Half-Fourier, three-dimensional technique for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of both breasts and axillae: Initial characterization of breast lesions

Radiology

Volumn 200, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 263-269

  Perman, William H ^a   Heiberg, Elisabeth V ^a   Herrmann, Virginia M ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, MR; Magnetic resonance (MR), half Fourier imaging; Magnetic resonance (MR), k space; Magnetic resonance (MR), technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AXILLA; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 0029893356     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657924     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Kaiser WA. MR mammography (MRM). MedicaMundi 1991; 36:168-182.
2. Heywang-Kobrunner SH. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: overview after 1250 patient examinations. Electromedica 1993; 2:43-52.
3. Heywang SH, Hilbertz T, Beck R, et al. Contrast-material enhanced MRI of the breast in patients with postoperative scarring and silicon implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14:348-356.
4. Allgayer B, Lukas P, Loos W, Kersting-Sommerhof B. MRT der mamma mit 2D-spinecho- und gradientecho-sequenzen in diagnostischen problemfallen. Fortschr Rontgenstr 1993; 158:423-427. [German]
5. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 191: 625-631.
6. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turboflash subtraction technique. Radiology 1994; 193:777-781.
7. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187:493-501.
8. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Haustein J, Pohl C, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of two different doses of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 1994; 191:639-646.
9. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA - preliminary observations. Radiology 1989; 170:681-686.
10. Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd MB, Dervan PA, Ennis JT. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology 1990; 174:491-494.
11. Greenstein O, Schnall MD, Powell CM, Hochman MG, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR guided biopsy. Radiology 1995; 196: 115-122.
12. Hachiya J, Seki T, Okada M, et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography. Radiol Med 1991; 9:232-240.
13. Folkman J, Shing Y. Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:10931-10934.
14. Weidner N, Semple J. Welch W, Folkman J. Tumor angiogensis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early stage breast carcioma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84:1875-1887.
15. Watt AC, Ackerman LV, Windham JP, et al. Breast lesions: differential diagnosis using digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1986; 159:39-42.
16. Cosgrove DO, Bamber JC. Color doppler in breast diseases (abstr). Br J Radiol 1989; 62:659.
17. Revel D, Brasch R, Paajanen H, et al. GdDTPA contrast enhancement and tissue differentiation in MR imaging of experimental breast carcinoma. Radiology 1986; 158:319-323.
18. Rubin P. Concepts of cancer staging. In: Calbresi P, Schein PS, Rosenberg SA, eds. Medical oncology: basic principles and clinical management of cancer. New York, NY: Maxmillian, 1985; 157-177.
19. Margosian P. Faster MR imaging: imaging with half the data (abstr). In: Book of abstracts: Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1985. Berkeley, Calif: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1985; 1024.
20. Feinberg DA, Hale JD, Watts JC, Kaufman L, Mark A. Halving MR imaging time by conjugation: demonstration at 3.5 kG. Radiology 1986; 161:527-531.
21. Runge VM, Wood ML. Half-Fourier MR imaging of CNS disease. AJNR 1990; 11:77-82.
22. Perman WH, El-Ghazzaway O, Gado MH, Larson KB, Perlmutter JS. Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 11:357-366.
23. Pike GB, Fredrickson JO, Glover GH, Ensmann DR. Dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging using a gradient-echo sequence (abstr). In: Book of abstracts: Society of Magentic Resonance in Medicine 1992. Berkeley, Calif: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1992; 1131.
24. van Vaal JJ, Engels H, deGraaf RF, et al. Method for accelerated perfusion imaging (abstr). In: Book of abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1992. Berkeley, Calif: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1992; 1139.
25. Spraggins TA. Spatial distortions in keyhole imaging (abstr). In: Book of abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1993. Berkeley, Calif: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1993; 1259.
26. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. Keyhole method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. JMRI 1993; 3:671-675.
27. Kucharczyk W, Bishop JE, Plewes DB, Keller MA, George S. Detection of pituitary microadenomas: comparison of dynamic keyhole fast spin-echo, unenhanced, and conventional contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJR 1994; 163:671-679.
28. Edelstein WA, Hutchison JMS, Johnson G, Redpath T. Spin warp NMR imaging and applications to human whole-body imaging. Phys Med Biol 1980; 25:751-756.
29. King KF, Moran PR. A unified description of NMR imaging, data-collection strategies, and reconstruction. Med Phys 1984; 11:1-14.
30. Bracewell R. The Fourier transform and its applications. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
31. Mirowitz SA, Lee JK, Brown JJ, Eilenberg SS, Heiken JP, Perman WH. Rapid acquisition spin echo (RASE) MR imaging: a new technique for reduction of artifacts and acquisition time. Radiology 1990; 175: 131-135.
32. Haacke EM, Mitchell H, Lee D. Improved contrast at 1.5 Tesla using half-Fourier imaging: applications to spin-echo and angiographic imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1990; 8:79-90.
33. Terk MR, Simon HE, Udkoff RC, Colletti PM. Half scan: clinical applications in MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 9:477-483.
34. MacFall JR, Pelc NJ, Vavrek RM. Correction of spatially dependent phase shifts for partial Fourier imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1988; 6:143-155.
35. Haacke EM, Liang Z, Izen SH. Constrained reconstruction: a superresolution, optimal signal-to-noise alternative to the Fourier transform in magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 1989; 16:388-397.
36. Perman WH, Heiberg EV, Grunz J, Herrmann VM, Janney CG. A fast 3D-imaging technique for performing dynamic Gd-enhanced MRI of breast lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 12:545-551.
37. Heiberg EV, Perman WH, Herrmann VM, Janney CG. A fast 3D-imaging technique for performing dynamic Gd-enhanced MRI of breast lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 14:337-348.
38. Fobben ES, Rubin CZ, Kalisher L, et al. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 196:143-152.
39. Chenevert TL, Helvie MA, Aisen AM, et al. Dynamic three-dimensional imaging with partial k-space sampling: initial application for gadolinium-enhanced rate characterization of breast lesions. Radiology 1995; 196: 135-142.
40. Bishop JE, Santyr GE, Kelcz F, Plewes DB. Accuracy of keyhole data acquisition in quantitative analysis of dynamic contrastenhanced breast MRI (abstr). In: Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance 1994. Berkeley, Calif: Society of Magnetic Resonance, 1995; 639.