Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours

Brain and Language

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 516-526

  Mussurakis, S ^a,c   Buckley, D L ^a   Drew, P J ^b   Fox, J N ^b   Carleton, P J ^b   Turnbull, L W ^a   Horsman, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^b Kingston General Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^c HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARTMENT MODEL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KINETICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 23744477998     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80328-5     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1986; 10:199-204.
2. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993;187:493-501.
3. Kerslake RW, Carleton PJ, Fox JN et al. Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Clinical Radiology 1995;50:440-454.
4. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 1995;196:115-122.
5. Weinreb JC, Newstead G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1995;196:593-610.
6. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989;170:681-686.
7. Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd MB et al. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology 1990;174:491-494.
8. Gribbestad IS, Nilsen G, Fjosne H et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Acta Oncologica 1992;31:833-842.
9. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994;193:777-781.
10. Turkat TJ, Klein BD, Polan RL et al. Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1994;4:563-568.
11. Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995;197:33-38.
12. Flickinger FW, Allison JD, Sherry RM et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses by time-intensity evaluation of contrast enhanced MRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1993;11:617-620.
13. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Livolsi VA et al. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994;190: 485-493.
14. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994;191:625-631.
15. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathological features. Radiology 1995;197:387-395.
16. Buckley DL, Kerslake RW, Blackband SJ et al. Quantitative analysis of multislice Gd-DTPA enhanced dynamic MR images using an automated simplex minimization procedure. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1994;32:646-651.
17. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R et al. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1991;15:621-628.
18. Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. fundamental concepts. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1991;17:357-367.
19. Weinmann HJ, Laniado M, Mutzel W. Pharmacokinetics of Gd-DTPA/ dimeglumine after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers. Physiological Chemistry and Physics and Medical NMR 1984;16:167-172.
20. Su MY, Jao JC, Nalcioglu O. Measurement of vascular volume fraction and blood-tissue permeability constants with a pharmacokinetic model: studies in rat muscle tumors with dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1994;32:714-724.
21. Hittmair K, Gomiscek G, Langenberger K et al. Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1994;31:567-571.
22. Vida S. A computer program for non-parametric receiver operating characteristic analysis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1993;40:95-101.
23. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DI. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-845.
24. 2 diagnostic? Medical Physics 1987;14:1-37.
25. Tofts PS, Berkowitz B, Schnall MD. Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1995;33:564-568.
26. Taylor NJ, Rowland IJ, Tanner SF et al. A rapid interleaved method for measuring signal intensity curves in both blood and tissue during contrast agent administration. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1993;30:744-749.
27. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Bowsley SJ et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma. Investigative Radiology 1995;30:650-662.
28. Mussurakis S, Gibbs P, Buckley DL et al. Localisation of MR-detected breast cancer using a prototype stereotactic guidance MR system. Breast 1997;6:65-68.
29. Walters TK, Zuckerman J, Nisbet-Smith A et al. Fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and management of fibroadenoma of the breast. British Journal of Surgery 1990;77:1215-1217.
30. Perman WH, Heiberg EM, Grunz J et al. A fast 3D-imaging technique for performing dynamic Gd-enhanced MRI of breast lesions. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1994;12:545-551.
31. Chenevert TL, Helvie MA, Aisen AM et al. Dynamic three-dimensional imaging with partial k-space sampling: initial application for gadolinium-enhanced rate characterization of breast lesions. Radiology 1995;196:135-142.
32. Aronen HJ, Gazit IE, Louis DN et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. Radiology 1994;191:41-51.
33. Gribbestad IS, Nilsen G, Fjosne HE et al. Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1994;4:477-480.
34. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Coady AM et al. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. British Journal of Radiology 1996;69:1009-1016.
35. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A. Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography (in press).