Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status

Hearing Research

Volumn 108, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 112-144

  Shepherd, Robert K ^a   Javel, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory nerve; Cochlear histopathology; Cochlear implant; Deafness; Electrical stimulation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CAT; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE UNIT ACTIVITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; CATS; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; NERVE DEGENERATION; NERVE FIBERS; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE;

EID: 0030977315     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00046-4     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Black R.C., Clark G.M. Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerve. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:1980;868-874.
2. Black R.C., Clark G.M., O'Leary S.J., Walters C. Intracochlear electrical stimulation of normal and deaf cats investigated using brainstem response audiometry. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 399:1983;5-17.
3. Blamey P.J., Pyman B.C., Gordon M., Clark G.M., Brown A.M., Dowell R.C., Hollow R.D. Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 101:1992;342-348.
4. Bostock H., Sears T.A., Sherratt R.M. The spatial distribution of excitability and membrane currents in normal and demyelinated mammalian nerve fibres. J. Physiol. 341:1983;41-58.
5. Brimacombe J.A., Eisenberg L.S. Tone decay in subjects with the single-channel cochlear implant. Audiology. 23:1984;321-332.
6. Bromm B., Frankenhaeuser B. Numerical calculations of the response in the myelinated nerve to short symmetrical double pulses. Pflügers Arch. 299:1968;357-363.
7. Brown M.C. Antidromic responses of single units from the spiral ganglion. J. Neurophysiol. 71:1994;1835-1847.
8. Brown M., Shepherd R.K., Webster W.R., Martin R.L., Clark G.M. Cochleotopic selectivity of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array using the 2-deoxyglucose technique. Hear. Res. 59:1992;224-240.
9. Brownell W.E., Bader C.R., Bertrand D., de Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science. 227:1985;194-196.
10. Brummett R.E., Brown R.T., Hines D.L. Quantitative relationships of the ototoxic interaction of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Arch. Otolaryngol. 105:1979;240-246.
11. Buchwald J.S., Huang C.M. Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat. Science. 189:1975;382-384.
12. Busby P.A., Tong Y.C., Clark G.M. Electrode position, repetition rate, and speech perception by early- and late-deafened cochlear implant patients. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;1058-1067.
13. Caird D.M., Sontheimer D., Klinke R. Intra- and extracrainially recorded auditory evoked potentials in the cat. Source location and binaural interaction. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 61:1985;50-60.
14. Colombo J., Parkins C.W. A model of electrical excitation of the mammalian auditory-nerve neuron. Hear. Res. 31:1987;287-312.
15. Cragg B.G., Thomas P.K. Changes in nerve conduction in experimental allergic neuritis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 27:1964;106-115.
16. Eddington D.K., Dobelle W.H., Brackman D.E., Mladejovsky M.G., Parkin J.L. Auditory prosthesis research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Ann. Otol. Suppl. 53:1978;5-39.
17. Felix H., Hoffmann V. Light and electron microscopic investigation of cochlear nerve specimens from profoundly deaf patients. Acta. Otolaryngol. Suppl. 423:1985;67-72.
18. Finley, C.C., Wilson, B.S. and White, M.W. (1990) Models of neural responsiveness to electrical stimulation. In: J.M. Miller and F.A. Spelman (Eds.), Cochlear Implants. Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear. Springer, Ney York, pp. 55-96.
19. Frankenhaeuser B., Huxley A.F. The action potential in the myelinated nerve fibre of Xenopus laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data. J. Physiol. 171:1964;302-315.
20. Frijns J.H.M., de Snoo S.L., Schoonhoven R. Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear. Res. 87:1995;170-186.
21. Frijns J.H.M., de Snoo S.L., ten Kate J.H. Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetrical model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear. Res. 95:1996;33-48.
22. Goldberg J.M., Fernandez C. Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating semicircular canals of squirrel monkey. III. Variations among units in their discharge properties. J. Neurophysiol. 34:1971;676-684.
23. Hall R.D. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear. Res. 45:1990;123-136.
24. Hartmann, R. and Klinke, R. (1990) Response characteristics of nerve fibres to patterned electrical stimulation. In: J.M. Miller and F.A. Spelman (Eds.), Cochlear Implants. Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear. Springer, New York, pp. 135-160.
25. Hartmann R., Topp G., Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 13:1984;47-62.
26. Hashisaki G.T., Rubel E.W. Effects of unilateral cochlear removal on anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons in developing gerbils. J. Comp. Neurol. 283:1989;465-473.
27. Hawkins J.E. The ototoxicity of kanamycin. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 68:1959;698-715.
28. Hazell, J.W.P. (1987) Surgical management of the tinnitus patient. In: J.W.P. Hazell (Ed.), Tinnitus. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp. 144-155.
29. Hinojosa, R., Blough, R.R. and Mhoon, E.E. (1987) Profound sensorineural deafness: a histopathological study. Ann. Otol Rhinol. Laryngol. 96, Suppl. 128, 26-30.
30. Javel E. Suppression of auditory nerve response. I. Temporal analysis, intensity effects and suppression contours. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69:1981;1735-1745.
31. Javel, E. (1986) Basic response properties of auditory nerve fibres. In: R.A. Altschuler, D.W. Hoffman and R.P. Bobbin (Eds.), Neurobiology of Hearing: The Cochlear Raven Press, New York.
32. Javel, E. (1990) Acoustic and temporal encoding of temporal information. In: J.M. Miller and F.A. Spelman (Eds.) Cochlear Implants. Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear. Springer, New York, pp. 247-295.
33. Javel, E., Tong, Y.C., Shepherd, R.K. and Clark, G.M. (1987) Responses of cat auditory nerve fibres to biphasic electrical current pulses. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 128, 96, 26-30.
34. Kiang, N.Y.S., Watanabe, T., Thomas, E.C. and Clark, L.F. (1965) Discharge Patterns of Single Fiber's in the Cat's Auditory Nerve. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Kiang, N.Y.S., Moxon, E.C. and Levine, R.A. (1970) Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: G.E.W. Wolstenholme and J. Knight (Eds.), Sensorineural Hearing Loss, J. and A. Churchill, London, UK, pp. 241-268.
36. Koles Z.J., Rasminsky M. A computer simulation of conduction in demyelinated nerve fibres. J. Physiol. 227:1972;351-364.
37. Leake P.A., Hradek G.T. Cochlear pathology of long term neomycin induced deafness in cats. Hear. Res. 33:1988;11-34.
38. Leake, P.A., Kessler, D.K. and Merzenich, M.M., 1990. Application and safety of cochlear prostheses. In: W.F. Agnew and D. B. McCreery (Eds.) Neural Prostheses: Funcamental Studies, Prentice Hall, NJ, pp. 253-296.
39. Liberman M.C. Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise environment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63:1978;442-455.
40. Liberman M.C. The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labelling auditory nerve fibres of known characteristic frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75:1982;1441-1449.
41. Liberman M.C., Kiang N.Y.S. Acoustic trauma in cats: cochlear pathology and auditory nerve activity. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 358:1978;1-63.
42. Lu C.-B., Schuknecht H.F. Pathology of prelingual profound deafness: magnitude of labyrinthitis fibro-ossificans. Am. J. Otol. 15:1994;74-85.
43. McAnally K.I., Clark G.M., Syka J. Hair cell mediated responses of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the cat. Hear. Res. 67:1993;55-68.
44. McDonald W.I., Sears T.A. The effects of experimental demyelination on conduction in the central nervous system. Brain. 93:1970;583-598.
45. McNeal D.R. Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME. 23:1976;329-337.
46. McNeal, D.R and Teicher, D.A. (1977) Effect of electrode position on threshold and initial site of excitation of a myelinated nerve fiber. In: F.T. Hambrecht and J.B. Reswick (Eds.), Functional Electrical Stimulation: Applications in Neural Prostheses, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 405-412.
47. Matsushima J., Shepherd R.K., Seldon H.L., Xu S.A., Clark G.M. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in deaf kittens: effects on cochlear nucleus morphology. Hear. Res. 56:1991;133-142.
48. Merzenich, M.M. and White, M.W. (1977) Cochlear implants: the interface problem. In: F.T. Hambrecht and J.B. Reswick (Eds.), Functional Electrical Stimulation: Applications in Neural Prostheses, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 321-340.
49. 1 of CAP in guinea pig. Hear. Res. 53:1991;209-216.
50. Miller C.A., Faulkner M.J., Pfingst B.E. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. II. Changes in electrophysiological and psychophysical measures over time. Hear. Res. 92:1995;100-111.
51. Moore D.R. Auditory brainstem of the ferret: early cessation of developmental sensitivity of neurons in the cochlear nucleus to removal of the cochlea. J. Comp. Neurol. 303:1990;2-15.
52. Moxon, E.C. (1967) Electric Stimulation of the Cat's Cochlea: a Study of Discharge Rates in Single Auditory Nerve Fibers. M.Sc. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
53. Moxon, E.C. (1971) Neural and Mechanical Responses to Electrical Stimulation of the Cat's Inner Ear. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
54. Nadol J.B. Degeneration of cochlear neurons as seen in the spiral ganglion of man. Hear. Res. 49:1990;141-154.
55. Nadol J.B., Young Y.-S., Glynn R.J. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 98:1989;411-416.
56. Ni D., Shepherd R.K., Seldon H.L., Xu S.A., Clark G.M., Millard R.E. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Normal hearing kitten. Hear. Res. 62:1992;62-81.
57. Otte J., Schuknecht H.F., Kerr A.G. Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae: implications for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope. 88:1978;1231-1246.
58. Parkins C.W., Colombo J. Auditory-nerve single-neuron thresholds to electrical stimulation from scala tympani electrodes. Hear. Res. 31:1987;267-286.
59. Parkins C.W. Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibres to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys. Hear. Res. 41:1989;137-168.
60. Pender M.P., Sears T.A. The pathophysiology of acute experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in the rabbit. Brain. 107:1984;699-726.
61. Pfingst B.E., Holloway L.A., Poopat N., Subramanya A.R., Warren M.F., Zwolan T.A. Effects of stimulus level on nonspectral frequency discrimination by human subjects. Hear. Res. 78:1994;197-209.
62. Pujol R. Development of tone-burst responses along the auditory pathway in the cat. Acta Otolaryngol. 24:1972;383-391.
63. Rasminsky M., Sears T.A. Internodal conduction in undissected demyelinated nerve fibres. J. Physiol. 227:1972;323-350.
64. Rattay F., Aberham M. Modeling axon membranes for functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40:1993;1201-1209.
65. Rubinstein J.T. Threshold fluctuations in an N sodium channel model of the node of Ranvier. Biophys. J. 68:1995;779-785.
66. Rupert A., Moushegian G., Glambos R. Microelectrode studies of primary vestibular neurons in cat. Exp. Neurol. 5:1962;100-109.
67. Rushton W.A.H. A theory of the effects of fibre size in medullated nerve. J. Physiol. 115:1951;101-122.
68. Sachs M.B., Abbas P.J. Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibres in cats: tone burst stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56:1974;1835-1847.
69. Shannon R.V. Multiple-channel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res. 11:1983;157-189.
70. Shepherd, R.K. and Javel, E. (1996) Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: fibre responses in normal and pathological cochleae. Proc. 3rd European Symposium on Paediatric Cochlear Implantation, Hannover, Germany, 6-8 June, A-172.
71. Shepherd R.K., Martin R.L. Onset of ototoxicity in the cat is related to onset of auditory function. Hear. Res. 92:1995;131-142.
72. Shepherd R.K., Clark G.M., Black R.C. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats: physiological and histopathological results. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 399:1983;19-31.
73. Shepherd, R.K., Maffi, C.L., Hatsushika, S., Javel, E., Tong, Y.C. and Clark, G.M. (1990) Temporal and spatial coding in auditory prostheses. In: M. Rowe and L. Aitkin (Eds.), Information Processing in Mammalian Auditory and Tactile Systems, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 281-293.
74. Shepherd R.K., Matsushima J., Millard R.E., Clark G.M. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation using non-charge balanced stimuli. Acta Otolaryngol. 111:1991;848-860.
75. Shepherd R.K., Maffi C.L., Clark G.M. The origin of electrophonic activity evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Proc. Aust. Neurosci. Soc. 3:1992;p129.
76. Shepherd R.K., Hatsushika S., Clark G.M. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear. Res. 66:1993;108-120.
77. Shepherd R.K., Clark G.M., Xu S.A., Pyman B.C. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque. Am. J. Otol. 16:1995;186-199.
78. Spoendlin H. Innervation patterns in the organ of Corti of the cat. Acta. Otolaryngol. 67:1972;239-254.
79. Spoendlin H. Factors inducing retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 93:(Suppl. 112):1984;76-82.
80. Spoendlin H., Schrott A. Analysis of the human auditory nerve. Hear. Res. 43:1989;25-38.
81. Simmons F.B. Permanent intracochlear electrodes in cats. Tissue tolerance and cochlear microphonics. Laryngoscope. 77:1967;171-186.
82. Stypulkowski P.H., Van den Honert C., Kvistad S.D. Electrophysiological evaluation of the cochlear implant patient. Otol. Clin. N. Am. 19:1986;249-257.
83. Suesserman M.F., Spelman F.A. Lumped-parameter model for in-vivo cochlear stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40:1993;237-245.
84. Suzuka Y., Schuknecht H.F. Retrograde cochlear neuronal degeneration in human subjects. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 450:1988;2-20.
85. Syka J. Experimental models of sensorineural hearing loss: effects of noise and ototoxic drugs on hearing. Prog. Sens. Physiol. 9:1989;97-170.
86. Tasaki I. New measurements of the capacity and resistance of the myelinated sheath and the nodal membrane of the isolated frog nerve fiber. Am. J. Physiol. 188:1955;639-650.
87. Terayama Y., Kaneko Y., Kawamoto K., Sakai N. Ultrastructural changes of the nerve elements following disruption of the organ of corti. I. Nerve elements in the organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol. 83:1977;291-302.
88. Tong Y.C., Clark G.M., Blamey P.J., Busby P.A., Dowell R.C. Psychophysical studies of two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71:1982;153-160.
89. Tykocinski M., Shepherd R.K., Clark G.M. Electrophysiological effects following acute intracochlear direct current (DC) stimulation of the guinea pig cochlea. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 104:(Suppl. 166):1995;68-71.
90. Van den Honert C., Mortimer J.T. The response of the myelinated nerve fibre to short duration biphasic stimulating currents. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 7:1979;117-125.
91. Van den Honert C., Stypulkowski P.H. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings. Hear. Res. 14:1984;225-243.
92. Van den Honert C., Stypulkowski P.H. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem reponse (ABR) in cats and humans. Hear. Res. 21:1986;109-126.
93. Van den Honert C., Stypulkowski P.H. Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli. Hear. Res. 29:1987;207-222.
94. Van den Honert C., Stypulkowski P.H. Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Hear. Res. 29:1987;195-206.
95. Walsh, E.J., and McGee, J. (1986) The development of function in the auditory periphery. In: R.A. Altschuler, D.W. Hoffman, and R.P. Bobbin (Eds.), Neurobiology of Hearing: The Cochlea, Raven, New York, pp. 247-270.
96. Walsh S.M., Leake-Jones P.A. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: physiological and histological results. Hear. Res. 7:1982;266-275.
97. Xu J., Shepherd R.K., Millard R.E., Clark G.M. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study. Hear. Res. 105:1997;1-29.
98. Xu S.-A., Shepherd R.K., Chen Y., Clark G.M. Profound hearing loss in the cat following the single co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Hear. Res. 70:1993;205-215.
99. Yamane H., Marsh R.R., Potsic W.P. Brainstem response evoked by electrical stimulation of the round window of the guinea pig. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 89:1981;117-126.
100. Ylikoski J., Savolainess S. The cochlear nerve in various forms of deafness. Acta. Otolaryngol. 98:1984;418-427.
101. Zhou R., Abbas P.J., Assouline J.G. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in peripheral myelin-deficient mice. Hear. Res. 88:1995;98-106.