Foliar architecture of vanilloid orchids: Insights into the evolution of reticulate leaf venation in monocotyledons

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 128, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 45-70

  Cameron, Kenneth M ^a   Dickison, William C ^b  

^a NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Galeola; Lecanorchis; Pogonia; Vanilla; Vanilleae

Indexed keywords

GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC MARKER; NEMATODE;

CLEMATEPISTEPHIUM SMILACIFOLIUM; DITYLENCHUS DESTRUCTOR; DITYLENCHUS DIPSACI; DITYLENCHUS MYCELIOPHAGUS; EPISTEPHIUM; ERIAXIS RIGIDA; ISOTRIA; NEMATODA; POGONIA OPHIOGLOSSOIDES; VANILLA; VICIA FABA;

EID: 0031711621     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/bojl.1998.0183     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Cameron KM, Chase MW. 1996. Systematic investigations of the vanilloid orchids: evidence from DNA sequences, anatomy, and morphology. American Journal of Botany 83 (supplement): 143.
2. Cameron KM, Chase MW, Hills H. 1992. A phylogenetic analysis of the Orchidaceac based on rbcL nucleotide sequence data. American Journal of Botany 79 (supplement): 137.
3. Chase MW, Stevenson DW, Wilkin P, Rudall PJ. 1995. Monocot systematics: a combined analysis. In: Rudall PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 685-730.
4. Conover MV. 1983. The vegetative morphology of the reticulate-veined Liliiflorae. Telopea 2: 401-412.
5. Conover MV. 1991. Epidermal patterns of the reticulate-veined Liliiflorae and their parallel-veined allies. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 107: 295-312.
6. Conran JG. 1987. A phenetic study of the relationships of Drymophila R. Br. within the reticulate-veined Liliiflorae. Australian Journal of Botany 35: 283-300.
7. Conran JG. 1989. Cladistic analyses of some net-veined Liliiflorae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 168: 123-141.
8. Conran JG, Christophel DC, Scriven L. 1994. Petermanniopsis angleseaensis gen. and sp. nov.: an Australian fossil net-veined monocotyledon from Eocene Victoria. International Journal of Plant Science 155: 816-827.
9. Cronquist A. 1981. An integrated system of clarification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
10. Dahlgren RMT, Clifford HT. 1982. The monocotyledons: a comparative study. London: Academic Press.
11. Dahlgren RMT, Clifford HT, Yeo PF. 1985. The families of the monocotyledons. New York: Springer Verlag.
12. Dahlgren RMT, Rasmussen FN. 1983. Monocotyledon evolution: characters and phylogenetic estimation. In: Heckt MK, Wallace B, Prance GT, eds. Evolutionary Biology 16: 255-395.
13. Doyle JA, Hickey LJ. 1974. Pollen and leaves from the mid-Crelaceous Potomac group and their bearing on early angiosperm evolution. In: Beck CB, ed. Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. New York: Columbia University Press. 139-206.
14. Dressler RL. 1990. The major clades of the Orchidaceae - Epidendroideae. Lindleyana 5: 117-125.
15. Dressier RL. 1993. Phylogeny and classification of the orchid family. Portland: Dioscorides Press.
16. Foster AS, Gifford EM. 1974. Comparative morphology of vascular plants. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
17. Garay L. 1961. Notes on the genus Epistephium. American Orchid Society Bulletin 30: 496-500.
18. Garay L. 1986. Olim Vanillaccae. Botanical Museum Leaflets 30: 223-237.
19. Groom P. 1895. Contributions to the knowledge of monocotyledonous saprophytes. Journal of the Linnaean Society of London 31: 149-215.
20. Hallier H. 1912. L'origine et le système phylétique des angiosperms. Arch. Néerl. Sci. Exact. Nat., Ser. 3 1: 146-234.
21. Hickey LJ. 1973. Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. American Journal of Botany 60: 17-33.
22. Hickey LJ. 1979. A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. In: Metcalfe CR, Chalk L, eds. Anatomy of the dicotyledons, second edition, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 25-39.
23. Hickey LJ, Peterson RK. 1978. Zingiberopsis, a fossil of the ginger family from late Cretaceous to early Eocene sediments of Western Interior North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 56: 1136-1152.
24. Hoehne FC. 1945. Flora Brasilica, volume XII, no. II Orchidaceae. Sao Paulo: Instituto de Botanica.
25. Inamdar JA, Shenoy KN, Rao NV. 1983. Leaf architecture of some monocotyledons with reticulate venation. Annals of Botany 52: 725-735.
26. Melville R. 1976. The terminology of leaf architecture. Taxon 25: 549-561.
27. Oliver WRB. 1950. The fossil flora of New Zealand. Tuatara 3: 1-11.
28. Pray TR. 1955a. Foliar venation of angiosperms III. Pattern and histology of the venation of Hosta. American Journal of Botany 42: 611-617.
29. Pray TR. 1955b. Foliar venation of angiosperms IV. Histogenesis of the venation of Hosta. American Journal of Botany 42: 698-706.
30. Taylor DW, Hickey LJ. 1990. An Aptian plant with attached leaves and flowers: implications for angiosperm origin. Science 247: 702-704.
31. Triplett JK, Kirchoff BK. 1991. Lamina architecture and anatomy in the Heliconiaceae and Musaceae (Zingiberales). Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 887-896.