Dynamic 3D-MR mammography: Is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine?

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 236-240

  Müller Schimpfle, Markus ^a   Ohmenhäuser, Katja ^a   Sand, Jürgen ^a   Stoll, Peter ^a   Claussen, Claus D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast neoplasm; Contrast media; Dynamic MR mammography; MRI; Pharmacokinetics

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PENTETIC ACID; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0031421870     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070137     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Viehweg P. Sensitivity of contrast enhanced MR imaging of the breast. MRI Clin North Am 1994; 2: 527-538.
2. Weinreb JC, Newstead G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1995; 196:593-610.
3. Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986; 10:199-204.
4. Kaiser WA, Zeitler W. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989; 170: 681-686.
5. Fischer U, Heyden Dv, Vosshenrich R, Vieweg I, Grabbe E. Signalverhalten maligner und benigner Läsionen in der dynamischen 2D-MRT der Mamma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1993; 158:287-292.
6. Kuhl CK, Kreft BP, Hauswirth A, et al. MR mammography using 0.5 T. Part II: differentiation between malignant and benign lesions on MR mammography using 0.5 and 1.5 T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1995; 162:482-491.
7. Hess T, Knopp MV, Hoffmann U, et al. A pharmacokinetic analysis of Gd-DTPA enhancement in MRT in breast carcinoma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1994; 160:518-523.
8. Hoffmann U, Brix G, Knopp MV, Hess T, Lorenz WJ. Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR Mammography. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:506-514.
9. Müller-Schimpfle M, Rieber A, Kurz S, Stern W, Claussen CD. Dynamic 3D-MR-mammography using a rapid gradient-echo sequence. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1995; 162:13-19.
10. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, Schad LR, Layer G, Lorenz WJ. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:621-628.
11. Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd MB, Dervan PA, Ennis JT. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology 1990; 174:491-494.
12. Knopp MV, Hess T, Hoffmann U, et al. Assessment of different quantification techniques for MR mammography. In: Proceedings of the 2nd annual scientific meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance and the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology. Nice, France: Society of Magnetic Resonance and the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology, 1995; 1599.
13. Tofts PS, Berkowitz BA. Measurement of capillary permeability from the Gd enhancement curve: a comparison of bolus and constant infusion injection methods. Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 12:81-91.
14. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-493.
15. Pedevilla M, Stollberger R, Schmidt F, Wach P, Ebner F. Comparison of various methods used for breast tumor characterization in Gd-DTPA enhanced MR-Imaging. In: Proceedings of the 2nd annual scientific meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance and the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology. Nice, France: Society of Magnetic Resonance and the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology, 1995; 1600.
16. Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991; 17:357-367.
17. Tofts PS, Berkowitz BA, Schnall M. Quantitative characterisation of breast tumours using dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. In: Proceedings of the 1st annual meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance. Dallas, TX: Society of Magnetic Resonance, 1994; 1461.
18. Tavassoli FA. Pathology of the breast. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1992; 425-442.
19. Fischer U, Westerhof JP, Brinck U, Korabiowska M, Schauer A, Grabbe E. The ductal carcinoma in situ in contrast enhanced dynamic MR mammography. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1996; 164: 290-294.
20. Knopp MV, Sinn P, Junkermann HJ, et al. Fibroadenomas in MR mammography: is there a correlation between enhancement pattern and histology? In: Proceedings of the 2nd annual scientific meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance. Nice, France: Society of Magnetic Resonance and the European Society for Magnetic Resonance 1995; 1604.