Limitations of the keyhole technique for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 716-723

  Bishop, Jonathan E ^a   Santyr, Giles E ^b   Kelcz, Frederick ^c   Plewes, Donald B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic keyhole contrast enhanced breast MR

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PENTETIC ACID; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0031421868     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070418     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kopans D. Breast imaging. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1989.
2. Jackson V. The role of US in breast imaging. Radiology 1990; 177:305-311.
3. Weinreb G, Newstead G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1995; 196:593-610.
4. Harms S, Flamig D. MR Imaging of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3:277-283.
5. Kaiser W, Zeitzler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA, preliminary observations. Radiology 1989; 170:681-686.
6. Kelcz F, Santyr G, Cron G, Mongin S. Application of a quantitative model to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions detected by dynamic Gd-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996 (in press).
7. Hulka C, Smith B, Sgrol D, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 197:33-38.
8. Gilles R, Guinebretiere J, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 191:625-631.
9. Boetes C, Barentsz J, Mus R, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turbo FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994; 193:777-781.
10. Noguchi S, Aihara T, Koyama H, et al. Discrimination between multicentrtc and multifocal carcinomas of the breast through clonal analysis. Cancer 1994; 74:872-877.
11. Dutt P, Page D. Multicentricity of in situ and invasive carcinoma. In: Bland KL, Coeland EM, eds. Epidemiology and natural history of breast cancer. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991; 299-308.
12. Plewes D, Bishop J, Soutar I, Cohen E. A segmented k-space imaging method for 3D dynamic breast MRI. In: Proceedings of the 11th scientific meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. New York: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1993; 1251.
13. Chenevert T, Helvie M, Aisen A, et al. Dynamic three-dimensional imaging with partial k-space sampling: initial application for gadolinium-enhanced rate characterization of breast lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:135-142.
14. Jones R, Haraldseth O, Muller T, Rinck P, Øksendal A. K-space substitution: a novel dynamic imaging technique. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29:830-834.
15. Kucharczyk W, Bishop J, Plewes D, Keller M, George S. Detection of pituitary microadenomas: comparison of dynamic keyhole fast spin-echo, unenhanced, and conventional contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:671-679.
16. van Vaals J, Brummer M, Dixon W, et al. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3:671-675.
17. Hu X. On the "keyhole" technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4:231.
18. Liang Z, Boada F, Constable T, et al. Constrained reconstruction methods in MR imaging. Rev Magn Reson Med 1992; 4:67-185.
19. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, Schad L, Layer G, Lorenz W. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:621-628.
20. Tofts P, Kermode A. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991; 17:357-367.
21. Larsson H, Stubgaard M, Frederiksen J, Jensen M, Henriksen O, Paulson O. Quantitation of blood-brain barrier defect by magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium-DTPA in patients with multiple sclerosis and brain tumors. Magn Reson Med 1990; 16:117-131.
22. Gadian D, Payne J, Bryant D, Young I, Carr D, Bydder G. Gadolinium-DTPA as a contrast agent in MR imaging - theoretical projections and practical observations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985; 9:242-251.
23. Hoffmann U, Brix G, Knopp M, Heβ T, Lorenz W. Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:506-514.
24. Spraggins T. Simulation of spatial and contrast distortions in keyhole imaging. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31:320-322.
25. Plewes D, Bishop J, Soutar I, Cohen E. Errors in quantitative dynamic three-dimensional keyhole MR imaging of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5:361-364.
26. Liang Z, Lauterbur P. An efficient method for dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994; 13: 677-686.
27. Cao Y, Levin D. Feature-recognizing MRI. Magn Reson Med 1993; 30:305-317.
28. Marseille G, Fuderer M, de Beer R, Mehlkopf A, van Ormondt D. Reduction of MRI scan time through nonuniform sampling and edge-distribution modeling. J Magn Reson B 1994; 103: 292-295.
29. Webb A, Liang Z, Magin R, Lauterbur P. Applications of reduced-encoding MR imaging with generalized-series reconstruction (RIGR). J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3:925-928.
30. Hui Y, Smith M. Comparing a neural network based image enhancement technique with keyhole magnetic resonance imaging. In: Proceedings of the 12th scientific meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance. Nice: International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1995.
31. Parrish T, Hu X. Continuous update with random encoding (CURE): a new strategy for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:326-336.
32. Kuhl C. Specificity of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography. In: Syllabus of the Society of Magnetic Resonance Workshop, Breast Cancer and MR. Washington, DC: Society of Magnetic Resonance, 1995; 5.
33. Nunes L, Schnall M, Orel S, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997; 202:833-841.
34. Graham S, Stanchev P, Lloyd-Smith J, Bronskill M, Plewes D. Changes in fibroglandular volume and water content of breast tissue during the menstrual cycle observed by MR imaging at 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5:695-701.
35. Schnall M. Morphologic diagnosis of breast masses. In: Syllabus of the Society of Magnetic Resonance Workshop, Breast Cancer and MR. Washington, DC: Society of Magnetic Resonance, 1995; 7.