Breast disease: Dynamic spiral MR imaging

Radiology

Volumn 209, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 499-509

  Daniel, Bruce L ^a   Yen, Yi Fen ^a   Glover, Gary H ^a   Ikeda, Debra M ^a   Birdwell, Robyn L ^a   Sawyer Glover, Anne M ^a   Black, John W ^a   Plevritis, Sylvia K ^a   Jeffrey, Stefanie S ^a   Herfkens, Robert J ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast neoplasms, MR; Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast enhancement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031728087     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807580     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1997; 202:413-420.
2. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, et al. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR 1997; 169:409-415.
3. Weinreb JC, Newstead G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1995; 196:593-610.
4. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-493.
5. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187:493-501.
6. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989; 171:95-103.
7. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989; 170: 681-686.
8. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turbo FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994; 193: 777-781.
9. Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 197:681-686.
10. Orel SG. High-resolution MR imaging of the breast. Semin CT Ultrasound 1996; 17:476-493.
11. Schreiber WG, Brix G, Knopp MV, Heá T, Lorenz WJ. Improved visualization of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced magnetization transfer MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35:861-869.
12. Kaiser WA. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography: causes, frequency, and methods to avoid. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1994; 2:539-555.
13. Kelcz F, Santyr G. Gadolinium-enhanced breast MRI. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1995; 36:287-338.
14. Sherif H, Mahfouz AE, Oellinger H, et al. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Radiology 1997; 205:209-213.
15. Flickinger FW, Allison JD, Sherry RM, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses by time-intensity evaluation of contrast enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 11:617-620.
16. Hoffman U, Brix G, Knopp MV, et al. Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:506-514.
17. Tofts PS, Berkowitz B, Schnall MD. Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:564-568.
18. Müller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhauser K, Sand J, et al. Dynamic 3D-MRmammography: is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine? JMRI 1997; 7:236-240.
19. Meyer CM, Hu BS, Nishimura D, Macovski A. Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992; 28:202-213.
20. Ahn CB, Kim JH, Cho ZH. High-speed spiral echo-planar NMR imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1986; MI-5:2-7.
21. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J, et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 1997; 203:137-144.
22. Müller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhauser K, Stoll P, Kietz K, Claussen CD. Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1997; 203:145-149.
23. Meyer CH, Pauly JM, Macovski A, Nishimura DG. Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation. Magn Reson Med 1990; 15:287-304.
24. Glover GH, Lai S. Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39:361-368.
25. Heywang SH, Hillbertz T, Beck R, Bauer WM, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. GdDTPA enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with postoperative scarring and silicone implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14:348-356.
26. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Schlegel A, Beck R, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:891-900.
27. Daniel BL, Birdwell RL, Okeda DM, et al. Breast lesion localization: a freehand, interactive MR imaging-guided technique. Radiology 1998; 207:455-463.
28. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, Schad LR, Layer G, Lorenz WJ. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:621-628.
29. Sachs L. Applied statistics: a handbook of techniques. 2nd ed. New York, NY: SpringerVerlag, 1984; 333-334.
30. Daniel BL, Daniel TM. Graphic representation of numerically calculated predictive values: an easily comprehended method of evaluating diagnostic tests. Med Decis Making 1993; 13:355-358.
31. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991; 342:1-8.
32. Degani H, Furman E, Fields S. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of MCF7 human breast cancer: pathophysiology and monitoring of treatment. Clin Chim Acta 1994; 228:19-23.
33. den Boer JA, Hoenderopp RKKM, Smink J, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of Gd-DTPA enhancement in dynamic threedimensional MRI of breast lesions. JMRI 1997; 7:702-715.
34. Perman WH, Heiberg EV, Herrmann VM. Half-Fourier, three-dimensional techniques for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of both breasts and axillae: initial characterization of breast lesions. Radiology 1996; 200:263-269.
35. Chenevert TL, Helvie MA, Aisen AM, et al. Dynamic three-dimensional imaging with partial k-space sampling: initial application for gadolinium-enhanced rate characterization of breast lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:135-142.
36. Bishop JE, Santyr GE, Kelcz F, Plewes DB. Limitations of the keyhole technique for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. JMRI 1997; 7:716-723.
37. Yang Y, Glover GH, van Gelderen P, et al. Fast 3D functional magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T with spiral acquisition. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:620-626.
38. Mussarakis S, Buckley DL, Drew PJ, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast rumours. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:516-526.
39. Tofts PS, Berkowitz BA. Measurement of capillary permeability from the Gd enhancement curve: a comparison of bolus and constant infusion injection methods. Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 12:81-91.
40. Degani H, Gusis V, Weinstien D, Fields S, Strano S. Mapping pathopyhsiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat Med 1997; 3:780-782.
41. Yen YF, Herfkens RJ, Birdwell RL, Daniel BL, Sawyer AM, Glover GH. Temporal consideration in dynamic breast MRI with spiral sequence. Presented at the Fifth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Van Couver, British Columbia, April 12-18, 1997.
42. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic finding and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996; 200: 639-649.
43. Buckley DL, Drew PJ, Mussurakis S, Monson JR, Horsman A. Microvessel density of invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI. JMRI 1997; 7:461-464.
44. Frouge C, Guinebretière JM, Contesso G, DiPaola R, Bléry M. Correlation between contrast enhancement in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast and tumor angiogenesis. Invest Radiol 1994; 29:1043-1049.
45. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997; 202:833-841.
46. Linver MN. The medical audit statistical basis of clinical outcomes analysis. In: Bassett LW, Jackson VP, Jahan R, Fu YS, Gold RH, eds. Diagnosis of disease of the breast. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1998; 134.
47. Plevritis SK, Garber AM, Macovski A, Ikeda DM. Cost-effectiveness analysis of MRI in screening for breast cancer. Presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making, Toronto, Ontario, October 13-16, 1996.
48. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 1995; 196:115-122.
49. Liao JR, Pauly JM, Pelc NJ. MRI using piecewise-linear spiral trajectory. Magn Reson Med 1997; 38:246-252.