Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 83-115

  Okhee, Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033238833     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00346543069001083     Document Type: Article

References (184)

1. Abedi, J., Lord, C., & Plummer, J. R. (1997). Final report of language background as a variable in NAEP mathematics performance (CSE Technical Report No. 429). Los Angeles, University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
2. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 26, 1-52.
3. Allen, N. J., & Crawley, F. E. (1998). Voices from the bridge: Worldview conflicts of Kickapoo students of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 111-132.
4. Allen, N. L., Swinton, S. S., Isham, S. P., & Zelenak, C. A. (1998). Technical report of the NAEP 1996 state assessment program in science. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education: National Center for Education Statistics.
5. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1996). Summary comparison of content between "National science education standards" and "Benchmarks for science literacy" and "Science for all Americans." Washington, DC: Author.
8. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1997). Resources for science literacy: Professional development. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. American Federation of Teachers. (1997). Making standards matter 1997: An annual fifty-state report on efforts to raise academic standards. Washington, DC: Author.
10. Anderson, J. A. (1988). Cognitive styles and multicultural populations. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 2-9.
11. Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3-42.
12. Atwater, M. M. (1994). Research on cultural diversity in the classroom. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 558-576). New York: Macmillan.
13. Atwater, M. M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 821-837.
14. Atwater, M. M., & Riley, J. P. (1993). Multicultural science education: Perspectives, definitions, and research agenda. Science Education, 77, 661-668.
15. August, D., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Baker, D. (1998). Equity issues in science education. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part two (pp. 869-896). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(1), 3-27.
18. Banks, J. (1993a). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions and practice. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of Research in Education. Vol. 19 (pp. 3-49). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
19. Banks, J. (1993b). Canon debate, knowledge construction, and multicultural education. Educational Researcher, 22(5), 4-14.
20. Banks, J. (1995). The historical reconstruction of knowledge about race: Implications for transformative teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(2), 15-25.
21. Barba, R. H. (1993). A study of culturally syntonic variables in the bilingual/ bicultural science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1053-1071.
22. Barba, R. H., & Reynolds, K. E. (1998). Towards an equitable learning environment in science for Hispanic students. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part two (pp. 925-940). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
23. Bernal, M. (1987). Black Athena - The Afroasiatic roots of classical civilization. London, UK: Free Association Books.
24. Brickhouse, N. (1994). Bringing in the outsiders: Reshaping the sciences of the future. Curriculum Studies, 26, 401-416.
25. Brickhouse, N. (1998). Feminism(s) in science education. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part two (pp. 1067-1082). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Brickhouse, N., & Stanley, W. B. (1995). Response to Good. Science Education, 79(3), 337-339.
27. Butler, F. A., & Stevens, R. (1997). Accommodation strategies for English language learners on large-scale assessments: Student characteristics and other considerations (CSE Technical Report No. 448). Los Angeles, University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
28. Calabrese Barton, A. (1997). Liberatory science education: Weaving connections between feminist theory and science education. Curriculum Inquiry, 27, 141-163.
29. Calabrese Barton, A. (1998a). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379-394.
30. Calabrese Barton, A. (1998b). Reframing 'science for all'' through the politics of poverty. Educational Policy, 12, 525-541.
31. Calabrese Barton, A., & Osborne, M. D. (Eds.). (1998). Pedagogies in science education. [Special Issue]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4).
32. Champagne, A. B. (1997). President's column. NARST News, 40(3), 1-2.
33. Champagne, A. B., & Newell, S. T. (1992). Directions for research and development: Alternative methods of assessing scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 841-860.
34. Christie, M. (1991). Aboriginal science for the ecologically sustainable future. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 37, 26-31.
35. Clune, W. H. (1998). The "standards wars" in perspective. Teachers College Record, 100, 144-149.
36. Cobern, W. W. (1991). World view theory and science education research (NARST Monograph, Number 3). Kansas State University, KS: The National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
37. Cobern, W. W., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1998). Cultural aspects of learning science. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part one (pp. 39-52). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
38. Cohen, D. K. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher, 24, 11-17.
39. Collins, A. (1998). National Science Education Standards: A political document. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(7), 711-727.
40. Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is. 'another world': Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79, 313-333.
41. Council of Chief State School Officers. (1997). A state-by-state look at content standards and benchmarks: Examples of mathematics and science standards. Washington, DC: Author.
42. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Boston: College-Hill Press.
43. Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 18-35.
44. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 5-30.
45. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280-298.
46. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: W. W. Norton.
47. Donmoyer, R. (1995). The rhetoric and reality of systemic reform: A critique of the proposed National Science Education Standards. Theory into Practice, 34, 30-34.
48. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12.
49. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Association, 33, 261-295.
50. Elmore, R. F. (1995). Structural reform in educational practice. Educational Researcher, 24, 23-26.
51. Elmore, R. F., & Fuhrman, S. H. (1994). Education professionals and curriculum governance. In R. F. Elmore & S. H. Fuhrman (Eds.), The governance of curriculum (pp. 210-215). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
52. Estrin, E. T. (1993). Alternative assessment: Issues in language, culture, and equity. Far West Laboratory, 11, 1-8.
53. Fradd, S. H., & Larrinaga McGee, P. (1994). Instructional assessment: An integrative approach to evaluating student performance. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
54. Fradd, S. H., Lee, O., Cabrera, P., del Rio, V., Leth, A., Morin, R., Ceballos, M., Santalla, M., Cross, L., & Mathieu, T. (1997). School-university partnership to promote science with students learning English. TESOL Journal, 7, 35-40.
55. Gallard, A., Viggiano, E., Graham, S., Stewart, G., & Vigliano, M. (1998). The learning of voluntary and involuntary minorities in science classrooms. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part two (pp. 941-954). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
56. García, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1994). Assessment and diversity. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of Research in Education. Vol. 20 (pp. 337-383). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
57. Gee, J. P. (1997). Science talk: Language and knowledge in classroom discussion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Oakbrook, IL.
58. Gee, J. P. (in press). Progressivism, critique, and socially situated minds. In C. Edelsky & C. Dudley-Marling (Eds.), Progressive education: History and critique. Urbana, IL: National Council for the Teaching of English.
59. George, Y. S., & Van Horne, V. V. (1996). Science education reform for all: A look at how state departments of education are infusing equity and excellence into preK-12 systemic reform. Washington, DC: Author.
60. Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.
61. Glaser, R., & Linn, R. (1997). Assessment in transition: Monitoring the nation's educational progress. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, National Academy of Education.
62. Good, R. (1993). Editorial: The slippery slopes of postmodernism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 427.
63. Good, R. G. (1995). Comments on multicultural science education. Science Education, 79(3), 335-336.
64. Grant, C. (1989). Equity, teachers and classroom life. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Equity in education (pp. 89-102). Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
65. Grant, C., & Sleeter, C. (1986). Turning on learning: Five approaches to multicultural teaching, plans for race, class, gender end disability. New York: Merrill.
66. Hamilton, L. S. (1998). Gender differences on high school science achievement tests: Do format and content matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(3), 179-195.
67. Hampton, E. (1991). Toward a redefinition of American Indian/Alaska Native education. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 20, 261-309.
68. Hewson, M. G. (1988). The ecological context of knowledge: Implications for learning science in developing countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 317-326.
69. Hodson, D. (1993). In search of a rationale for multicultural science education. Science Education, 77, 685-711.
70. Hodgkinson, H. L. (1985). All one system: Demographics of education, kindergarten through graduate school. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
71. Howes, E. V. (1998). Connecting girls and science: A feminist teacher research study of a high school prenatal testing unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(8), 877-896.
72. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (1988). Science achievement in seventeen countries: A preliminary report. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
73. Jegede, O. J., & Okebukola, P. A. (1991). The relationship between African traditional cosmology and students' acquisition of a science process skill. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 37-47.
74. Jegede, O. J., & Okebukola, P. A. (1992). Differences in sociocultural environment perceptions associated with gender in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 637-647.
75. Jones, L. V. (1996). A history of the National Assessment of Educational Progress and some questions about its future. Educational Researcher, 25, 15-22.
76. Jones, L. R., Mullis I. V. S., Raizen, S. A., Weiss, I. R., & Weston, E. A. (1992). The 1990 science report card: NAEP's assessment of fourth, eighth, and twelfth graders. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education: National Center for Education Statistics.
77. Kahle, J. B. (1990). Why girls don't know. In M. B. Rowe (Ed.), What research says to science teachers (pp. 55-67). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
78. Kahle, J. B. (1997). Reaching equity in systemic reform: How do we assess progress and problems? Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.
79. Kawagley, A. O., Norris-Tull, D., & Norris-Tull, R. A. (1998). The indigenous worldview of Yupiaq culture: Its scientific nature and relevance to the practice and teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 133-144.
80. Kawasaki, K. (1996). The concepts of science in Japanese and Western education. Science & Education, 5, 1-20.
81. Keller, E. (1982). Feminism and science. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 7(3), 589-602.
82. Kirst, M. W., & Bird, R. (1997, April). The politics of developing and maintaining math and science curriculum standards (Research Monograph #2). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.
83. Klein, S. P. (1997). The cost effectiveness of performance measures. Paper presented at the "Science education standards: The assessment of science meets the science of assessment" conference, Washington, DC.
84. Knapp, M. S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 227-266.
85. Kochman, T. (1989). Black and white cultural styles in pluralistic perspective. In B. Gifford (Ed.), Test policy and test performance: Education, language, and culture. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
86. Koretz, D. (1997). The assessment of students with disabilities in Kentucky (CSE Technical Report 431). Los Angeles, University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
87. Kumar, A., & Kenealy, P. (1992). An issue of cultural diversity in science. In S. Hills (Ed.), The history and philosophy of science education. Vol. II Kingston, Ontario: Queen's University.
88. Lacelle-Peterson, M. W., & Rivera, C. (1994). Is it real for all kids? A framework for equitable assessment policies for English language learners. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 55-75.
89. Lawrenz, F., & Gray, B. (1995). Investigation of worldview theory in a South African context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 555-568.
90. Lee, O. (1996). Diversity and equity for Asian American students in science education. Science Education, 81, 107-122.
91. Lee, O. (1997). Science literacy for all: What is it, and how can we achieve it? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 219-222.
92. Lee, O. (1998). Current conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents and implications for equity and assessment (Research Monograph 12). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.
93. Lee, O. (in press). Science knowledge, world views, and information sources in social and cultural contexts: Making sense after a natural disaster. American Educational Research Journal.
94. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1996). Interactional patterns of linguistically diverse students and teachers: Insights for promoting science learning. Linguistics and Education: An International Research Journal, 8, 269-297.
95. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 12-21.
96. Lee, O., Fradd, S. H., & Sutman, F. X. (1995). Science knowledge and cognitive strategy use among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 797-816.
97. Lomask, M. S., Baron, J. B. & Greig, J. (1998). Large-scale science performance assessment in Connecticut: Challenges and resolutions. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part two (pp. 823-844). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
98. Loving, C. (1995). Comment on multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 79(3), 341-348.
99. Loving, C. C. (1997). From the summit of truth to its slippery slopes: Science education's journey through positivist-postmodern territory. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 421-452.
100. Lynch, S. (in press). Equity and science education reform. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbuam Publishers.
101. Madaus, G. F. (1994). A technological and historical consideration of equity issues associated with proposals to change the nation's testing policy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 76-95
102. Maddock, M. N. (1981). Science education: An anthropological viewpoint. Studies in Science Education, 8, 1-26.
103. Martin, M. O., & Kelly, D. L. (Eds.). (1996). Third International Mathematics and Science Study technical report, Volume 1: Design and development. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy.
104. Massell, D. (1994). Three challenges for national content standards. Education and Urban Society, 26, 185-195.
105. Matthews, C. E., & Smith, W. S. (1994). Native American related materials in elementary science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4), 363-380.
106. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
107. Matthews, M. R. (1998). The nature of science and science teaching. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part two (pp. 981-1000). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
108. Mayberry, M. (1998). Reproductive and resistant pedagogies: The comparative roles of collaborative learning and feminist pedagogy in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 443-460.
109. McKinley, E., Waiti, P. M., & Bell, B. (1992). Language, culture and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 579-595.
110. McDonnell, L. M., McLaughlin, M. J., & Morison, P. (Eds.). (1997). Educating one an all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
111. McKnight, C. C., Schmidt, W. H., & Raizen, S. A. (1993). Test blueprints: A description of the TIMSS achievement test content and design (Doc. Ref.: ICC797/NRC357). Document prepared for the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS).
112. McLaughlin, M. W., Shepard, L. A., & O'Day, J. A. (1995). Improving education through standards-based reform: A report by the National Academy of Education Panel on Standards-based Education Reform. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, National Academy of Education.
113. Monty Neill, D., & Medina, N. (1989). Standardized testing: Harmful to educational health. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 688-697.
114. National Assessment Governing Board. (1994). Science assessment and exercise specifications for the 1994 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: Author.
115. National Assessment Governing Board. (1996). Science framework for the 1996 National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP Science Consensus Project. Washington, DC: Author.
116. National Center on Education and the Economy. (1997a). Performance standards: English language arts, mathematics, science, applied learning. Vol. 1. Elementary school. Washington, DC: Author.
117. National Center on Education and the Economy. (1997b). Performance standards: English language arts, mathematics, science, applied learning. Vol. 2. Middle school. Washington, DC: Author.
118. National Center on Education and the Economy. (1997c). Performance standards: English language arts, mathematics, science, applied learning. Vol. 3. High school. Washington, DC: Author.
119. National Center on Education and the Economy. (1998). New Standards science reference exam: Release package, 4th grade spring pilot 1997. Washington, DC: Author.
120. National Center for Education Statistics. (1992). Language characteristics and academic achievement: A look at Asian and Hispanic eighth graders in NELS: 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
121. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. (1997). Moving up to complex assessment systems: Proceedings from the 1996 CRESST Conference. Evaluation Comment, 7(1).
122. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
123. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
124. National Science Foundation. (1994). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 1994. Arlington, VA (NSF-94-333).
125. National Science Teachers Association. (1992). Scope, sequence, and coordination of secondary school science. Vol. 1. The content core: A guide for curriculum designers. Washington, DC: Author.
126. National Science Teachers Association. (1995). Scope, sequence, and coordination of national science education content standards: An addendum to the Content Core based on the 1994 Draft National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
127. National Science Teachers Association. (1996). Scope, sequence, and coordination: A framework for high school science education, 1996 edition, based on the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
128. Needham, J. (1981). Science of traditional China: A comparative perspective. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
129. Newmann, F., Brandt, R., & Wiggins, G. (1998). An exchange of views on "semantics, psychometrics, and assessment reform: A close look at 'authentic' assessments." Educational Researcher, 27(6), 19-22.
130. Nicholls, S. E., Gilmer, P. J., Thompson, A. D., & Davis, N. (1998). Women in science: Expanding the vision. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part two (pp. 967-980). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
131. O'Day, J. A., & Smith, M. S. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system (pp. 250-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
132. Ogawa, M. (1995). Science education in a multiscience perspective. Science Education, 79(5), 583-593.
133. Ogunniyi, M. B. (1988). Adapting western science to traditional African culture. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 1-9.
134. O'Loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 791-820.
135. Olson, S. (1998, September 30). Science Friction. Education Week, pp. 25-29.
136. O'Sullivan, C. Y., Reese, C. M., & Mazzeo, J. (1997). NAEP 1996 science report card for the nation and the states. Wishington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
137. Parker, L. H., & Rennie, L. J. (1998). Equitable assessment strategies. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part two (pp. 897-910). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
138. Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1991). Students' multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 224-250.
139. Pomeroy, D. (1992). Science across cultures: Building bridges between traditional western and Alaskan Native sciences. In S. Hills (Ed.), The history and philosophy of science in science education. Vol. II. Kingston, Ontario: Queen's University.
140. Pomeroy, D. (1994). Science education and cultural diversity: Mapping the field. Studies in Science Education, 24, 49-73.
141. Porter, A. C. (1995). The uses and misuses of opportunity-to-learn standards. Educational Researcher, 24, 21-27.
142. Porter, A. C., Smithson, J., & Osthoff, E. (1994). Standards setting as a strategy for upgrading high school mathematics and science. In R. F. Elmore, & S. H. Fuhrman (Eds.), The governance of curriculum (pp. 138-166). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
143. Portes, A., & Hao, L. (1998). E Pluribus Unum: Bilingualism and loss of language in the second generation. Sociology of Education, 71, 269-294.
144. Prophet, R. B., & Rowell, P. M. (1993). Coping and control: Science teaching strategies in Botswana. Qualitative Studies in Education, 6, 197-209.
145. Raizen, S. A. (1998). Standards for science education. Teachers College Record, 100(1), 66-121.
146. Rakow, S. J., & Bermudez, A. B. (1993). Science is "Cicencia": Meeting the needs of Hispanic American students. Science Education, 77, 547-560.
147. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
148. Rennie, L. J. (1998). Gender equity: Toward clarification and a research direction for science teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(8), 951-961.
149. Robbins, R. (1983). John Dewey's philosophy and American Indian: A brief discussion of how it could work. Journal of American Indian Education, 22, 1-9.
150. Robitallie, D. F., McKnight C., Schmidt, W. H., Britton, E., Raizen, S., & Nicol, C. (1993). TIMSS Monograph No. 1. Curriculum frameworks for mathematics and science. Vancouver, CA: Pacific Educational Press.
151. Rodríguez, A. J. (1997). The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council's National Science Education Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 19-37.
152. Rodríguez, A. J. (1998a). Busting open the meritocracy myth: Rethinking equity and student achievement in science education. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering [Special Issue on Evaluating Equity Programs].
153. Rodríguez, A. J. (1998b). Strategies for counterresistence: Toward sociotransformative constructivism and learning to teach science for diversity and for understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 589-622.
154. Romberg, T. A. (1998). Comments: NCTM's curriculum and evaluation standards. Teachers College Record, 100(1), 8-21.
155. Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 61-94.
156. Ross, K. E. K., & Shuell, T. J. (1993). Children's beliefs about earthquakes. Science Education, 77, 191-205.
157. Roth, W-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35-59.
158. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Rhetoric and reality in science performance assessments: An update. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1045-1063.
159. Sardar, Z. (1989). Explorations in Islamic science. London, UK: Mansell.
160. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
161. Secada, W. G. (1989). Educational equity versus equality of education: An alternative conception. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Equity in education (pp. 68-88). Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
162. Secada, W. G. (1994a). Equity and the teaching of mathematics. In M. M. Atwater, K. Radzik-Marsh, & M. Strutchens (Eds.), Multicultural education: Inclusion of all (pp. 19-38). Athens, GA: The University of Georgia.
163. Secada , W. G. (1994b). Equity in restructured schools. NCRMSE Research Review: The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, 3(3). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Center for Research in Mathematical Sciences Education.
164. Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., Pine, J. (1992). Performance assessments: Political rhetoric and measurement reality. Educational Researcher, 2(1), 22-27.
165. Shaw, J. M. (1997). Threats to the validity of science performance assessments for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 721-743.
166. Shepard, L., Taylor, G., & Betebenner, D. (1998). Inclusion of limited-English-proficient students in Rhode Island's grade 4 mathematics performance assessment (CSE Technical Report No. 486). Los Angeles, University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
167. Siegel, H. (1997). Science education: Multicultural and universal. Interchange, 28(2), 97-108.
168. Simmons, W., & Resnick, L. (1993). Assessment as the catalyst of school reform. Educational Leadership, 50(5), 11-15.
169. Smith, M. S., & O'Day, J. (1990). Educational equality: 1966 and now. In D. Verstegen (Ed.), Spheres of justice in American schools. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
170. Smith, M. S., & O'Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman, & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing: The 1990 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 233-268). Briston, PA: The Falmer Press.
171. Smolicz, J. J., & Nunan, E. E. (1975). The philosophical and sociological foundations of science education: The demythologizing of school science. Studies in Science Education, 2, 101-143.
172. Stanley, W., & Brickhouse, N. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 28, 387-398.
173. Stecher, B. M., & Klein, S. P. (1997). The cost of science assessments in large-scale programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(1), 1-14.
174. Taylor, P. C. (1998). Constructivism: Value added. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Part two (pp. 1111-1126). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
175. Terwilliger, J. S. (1997). Semantics, psychometrics, and assessment reform: A close look at "authentic" assessments. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 24-27.
176. Terwilliger, J. S. (1998). Rejoinder: Response to Wiggins and Newmann. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 22-23.
177. Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Significance of limited English proficiency and cultural capital to the performance in science of Chinese-Australians. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 265-282.
178. U.S. Department of Commerce. (1993). 1990 profiles of the foreign-born population, selected characteristics by place of birth (CPH-L-148). Washington, DC: Author.
179. Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Conant, F. R. (1989). Cheche Konnen: Science and literacy in language minority classrooms. Newton, MA: Bolt, Beranek, & Newman.
180. Webb, N. (1997a). Criteria for alignment of frameworks/standards and student assessments for mathematics and science education (Research Monograph No. 6). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.
181. Webb, N. (1997b). Determining alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education (NISE Brief, Vol. 1, No. 2). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.
182. Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language. (1989). New York: Gramercy Books.
183. Williams, H. (1994). A critique of Hudson's "In search of a rationale for multicultural science education." Science Education, 78(5), 515-519.
184. Willis, S. (1996). Gender justice and the mathematics curriculum: Four perspectives. In L. H. Parker, L. J. Rennie, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Gender, mathematics and science: Shortening the shadow (pp. 41-51). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.