Electrophysiological findings in two bilateral cochlear implant cases: Does the duration of deafness affect electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses?

Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

Volumn 111, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1008-1014

  Thai Van, Hung ^a   Gallego, Stéphane ^a   Truy, Eric ^a   Veuillet, Evelyne ^a   Collet, Lionel ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Bilateral cochlear implantation; Deafness duration; Electrically evoked auditory brain stem response

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DEVICE; DISEASE DURATION; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MODEL; NEUROTRANSMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH;

EID: 0036845006     PISSN: 00034894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000348940211101111     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Pelizzone M, Kasper A, Montandon P. Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient. Hear Res 1990;48:287-90.
2. Truy E, Gallégo S, Chanal JM, Collet L, Morgon A. Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users. Laryngoscope 1998;108:554-9.
3. Gallégo S, Micheyl C, Berger-Vachon C, Truy E, Morgon A, Collet L. Ipsilateral ABR with cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996;116:228-33.
4. Gabriel S, Durrant JD, Dickter AE, Kephart JE. Computer identification of waves in the auditory brain stem evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980;49:421-3.
5. Gallégo S, Micheyl C. Intensity discrimination and auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners. Behav Neurosci 1998;112:793-9.
6. Gallégo S, Frachet B, Micheyl C, Truy E, Collet L. Cochlear implant performance and electrically-evoked auditory brain-stem response characteristics. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;108:521-5.
7. Gallégo S, Truy E, Morgon A, Collet L. EABRs and surface potentials with a transcutaneous multielectrode cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997;117:164-8.
8. Gallégo S, Garnier S, Micheyl C, Truy E, Morgon A, Collet L. Loudness growth functions and EABR characteristics in Digisonic cochlear implantees. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1999;119:234-8.
9. Pelizzone M, Kasper A, Montandon P. Electrically evoked responses in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 1989;28:230-8.
10. van den Honert C, Stypulkowsky PH. Characterization of the electrically evoked brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans. Hear Res 1986;21:109-26.
11. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation. Hear Res 1988;36:153-62.
12. Blarney PJ, Pyman BC, Gordon M, et al. Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101: 342-8.
13. Tyler RS, Summerfield AQ. Cochlear implantation: Relationships with research on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear Hear 1996;17(suppl 3):38S-50S.
14. van Dijk JE, van Olphen AF, Langereis MC, Mens LH, Brokx JP, Smoorenburg GF. Predictors of cochlear implant performance. Audiology 1999;38:109-16.
15. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: Effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 1999;20:445-52.
16. Webster DB, Webster M. Effects of neonatal conductive hearing loss on brain stem auditory nuclei. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979;88:684-8.
17. Moore DR. Postnatal development of the mammalian central auditory system and the neural consequences of auditory deprivation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1985(suppl 421):19-30.
18. Smith L, Simmons FB. Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983;92:19-23.
19. Lusted HS, Shelton C, Simmons FB. Comparison of electrode sites in electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Laryngoscope 1984;94:878-82.
20. Hall RD. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 1990;49:155-68.
21. Nadol JB Jr, Young YS, Glynn RJ. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: Implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;98: 411-6.
22. Shepherd RK, Javel E. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hear Res 1997;108:112-44.
23. Shirane M, Harrison RV. The effects of long and short term profound deafness on the responses of inferior colliculus to electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1991(suppl 489):32-40.
24. Otte J, Schuknecht HF, Kerr AG. Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1978;88:1231-46.