Connecting Girls and Science: A Feminist Teacher Research Study of a High School Prenatal Testing Unit

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 877-896

  Howes, Elaine Virginia ^a  

^a Box 210 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000561112     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199810)35:8<877::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-R     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings on girls and education. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
3. Ball, D. (in press). Working on the inside: Using one's own practice as a site for studying mathematics teaching and learning. In A. Kelly & Richard Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.
4. Barbieri, M. (1995). Sounds from the heart: Learning to listen to girls. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.
6. Biological Science Curriculum Study. (1993). Basic genetics: A human approach. Dubuque: Kendall-Hunt.
7. Bleier, R. (1986). Feminist approaches to science. New York: Pergamon Press.
8. Bogden, R., & Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9. Brickhouse, N. (1994). Bringing in the outsiders: Reshaping the science of the future. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, 401-416.
10. Calabrese-Barton, A. (1997). Liberatory science education: Weaving connections between feminist theory and science education. Curriculum Inquiry, 27, 141-163.
11. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
12. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Dadds, M. (1995). Passionate enquiry and school development: A story about teacher action research. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
14. Daly, M. (1990). Gyn/ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.
15. Driver, R. (1989). The construction of scientific knowledge in school classrooms. In R. Millar (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education (pp. 83-106). New York: Falmer Press.
16. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children 's ideas. London: Routledge.
17. Edmondson, K., & Novak, J. (1993). The interplay of scientific epistemological views, learning strategies, and attitudes of college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 547-559.
18. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261-295.
19. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic Books.
20. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Gilligan, C., Lyons, N., & Hanmer, T. (Eds.) (1990). Making connections: The relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
23. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
24. Grumet, M. (1988). Bitter milk: Women and teaching. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
25. Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26. Hazelwood, C. (1996). Shaping identities in school science: A narrative study of girls of Mexican origin. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
27. Keller, E. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
28. Kurth, L., & Smith, E. (1997, March). Textual analysis of personal, conversational and scientific elements in elementary student science journals. Paper presented at the 18th annual Ethnography in Education Research Forum, Philadelphia, PA.
29. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
30. Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-grade science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 303-318.
31. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
32. Lerner, Gerda (1986). The creation of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34. Maher, F., & Tetreault, M. (1994). The feminist classroom: An inside look at how professors and students are transforming higher education for a diverse society. New York: Basic Books.
35. Mason, C., & Kahle, J. (1988). Student attitudes toward science and science-related careers: A program designed to promote a stimulating gender-free learning environment Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 25-39.
36. Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution San Francisco: Harper & Row.
37. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38. Olesen, V. (1994). Feminisms and models of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 158-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Pollitt, K. (1995). Reasonable creatures: Essays on women and feminism. New York: Vintage.
40. Rich, A. (1986). Of woman bom: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York: W.W. Norton.
41. Rodriquez, A. (1997). The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council's National Science Education Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 19-38.
42. Rosser, S. (1992). Biology and feminism: A dynamic interaction. New York: Twayne.
43. Rosser, S. (1997). Re-engineering female friendly science. New York- Teachers College Press.
44. Roth, K. (1995). Stories of alienation and connection: Examining the neighborhood of science from the margins. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
45. Rothman, B. (1989). Recreating motherhood: Ideology and technology in a patriarchal society. New York: W.W. Norton.
46. Roychoudberry, A., Tippins, D., & Nichols, S. (1993-1994, Winter). An exploratory attempt toward a feminist pedagogy for science education. Action in Teacher Research, XV, 36-46.
47. Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: Notes on the "political economy" of sex In R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157-210). New York: Monthly Review
48. Rutherford, F., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls New York: Simon & Schuster.
50. Schiebinger, L. (1993). Nature's body: Gender in the making of modern science. Boston: Beacon Press.
51. Stage, E., Kreinberg, N., & Becker, J. (1987). Increasing the participation and achievement of girls and women in mathematics, science and engineering. In A. Kelly (Ed.), Science for girls?, pp. 119-134. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
52. Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and education theory and practice (pp. 147-176). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
53. Tannen, D. (1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in dominance and gender. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 165-188). New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
55. Weiler, K. (1988). Women teaching for change: Gender, class and power, New York: Bergin and Garvey.
56. Wilson, S. (1995). Not tension but intention: A response to Wong's analysis of the researcher/teacher. Educational Researcher, 24, 19-22.
57. Wong, E. (1995). Challenges confronting the researcher/teacher: Conflicts of purpose and conduct. Educational Researcher, 24, 22-28.