Surfactant activated dip-pen nanolithography

Nano Letters

Volumn 4, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 2171-2177

  Jung, Hyungil ^a,b   Dalal, Chiraj K ^a   Kuntz, Steven ^a   Shah, Raman ^a   Collier, C Patrick ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMOLECULES; BIOTIN; DIP-PEN NANOLITHOGRAPHY (DPN); NONIONIC SURFACTANTS;

ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; GLASS; HYDROPHOBICITY; INK; MONOLAYERS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 9644303061     PISSN: 15306984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/nl048705c     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ginger, D. S.; Zhang, H.; Mirkin, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 30.
2. Piner, R. D.; Zhu, J.; Xu, F.; Hong, S. H.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 1999, 283, 661.
3. Fu, L.; Liu, X. G.; Li, S. Y.; Dravid, V. P.; Mirkin, C. A. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 757.
4. Jung, H.; Kulkarni, R.; Collier, C. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12096.
5. Lim, J.-H.; Mirkin, C. A. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 1474.
6. McKendry, R.; Huck, W. T.; Weeks, B.; Fiorini, M.; Abell, C.; Rayment, T. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 713.
7. Demers, L. M.; Ginger, D. S.; Park, S. J.; Li, Z.; Chung, S. W.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 2002, 296, 1836.
8. Lim, J. H.; Ginger, D. S.; Lee, K. B.; Heo, J.; Nam, J. M.; Mirkin, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2309.
9. Ivanisevic, A.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 122, 7887.
10. Weeks, B. L.; Noy, A.; Miller, A. E.; De Yoreo, J. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 25505.
11. Rozhok, S.; Piner, R.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 751.
12. Jang, J.; Schatz, G. C.; Ratner, M. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 3875.
13. de Gennes, P.-G.; Brochard-Wyart, F.; Quéré, D. Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2004.
14. Lee, K. B.; Lim, J. H.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5588.
15. Nam, J.-M.; Man, S. W.; Lee, K.-B.; Liu, X.; Ratner, M. A.; Mirkin, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1246, and supporting information.
16. Agarwal, G.; Naik, R. R.; Stone, M. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7408.
17. Pirrung, M. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1276.
18. Adamson, A. W.; Gast, A. P. Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, 6th ed.; Wiley: New York, 1997.
19. Hong, S.; Zhu, J.; Mirkin, C. A. Langmuir 1999, 15, 7897.
20. Hyun, J.; Ahn, S. J.; Lee, W. K.; Chilkoti, A.; Zauscher, S. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 1203.
21. Pena, D. J.; Raphael, M. P.; Byers, J. M. Langmuir 2003, 19, 9028.
22. Thean, E. T.; Toh, B. H. Anal. Biochem. 1989, 177, 256.
23. Tovey, E. R.; Ford, S. A.; Baldo, B. A. Electrophoresis 1989, 10, 243.
24. Lund, S.; Orlowski, S.; de Foresta, B.; Champeil, P.; le Maire, M.; Møller, J. V. J. Bio. Chem. 1989, 264, 4907.
25. Chen, R. J.; Bangsaruntip, S.; Drouvalakis, K. A.; Kam, N. W. S.; Shim, M.; Li, Y.; Kim, W.; Utz, P. J.; Dai, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 4984.
26. Sigal, G. B.; Mrksich, M.; Whitesides, G. M. Langmuir 1997, 13, 2749.
27. Kern, W. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1990, 137, 1887.
28. Krasnoslobodtsev, A. V.; Smirnov, S. N. Langmuir 2002, 18, 3181.
29. 2-biotin on MPTMS-functionalized glass coverslips with varying amounts of Tween-20 (0.005-0.1%), followed by incubation with Cy3-streptavidin. Integration of the resultant fluorescence intensities showed that the inclusion of surfactant in this range of concentrations did not affect the binding of the maleimide to the thiol groups on the surface.
30. Jang, J.; Hong, S.; Schatz, G. C.; Ratner M. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 2721.
31. Welin-Klintström, S.; Askendal, A.; Elwing, H. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1993, 158, 188.
32. Israelachvili, J. Intermodular and Surface Forces, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, 1992.
33. Holmes-Farley, S. R.; Reamey, R. H.; McCarthy, T. J.; Deutch, J.; Whitesides, G. W. Langmuir 1985, 1, 725.
34. Busoni, L.; Carlà, M.; Lanzi, L. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2001, 72, 2784.
35. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 79th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1998.
36. R = 36°, indicating moderately large contact angle hysteresis, probably due to chemical heterogeneity in the MPTMS monolayer. The stationary contact angle for water, θ = 58°, was close to the advancing angle.
37. Young, T. Philos. Trans. Soc. London 1805, 95, 65.
38. Garavito, R. M.; Ferguson-Miller, S. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 32403.