The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 151-163

  Brown, Carolyn J ^a,b   Hughes, Michelle L ^b   Luk, Betty ^a   Abbas, Paul J ^a,b   Wolaver, Abigail ^b   Gervais, Jonathan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; MALE; NERVE POTENTIAL; PREDICTION; SPEECH ANALYSIS; TELEMETRY;

EID: 0034113705     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J., Hughes, M. L., Gantz, B. J., Wolaver, A. A., Gervais, J. P., & Hong, S. H. (in press). Electrically evoked compound action potentials (EAP) recorded from subjects who use the Nucleus CI24M device. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology.
2. Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J., Shallop, J. K., Firszt, J. B., Hughes M. L., Hong, S. H., & Staller, S. J. (1999). Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear and Hearing, 20, 45-59.
3. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Borland, J., & Bertschy, M. (1996). Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users and their relationship to psychophysical performance. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 453-467.
4. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Fryauf-Bertschy, H., Kelsay, D., & Gantz, B. J. (1994). Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in Nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear and Hearing, 15, 168-176.
5. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., & Gantz, B. J. (1990). Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials I. Data from Symbion cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1385-1391.
6. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., & Gantz, B. J. (1998). Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. American Journal of Otology, 19, 320-327.
7. Brown, C. J., Hong, S. H., Hughes, M., Lowder, M., Parkinson, W., & Abbas, P. J. (1997). Comparison between electrically evoked whole nerve action potential (EAP) thresholds and the behavioral levels used to program the speech processor of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Abstracts of the 1997 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, 96.
8. Brown, C. J., Hughes, M. L., Lopez, S. M., & Abbas, P. J. (1999). The relationship between EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Clarion speech processor. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 108, 4 (Suppl. 177), 50-57.
9. Cullen, J. K., Ellis, M. S., Berlin, C. I., & Lousteau, R. J. (1972). Human acoustic nerve action potential recordings from the tympanic membrane without anesthesia. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 74, 15-22.
10. Ferraro, J. A., & Ruth, R. A. (1994). Electrocochleography. In J. T. Jacobson (Ed.), Principles & applications in auditory evoked potentials. (pp. 101-122). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
11. Gantz, B. J., Brown, C. J., & Abbas, P. J. (1994). Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential. American Journal of Otology, 15, 137-144.
12. Hughes, M. L., Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J., & Gantz, B. J. (in press). Using EAP thresholds to facilitate creating MAPs for children with the Nucleus CI24M. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.
13. Hughes, M. L., Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Wolaver, A. A., & Gervais, J. P. (in press). Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant: Data from children. Ear and Hearing, 21, 164-174.
14. Laureano, A. N., McGrandy, D. M., & Campbell, K. C. M. (1995). Comparison of tympanic membrane-recorded electrocochleography and the auditory brainstem response in threshold determination. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 16, 209-215.
15. Mason, S. M., Sheppard, S., Garnham, C. W., Lutman, M. E., O'Donoghue, G. M., & Gibbin, K. P. (1993). Application of intraoperative recordings of electrically evoked ABRs in pediatric cochlear implant programme. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 48, 136-141.
16. Mens, L. H. M., Oostendorp, T., & van den Broek, P. (1994). Cochlear implant generated surface potentials: Current spread and side effects. Ear and Hearing, 15, 339-345.
17. Shallop, J. K., VanDyke, L., Goin, D. W., & Mischke, R. E. (1991). Prediction of behavioral threshold and comfort values for Nucleus 22-channel implant patients from electrical auditory brain stem response test results. Annals of Otololgy, Rhinology and Laryngology, 100, 896-898.
18. Waltzman, S. B., Cohen, N. L., & Shapiro, W. H. (1986). Long-term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage. Laryngoscope, 96, 1083-1087.