambegaokar, K. B. & Srivastava, P. S. (eds.). 1992. Comparative embryology of angiosperms. Berlin.
240. Judd, W. S., Stern, W. L. & Cheadle, V. I. 1993. Phylogenetic position of Apostasia and Neuwiedia (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 113: 87-94.
241. _ , Campbell, C. S., Kellogg, E. A. & Stevens, P. F. 1999. Plant systematics, a phylogenetic approach. Sunderland.
242. Kadereit, J. W. 1994. Molecules and morphology, phylogenetics and genetics. Bot. Acta 107: 369-373.
243. _ , Blattner, F. R., Jork, K. B. & Schwarzbach, A. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of the Papaveraceae s.l. (incl. Fumariaceae, Hypecoaceae, and Pteridophyllaceae) based on morphological characters. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 116: 361-390.
244. _ , _ , _ & _ 1995. The phylogeny of the Papaveraceae sensu lato: morphological, geographical and ecological implications. Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl. 9: 133-145.
245. Kapil, R. N. & Bhatnagar, A. K. 1991. Embryological evidence in angiosperm classification and phylogeny. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 113: 309-338.
246. Kaplan, D. R. 1970. Comparative foliar histogenesis in Acorus calamus and its bearing on the phyllode theory of monocotyledonous leaves. Amer. J. Bot. 57: 331-361.
247. _ 1972. On the value of comparative development in phylogenetic studies - a rejoinder. Phytomorphology 21: 134-140.
248. _ 1973. The problem of leaf morphology and evolution of the monocotyledons. Quart. Rev. Biol. 48: 437-457.
249. _ 1975. Comparative developmental evaluation of the morphology of unifacial leaves in the monocotyledons. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 95: 1-105.
250. _ 1984. The concept of homology and its central role in the elucidation of plant systematic relationships. Pp. 51-70 in: Duncan, T. & Stuessy, T. F. (eds.), Cladistics: perspectives on the reconstruction of evolutionary history. New York.
251. _ & Cooke, T. J. 1997. Fundamental concepts in the embryogenesis of dicotyledons: a morphological interpretation of embryo mutants. Plant Cell 9: 1903-1919.
252. Karehed, J., Lundberg, J., Bremer, B. & Bremer, K. 1999. Evolution of the Australasian families Alseuosmiaceae, Argophyllaceae, and Phellinaceae. Syst. Bot. 24: 660-682.
253. Karol, K. G., Rodman, J. E., Conti, E. & Sytsma, K. J. 1999. Nucleotide sequence of rbcL and phylogenetic relationships of Setchellanthus caeruleus (Setchellanthaceae). Taxon 48: 303-315.
254. Keck, D. D. 1957. Trends in systematic botany. Surv. Biol. Progr. 3: 47-107.
255. Kellogg, E. A. & Shaffer, H. B. 1993. Model organisms in evolutionary studies. Syst. Biol. 42: 409-414.
256. Kenrick, P. & Crane, P. R. 1997. The origin and early diversification of land plants. A cladistic study. Washington, D. C.
257. Klaassen, R. 1999. Wood anatomy of the Sapindaceae. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. J. Suppl. 2.
258. Kramer, E. M. & Irish, V. F. 1999. Evolution of genetic mechanisms controlling petal development. Nature 399: 144-148.
259. Kron, K. A., Judd, W. S. & Crayn, D. M. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of Andromedeae (Ericaceae subfam. Vaccinioideae). Amer. J. Bot. 86: 1290-1300.
260. Kubitzki, K. 1972. Probleme der Grosssystematik der Blütenpflanzen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 85: 259-277.
261. _ (ed.). 1990, 1993, 1998a,b. Families and genera of vascular plants, vols. 1,2,3,4. Berlin.
262. _ , von Sengbusch, P. & Poppendieck, H.-H. 1991. Parallelism, its evolutionary origin and systematic significance. Aliso 13: 191-206.
263. Kuprianova, L. A. 1963. On a hitherto undescribed family belonging to the Amentiferae. Taxon 27: 39-44.
264. Lam, H. J. 1950. Stachyospory and phyllospory as factors in the natural system of the Cormophyta. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 44: 517-534.
265. _ 1959. Taxonomy: general principles and angiosperms. Pp. 3-75 in: Turrill, W. B. (ed.), Vistas in Botany. London.
266. Leinfellner, W. 1950. Der Bauplan des synkarpen Gynoeceums. Österr. Bot. Z. 97: 403-436.
267. Leins, P. 1975. Die Beziehungen zwischen multistaminaten und einfachen Androeceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 96: 231-237.
268. _ & Metzenauer, G. 1979. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Capparis-Blüten. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 100: 542-554.
269. _ & Winhard, W. 1973. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien an Loasaceen-Blüten. Österr. Bot. Z. 122: 145-165.
270. Les, D. H., Schneider, E. L., Padgett, D. J., Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E. & Zanis, M. 1999. Phylogeny, classification and floral evolution of water lilies (Nymphaeaceae: Nymphaeales): a synthesis of non-molecular, rbcL, matK, and 18S rDNA data. Syst. Bot. 24: 28-46.
271. Lewis, L. A., Mishler, B. D. & Vilgalys, R. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the liverworts (Hepaticae), a basal embryophyte lineage, inferred from nucleotide sequence data of the chloroplast gene rbcL. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 7: 377-393.
272. Liese, W. 1951. Demonstration elektronenmikroskopischer Aufnahmen von Nadelholzhoftüpfeln. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 64: 31-32.
273. _ 1957. Beitrag zur Warzenstruktur der Koniferentracheiden mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Cupressaceae. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 70: 21-30.
274. Linder, H. P. 1988. A review of cladistics for botanists. S. Afr. J. Bot. 54: 208-220.
275. _ & Kellogg, E. A. 1995. Phylogenetic patterns in the commelinid clade. Pp. 473-496 in: Rudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F. & Humphries, C. J. (eds.), Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew.
276. _ & Rudall, P. J. 1993. The megagametophyte in Anarthria (Anarthriaceae, Poales) and its implications for the phylogeny of the Poales. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 1455-1464.
277. Loconte, H. & Stevenson, D. W. 1991. Cladistics of the Magnoliidae. Cladistics 7: 267-296.
278. Lord, E. M. & Hill, J. P. 1987. Evidence for heterochrony in the evolution of plant form. Pp. 47-70 in: Raff, R. A. & Raff, E. C. (eds.), Development as an evolutionary process. New York.
279. Magallón, S., Crane, P. R. & Herendeen, P. S. 1999. Phylogenetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of eudicots. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 297-372.
280. Manchester, S. 1994. Fruits and seeds of the Middle Eocene Nut Beds Flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon. Palaeontogr. Amer. 58: 1-205.
281. Mathews, S. & Donoghue, M. J. 1999. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286: 947-950.
282. McKinney, M. L. (ed.). 1988. Heterochrony in evolution: a multidisciplinary approach. New York.
283. _ & McNamara, K. J. (eds.). 1991. Heterochrony: the evolution of ontogeny. New York.
284. Meeuse, A. D. J. 1963. The multiple origins of the angiosperms. Advancing Frontiers Pl. Sci. 1: 105-127.
285. Melville, R. 1962, 1963. A new theory of the angiosperm flower: I, II. Kew Bull. 16: 1-50, 17: 1-63.
286. Melville, R. 1962, 1963. A new theory of the angiosperm flower: I, II. Kew Bull. 16: 1-50, 17: 1-63.
287. _ 1969. Leaf venation patterns and the origin of the angiosperms. Nature 224: 121-125.
288. Merxmüller, H. 1972. Systematic botanyn - an unachieved synthesis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 4: 311-321.
289. Metcalfe, C. R. 1960. Anatomy of the monocotyledons. I. Gramineae. Oxford.
290. _ 1968. Current developments in systematic plant anatomy. Pp. 45-57 in: Heywood, V. H. (ed.), Modern methods in plant taxonomy. London.
291. _ 1971. Anatomy of the monocotyledons. V. Cyperaceae. Oxford.
292. _ 1987. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. III. Oxford.
293. _ & Chalk, L. 1950 Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Oxford.
294. _ & _ 1979, 1983. Anatomy of the dicotyledons, ed. 2. I, II. Oxford.
295. Meusel, H. 1951. Die Bedeutung der Wuchsform für die Entwicklung des natürlichen Systems der Pflanzen. Feddes Repert. 54: 137-172.
296. Meylan, B. A. & Butterfield, B. G. 1972. Three-dimensional structure of wood. A scanning electron microscope study. London.
297. Mishler, B. D. & Churchill, S. P. 1984. A cladistic approach to the phylogeny of the "bryophytes". Brittonia 36: 406-424.
298. Muller, J. 1981. Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 47: 1-142.
299. Munro, S. L. & Linder, H. P. 1998. The phylogenetic position of Prionium (Juncaceae) within the order Juncales based on morphological and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 23: 43-55.
300. Nandi, O. I., Chase, M. W. & Endress, P. K. 1998. A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and non-molecular data sets. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 137-212.
301. Napp-Zinn, K. 1973, 1974, 1984, 1988. Anatomie des Blattes II. Blattanatomie der Angiospermen. Encyclopedia of plant anatomy VIII, A 1, 2, B 1, 2. Berlin.
302. Niklas, K. J. 1994, Plant allometry. The scaling of form and process. Chicago.
303. _ 1997. The evolutionary biology of plants. Chicago.
304. Nixon, K. C., Crepet, W. L., Stevenson, D. W. & Friis, E. M. 1994. A re-evaluation of seed plant phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 484-533.
305. Noshiro, S. & Baas, P. 1998. Systematic wood anatomy of Cornaceae and allies. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. J. 19: 43-97.
306. Nyffeler, R. & Baum, D. A. In press. Phylogenetic relationships of the durians (Bombacaceae-Durioneae or /Malvaceae/Helicteroideae/Durioneae) based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Pl. Syst. Evol. 221.
307. Olmstead, R. G., Bremer, B., Scott, K. M. & Palmer, J. D. 1993. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on rbcL sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 700-722.
308. _ , dePamphilis, C. W., Wolfe, A. D., Young, N. D., Elisens, W. J. & Reeves, P. A. In press. Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 87.
309. Philipson, W. R. 1977. Ovular morphology and the classification of dicotyledons. Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl. 1: 123-140.
310. Poole, I. & Francis, J. E. 2000. The first record of fossil wood of Winteraceae from the Upper Cretaceous of Antarctica. Ann. Bot. 85: 307-315.
311. Prance, G. T. 1968. The systematic position of Rhabdodendron Gilg and Pilg. Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg. 38: 127-146.
312. Puri, V. 1951. The role of floral anatomy in the solution of morphological problems. Bot. Rev. 17: 471-551.
313. Qiu, Y.-L., Cho, Y., Cox, J. C. & Palmer, J. D. 1998a. The gain of three mitochondrial introns identifies liverworts as the earliest land plants. Nature 394: 671-674.
314. _ , Chase, M. W., Hoot, S. B., Conti, E., Crane, P. R., Sytsma, K. J. & Parks, C. R. 1998b. Phylogenetics of the Hamamelidae and their allies: parsimony analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 159: 891-905.
315. _ , Lee, J., Bernasconi-Quadroni, F., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Zanis, M., Zimmer, E. A., Chen, Z., Savolainen, V. & Chase, M. W. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402: 404-407.
316. Raven, P. H. 1981. Research in botanical gardens. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 102: 53-72.
317. Reeves, P. A. & Olmstead, R. G. 1998. Evolution of novel morphological and reproductive traits in a clade containing Antirrhinum majus (Scrophulariaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 85: 1047-1056.
318. Renner, S. S. 1999. Circumscription and phylogeny of the Laurales: evidence from molecular and morphological data. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 1301-1315.
319. Resch, A. & Blaschke, R. 1968. Über die Anwendung des Raster-Elektronenmikroskopes in der Holzanatomie. Planta 78: 85-88.
320. Retallack, G. & Dilcher, D. L. 1981. Arguments for a glossopterid ancestry of angiosperms. Paleobiology 7: 54-67.
321. Richter, H. G. 1981. Anatomie des sekundären Xylems und der Rinde der Lauraceae. Sonderb. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg 5: 1-148.
322. Ridder-Numan, J. 1996. Historical biogeography of the Southeast Asian genus Spatholobus (Legum.-Papilionoideae) and its allies. Blumea Suppl. 10.
323. Rohweder, O. 1963. Anatomische und histogenetische Untersuchungen an Laubsprossen und Blüten der Commelinaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 82: 1-99.
324. _ 1965. Centrospermen-Studien. 2. Entwicklung und morphologische Deutung des Gynöciums bei Phytolacca. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 84: 509-529.
325. _ 1967. Centrospermen-Studien 3. Blütenentwicklung und Blütenbau bei Silenoideen (Caryophyllaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 86: 130-185.
326. _ 1972. Das Andröcium der Malvales und der "Konservatismus" des Leitgewebes. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 92: 155-167.
327. _ 1973. Angiospermen-Morphologie - Ergebnis oder Ausgangspunkt phylogenetischer Hypothesen? Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 93: 372-403.
328. _ 1983. Morphologie. Pp. 1-128, 351-364 in: Rohweder, O. & Endress, P. K. (eds.), Samenpflanzen. Morphologie und Systematik der Angiospermen und Gymnospermen. Stuttgart.
329. Rohwer, J. 2000. Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Lauraceae: evidence from matK sequences. Syst. Bot. 25: 60-71.
330. Ronse Decraene, L. P. & Smets, E. F. 1987. The distribution and the systematic relevance of the androecial characters oligomery and polymery in the Magnoliophytina. Nord. J. Bot. 7: 239-253.
331. _ & _ 1998. Notes on the evolution of androecial organisation in the Magnoliophytina (angiosperms). Bot. Acta 111: 77-86.
332. Rothwell, G. W. & Serbet, R. 1994. Lignophyte phylogeny and the evolution of spermatophytes: a numerical cladistic analysis. Syst. Bot. 19: 443-482.
333. Rudall, P. J. 1995. Anatomy of the monocotyledons VIII. Iridaceae. Oxford.
334. _ & Chase, M. W. 1996. Systematics of Xanthorrhoeaceae sensu lato: evidence for polyphyly. Telopea 6: 629-647.
335. _ & Cutler, D. F. 1995. Asparagales: a reappraisal. Pp. 157-168 in: Rudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F. & Humphries, C. J. (eds.), Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew.
336. _ Stevenson, D. W. & Linder, H. P. 1999. Structure and systematics of Hanguana, a monocotyledon of uncertain affinity. Austral. Syst. Bot. 12: 311-330.
337. Rudall, P. J., Chase, M. W., Cutler, D. F., Rusby, J. & de Bruijn, A. Y. 1998. Anatomical and molecular systematics of Asteliaceae and Hypoxidaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 127: 1-42.
338. Rury, P. M. 1985. Systematic and ecological wood anatomy of the Erythroxylaceae. Int. Assoc. Wood. Anal. Bull. n.s. 6: 365-397.
339. _ & Dickison, W. C. 1984. Structural correlations among wood, leaves and plant habit. Pp. 495-540 in: White, R. A. & Dickison, W. C. (eds.), Contemporary problems in plant anatomy. Orlando.
340. Rutishauser, R. 1985. Blattquirle, Stipeln und Kolleteren bei den Rubieae (Rubiaceae) im Vergleich mit anderen Angiospermen. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 59: 375-424.
341. _ 1998. Plastochron ratio and leaf arc as parameters of a quantitative phyllotaxis analysis in vascular plants. Pp. 171-212 in: Jean, R. V. & Barabé, D. (eds.), Symmetry in plants. Singapore.
342. _ & Dickison, W. C. 1989. Developmental morphology of stipules and systematics of the Cunoniaceae and presumed allies. I. Taxa with interpetiolar stipules. Bot. Helv. 99: 147-169.
343. Sajo, M. G. & Rudall, P. J. 1999. Systematic vegetative anatomy and ensiform leaf development in Xyris (Xyridaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 130: 171-182.
344. Sanderson, M. J. & Donoghue, M. J. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43: 1781-1795.
345. _ & Hufford, L. (eds.). 1996. Homoplasy: the recurrence of similarity in evolution. San Diego.
346. Satina, S. & Blakeslee, A. F. 1943. Periclinal chimeras in Datura in relation to the development of the carpel. Amer. J. Bot. 30: 456-462.
347. Sattler, R. 1972. Centrifugal primordial inception in floral development. Advances Pl. Morph. 1972: 170-178.
348. _ 1974. Organogenesis of flowers. A photographic text-atlas. Toronto.
349. Savolainen, V., Fay, M. F., Albach, D. C., Backlund, A., Van der Bank, M., Cameron, K. M., Johnson, S. A., Lledó, M. D., Pintaud, J.-C., Powell, M., Sheahan, M. C., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Weston, P., Whitten, W. M., Wurdack, K., J. & Chase, M. W. In press. Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew. Bull. 55.
350. Schmid, R. 1972. Floral bundle fusion and vascular conservation. Taxon 21: 429-446.
351. _ , Carlquist, S., Hufford, L. D. & Webster, G. L. 1984. Systematic anatomy of Oceanopapaver. a monotypic genus of the Capparaceae from New Caledonia. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 89: 119-152.
352. Schmid-Hollinger, R. 1964. Die systematische Stellung der Dioncophyllaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 83: 1-56.
353. Schneider, E. L. & Carlquist, S. 1997. Origins and nature of vessels in monocotyledons. 2. Juncaginaceae and Scheuchzeriaceae. Nord. J. Bot. 17: 397-401.
354. _ & _ 1998. Origin and nature of vessels in monocotyledons. 4. Araceae subfamily Philodendroideae. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 125: 253-260.
355. Schwarzbach. A. E. & Ricklefs, R. E. 2000. Systematic affinities of Rhizophoraceae and Anisophylleaceae, and intergeneric relationships within Rhizophoraceae, based on chloroplast DNA, nuclear ribosomal DNA, and morphology. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 547-564.
356. Sennblad, B., Endress, M. E. & Bremer, B. 1998. Morphology and molecular data in phylogenetic fraternity: the tribe Wrightieae (Apocynaceae) revisited. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 1143-1158.
357. Solereder, H. 1899 [English translation by Boodle, L. A. & Fritsch, F. E., 1908. Oxford.] Systematische Anatomie der Dicotyledonen. Stuttgart.
358. _ & Meyer, F. J. 1928-1933. Systematische Anatomie der Monocotyledonen, 1, 3, 4. Berlin.
359. Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Chase, M. W., Mort, M. E., Albach, D. C., Zanis, M., Savolainen, V., Hahn, W. H., Hoot, S. B., Fay, M. F., Axtell, M., Swensen, S. M., Nixon, K. C. & Farris, J. S. In press. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from a combined data set of 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133.
360. Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E. & Chase, M. W. 1999. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402: 402-404.
361. Sporne, K. R. 1958. Some aspects of floral vascular systems. Proc. Linn. Soc. London 169: 75-84.
362. Stace, C. A. 1965. Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. Bull. Brit. Mus., Nat. Hist., Bot., 4: 1-78.
363. Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering plants. Evolution above the species level. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
364. Steere, W. C. (ed.). 1958. Fifty years of botany. Golden Jubilee Volume of the Botanical Society of America. New York.
365. Stern, W. L. 1978. A retrospective view of comparative anatomy, phylogeny, and plant taxonomy. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. Bull. 1978(2-3): 33-39.
366. _ , Cheadle, V. I. & Thorsch, J. 1993. Apostasiads, systematic anatomy, and the origins of Orchidaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 111: 411-455.
367. Stevens, P. F. 1980. Evolutionary polarity of character states. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 333-358.
368. _ 1986. Evolutionary classification in botany, 1960-1985. J. Arnold Arbor. 67: 313-339.
369. _ 1991. Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: a review. Syst. Bot. 16: 553-583.
370. Stevenson, D. W. 1973. Phyllode theory in relation to leaf ontogeny in Sansevieria trifasciata. Amer. J. Bot. 60: 387-395.
371. _ & Loconte, H. 1995. Cladistic analysis of monocot families. Pp. 543-578 in: Rudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F. & Humphries, C. J. (eds.), Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew.
372. Stuessy, T. F. 1979a. The cladistics of Melampodium (Compositae). Taxon 28: 179-195.
373. _ 1979b. Ultrastructural data for the practicing plant systematist. Amer. Zool. 19: 621-636.
374. _ 1980. Cladistics and plant systematics: problems and prospects. Introduction. Syst. Bot. 5: 109-111.
375. _ 1990. Plant taxonomy. The systematic evaluation of comparative data. New York.
376. Suessenguth, K. & Merxmüller, H. 1952. Über die Herkunft der Angiospermen. Phyton 4: 1-18.
377. Takhtajan, A. 1959. Die Evolution der Angiospermen. Jena.
378. _ 1966. Systema et phylogenia Magnoliophvtorum. Leningrad.
379. _ 1976. Neoteny and the origin of flowering plants. Pp. 207-219 in: Beck, C. B. (ed.), Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. New York.
380. _ 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev. 46: 225-359.
381. _ 1987. Systema Magnoliophytorum. Leningrad.
382. _ (ed.). 1985-1996. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Leningrad/St. Petersburg.
383. _ 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York.
384. Taylor, D. W. 1990. Angiosperm ovules and carpels: their characters and polarities, distribution in basal clades, and structural evolution. Postilla 208: 1-40.
385. _ & Hickey, L. J. 1992. Phylogenetic evidence for the herbaceous origin of angiosperms. Pl. Syst. Evol. 180: 137-156.
386. Taylor, T. N. & Millay, M. A. 1979. Pollination biology and reproduction in early seed plants. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 27: 329-355.
387. Theissen, G. & Saedler, H. 1999. The golden decade of molecular floral development (1990-1999): a cheerful obituary. Developm. Genet. 15: 1-13.
388. Thorne, R. F. 1963. Some problems and guiding principles of angiosperm phylogeny. Amer. Nat. 97: 287-305.
389. _ 1973. The "Amentiferae" or Hamamelidae, as an artificial group: a summary statement. Brittonia 25: 395-405.
390. _ 1976. A phylogenetic classification of the Angiospermae. Evol. Biol. 9: 35-106.
391. _ 1992. Systematics and geography of the flowering plants. Bot. Rev. 58: 225-348.
392. Thorsch, J. A. & Cheadle, V. I. 1996. Vessels in Eriocaulaceae. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. J. n.s. 17: 183-204.
393. _ & Stern, W. L. 1997. Tracheary studies and the terrestrial ancestry of Orchidaceae. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 158: 222-227.
394. Thulin, M., Bremer, B., Richardson, J., Niklasson, J., Fay, M. F. & Chase, M. W. 1998. Family relationships of the enigmatic rosid genera Barbeya and Dirachma from the Horn of Afrca region. Pl. Syst. Evol. 213: 103-119.
395. Tirel, C., Jérémie, J. & Lobreau-Callen, D. 1996. Corchorus neocaledonicus (Tiliaceae), véritable identité de l'énigmatique Oceanopapaver. Adansonia 18: 35-43.
396. Tobe, H., Carlquist, S. & Iltis, H. H. 1999. Reproductive anatomy and relationships of Setchellanthus caeruleus (Setchellanthaceae). Taxon 48: 277-283.
397. Tomlinson, P. B. 1961. Anatomy of the monocotyledons II. Palmae. Oxford.
398. _ 1969. Anatomy of the monocotyledons III. Commelinales-Zingiberales. Oxford.
399. _ 1977. Plant morphology and anatomy in the tropics - the need for integrated approaches. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 64: 685-693.
400. _ 1982. Anatomy of the monocotyledons VII. Helobiae (Alismatidae). Oxford.
401. _ 1984a. Vegetative morphology - some enigmas in relation to plant systematics. Pp. 49-66 in: Heywood, V. H. & Moore, D. M. (eds.), Current concepts in plant taxonomy. London.
402. _ 1984b. Development of the stem conducting tissues in monocotyledons. Pp. 1-51 in: White, R. A. & Dickison, W. C. (eds.), Contemporary problems in plant anatomy. Orlando.
403. _ 1987. Architecture of tropical plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 1-21.
404. _ 1990. The structural biology of palms. Oxford.
405. _ 1995. Non-homology of vascular organisation in monocotyledons and dicotyledons. Pp. 589-622 in: Rudall, P. J., Cribb, P., Cutler, D. F. & Humphries, C. J. (eds.), Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew.
406. _ & Smith, A. C. 1970. Joinvilleaceae, a new family of monocotyledons. Taxon 19: 887-889.
407. _ & Zimmermann, M. H. 1966a. Anatomy of the palm Rhapis excelsa, III. Juvenile phase. J. Arnold Arbor. 47: 301-312.
408. _ & _ 1966b. Vascular bundles in palm stems - their bibliographic evolution. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 110: 174-181.
409. _ , Sattler, R. & Stevens, P. F. 1984. Homology in modular organisms - concepts and consequences. Syst. Bot. 9: 373-109.
410. Troll, W. 1964, 1969. Die Infloreszenzen I, II, 1. Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers. Jena.
411. _ & Weberling, F. 1989. Infloreszenzuntersuchungen an monotelen Familien. Stuttgart.
412. Tucker, S. C. 1959. Ontogeny of the inflorescence and flower in Drimys winteri var. chilensis. Univ. Calif. Publ Bot. 30: 257-336.
413. _ 1972. The role of ontogenetic evidence in floral morphology. Advances Pl. Morph. 1972: 359-369.
414. _ 1975. Floral development in Saururus cernuus (Saururaceae): 1. Floral initiation and stamen development. Amer. J. Bot. 62: 993-1005.
415. _ 1989. Evolutionary implications of floral ontogeny in legumes. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 29: 59-75.
416. _ & Douglas, A. W. 1994. Ontogenetic evidence and phylogenetic relationships among basal taxa of legumes. Pp. 11-32 in: Ferguson, I. K. & Tucker, S. (eds.), Advances in legume systematics 6: Structural botany. Kew.
417. _ & _ 1996. Floral structure, development, and relationships of paleoherbs: Saruma, Cabomba, Lactoris and selected Piperales. Pp. 141-175 in: Taylor, D. W. & Hickey, L. J. (eds.), Flowering plant origin, evolution and phylogeny. New York.
418. _ , _ & Liang, H.-X. 1993. Utility of ontogenetic and conventional characters in determining phylogenetic relationships of Saururaceae and Piperaceae (Piperales). Syst. Bot. 18: 614-641.
419. Turner, H. 1995. Cladistic and biogeographic analyses of Arytera Blume and Mischarytera gen. nov. (Sapindaceae). Blumea Suppl. 9.
420. Uphof, J. C. Th., Hummel, K. & Staesche, K. 1962. Plant hairs. Encyclopedia of plant anatomy IV, 5. Berlin.
421. van Heel, W. A. 1966. Morphology of the androecium in the Malvales. Blumea 13: 177-394.
422. _ 1983. The ascidiform early development of free carpels, a S.E.M.-investigation. Blumea 28: 231-270.
423. Van Vliet, G. J. C. M. & Baas, P. 1984. Wood anatomy and classification of the Myrtales. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 71: 783-800.
424. Van Welzen, P. C. 1989. Guioa Cav. (Sapindaceae): taxonomy, phylogeny, and historical biogeography. Leiden Bot. Series 12.
425. Vogel, S. 1959. Organographie der Blüten kapländischer Ophrydeen mit Bemerkungen zum Koaptations-Problem I, II. Abh. Akad. Wiss. Lit. Mainz, Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 1959: 265-532.
426. Wagenitz, G. 1959. Die systematische Stellung der Rubiaceae. Ein Beitrag zum System der Sympetalen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 79: 17-35.
427. _ 1975. Blütenreduktion als ein zentrales Problem der Angiospermen-Systematik. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 96: 448-470.
428. _ 1997. The impact of molecular methods on the systematics of angiosperms. Bot. Acta 110: 274-281.
429. Walker, D. B. 1975a, b, c. Postgenital carpel fusion in Catharanthus roseus (Apocynaceae) I, II, III. Amer. J. Bot. 62: 457-467; Protoplasma 86: 29-41, 43-63.
430. Walker, D. B. 1975a, b, c. Postgenital carpel fusion in Catharanthus roseus (Apocynaceae) I, II, III. Amer. J. Bot. 62: 457-467; Protoplasma 86: 29-41, 43-63.
431. Walker, J. W. 1976. Evolutionary significance of the exine in the pollen of primitive angiosperms. Pp. 251-308 in: Ferguson, I. K. & Muller, J. (eds.), The evolutionary significance of the exine. London.
432. _ 1979. Contributions of electron microscopy to angiosperm phylogeny and systematics: significance of ultrastructural characters in delimiting higher taxa. Amer. Zool. 19: 609-619.
433. _ & Walker, A. G. 1984. Ultrastructure of Lower Cretaceous angiosperm pollen and the origin and early evolution of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 71: 464-521.
434. Wallander, E. & Albert, V. A. In press. Phylogeny and classification of Oleaceae based on rps16 and trnL-F sequence data. Amer J. Bot. 87.
435. Weber, A. 1980. Die Homologie des Perigons der Zingiberaceen: ein Beitrag zur Morphologie und Phylogenie des Monokotylen-Perigons. Pl. Syst. Evol. 133: 149-179.
436. Weberling, F. 1964. Homologien im Infloreszenzbereich und ihr systematischer Wert. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 76: 102-112.
437. _ 1989a. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge.
438. _ 1989b. Structure and evolutionary tendencies of inflorescences in the Leguminosae. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bol. Gard 29: 35-58.
439. _ & Troll, W. 1998. Die Infloreszenzen. Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers II/2. Monotele undpolytele Synfloreszenzen. Jena.
440. Westerkamp, C. & Demmelmeyer, H. 1997. Leaf surfaces of Central European woody plants. Berlin.
441. Wheeler, E. A. & Baas, P. 1991. A survey of the fossil record for dicotyledonous wood and its significance for evolutionary and ecological wood anatomy. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. Bull., n.s. 12: 275-332.
442. _ & _ 1998. Wood identification - a review. Int. Assoc. Wood. Anal. J. 19: 241-264.
443. Williams S. E., Albert, V. A. & Chase, M. W. 1994. Relationships of Droseraceae: a cladistic analysis of rbcL sequence and morphological data. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 1027-1037.
444. Wolfe, J. 1973. Fossil forms of Amentiferae. Brittonia 25: 334-355.
445. Wunderlich, R. 1968. Some remarks on the taxonomic significance of the seed coat. Phytomorphology 17: 301-311.
446. Wurdack, J. J. 1986. Atlas of hairs for neotropical Melastomataceae. Smithsonian Contr. Bot. 63: 1-80.
447. Yakovlev, M. S. (ed.). 1981-1990. Comparative embryology of flowering plants. Leningrad.
448. Young, D. A. 1981. Are the angiosperms primitively vesselless? Syst. Bot. 6: 313-330.
449. Zimmer, E. A. 1994. Perspectives on future applications of experimental biology to evolution. Pp. 607-616 in: Schierwater, B., Streit, B., Wagner, G. P. & DeSalle, R. (eds.), Molecular ecology and evolution: approaches and applications. Basel.
450. Zimmermann, M. H. & Tomlinson, P. B. 1965a. Anatomy of the palm Rhapis excelsa, I. Mature vegetative axis. J. Arnold Arbor. 46: 160-180.
451. _ & _ 1965b. Unravelling the palm stem. Principes 9: 88-93.
452. _ & _ 1967. Anatomy of the palm Rhapis excelsa, IV. Vascular development in apex of vegetative aerial axis and rhizome. J. Arnold Arbor. 48: 122-142.
453. _ & _ 1974. Vascular patterns in palm stems: variations of the Rhapis principle. J. Arnold Arbor. 55: 402-424.
454. Zimmermann, W. 1959. Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen, ed. 2. Stuttgart.