Science education: Multicultural and universal

Interchange

Volumn 28, Issue 2-3, 1997, Pages 97-108

  Siegel, Harvey ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b Department of Biology   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural artifacts; Epistemology; Morality; Multiculturalism; Particularity; Respect; Science education; Universalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002782498     PISSN: 08264805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007314420384     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Atwater, M. M., & Riley, J. P. (1993), Multicultural science education: Perspectives, definitions, and research agenda. Science Education, 77(6), 661-668.
2. Good, R., & Demastes, S. (1995). The diminished role of nature in postmodern views of science and science education. In F. Finley, D. Allchin, D. Rhees, and S. Fifield (Eds.), Third international history, philosophy, and science teaching conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, proceedings, Volume 1 (pp. 480-487). University of Minnesota.
3. Hodson, D. (1993). In search of a rationale for multicultural science education. Science Education, 77(6), 685-711.
4. Hodson, D. (1994). Response to Williams' comment. Science Education, 78(5), 521-525.
5. Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Translated by G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6. MacIntyre, A. (1987). The relationship of philosophy to history: Postscript to the second edition of 'after virtue.' Reprinted in K. Baynes, J. Bohman, and T. McCarthy (Eds.), After philosophy: End or transformation? (pp. 412-422). Cambridge: MIT Press.
7. MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? London: Duckworth.
8. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
9. Rorty, R. (1989a). Solidarity or objectivity? In M. Krausz (Ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and confrontation (pp. 35-50). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
10. Rorty, R. (1989b). Contingency, irony, and solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Siegel, II. (1981). Creationism, evolution, and education: The California fiasco. Phi Delta Kappan, 63(2), 95-101.
12. Siegel, H. (1985). What is the question concerning the rationality of science? Philosophy of Science, 52(4), 517-537.
13. Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. New York: Routledge.
14. Siegel, H. (1993). Gimme that old-time enlightenment meta-narrative: Radical pedagogies (and politics) require traditional epistemology (and moral theory). Inquiry, 11(4), 17-22.
15. Siegel, H. (1995a). What price inclusion? Teachers College Record, 87(1), 6-31.
16. Siegel, H. (1995b). 'Radical' pedagogy requires 'conservative' epistemology. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 29(1), 33-46.
17. Siegel, H. (1995c), Knowledge and certainty; Feminism, postmodernism, and multiculturalism. In W. Kohli (Ed.), Critical conversations in philosophy of education (pp. 190-200). New York: Routledge.
18. Siegel, H. (1997). Rationality redeemed?: Further reflections on an educational ideal. New York: Routledge.
19. Smith, M. U., Siegel, H., & McInerney, J. D. (1995). Foundational issues in evolution education. Science & Education, 4(1), 23-46.
20. Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 78(4), 387-398.
21. Williams, H. (1994). A critique of Hodson's 'In search of a rationale for multicultural science education.' Science Education, 78(5), 515-519.