A Reinvestigation by Circular Dichroism and NMR: Ruthenium(II) and Rhodium(III) Metallointercalators Do Not Bind Cooperatively to DNA

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 37, Issue 20, 1998, Pages 5198-5210

  Franklin, Sonya J ^a   Treadway, Christopher R ^a   Barton, Jacqueline K ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000927026     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic9801948     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Holmlin, R. E.; Dandliker, P. J.; Barton, J. K. Angew. Chem. 1997, 36, 2715-2730.
2. (a) Stemp, E. D. A.; Barton, J. K. Met. Ions Biol. Syst. 1996, 33, 325.
3. (b) Meade, T. J. Met. Ions Biol. Syst. 1996, 32, 453.
4. (c) Beratan, D. N.; Priyadarshy, S.; Risser, S. M. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 3.
5. (d) Turro, N. J.; Barton, J. K. 1998, 3, 201-209.
6. Murphy, C. J.; Arkin, M. R.; Jenkins, Y.; Ghatlia, N. D.; Bossmann, S.; Turro, N. J.; Barton, J. K. Science 1993, 262, 1025.
7. Arkin, M. R.; Stemp, E. D. A.; Holmlin, R. E.; Barton, J. K.; Hormann, A.; Olson, E. J. C.; Barbara. P. F. Science 1996, 273, 475.
8. (a) Holmlin, R. E.; Stemp, E. D. A.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5236.
9. (b) Stemp, E. D. A.; Arkin, M. R.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2375.
10. Murphy, C. J.; Arkin, M. R.; Ghatlia, N. D.; Bossmann, S. H.; Turro, N. J.; Barton, J. K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 5315.
11. Arkin, M. R., Stemp, B. D. A.; Turro, C.; Turro, N. J.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2267.
12. Kelley, S. O.; Holmlin, R. E.; Stemp, E. D. A.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9861-9870.
13. O'Neill, P.; Fielden, E. M. Adv. Radiat. Biol. 1993, 17, 53.
14. (a) Hall, D. B.; Holmlin, R. E.; Barton, J. K. Nature 1996, 382, 731.
15. (b) Hall, D. B.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem, Soc. 1997, 119, 5045.
16. Arkin, M. R.; Stemp, E. D. A.; Pulver, S. C.; Barton, J. K. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 389.
17. (a) Dandliker, P. J.; Holmlin, R. E.; Barton, J. K. Science 1997, 275, 1465.
18. (b) Dandliker, P. J.; Nuñéz, M. E.; Barton, J. K. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 6491-6502.
19. Lincoln, P.; Tuite, E.; Nordén, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1454.
20. Olson, E. J. C.; Hu, D.; Hormann, A.; Barbara, P. F. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 299.
21. Clustering or cooperative binding thermodynamically represents the increased stabilization associated with intercalative binding in the presence of another intercalator bound at the nearest neighbor site compared to the stabilization in the absence of the nearest neighbor. Noncooperative binding indicates equal stabilization in the absence and presence of a nearest neighbor. Anticooperative binding indicates a destabilization in the presence of a nearest neighbor compared to that in its absence. Structurally, cooperative binding might allow possible contact between the favored nearest neighbors. Anticooperativity, while leading to correlated binding, that is the complexes statistically avoiding one another on the helix, would result in an increased separation between complexes compared to random occupation.
22. Winkler, J. R., Gray, H. B. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 369.
23. (a) Priyadarshy, S.; Risser, S. M.; Beratan, D. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 17678.
24. Other theoretical models may better describe our results, however. See: (b) Felts, A. K.; Pollard, W. T.; Friesner, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 2929.
25. (c) Evenson, J. W.; Karplus, M. Science 1993, 262, 1247.
26. Meade, T. J.; Kayyem, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 352.
27. Lewis, F. D.; Wu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Letsinger, R. L.; Greenfield, S. R.; Wasielewski, M. R. Science 1997, 277, 673.
28. (a) Dupureur, C. M., Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10286.
29. (b) Dupureur, C. M.; Barton, J. K. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 33.
30. (a) David, S. S.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2984.
31. (b) Hudson, B. P.; Dupureur, C. M.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9379.
32. (c) Hudson, B. P.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6877.
33. Amouyal, E.; Homsi, A.; Chambron, J.-C.; Sauvage, J.-P. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1990, 1841.
34. (a) Pyle, A. M.; Chiang, M. Y.; Barton, J. K. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 4487.
35. (b) Sardesai, N. Y.; Lin, S. C.; Zimmermann, K.; Barton, J. K. Bioconjugate Chem. 1995, 6, 302.
36. (c) Sitlani, A.; Barton, J. K. Biochem. 1994, 33, 12100.
37. Yoshikawa, Y.; Yamasaki, K. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1979, 28, 205.
38. (a) Friedman, A. E.; Chambron, J.-C.; Sauvage, J.-P.; Turro, N. J.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4960.
39. (b) Jenkins, Y.; Friedman, A. E.; Turro, N. J.; Barton, J. K. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 10809.
40. (c) Hartshorn, R. M.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5919.
41. Friedman, A. E.; Kumar, C. V.; Turro, N. J.; Barton, J. K. Nucleic Acids. Res. 1991, 19, 2595.
42. Piotto, M.; Saudek, V.; Sklenar, V. J. Biomol. NMR 1992, 2, 661.
43. 3+ and this cooperatively depended upon the presence of the hydrophobic phenyl substituents. See: Sitlani, A.; Dupureur, C. M.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12589.
44. (a) Mason, S. F.; McCaffery, A. J. Nature 1964, 204, 468.
45. (b) Blake, A.; Peacocke, A. R. Biopolymers 1966, 4, 1091.
46. (c) Gardner, B. J.; Mason, S. F. Biopolymers 1967, 5, 79.
47. (d) Blake, A.; Peacocke, A. R. Biopolymers 1967, 5, 383.
48. (e) Blake, A.; Peacocke, A. R. Biopolymers 1967, 5, 871.
49. (f) Yamaoka, K.; Resnik, R. Nature 1967, 213, 1031.
50. (g) Crothers, D. M.; Li, H. J. Biopolymers 1969, 8, 217.
51. Holmlin, R. E.; Stemp, E. D. A.; Barton, J. K. 1998, 37, 29.
52. Ewing, A. R. J. Chem. Soc. 1985, 67, 102.
53. Wilson, W. D.; Li, Y.; Veal, J. M. Advances in DNA Sequence Specific Agents, JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1992; Vol. 1.
54. (a) Patel, D. J.; Shen, C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1978, 75, 2553.
55. (b) Feigon, J.; Denny, W. A.; Leupin, W.; Kearns, D. R. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 450.
56. (c) Searle, M. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1993, 25, 403.
57. Wüthrich, K. NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1986; Chapter 13.
58. 2 is not observed, due to its greater solvent accessibility as the terminal base.
59. This is also readily apparent in the region of the TMe to aromatic cross-peaks (Supporting Information).
60. The cross-peaks between TMe groups and aromatic H6 and H8 protons are also informative about the structure of the decamer with two metallointercalators (Supporting Information).
61. Crothers, D. M. Biopolymers 1968, 6, 575.
62. This nearest neighbor exclusion leads us to define cooperative binding as a two base pair separation between intercalating ligands, and noncooperative binding as three or greater base pair separation.
63. Neidel, S.; Herman, H. M. Prog. Biophys. Biol. 1983, 41, 43.
64. (a) Kumar, R. A.; Ikemoto, N.; Patel, D. J. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 265, 173.
65. (b) Vanderwall, D. E.; Lui, S. M.; Wu, W.; Turner, C. J.; Kozarich, J. W.; Stubbe, J. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 373.
66. (e) Wu, W.; Vanderwall D. E.; Turner, C. J.; Kozarich, J. W.; Stubbe, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1281.
67. (d) Pavlopoulos, S.; Bicknell, W.; Craik, D. J.; Wickham, G. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 9314.
68. (e) Lian, C.; Robinson, H.; Wang, A. H.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8791.
69. (f) Gao, X.; Stassinopoulos, A.; Rice, J. S.; Goldberg, I. H. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 40.
70. (g) Brown, D. R.; Kurz, M.; Kearns, D. R.; Hsu, V. L. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 651.
71. (a) Kamitori, S.; Takusagawa, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4154.
72. (b) Kamitori, S.; Takusagawa, F. J. Mol. Biol., 1992, 225, 445.
73. (c) Hunter, C. A. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 230, 1025.
74. For the major population with a 4 bp separation between complexes, the closest distances between protons on the ancillary ligands range from 13 to 14 Å. For the minor population at a 3 bp separation, the closest distances between protons on the ancillary ligands range from 7 to 8 Å.
75. Kelley, S. O.; Barton, J. K. Chem. Biol. 1998, 8, 413.