Effects of time after deafening and implantation on guinea pig electrical detection thresholds

Hearing Research

Volumn 144, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 175-186

  Miller, Amy L ^a   Morris, Deborah J ^a   Pfingst, Bryan E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Aminoglycoside; Cochlear implant; Electrical detection threshold; Guinea pig; Psychophysics; Spiral ganglion cell; Time

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL SURVIVAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; GUINEA PIG; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HISTOLOGY; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPIRAL GANGLION; TIME;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CELL COUNT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; GUINEA PIGS; NEOMYCIN; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPIRAL GANGLION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0034080724     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00066-6     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Blamey P. Are spiral ganglion cell numbers important for speech perception with a cochlear implant? Am. J. Otol. 18:1997;S11-S12.
2. Bledsoe, S.C., Nagase, S., Altschuler, R.A. and Miller, J.M., 1997. Changes in the central auditory system with deafness and return of activity via a cochlear prosthesis. In: Syka, J. (Ed.), Acoustical Signal Processing in the Central Auditory System. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 513-528.
3. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Bertschy M., Tyler R.S., Lowder M., Takahashi G., Purdy S., Gantz B.J. Longitudinal assessment of physiological and psychophysical measures in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 16:1995;439-449.
4. Bruce I.C., White M.W., Irlicht L.S., O'Leary S.J., Dynes S., Javel E., Clark G.M. The effects of stochastic neural activity in a model predicting intensity perception with cochlear implants: low-rate stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46:1999;617-629.
5. Colombo J., Parkins C.W. A model of electrical excitation of the mammalian auditory-nerve neuron. Hear. Res. 31:1987;287-312.
6. Dodson H.C. Loss and survival of spiral ganglion neurons in the guinea pig after intracochlear perfusion with aminoglycosides. J. Neurocytol. 26:1997;541-556.
7. Dorman M.F., Smith L.M., Dankowski K., McCandless G., Parkin J. Long-term measures of electrode impedance and auditory thresholds for the Ineraid cochlear implant. J. Speech Hear. Res. 35:1992;1126-1130.
8. Duckert L.G. Morphological changes in the normal and neomycin-perfused guinea pig cochlea following chronic prosthetic implantation. Laryngoscope. 93:1983;841-855.
9. Eddington D.K., Dobelle W.H., Brackmann D.E., Mladejovsky M.G., Parkin J.L. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 53:(Suppl.):1978;1-39.
10. Gantz B.J., Woodworth G.G., Abbas P.J., Knutson J.F., Tyler R.S. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 102:1993;909-916.
11. Hall R.D. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear. Res. 49:1990;155-168.
12. Hartshorn D.O., Miller J.M., Altschuler R.A. Protective effect of electrical stimulation in the deafened guinea pig cochlea. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 104:1991;311-319.
13. Jyung R.W., Miller J.M., Cannon S.C. Evaluation of eighth nerve integrity by the electrically evoked middle latency response. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 101:1989;670-682.
14. Koitchev K., Guilhaume A., Cazals Y., Aran J.-M. Spiral ganglion changes after massive aminoglycoside treatment in the guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol. 94:1982;431-438.
15. Leake P.A., Hradek G.T. Cochlear pathology of long term neomycin induced deafness in cats. Hear. Res. 33:1988;11-34.
16. Leake P.A., Hradek G.T., Rebscher S.J., Snyder R.L. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats. Hear. Res. 54:1991;251-271.
17. Leake P.A., Snyder R.L., Hradek G.T., Rebscher S.J. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location. Hear. Res. 64:1992;99-117.
18. Leake P.A., Snyder R.L., Hradek G.T., Rebscher S.J. Consequences of chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats. Hear. Res. 82:1995;65-80.
19. Leake-Jones P.A., Vivion M.C., O'Reilly B.F., Merzenich M.M. Deaf animal models for studies of a multichannel cochlear prosthesis. Hear. Res. 8:1982;225-246.
20. Lousteau R.J. Increased spiral ganglion cell survival in electrically stimulated, deafened guinea pig cochleae. Laryngoscope. 97:1987;836-841.
21. Marsh M.A., Coker N.J., Jenkins H.A. Temporal bone histopathology of a patient with a nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. Am. J. Otol. 13:(3):1992;241-248.
22. Michelson R.P. Electrical stimulation of the human cochlea - a preliminary report. Arch. Otolaryngol. 93:1971;317-323.
23. Miller A.L., Morris D.J., Pfingst B.E. Effects of time after deafening and implantation on guinea pig electrical detection threshold. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. Abstr. 22:1999;654.
24. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Robinson B.K. The use of long-duration current pulses to assess nerve survival. Hear. Res. 78:1994;11-26.
25. Miller C.A., Faulkner M.J., Pfingst B.E. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. II. Changes in electrophysiological and psychophysical measures over time. Hear. Res. 92:1995;100-111.
26. Miller C.A., Woodruff K.E., Pfingst B.E. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measure. Hear. Res. 92:1995;85-99.
27. Miller, J.M., Altschuler, R.A., Dupont, J., Lesperance, M. and Tucci, D., 1995c. Consequences of deafness and electrical stimulation in the auditory system. In: Salvi, R.J., Henderson, D., Fiorino, F. and Colletti, V. (Eds.), Auditory Plasticity and Regeneration: Scientific and Clinical Implications. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York.
28. Mitchell A., Miller J.M., Finger P.A., Heller J.W., Raphael Y., Altschuler R.A. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig. Hear. Res. 105:1997;30-43.
29. Pfingst B.E. Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 50:1990;225-236.
30. Pfingst B.E., Sutton D. Relation of cochlear implant function to histopathology in monkeys. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 405:1983;224-239.
31. Pfingst, B.E., Glass, I., Spelman, F.A. and Sutton, D., 1985. Psychophysical studies of cochlear implants in monkeys: clinical implications. In: Schindler, R.A. and Merzenich, M.M. (Eds.), Cochlear Implants. Raven Press, New York, pp. 305-320.
32. Skinner M.W., Binzer S.M., Holden L.K., Holden T.A. Hearing changes in adults with cochlear implants. Semin. Hear. 16:1995;228-238.
33. Smith L., Simmons F.B. Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 92:1983;19-23.
34. Snyder R., Leake P., Rebscher S., Beitel R. Temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus to intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of neonatal deafening and chronic stimulation. J. Neurophys. 73:1995;449-467.
35. Snyder R.L., Rebscher S.J., Cao K., Leake P.A., Kelly K. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation. Hear. Res. 50:1990;7-34.
36. Spelman F.A., Pfingst B.E., Miller J.M. A constant-current stimulator for use with chronic cochlear implants. Proc. San Diego Biomed. Symp. 17:1978;1-3.
37. Spoendlin H. Retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve. Acta Otolaryngol. 79:1975;266-275.
38. Waltzman S.B., Cohen N.L., Shapiro W.H. Effects of chronic electrical stimulation on patients using a cochlear prosthesis. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 105:1991;797-801.
39. Webster D.B. Long term sequelae of organ of Corti loss in guinea pigs. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. Abstr. 19:1996;820.
40. Webster M., Webster D.B. Spiral ganglion neuron loss following organ of Corti loss: a quantitative study. Brain Res. 212:1981;17-30.
41. White, M.W., 1978. Design considerations of a prosthesis for the profoundly deaf. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkley, CA.
42. White, M.W., Finley, C.C., Wilson, B.S., 1987. Electrical stimulation model of the auditory nerve: stochastic response characteristics. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, MA, pp. 1906-1907.
43. Xue X.L., Pfingst B.E. Inner ear implants for experimental electrical stimulation of auditory nerve arrays. J. Neurosci. Methods. 28:1989;189-196.