Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: Clinical implications for implant fitting

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 115, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2811-2824

  Thai Van, Hung ^a   Truy, Eric ^a   Charasse, Basile ^a   Boutitie, Florent ^b   Chanal, Jean Marc ^a   Cochard, Nadine ^c   Piron, Jean Pierre ^d   Ribas, Sébastien ^c   Deguine, Olivier ^c   Fraysse, Bernard ^c   Mondain, Michel ^d   Uziel, Alain ^d   Collet, Lionel ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c CHU PURPAN   (France)

^d GUI DE CHAULIAC HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Compound action potential; Hierarchical regression analysis; Jack knife validation; Neural response telemetry; Psychophysical levels

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED COMPOUND ACTION POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ACTION POTENTIALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 8844226063     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.024     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. P.J. Abbas, C.J. Brown, J.K. Shallop, J.B. Firszt, M.L. Hughes, S.H. Hong, and S.J. Staller Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential Ear Hear 20 1999 45 59
2. B. Almqvist, and U. Willstedt-Svensson The Lund Technique, a method to set an initial MAP based on objective measures. Personal Communication Nucleus European Satellite Symposium Paediatric CI Conference, s'Hertogenbosh, June 1998
3. C.J. Brown, P.J. Abbas, and B.J. Gantz Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential: data from human cochlear implant users J Acoust Soc Am 88 1990 1385 1391
4. C.J. Brown, P.J. Abbas, and B.J. Gantz Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry system in the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant Am J Otol 19 1998 320 327
5. C.J. Brown, M.L. Hughes, B. Luk, P.J. Abbas, A.A. Wolaver, and J.P. Gervais The relationship between ECAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults Ear Hear 21 2000 151 163
6. R. Carhart, and J.F. Jerger Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds J Speech Hear Disord 24 1959 330 345
7. B. Charasse, H. Thai-Van, C. Berger-Vachon, and L. Collet Assessing auditory nerve recovery function with a modified subtraction method: results and mathematical modeling Clin Neurophysiol 114 2003 1344 1350
8. H. Cullington Preliminary neural response telemetry results Br J Audiol 34 2000 131 140
9. N. Dillier, W.K. Lai, B. Almqvist, C. Frohne, J. Muller-Deile, M. Stecker, and E. Wallenberg Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111 2002 407 414
10. R. Ecochard, and D. Clayton Multi-level modelling of conception in artificial insemination by donor Stat Med 17 1998 1137 1156
11. D.K. Eddington, W.H. Dobelle, D.E. Brackmann, M.G. Mladejovsky, and J.L. Parkin Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 87 1978 1 39
12. K.H. Franck A model of a nucleus 24 cochlear implant fitting protocol based on the electrically evoked whole nerve action potential Ear Hear 23 Suppl 2002 67 71
13. K.H. Franck, and S.J. Norton Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device Ear Hear 22 2001 289 299
14. B.J. Gantz, C.J. Brown, and P.J. Abbas Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential Am J Otol 15 1994 137 144
15. H. Goldstein The basic linear multilevel model and its estimation H. Goldstein Multilevel statistical models 3 2nd ed 1995 Kendall' Library of Statistics London 15 37
16. K.A. Gordon, K.A. Ebinger, J.E. Gilden, and W.H. Shapiro Neural response telemetry in 12- to 24-month-old children Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 189 Suppl 2002 42 48
17. R.D. Hall Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response Hear Res 45 1990 123 136
18. Y. Henkin, R. Kaplan-Neeman, C. Muchnik, J. Kronenberg, and M. Hildesheimer Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67 2003 873 880
19. A.V. Hodges, T.J. Balkany, R.A. Ruth, P.R. Lambert, S. Dolan-Ash, and J.J. Schloffman Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117 1997 255 261
20. M.L. Hughes, C.J. Brown, P.J. Abbas, A.A. Wolaver, and J.P. Gervais Comparison of ECAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children Ear Hear 21 2000 164 174
21. M.L. Hughes, K.R. Vander Werff, C.J. Brown, P.J. Abbas, D.M. Kelsay, H.F. Teagle, and M.W. Lowder A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users Ear Hear 22 2001 471 486
22. A. Kawano, H.L. Seldon, G.M. Clark, R.T. Ramsden, and C.H. Raine Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation Acta Otolaryngol 118 1998 313 326
23. J. Kiefer, S. Hohl, E. Sturzebecher, T. Pfennigdorff, and W. Gstoettner Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the Nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system Audiology 40 2001 32 42
24. P.R. Kileny, T.A. Zwolan, and C. Ashbaugh The influence of age at implantation on performance with a cochlear implant in children Otol Neurotol 22 2001 42 46
25. W.K. Lai, and N. Dillier A simple two-component model of the electrically evoked compound action potential in the human cochlea Audiol Neurootol 5 2000 333 345
26. B.J. Macpherson, J.L. Elfenbein, R.L. Schum, and R.A. Bentler Thresholds of discomfort in young children Ear Hear 12 1991 184 190
27. S.M. Mason, Y. Cope, J. Garnham, G.M. O'Donoghue, and K.P. Gibbin Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the Nucleus C124M cochlear implant Br J Audiol 35 2001 225 235
28. R.P. Michelson Electrical stimulation of the human cochlea. A preliminary report Arch Otolaryngol 93 1971 317 323
29. A.L. Miller, D.J. Morris, and B.E. Pfingst Effects of time after deafening and implantation on guinea pig electrical detection thresholds Hear Res 144 2000 175 186
30. J.B. Nadol Jr Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117 1997 220 228
31. B.E. Pfingst Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea Hear Res 50 1990 225 236
32. B.E. Pfingst, and D. Sutton Relation of cochlear implant function to histopathology in monkeys Ann NY Acad Sci 405 1983 224 239
33. B.E. Pfingst, D. Sutton, J.M. Miller, and B.A. Bohne Relation of psychophysical data to histopathology in monkeys with cochlear implants Acta Otolaryngol 92 1981 1 13
34. B.E. Pfingst, I. Glass, F.A. Spelman, and D. Sutton Psychophysical studies of cochlear implants in monkeys: clinical implications R.A. Schindler M.M. Merzenich Cochlear implants 1985 Raven Press New York, NY 305 321
35. G. Rance, and R.C. Dowell Speech processor programming G.M. Clark R.S.C. Cowan R.C. Dowell Cochlear implantation for infants and children: advances 1997 Singular Publishing group San Diego, CA 147 170
36. J.L. Rodgers The bootstrap, the jackknife, and the randomization test: a sample taxonomy Multivariate Behav Res 34 1999 441 456
37. R.V. Shannon Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man: I. Basic psychophysics Hear Res 11 1983 157 189
38. W. Shapiro, and S. Waltzman Changes in electrical thresholds over time in young children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear prosthesis Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166 1995 177 178
39. R.K. Shepherd, and E. Javel Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status Hear Res 108 1997 122 144
40. G.F. Smoorenburg, C. Willeboer, and J.E. Van Dijk Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds Audiol Neurootol 7 2002 335 347
41. L.G. Spivak, P.M. Chute, A.L. Popp, and S.C. Parisier Programming the cochlear implant based on electrical acoustic reflex thresholds: patient performance Laryngoscope 104 1994 1225 1230
42. H. Thai-Van, J.M. Chanal, C. Coudert, E. Veuillet, E. Truy, and L. Collet Relationship between NRT measurements and behavioral levels in children with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant may change over time: preliminary report Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 58 2001 153 162
43. H. Thai-Van, S. Gallégo, E. Truy, E. Veuillet, and L. Collet Electrophysiological findings in two bilateral cochlear implant cases: does the duration of deafness affect electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111 2002 1008 1014
44. S.B. Waltzman, N.L. Cohen, R.H. Gomolin, W.H. Shapiro, S.R. Ozdamar, and R.A. Hoffman Long-term results of early cochlear implantation in congenitally and prelingually deafened children Am J Otol 15 Suppl 2 1994 9 13