Protein structure prediction

Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 383-389

  Westhead, David R ^a   Thornton, Janet M ^a,b,c  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; GENOME; MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

EID: 0032145543     PISSN: 09581669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0958-1669(98)80012-8     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Zhu ZY, Blundell TL. The use of amino acid patterns of classified helices and strands in secondary structure prediction. J Mol Biol. 260:1996;261-276.
2. Riis SK, Krough A. Improving prediction of protein secondary structure using neural networks and multiple sequence alignments. J Comp Biol. 3:1996;163-183.
3. Goldman N, Thorne JL, Jones DT. Using evolutionary trees in protein secondary structure prediction and other comparative sequence analyses. J Mol Biol. 263:1996;196-208.
4. King RD, Sternberg MJE. Identification and application of the concepts important for accurate and reliable secondary structure prediction. Protein Sci. 5:1996;2298-2310.
5. Kawabata T, Doi J. Improvement of protein secondary structure prediction using binary word encoding. Proteins. 27:1997;36-46.
6. Hu W-P, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Improved method for prediction of protein backbone U-turn positions and major secondary structural elements between U-turns. Proteins. 29:1997;443-460.
7. Frishman D, Argos P. Incorporation of non-local interactions in protein secondary structure prediction from the amino acid sequence. Protein Eng. 9:1996;133-142.
8. Frishman D, Argos P. Seventy five percent accuracy in protein secondary structure prediction. Protein. 27:1997;329-335.
9. Frishman D, Argos P. The future of protein secondary structure prediction accuracy. Fold Des. 2:1997;159-162.
10. Salomov AA, Solovyev VV. Protein secondary structure prediction using local alignments. J Mol Biol. 268:1997;31-36.
11. Levin JM. Exploring the limits of nearest neighbour secondary structure prediction. Protein Eng. 10:1997;771-776.
12. Rychlewski L, Godzik A. Secondary structure prediction using segment similarity. Protein Eng. 10:1997;1143-1153.
13. Thompson MJ, Goldstein RA. Predicting protein secondary structure with probabilistic schemata of evolutionary derived information. Protein Sci. 6:1997;1963-1975.
14. Ito M, Matsuo Y, Nishikawa K. Prediction of protein secondary structure using the 3D-1D compatibility algorithm. Comput Appl Biosci. 13:1997;473-474.
15. Vivarelli F, Fariselli P, Casadio R. The prediction of protein secondary structure with a cascade correlation learning architecture of neural networks. Neural Comp Appl. 6:1997;57-62.
16. Abe M, Mamitsuka H. Predicting protein secondary structure using stochastic tree grammars. Machine Learning. 29:1997;275-301.
17. Bystroff C, Baker D. Blind predictions of local protein structure in CASP2 targets using the I-sites library. Proteins. 1997;167-171.
18. Han KF, Bystroff C, Baker D. Three dimensional structures and contexts associated with recurrent amino-acid sequence patterns. Protein Sci. 6:1997;1587-1590.
19. Zvelebil MJ, Barton GJ, Taylor WR, Sternberg MJE. Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. J Mol Biol. 195:1987;957-961.
20. Rost B, Sander C. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins. 19:1994;55-72.
21. Cohen FE, Arbanel RM, Kuntz ID, Fletterick RJ. Turn prediction in proteins using a pattern matching approach. Biochemistry. 25:1986;266-275.
22. Russell RB, Saqi M, Sayle RA, Bates PA, Sternberg MJE. Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds: analysis of sequence and structure conservation. J Mol Biol. 269:1997.
23. Defay TR, Cohen FE. Multiple sequence information for threading. J Mol Biol. 262:1996;314-323.
24. Taylor WR. Multiple sequence threading: an analysis of alignment quality and stability. J Mol Biol. 269:1997;902-943.
25. Lemer CM-R, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Protein structure prediction by threading methods. Proteins. 23:1995;337-355.
26. Russell RB, Copley RR, Barton GJ. Protein fold recognition by mapping predicted secondary structures. J Mol Biol. 259:1996;349-365.
27. Rost B, Schneider R, Sander C. Protein fold recognition by prediction based threading. J Mol Biol. 270:1997;471-480.
28. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. Protein fold recognition using sequence derived predictions. Protein Sci. 5:1996;947-955.
29. Rice DW, Eisenberg D. A 3D/1D substitution matrix for protein fold recognition that includes predicted secondary structure of the sequence. J Mol Biol. 267:1997;1026-1038.
30. Di Francesco V, Garnier J, Munson PJ. Protein topology recognition from secondary structure sequences. J Mol Biol. 267:1997;446-463.
31. Lattman EA. Supplement 1. Proteins Struct Func Genet. 1997;1-230.
32. Murzin AG, Bateman A. Distant homology recognition using structural classification of proteins. Proteins. 1997;105-112.
33. Mirny L, Domany E. Protein fold recognition and dynamics in the space of contact maps. Proteins. 26:1996;391-410.
34. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol. 266:1997;831-846.
35. Munson PJ, Singh RK. Statistical significance of hierarchical multibody potentials based on Delauney tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment. Protein Sci. 6:1997;1467-1481.
36. Sunyaev S, Kuznetsov E, Rodchenkov I, Tumanyan V. Protein sequence-structure compatibility criteria in terms of statistical hypothesis testing. Protein Eng. 10:1997;635-646.
37. Koretke KK, Luthyschulten Z, Wolynes PG. Self-consistently optimized statistical-mechanical energy functions for sequence structure alignment. Protein Sci. 5:1996;1043-1059.
38. Bryant SH. Evaluation of threading specificity and accuracy. Proteins. 26:1996;167-171.
39. Xu Y, Uberbacher EC. A polynomial time algorithm for a class of protein threading problems. Comput Appl Biosci. 12:1996;511-517.
40. Zhang BH, Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Godzik A. Similarities and differences between non-homologous proteins with similar folds. Fold Des. 2:1997;307-317.
41. Reva BA, Finkelstein AV, Sanner MF, Olsen AJ. Residue-residue mean force potentials for protien structure recognition. Protein Eng. 10:1997;865-876.
42. Huber T, Torda AE. Protein fold recognition without Boltzmann statistics or explicit physical basis. Protein Sci. 7:1998;142-149.
43. Moult J. The current state of the art in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 7:1996;422-427.
44. Sanchez R, Sali A. Advances in comparative protein modelling. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 7:1997;206-214.
45. Johnson MS, Srinivasan N, Sowdhamini R, Blundell TL. Knowledge based protein modelling. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 29:1994;1-68.
46. Lee RH. Protein model building using structral homology. Nature. 356:1992;543-544.
47. Greer J. Comparative modelling of homologous proteins. Methods Enzymol. 202:1992;239-252.
48. Peitsch MC. Protein modelling by E-mail. Bio/Technology. 13:1995;658-660.
49. Peitsch MC. ProMod and Swiss-Model: internet-based tools for automated comparative protein modelling. Biochem Soc Trans. 24:1996;279-660.
50. Donate LE, Rufino SD, Canard LHJ, Blundell T. Conformational analysis and clustering of short and medium sized loops connecting regular secondary structures: a database for modelling and prediction. Protein Sci. 5:1996;2600-2616.
51. Oliva B, Bates PA, Querol E, Aviles FX, Sternberg MJE. An automated classification of the structure of protein loops. J Mol Biol. 266:1997;814-830.
52. Rufino SD, Donate LE, Canard LHC, Blundell T. Predicting the conformational class of short and medium sized loops connecting regular secondary structures: application to comparative modelling. J Mol Biol. 267:1997;352-367.
53. van Vlijman HWT, Karplus M. PDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization. J Mol Biol. 267:1997;975-1001.
54. Martin ACR, Thornton JM. Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic modelling and application to antibodies. J Mol Biol. 263:1996;800-815.
55. Lessel U, Schomburg D. Creation and characterization of a new, non-redundant fragment databank. Protein Eng. 10:1997;659-664.
56. De Maeyer M, Desmet J, Lasters I. All in one: a highly detailed rotamer library improves both accuracy and speed in the modelling of sidechains by dead-end-elimination. Fold Des. 2:1997;53-56.
57. Bower MJ, Cohen FE, Dunbrack RL Jr. Prediction of protein side chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modelling tool. J Mol Biol. 267:1997;1268-1282.
58. Dunbrack RL Jr, Cohen FE. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 6:1997;1661-1681.
59. Ogata K, Umeyama H. Prediction of protein side-chain conformations by principal component analysis for fixed main chain atoms. Protein Eng. 10:1997;353-359.
60. Tuffery P, Etchebest C, Hazout S. Prediction of protein side chain conformations: a study on the influence of backbone accuracy on conformation stability in the rotamer space. Protein Eng. 10:1997;361-372.
61. Chung SY, Subbiah S. How similar must a template protein be for homology modelling by side-chain packing methods. Hunter L, Klein TE. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. 1996;126-141 World Scientific, Hawaii, USA.
62. Aszodi A, Munro REJ, Taylor WR. Protein modelling by multiple sequence threading and distance geometry. Proteins. 1997;38-42.
63. Aszodi A, Taylor WR. Homology modelling by distance geometry. Fold Des. 1:1996;325-334.
64. Aszodi A, Munro REJ, Taylor WR. Distance geometry based comparative modelling. Fold Des. 2:1997;S3-S6.
65. Li H, Tejero R, Monleon D, Bassolino-Klimas D, Abate-Shen C, Bruccoleri RE, Montelione GT. Homology modelling using simulated annealing of restrained molecular dynamics and conformational search calculations with CONGEN: application in predicting the three-dimensional structure of murine homeodomain Msx-1. Protein Sci. 6:1997;956-970.
66. Alexandrov NN, Luethy R. Alignment algorithm for homology modelling and threading. Protein Sci. 7:1998;254-258.
67. Abagyan RA, Totrov MM. Contact area difference (CAD): a robust measure to evaluate accuracy of protein models. J Mol Biol. 268:1997;678-685.
68. Rost B. Marrying structure and genomics. Structure. 6:1998;259-263.
69. Shapiro L, Lima CD. The Argonne structural genomics workshop: Lamaze class for the birth of a new science. Structure. 6:1998;265-267.