Balanced regulation of microtubule dynamics during the cell cycle: A contemporary view

BioEssays

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 53-60

  Andersen, Søren S L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0033007989     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199901)21:1<53::AID-BIES7>3.0.CO;2-L     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Kirschner M, Mitchison T. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell 1986;45:329-342.
2. Hyman AA, Karsenti E. Morphogenetic properties of microtubules and mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 1996;84:401-411.
3. Mitchison TJ, Kirschner MW. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 1984;312:237-242.
4. Gliksman NR, Skibbens RV, Salmon ED. How the transition frequencies of microtubule dynamic instability (nucleation, catastrophe, and rescue) regulate microtubule dynamics in interphase and mitosis: analysis using a Monte Carlo computer simulation. Mol Biol Cell. 1993;4:1035-1050.
5. Verde F, Dogterom M, Stelzer E, Karsenli E, Leibler S. Control of microtubule dynamics and length by cyclin A and cyclin B dependent kinases in Xenopus egg extracts. J. Cell Biol. 1992;118:1097-1108.
6. Tournebize R, Andersen SSL, Verde F, Dorée M, Karsenti E, Hyman AA. Distinct roles of PP1 and PP2A-like phosphatases in control of microtubule dynamics during mitosis. EMBO J 1997;16:5537-5549.
7. McIntosh JR. Microtubule catastrophe. Nature 1984;312:196-197.
8. Walker RA, O'Brien ET, Pryer NK, Sobeiro MF, Voter WA, Erickson HP, Salmon ED. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analysed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies. J Cell Biol 1988;107:1437.
9. Margolis RL, Wilson L. Microtubule treadmilling: what goes around comes around. BioEssays 1998;20:830-836.
10. Vorobjev IA, Svitkina TM, Borisy GG. Cytoplasmic assembly of microtubules in cultured cells. J Cell Sci 1997;110:2635-2645.
11. Desai A, Maddox PS, Mitchison TJ, Salmon ED. Anaphase A chromosome movement and poleward spindle microtubule flux occur at similar rates in Xenopus extract spindles. J Cell Biol 1998;141:703-713.
12. Belmont LD, Hyman AA, Sawin KE, Mitchison TJ. Real-time visualization of cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in cytoplasmic extracts. Cell 1990;62:579-589.
13. Parsons SF, Salmon ED. Microtubule assembly in clarified Xenopus egg extracts. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1997;36:1-11.
14. Ookata K, Hisanaga S-I, Sugita M, Okuyarna A, Murofushi H, Kitazawa H, Chan S, Bulinski JC, Kishimoto T. MAP4 is the in vivo substrate for cdc2 kinase in HeLa cells: identification of an M-phase specific and a cell cycle-independent phosphorylation site in MAP4. Biochemistry 1997;36:15873-15883.
15. Verde F, Labbé JC, Dorée M, Karsenti E. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by cdc2 protein kinase in cell-free extracts of Xenopus eggs. Nature 1990;343:233-238.
16. Drewes G, Ebneth A, Preuss U, Mandelkow E-M, Mandelkow E. MARK, a novel family of protein k nases that phosphorylate microtubule-associated proteins and trigger microtubule disruption. Cell 1997;89:297-308.
17. Gotoh Y, Nishida E, Matsuda S, Shiina N, Kosako H, Shiokawa K, Akiyama T, Ohta K, Sakai H. In vitro effects on microtubule dynamics of purified Xenopus M phase-activated MAP kinase. Nature 1991;349:251-254.
18. Andreassen PR, Lacroix FB, Villa-Moruzzi E, Margolis RL. Differential subcellular localization of protein phosphatase-1 alpha, gamma1, and delta isoforms during both interphase and mitosis in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 1998;141:1207-1215.
19. Belmont L, Mitchison T, Deacon HW. Catastrophic revelations about Op18/stathmin. Trends Biochem Sci 1996;21:197-198.
20. McNally FJ. Modulation of microtubule dynamics during the cell cycle. Curr Opin Cell Bio 1996;8:23-29.
21. Andersen SSL. Xenopus interprase and mitotic microtubule-associated proteins differentially suppress microtuoule dynamics in vitro. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1998;41:202-213.
22. Belmont LD, Mitchison TJ. Identification of a protein that interacts with tubulin dimers and increases the catastrophe rate of microtubules. Cell 1996;84:623-631.
23. Walczak CE, Mitchison TJ, Desai A. XKCM1: a Xenopus kinesin-related protein that regulates microtubule dynamics during mitotic spindle assembly. Cel 1996;84:37-47.
24. Huyett A, Kahana J, Silver P, Zeng X, Saunders WS. The Kar3p and Kip2p motors function antagonistically at the spindle poles to influence cytoplasmic microtubule numbers. J Cell Sci. 1998;111:295-301.
25. Sobel A, Tashjian JAH. Distinct patterns of cytoplasmic protein phosphorylation related to regulation of synthesis and release of prolactin by GH cells. J Biol Chem 1983;258:10312-10324.
26. Sobel A. Stathmin: a relay phosphoprotein for multiple signal transduction? Trends Biochem Sci 1991;16:301-305.
27. 2S complex with two tubulin molecules. Biochemistry 1997;36:10817-10821.
28. Curmi PA, Andersen SSL, Lachkar S, Gavet O, Karsenti E, Knossow M, Sobel A. The Stathmin/tubulin nteraction in vitro. J Biol Chem 1997;272: 25029-25036.
29. Andersen SSL, Ashford AJ, Tournebize R, Gavet O, Sobel A, Hyman AA, Karsenti E. Mitotic chromatin regulates phosphorylation of Stathmin/ Op18. Nature 1997;389:640-643.
30. Schubart UK, Yu J, Amat JA, Wang Z-Q, Hoffmann MK, Edelmann W. Normal development of mice lacking metablastin (P19), a phosphoprotein implicated in cell cycle regulation. J Biol Chem 1996;271:14062-14066.
31. Lawler S. Microtubule dynamics: if you need a shrink try Stathmin/Op18 Curr Biol 1998;8:R212-R214.
32. Gradin HM, Larsson N, Marklund U, Gullberg M. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by extracellular signals: cAMP-dependent protein kinase switches off the actvity of oncoprotein 18 in intact cells. J Cell Biol 1998;140:131-141.
33. Larsson N, Melander H, Marklund U, Osterman O, Gullberg M. G2/M transition requires multisite phosphorylation of oncoprotein 18 by two distinct protein kinase systems. J Biol Chem 1995;270:14175-14183.
34. Marklund U, Larsson N, Gradin HM, Brattsand G, Gullberg M. Oncoprotein 18. is a phosphorylation-responsive regulator of microtubule dynamics. EMBO J 1996;15:5290-5298.
35. Larsson N, Marklund U, Melander HG, Brattsand G, Gullberg M. Control of microtubule dynamics by oncoprotein 18: dissection of the regulatory role of multisite phosphorylation during mitosis. Mol Cell Biol 1997;17:5530-5539.
36. Zhai Y, Kronebusch PJ, Simon PM, Borisy GG. Microtubule dynamics at the G2/M transition abrupt breakdown of cytoplasmic microtubules at nuclear envelope breakdown and implications for spindle morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 1996;135:201-214.
37. Fygenson DK, Braun E, Libchaber A. Phase-diagram of microtubules. Phys Rev Ed 1994;50:1579-1588.
38. Hyman A, Karsenti E. The role of nucleation in patterning microtubule networks. J Cell Sci 1998;111:2077-2083.
39. Hartman JJ, Mahr J, McNally K, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, Thomas S, Cheesman S, Heuser J, Vale RD, McNally FJ. Katanin, a microtubule-severing protein, is a novel AAA ATPase that targets to the centrosome using a WD40-containing subunit. Cell 1998;93:277-287.
40. Waters JC, Salmon ED. Pathways of spindle assembly. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1997;9:37-43.
41. McKim KS, Hawley RS. Chromosomal control of meiotic cell division. Science 1995;270:1595-1601.
42. Karsenti E. Mitotic spindle morphogenesis in animal cells. Semin Cell Biol 1991;2:251-260.
43. Andersen SSL. Molecular characteristics of the centrosome. Int Rev Cytol 1999;187:51-109.
44. Nicklas RB. Chromosomes and kinetochores do more in mitosis than previously thought. In: Gustafson JP, Appels R, editors. Chromosome structure and function: the impact of new concepts. New York: Plenum Press; 1988. p 53-74.
45. Holy TE, Leibler S. Dynamic instability of microtubules as an efficient way to search in space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:5682-5685.
46. Nicklas RB. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 1997;275:632-637.
47. Marek LF. Control of spindle form and function in Grasshopper spermatocytes. Chromosoma 1978;68:367-398.
48. 2 cells after release from nocodazole treatment. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1981;1:469-483.
49. Karsenti E, Newport J, Kirschner M. Respective roles of centrosomes and chromatin in the conversion of microtubule arrays from interphase to metaphase. J Cell Biol 1984;99:47s-57s.
50. Heald R, Tournebize R, Blank T, Sandaltzopoulos R, Becker P, Hyman A, Karsenti E. Self-organization of microtubules into bipolar spindles around chromatin beads in Xenopus egg extracts. Nature 1996;382:420-425.
51. Heald R, Tournebize R, Habermann A, Karsenti E, Hyman A. Spindle assembly in Xenopus egg extracts: respective roles of centrosomes and microtubule self-organization. J Cell Biol 1997;138:615-628.
52. Dogterom M, Felix MA, Guet CC, Leibler S. Influence of M-phase chromatin on the anisotropy of microbule asters. J. Cell Biol 1996;133:125-140.
53. Zhang D, Nicklas RB. Chromosomes initiate spindle assembly upon experimental dissolution of the nuclear envelope in grasshopper spermatocytes. J Cell Biol 1995;131:1125-1131.
54. de Saint Phalle B, Sullivan W. Spindle assembly and mitosis without centrosomes in parthenogenetic sciara embryos. J Cell Biol 1998;141:1383-1391.
55. Church K, Nicklas BR, Lin H-PP. Micromanipulated bivalents can trigger mini-spindle formation in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocyte cytoplasm. J Cell Biol 1986;103:2765-2773.
56. Steffen W, Fuge H, Dietz R, Bastmeyer M, Muller G. Aster-free spindle poles in insect spermatocytes: evidence for chromosome-induced spindle formation? J Cell Biol 1986;102:1679-1687.
57. Karsenti E, Verde F, Félix MA. Role of type 1 and type 2A protein phosphatases in the cell cycle. Adv Protein Phosph 1991;6:453-482.
58. Nicklas RB. Chromosomes and kinetochores do more in mitosis than previously thought. New York: Plenum Press; 1988 p 53-74.
59. Wood KW, Sakowicz R, Goldstein LS, Cleveland DW. CENP-E is a plus end-directed kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell 1997;91:357-366.
60. Lambert A-M. Microtubule-organizing centers in higher plants. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1993;5:116-122.
61. Maro B, Jonnson MH, Webb M, Flach G. Mechanism of polar body formation in the mouse oocyte: an interaction between the chromosomes, the cytoskeleton and the plasma membrane. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1986;92:11-32.
62. Sluder G, Rieder CL, Miller F. Experimental separation of pronuclei in fertilized sea urchin eggs: chromosomes do not organize a spindle in the absence of centrosomes. J. Cell Biol 1985;100:897-903.
63. Andersen SSL, Buendia B, Dominguez JE, Sawyer A, Karsenti E. Effect on microtubule dynamics of XMAP230, a microtubule-associated protein present in Xenopus laevis eggs and dividing cells. J Cell Biol 1994;127:1289-1299.
64. Andersen SSL, Karsenti E. XMAP310: a Xenopus rescue promoting factor localized to the mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol 1997;139:975-983.
65. Gard D, Kirschner M. A microtubule-associated protein from Xenopus eggs that specifically promotes assembly at the plus end. J Cell Biol 1987;105:2203-2215.
66. Zheng JQ, Felder M, Connor JA, Poo M-M. Turning of nerve growth cones induced by neurotransmitters. Nature 1994;368:140-144.
67. Mandell JW, Banker GA. A spatial gradient of tau protein phosphorylation in nascent axons. J Neurosci 1996;16:5727-5740.
68. Tessier-Lavigne M, Placzek M. Target attraction: are developing axons guided by chemotropism? Trends Neurosci 1991;14:303-310.
69. Post PL, Debiasio RL, Taylor DL. A fluorescent protein biosensor of myosin II regulatory light chain phosphorylation reports a gradient of phosphorylated myosin II in migrating cells. Mol Biol Cell 1995;6:1755-1768.
70. Berg HC. Chemotaxis in bacteria. Annu Rev Biol Bioeng 1975;4:119-136.
71. Gabay L, Seger R, Shilo BZ. In situ activation pattern of Drosophila EGF receptor pathway during development. Science 1997;277:1103-1106.
72. Gurdon JB, Dyson S, St Johnston D. Cells' perception of position in a concentration gradient. Cell 1998;95:159-162.
73. 2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase IV/Gr-dependent phosphorylation of oncoprotein 18. Mol Cell Biol 1997;17:3459-3467.
74. Grieco D, Porcellini A, Avvedimento EV, Gottesman ME. Requirement for cAMP-PKA pathway activation by M phase-promoting factor in the transition form mitosis to interphase. Science 1996;271:1718-1723.
75. Masson D, Kreis TE. Binding of E-MAP-115 to microtubules is regulated by cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation. J Cell Biol 1995;131:1015-1024.
76. Dogterom M. Physical aspects of microtubule growth and mitotic spindle formation. Thesis. University of Paris-Sud. France: 1994. p 140-146.
77. Karsenti E, Bravo R, Kirschner M. Phosphorylation changes associated with the early cell cycle in Xenopus eggs. Dev Biol 1987;119:442-453.
78. Ookata K, Hisanaga S, Bulinski JC, Murofushi H, Aizawa H, Itoh TJ, Hotani H, Okumura E, Tachibana K, Kishimoto T. Cyclin B interaction with microtubule-associated protein 4 (MAP4) targets p34cdc2 kinase to microtubules and is a potential regulator of M-phase microtubule dynamics. J Cell Biol 1995;128:849-862.
79. Curmi PA, Maucuer A, Asselin S, Lecourtois M, Chaffotte A, Schmitter JM, Sobel A. Molecular characterization of human stathmin expressed in Escherichia coli: site-directed mutagenesis of two phosphorylatable serines (Ser-25 and Ser-63). Biochem J 1994;300:331-338.
80. Maucuer A, Moreau J, Mechali M, Sobel A. Stathmin gene family: phylogenetic conservation and developmental regulation in Xenopus. J Biol Chem 1993;268:16420-16429.
81. Compton DA. Focusing on spindle poles. J Cell Sci 1998;111:1477-1481.
82. Inoué, Salmon ED. Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements. Mol Biol Cell 1995;6:1619-1640.
83. Riederer BM, Pellier V, Antonsson B, Paolo GD, Stimpson SA, Lütjens R, Catsicas S, Grenningloh G. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by the neuronal protein SCG10. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:741-745.
84. Küntziger T, Gavet O, Manceau V, Sobel A, Bornens M. Phosphorylation of the tubulin-sequestering protein stathmin is regulated by microtubule assembly. Mol Biol Cell 1998;9s:257a.