Assessing auditory nerve recovery function with a modified subtraction method: Results and mathematical modeling

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 114, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1307-1315

  Charasse, Basile ^a   Thai Van, Hung ^a,b   Berger Vachon, Christian ^a,b   Collet, Lionel ^a,b  

^a Lab Neurosci/Syst Sensoriels   (France)

^b EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Auditory nerve; Cochlear implant; Compound action potential; Mathematical simulation; Neural response telemetry; Recovery function

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRICAL COMPOUND ACTION POTENTIAL; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NERVE POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE; TELEMETRY;

EID: 0038204574     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00071-3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Abbas P.J., Brown C.J., Shallop J.K., Firszt J.B., Hughe M.L., Hong S.H., Staller S.J. Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear. 20:(1):1999;45-59.
2. Bear M.F., Connors B.W., Paradiso M.A. Neurosciences, à la découverte du cerveau. 1997;Edition Pradel.
3. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Gantz B. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 88-3:1990;1385-1391.
4. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Fryauf-Bertschy H., Kelsay D., Gantz B.J. Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses in nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear. 15:(2):1994;168-176.
5. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Bertschy M.R., Tyler R.S., Lowder M., Takahashi G., Purdy S., Gantz B.J. Longitudinal assessment of physiological and psychophysical measures in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 16:(5):1995;439-449.
6. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Borland J., Bertschy M.R. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in ineraid cochlear implant users: response to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical response. J Speech Hear Res. 39:1996;453-467.
7. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Gantz B.J. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am J Otol. 19:(3):1998;320-327.
8. Dillier N., Lai W.K., Wyttenbach M. NRT cookbook. 1995.
9. Dillier N., Lai W.K., Almqvist B., Frohne C., Muller-Deile J., Stecker M., Wallenberg E. Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 111:2002;407-414.
10. Finley C, Wilson B, Van Den Honert C, Lawson D. Speech processors for auditory prostheses, Sixth quarterly progress report, NIH project; 1997.
11. Gallégo S., Frachet B., Micheyl C., Truy E., Collet L. Cochlear implant performance and electrically-evoked auditory brain-stem response characteristics. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 108:1998;521-525.
12. Kandel E.R., Schwartz J.H. Principles of neural science. 2nd ed. 1985;Elsevier, New York.
13. Lai W.K., Dillier N. A simple two component Model of the electrically evoked compound action potential in human cochlea. Audiol Neuro-otol. 5:2000;333-345.
14. Lai W.K., Dillier N., Laszig R., Fisch U. Results from a pilot study using the nucleus CI24M/SP5 cochlear implant system.U.1. Am J Otol. 18:(Suppl 6):1997;S35-S36.
15. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Brown C.J. An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential. Ear Hear. 21:(4):2000;280-290.
16. Péréon Y., Laplaud D., Nguyen The Tich S., Radafy E. A new application for the sympathetic skin response: the evaluation of auditory thresholds in cochlear implant patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 112:2001;314-318.