GLOBALIZING PRACTICES AND UNIVERSITY RESPONSES: European and Anglo-American Differences

Globalizing Practices and University Responses: European and Anglo-American Differences

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-231

  Currie, Jan ^a   DeAngelis, Richard ^b   de Boer, Harry ^c   Huisman, Jeroen ^c   Lacotte, Claude ^d   Altbach, Philip G ^e  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^d Normes   (France)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85183209397     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (271)

1. Aamodt, P.O. (1990). A new deal for Norwegian higher education. European Journal of Education 25(2): 171-185.
2. Aamodt, P.O., Kyvik, S., & Skoie, H. (1991). Norway: Towards a more indirect model of governance? In G. Neave & FA. van Vught (Eds.), The Changing Relationship Between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe (129-144). Oxford:Pergamon Press.
3. Abecassis, A. (1994). The policy of contracts between the state and the universities. A quiet revolution. In Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (Ed.), Evaluation and the Decision Making Process in Higher Education:French, German and Spanish Experiences (13-18). Paris: OECD.
4. Aitkin, D. (2000, Sept. 6). A bedrock that’s not set in stone. The Australian: 33.
5. Albrow, M. (1993). Globalization. In W Outhwaite & T. Bottomore (Eds.), Blackwell Dictionary of Twentieth Century Social Thoughts (248-249). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6. Alexander, F.K. (2000). The changing face of accountability. Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education. Journal of Higher Education 71(4):411-431.
7. Altbach, P.G. (2001). Higher education and the WTO: Globalization run amok. International Higher Education 23: 2-4.
8. Altbach, P. & Lewis, L. (1996). The academic profession. In P.G. Altbach (Ed.), The International Academic Profession (3-48). Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
9. American Association of University Professors. (AAUP). (1940). Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure. Washington, DC: AAUP.
10. American Association of University Professors. (AAUP). (1966). Statement on Professional Ethics. Washington, DC: AAUP.
11. American Association of University Professors. (AAUP). (1999). Post-Tenure Review: An AAUP Response. Washington, DC: AAUP.
12. American Association of University Professors. (AAUP). (2000). Incentives to Forgo Tenure. A Statement by Committee A. Washington, DC: AAUP.
13. Anderson, D. & Johnson, R. (1998). University Autonomy in Twenty Countries. Canberra:DEETYA, Higher Education Division.
14. Anderson, H. (2001, Jan. 27-28). France finds more time for the good life. The Weekend Australian: 20.
15. Appadurai, A. (2000). Grassroots globalisation and the research imagination. Globalisation, Special Edition of Public Culture 12(1): 1-19.
16. Arenson, K. (2000, Jun. 6). SUNY fight over curriculum mirrors larger debate. New York Times: B1.
17. Bacharach, S.B., Bamberger, P., & Conley, S.C. (1991). Negotiating the ‘see-saw’ of managerial strategy. A resurrection of the study of professionals in organizational theory. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 8: 217-238.
18. Balligand, J.-P. (1998, Sept. 29). Le globalization l’etat et le marche [Globalization, the state and the market]. Le Monde: 26.
19. Barry Jones, R.J. (1995). Globalization and Interdependence in the International Political Economy. London: Pinter.
20. Bauer, M., Askling, B., Marton, S.G., & Marton, F. (1999). Transforming Universities:Changing Patterns of Governance, Structure and Learning in Swedish Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
21. Becher, T. & Kogan, M. (1992). Process and Structure in Higher Education. London/New York: Routledge.
22. Benjamin, E. (1997). Some Implications of Tenure for the Profession and Society. Washington, DC: AAUP.
23. Bess, J.L. (1992). Collegiality: Toward a clarification of meaning and function. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research VIII (1-36). Bronx, NY: Agathon Press.
24. Bleiklie, I. (1996). Reform and change in higher education system. Unpublished, University of Bergen.
25. Bleiklie, I., Hostaker, R., & Vabo, A. (2000). Policy and Practice in Higher Education. Reforming Norwegian Universities. London: Jessica Kingsley.
26. Blumenstyk, G. (2001, Nov. 30). Group denounces ‘blame America first’ response to September 11 attacks. The Chronicle of Higher Education: A12.
27. Boer, H. de (2002). On nails, coffins and councils. European Journal of Education 37(1):7-20.
28. Boer, H. de & Denters, B. (1999). Analysis of institutions of university governance: A classification scheme applied to postwar changes in Dutch higher education. In B. Jongbloed, P. Maassen, & G. Neave (Eds.), From the Eye of the Storm: Higher Education’s Changing Institution (211-233). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Boer, H. de, Denters, B., & Goedegebuure, L. (1998). On boards and councils: shaky balances considered. The governance of Dutch universities. Higher Education Policy 11(2/3): 153-164.
30. Boer, H. de, Denters, B., & Goedegebuure, L. (2000). Dutch disease of Dutch model: An evaluation of the pre-1998 system of democratic university government in the Netherlands. In R. Weissberg (Ed.), Democracy and the Academy (123-140). Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
31. Boer, H. de, Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, L. (1998). In the winter of discontent-business as usual. Higher Education Policy 11(2/3): 103-110.
32. Boer, H. de, & Huisman, J. (1999) The new public management in Dutch universities. In D. Braun & F.-X. Merrien (Eds.), Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities? A Comparative View (100-118). London: Jessica Kingsley.
33. Boezerooy, P. (1999). Higher education in the Netherlands: Country report. CHEPS Higher Education Monitor 310. Enschede: University of Twente Higher Education Policy Series.
34. Brabazon, T. (2001). Internet teaching and the administration of knowledge. First Monday 6: 1-10. Retrieved November 20, 2001, from www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_6/brabazon.
35. Brain, P. (2001, May 8). The opportunity cost of misplaced faith. The Australian Financial Review: 3.
36. Brewster, K. (1972). On tenure. AAUP Bulletin 58(4): 382-383.
37. Buck, J. (2001, Feb. 24). Academic freedom for a free society. Paper presented at the ASC/CBC Joint Leadership Conference. Kansas City, MO.
38. Burtchaell, J.T. (1998). The Dying of the Light: The Disengagement of College and Universities from their Christian Churches. Grand Rapids, MI: WB. Eerdmans Publishing.
39. Callan, P.M., Doyle, W, & Finney, J.E. (2001, Mar-Apr.). Evaluating state higher education performance. Change: 10-19.
40. Carlson, S. & Carnevale, D. (2001, Dec. 14). Debating the demise of NYUonline. The Chronicle of Higher Education: A31, A32.
41. Central Intelligence Agency. (CIA). (2001). The World Factbook-United States, Australia, the Netherlands, Norway and France. Retrieved September 29,2001, from www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geaos/us/as/nl/no/fr.html.
42. CEPES. (1993). France. Higher Education in Europe 19(1).
43. Chapman, J.W (Ed.). (1983). The Western University on Trial. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44. Charle, C. (1994). La Republique des Universitaires: 1870-1940. Paris: Seuil.
45. Chemerinsky, E. (1998). Is tenure necessary to protect academic freedom? American Behavioral Scientist 41(5): 607-626.
46. Chevaillier, T. (1998). Moving away from central planning: Using contracts to steer higher education in France. European Journal of Education 33(1): 65-76.
47. Chipman, L. (2000, Mar. 8-14). Academic freedom can prevail. Campus Review: 17.
48. The Chronicle of Higher Education. (1997). The Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac 97-98. Retrieved November 7,2000, from www.chronicle.com/data/infobank.dir/almanac.dir/97alm.dir/97almain.htm.
49. Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
50. Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: IAU Press, Pergamon.
51. Coady, T. (1996). The very idea of a university. Australian Quarterly 68(4): 49-62.
52. Coaldrake, P. & Stedman, L. (1999). Academic work in the twenty-first century: changing roles and policies. Occasional Paper Series 99-H. Canberra, ACT: DETYA, Higher Education Division.
53. Cohen, M. (1999/2000). The general agreement on trade in services: Implications for public post-secondary education in Australia. Australian Universities’ Review 42(2)/43(1): 9-15.
54. Collis, B. (1999). Pedagogical perspectives on ICT use in higher education. In B. Collins & M.C. Van Der Wende (Eds.), The Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Higher Education: An International Orientation on Trends and Issues (51-86). Enschede: University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
55. Comite National d’Evaluation. (1991). UUniversite d!Avignon et des Pays du Vaucluse:Report d’Evaluation. Paris: Comite National d’Evaluation.
56. Considine, M. (2001a). Enterprising States: The Public Management of Welfare-to-Work.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Considine, M. (2001b). Commentary: APS A presidential address 2000: The tragedy of the common rooms ? political science and the new university governance. Australian Journal of Political Science 36(1): 145-156.
58. Cunningham, S., Tapsall, S., Ryan, Y, Stedman, L., Bagdon, K., & Flew, T. (1998). New Media and Borderless Education: A Review of the Convergence Between Global Media Networks and Higher Education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
59. Currie, J. (2001). Privatization and academic freedom in Australian universities. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE) 26th Annual Conference, Richmond, VA.
60. Currie, J. & Newson, J. (Eds.). (1998). Universities and Globalization: Critical Perspectives.London: Sage.
61. Daalder, H. (1982). The Netherlands: Universities between the ʼnew democracy’ and the ʼnew management.' In H. Daalder & E. Shils (Eds.), Universities, Politicians and Bureaucrats: Europe and the United States (173-232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Daalder, H. & Shils, E. (Eds.). (1982). Universities, Politicians and Bureaucrats: Europe and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Dahl, R.A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64. Daly, H. (1994). Farewell lecture to the World Bank. In J. Cavanagh, D. Wysham, & M. Arruda (Eds.), Beyond Bretton Woods: Alternatives to the Global Economic Order (109-117). Boulder, CO: Institute for Policy Studies and Transitional Institute.
65. Daniel, M. (1999, Nov. 18). Report. The Boston Globe: A35.
66. Darras, B., Harvey, D., Lemmel, C, & Peraya, D. (2000). Construction des savoirs et multimedias. In B. Darras (Ed.), Multimedia et Savoir. MEI, Mediation et information 11 (10-57). Paris: L’Harmattan.
67. DeAngelis, R. (1992). The Dawkins revolution. Australian Universities’ Review 35(1):37-42.
68. DeAngelis, R. (1993). Funding the Dawkins revolution in higher education: The first five years-policy, problems, prospects. Flinders Studies in Policy and Administration 9:43.
69. DeAngelis, R. (1996). Universities. In A. Parkin (Ed.), South Australia, Federalism and Public Policy (217-230). Canberra: Federalism Research Centre, The Australian National University.
70. DeAngelis, R. (1998). The last decade of higher education reform in Australia and France:Different constraints, differing choices in higher education politics and policies. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and Globalization: Critical Perspectives (123-139). Thousand Oaks, CA/London: Sage.
71. DeBats, D. & Ward, A. (1999). Degrees of Difference: Reshaping the University in Australia and the United States. Sydney: Centre for American Studies, University of Sydney.
72. De Groof, J., Neave, G., & Svec, J. (1998). Democracy and Governance in Higher Education.The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
73. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA) (2000). Higher Education Selected Staff Statistics (Tables 1, 4). Desktop 2000. Enterprise Technology Resource Management Project. Retrieved May 28, 2001, from www.Boston.edu/Boston.org/tv/etrm.
74. Dill, D.D. (1997). Accreditation, assessment, anarchy? The evolution of academic quality assurance policies in the United States. In J. Brennan, P. De Vries, & R. Williams (Eds.), Standards and Quality in Higher Education (15-43). London: Jessica Kingsley.
75. Dill, D.D. (1998). Evaluating the ‘evaluative state’: Implications for research in higher education. European Journal of Education 33(3): 361-378.
76. Dill, D.D. (1999). Academic accountability and university adaption: The architecture of an academic learning organization. Higher Education 38(2): 127-154.
77. Dill, D.D. (2000). The Nature of Academic Organisation. Utrecht: Lemma Publishers.
78. Dill, D.D. & Peterson Helm, K. (1988). Faculty participation in strategic policy making. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research IV (319-355). New York: Agathon Press.
79. Dimmen, A. & Kyvik, S. (1998). Recent changes in governance of higher education institutions in Norway. Higher Education Policy 11(2/3): 217-218.
80. Dionne, E.J.J. (1998, Aug. 11). A ‘third way’ is in vogue on both sides of the Atlantic. Herald International Tribune: 6.
81. The Economist. (2001a, Sept. 9). Globalisation and its critics: 1-30.
82. The Economist. (2001b, Nov. 10). Reading the tea leaves: 39.
83. The Economist. (2001c, Aug. 4). Putting the brakes on: Globalisation through French eyes: 42.
84. Ehrmann, S.C. (1999). Asking the hard questions about technology use and education. Change March/April: 25-29.
85. Elliot, L. (1998, Sept. 13). Capitalism on a fast road to ruin. Guardian Weekly: 19.
86. Engstrand, G. (1998). ‘Tenure wars’: The battles and the lessons. American Behavioral Scientist 41(5): 607-626.
87. Exworthy, M. & Halford, S. (Eds.). (1999). Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector. Buckingham: Open University Press.
88. Feigenbaum, H., Henig, J., & Hamnett, C. (1999). Shrinking the State: The Political Underpinnings of Privatization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89. Folger, J.K. (1977). Editor’s note to ‘Increasing the public accountability of higher education.' New Directions for Institutional Research 16: vii-xii.
90. Foster, L. (2001) Review essay: Technology: Transforming the landscape of higher education. The Review of Higher Education 25(1): 115-124.
91. Frederiks, M.M.H., Westerheijden, D.F., & Weusthof, P.J.M. (1994). Effects of quality assessment in Dutch higher education. European Journal of Education 29(2):181-199.
92. Friedberg, E. & Musselin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Le Gouvernement des Universites: Perspectives Comparatives. Paris: L’Harmattan.
93. Friedman, T.L. (2000). The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Random House.
94. Geurts, PA., Maassen, P.A.M., & van Vught, FA. (1996). The Dutch professoriate. In P.G. Altbach (Ed.), The International Academic Profession (493-528). Princeton, NJ:The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
95. Gidley, J. (2000). Unveiling the human face of university futures. In S. Inayatullah & J. Gidley (Eds.), The University in Transformation: Global Perspectives on the Future of the University (235-245). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
96. Glassick, C. (1997). Scholarship for Higher Education. Canberra: Higher Education Council.
97. Goedegebuure, L., Kaiser, E, Massen, P., Meek, L., Vught, F. van, & Weert, E. de (Eds.). (1994). Higher Education Policy. An International Comparative Perspective. Oxford:Pergamon Press.
98. Goedegebuure, L. & Vught, F. van (1994). Alternative models of government steering in higher education. In L. Goedegebuure & F. van Vught (Eds.), Comparative Policy Studies in Higher Education (1-34). Utrecht: Lemma.
99. Gorbachev, M. (2001, Jan. 6-7). Mikhail Gorbachev delivers the new president a reality check. The Weekend Australian: 17.
100. Gornitzka, A., Huisman, J., Massen, P., Van Heffen, O., Klemperer, A., Van De Maat, L., & Vossensteyn, H. (1999). State Steering Models with Respect to Western European Higher Education. Enschede: CHEPS.
101. Graham, W (2000). Academic freedom or commercial license? In J.L. Turk (Ed.), The Corporate Campus: Commercialization and the Dangers to Canada’s Colleges and Universities (23-30). Toronto: James Lormier and Company.
102. Gray, J. (1998, Sept. 13). Unfettered capital spells global doom. Guardian Weekly: 1,4.
103. Greenwood, D. (1998, Jan.-Feb.). Problems in the university ? Tenure, they say. Academe:23-24.
104. Guin, J. (1990). The reawakening of higher education in France. European Journal of Education 25(2): 123-145.
105. Halimi, S. (1998, Oct. 1). Le naufrage des dogmes liberaux [The shipwreck of liberal dogma]. Le Monde Diplomatique: 18,19.
106. Halsey, A.H. (1982). Decline of Donnish Dominion: The British Academic Professions in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
107. Harley, D. (2001). Higher Education in the Digital Age: Planning for an Uncertain Future. Syllabus 15(2): 10-12.
108. Haug, G. (1999, Dec). Visions of a European future: Bologna and beyond. Paper presented at the 11th EAIE Annual Conference. Maastricht.
109. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London:Jessica Kingsley.
110. Henry, M., Lingard, R., Rizvi, E, & Taylor, S. (1997). Globalization, the state and education policy making. In S. Taylor (Ed.), Educational Policy and the Politics of Change. London: Routledge.
111. Hickling-Hudson, A. (2000) Scholar-activism for a new world: The future of the Caribbean university. In S. Inayatullah & J. Gidley (Eds.), The University in Transformation:Global Perspectives on the Future of the University (150-159). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
112. Hirschman, A.O. (1982). Shifting Involvements: Private Interests and Public Action. Oxford:Martin Robertson.
113. Honan, J.P. & Teferra, D. (2001). The U.S. academic profession: Key policy challenges. Higher Education 41(1/2): 183-203.
114. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration 69(Spring):2-19.
115. Hood, C. (1995). Contemporary public management. Public Policy and Administration 10(2): 104-117.
116. Hoppe-Jeliazkova, M.I. & Westerheijden, D.F. (2000). Het Zichtbare Eindresultaat. Den Haag: Algemene Rekenkamer.
117. Hughes, O. (1994). Public Management and Administration: An Introduction. London:St. Martin’s Press.
118. Huisman, J. & Jenniskens, I. (1994). The role of Dutch government in curriculum design and change. European Journal of Education 29(3): 269-279.
119. Huisman, J. & Theisens, H. (2001). Marktwerking in het hoger onderwijs. B & M, tijdschrift voor beleid, politiek en maatschappij 28(3): 165-176.
120. Huisman, J., Westerheijden, D., & Boer, H. de (2001). De tuinen van het hoger onderwijs.Enschede: Twente University Press.
121. Inayatullah, S. (2000). Corporate networks or bliss for all: The politics of the future of the university. In S. Inayatullah & J. Gidley (Eds.), The University in Transformation:Global Perspectives on the Future of the University (221-233). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
122. James, B. (1998, Sept. 25). The elusive ‘third way’: Europe’s socialists rarely agree on definition. Herald International Tribune: 1,7.
123. Jeanneret, Y. (2000). Ya-t-il (Vraiment) des Technologies de l’Information? Paris: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
124. Jonassen, D.H. (1995). Computers as cognitive tools: learning with technology, not from technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 6(2): 40-73.
125. Jongbloed, B. & Vander Knoop, H. (1999). Budgeting at the institutional level: Responding to internal pressures and external opportunities. In B. Jongbloed, P. Maassen, & G. Neave (Eds.), From the Eye of the Storm: Higher Education’s Changing Institution (141-164). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
126. Kaiser, F. (2001). France: Country Report. Enschede: CHEPS Higher Education Monitor.
127. Kaiser, F. & Neave, G. (1994). Higher education policy in France. In L. Goedegebuure, et al. (Eds.), Higher Education Policy: An International Comparative Perspective.Oxford: Pergamon Press.
128. Kaiser, E, Van der Meer, P., Beverwijk, J., Klemperer, A., Steunenberg, B., & Van Wageningen, A. (1999). Market type mechanisms in higher education: A comparative analysis of their occurrence and discussions on the issue in five higher education systems. Enschede: CHEPS.
129. Karmel, P. (1992). The Australian university into the twenty-first century. Australian Quarterly, Autumn: 49-70.
130. Katzenstein, P.J. (1985). Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe.Ithaca/New York/London: Cornell University Press.
131. Kelly, P. (2000). Internationalizing the curriculum: For profit of planet? In S. Inayatullah & J. Gidley (Eds.), The University in Transformation: Global Perspectives on the Future of the University (161-172). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
132. Kerr, C. (1982). The Uses of the University (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University.
133. Kim, H. & Fording, R.C. (1998). Voter ideology in western democracies, 1946-1989. European Journal of Political Research 33: 73-97.
134. Kogan, M. (1986). Education Accountability. An Analytic Overview. London: Hutchinson.
135. Kong, D. (2000, Sept. 3). College try: As tuition keeps soaring, families put their all into finding ways to foot the bill. The Boston Globe: F4.
136. Korean Ministry of Education. (2001). Review of National Policies on Education. Followup to OECD Recommendations for Higher Education. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Education.
137. Kyvik, S. (2000). Academic work in Norwegian higher education. In M. Tight (Ed.), Academic Work and Life: What it is to be an Academic and How this is Changing (33-72). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
138. Kyvik, S. & Odegard, E. (1990). Universitetene i Nordenforan 90-tallet. Endringer i Styring og Finansiering av Forskning [The Nordic Universities Towards the 90s. Changes in Governance and Research Funding]. Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerrad.
139. Lacotte, C. (2001, Nov. 15, personal communication). Academic at the University of Avignon.
140. Langlois, G., Litoff, J., & Iiacqua, J. (2001). Reaching across boundaries: The Bryant College-Belarus Connection. Syllabus 15(3): 12-14.
141. Lanzara, G.F. (1998). Self-destructive processes in institution building and some modest countervailing mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research 33: 1-39.
142. Larsen, I.M. (2001, Oct.). The role of the governing board in higher education institutions.Paper presented at the Governance Structures in Higher Education Institutions seminar. Porto: CIPES/HEDDA.
143. Larsen, I.M. & Gornitzka, A. (1995). New management systems in Norwegian universities:The interface between reform and institutional understanding. European Journal of Education 30(3): 347-362.
144. Lawday, D. (2001, Aug. 11-12). New French resistance: France is standing firm against a global culture dominated by the United States. Australian Financial Review: 1,3.
145. Lawrence, S.V. (2001, Nov. 15). Going out of business. Far Eastern Economic Review: 38.
146. Leithwood, K., Edge, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). Educational Accountability: The State of the Art. Gutersloh: Bertelsmann.
147. Leslie, D.W. (1998). Redefining tenure: Tradition versus the new political economy of higher education. American Behavioral Scientist 41(5): 652-679.
148. Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
149. Lingard, R. & Rizvi, F. (1998). Globalization, the OECD, and Australian higher education. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and Globalization: Critical Perspectives (257-273). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
150. Lowi, T. (2001). Our millennium: Political science confronts the global corporate economy. International Political Science Review 22(2): 131-150.
151. Maassen, P.A.M. & Vught, FA. van (1988). An intriguing Janus-head: two faces of the new governmental strategy for higher education in The Netherlands. European Journal of Education 23(1/2): 65-76.
152. Maloney, WA. (1999). Mortar campuses go online. Academe Sept/Oct: 19-24.
153. Marceau, J. (1993). Steering from a Distance: International Trends in the Financing and Governance of Higher Education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
154. Marginson, S. (1997). Educating Australia: Government, Economy and Citizen Since 1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
155. Marginson, S. and Considine, M. (2000). The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
156. Marginson, S. & Mollis, M. (1999/2000). Comparing national education systems in the global era. Australian Universities’ Review 42(2)/43(1): 53-63.
157. McBrien, R.P. (2001). Theologians at risk? Ex corde and catholic colleges. Academe Jan.-Feb.: 13-16.
158. McBurnie, G. (2001). Leveraging globalization as a policy paradigm for higher education. Higher Education in Europe 26(1): 11-26.
159. McDaniel, O.C. (1996). The paradigms of governance in higher education systems. Higher Education Policy 9(2): 137-158.
160. Mclnnis, C. (1996). Change and diversity in the work patterns of Australian academics. Higher Education Management 8(2): 105-117.
161. Mclnnis, C. (2000). Towards new balance or new divides? In M. Tight (Ed.), The Changing Work Roles of Academics in Australia. Academic Work and Life: What It Is to Be an Academic, and How This Is Changing (117-145). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
162. McKew, M. (2001, Jul. 17). Glyn Davis… VC elect. Bulletin: 42-44.
163. McNicol, I.H. (2001, May 25). Universities are private already. Letter to the Times: 15.
164. Medina, J. (2001, Aug. 5). Despite school closing, online colleges beckon. Boston Sunday Globe: B9, B12.
165. Menand, L. (2001, Oct. 18). College: The end of the golden age. New York Review of Books: 44-47.
166. Merrien, F.-X. & Musselin, C. (1999). Are French universities finally emerging? Path dependency phenomena and innovative reforms in France. In D. Braun & F.-X. Merrien (Eds.), Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities? A Comparative View (220-238). London: Jessica Kingsley.
167. Midgaard, K. (1982). Norway: The interplay of local and central decisions. In H. Daalder & E. Shils (Eds.), Universities, Politicians and Bureaucrats: Europe and the United States (275-328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
168. Mignot Gerard, S. (2000, Sept. 9). The paradoxical victory of representative leadership in universities: the French model Paper presented at the EAIR Forum. Berlin.
169. Miyoshi, M. (1998). Globalization, culture and the university. In F. Jameson & M. Miyoshi (Eds.), The Cultures of Globalization (247-270). London: Duke University Press.
170. Morrow, G.R. (1968). Academic freedom. In D.D. Dill (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences 1&2 (4-10). New York: The Macmillan Company/The Free Press.
171. Mounyol, T. & Milion, M. (2000). Flexibility d’un support pedagogique multimedia. In H. Samier (Ed.), Les Universites Virtuelles (173-192). Paris: Hermes.
172. Musselin, C. (1997). State/university relations and how to change them: The case of France and Germany. European Journal of Education 32(2): 145-164.
173. Musselin, C. (2001). La Longue Marche des Universites Frangaises. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
174. Myers, R.S., Frankel, M.C., Reed, K.M., & Waugaman P.G. (1998). Accreditation and Accountability in American Higher Education. Bonn: Federal Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology (BMBF).
175. National Centre for Post Secondary Involvement. (NCPI). (2000). Market-driven accountability in post-secondary education. Change May/June: 53-56.
176. National Office of Overseas Skill Recognition. (1992). Country Education Profiles: France:A Comparative Study. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services.
177. National Tertiary Education Union. (NTEU). (2000). Unhealthy Places of Learning:Working in Australian Universities. South Melbourne: The National Tertiary Education Union.
178. Neal, J.E. (1995). Overview of policy and practice: Differences and similarities in developing higher education accountability. New Directions for Higher Education 91:5-10.
179. Neave, G. (1988a). On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe, 1986-1988. European Journal of Education 23(1/2): 7-23.
180. Neave, G. (1988b). The making of the executive head: The process of defining institutional leaders in certain European countries. International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 12(1): 104-114.
181. Neave, G. (1991). The reform of French higher education, or the ox and the toad: A fabulous tale. In G. Neave & FA. van Vught (Eds.), The Changing Relationship Between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
182. Neave, G. (1994). The evaluation of the higher education system in France. In R. Cowen (Ed.), The Evaluation of Higher Education Systems (66-81). London/Philadelphia:Kogan Page.
183. Neave, G. (1998). The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education 33(3):265-284.
184. Neave, G. & Vught, FA. van (1991). Conclusion. In G. Neave & FA. van Vught (Eds.), Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship Between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe (239-255). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
185. Newson, J. (1992). The decline of faculty influence: Confronting the effects of the corporate agenda. In W Carroll, L. Christiansen-Ruffman, R. Currie, & D. Harrison (Eds.), Fragile Truths: 25 Years of Sociology and Anthropology in Canada (227-246). Ottawa: Carlton University Press.
186. Newson, J. (1996). Technopedagogy: A critical sighting of the post-industrial university. In (Ed.), Research Monograph Series in Higher Education: Vol. 3. The Canadian University in the Twenty-First Century (45-66). University of Manitoba: Research Monograph Series in Higher Education.
187. Newson, J. (1998). Conclusion: Repositioning the local through alternative responses to globalization. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and Globalization:Critical Perspectives (295-313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
188. Noble, D. (2000). Digital diploma mills: Rehearsal for the revolution. In J.L. Turk (Ed.), The Corporate Campus: Commercialization and the Dangers to Canada’s Colleges and Universities (101-121). Toronto: James Lormier and Co.
189. Nora, S. & Mine, A. (1978). LTnformatisation de la societe: Rapport a M. le President de la Republique. Paris: La Documentation Francaise-Ed. du Seuil, coll. “Points.”
190. NOU. (1988). Med Viten og Vilj [Hernes Report]. Oslo: Kultur-og vitenskapsdepartementet.
191. Oillo, D. & P. Barraque (2000). Universites virtuelles, universites plurielles. In H. Samier (Ed.), Les Universites Virtuelles (17-36). Paris: Hermes.
192. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review 16(1): 145-179.
193. Oliveri, N. (2000). When money and truth colllide. In J.L. Turk (Ed.), The Corporate Campus:Commercialization and the Dangers to Canada’s Colleges and Universities (53-62). Toronto: James Lormier and Company.
194. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (1987). Universities Under Scrutiny. Paris: OECD.
195. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (1988). Reviews of National Policies for Education. Norway. Paris: OECD.
196. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (1994). Evaluation and the Decision Making Process in Higher Education: French, German and Spanish Experiences. Paris: OECD.
197. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (1996). Reviews of National Policies for Education. France. Paris: OECD.
198. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (1997). Thematic Review of the First Years of Tertiary Education. Country Note: Norway. Paris: OECD.
199. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (1998a). Open Markets Matter: The Benefits of Trade and Investment Liberalization. Paris: OECD.
200. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (1998b). Redefining Tertiary Education [Redefinir I’Enseignement Tertiaire] Paris: OECD.
201. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (1998c). National Accounts of OECD Countries: Main Aggregates 1989/2000. Paris: OECD.
202. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (1990). Financing Higher Education: Current Patterns. Paris: OECD.
203. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (OECD). (2000). Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD.
204. Paulson, M. (2000). Bishops say theologians may teach without OK. The Boston Globe: A01.
205. Perley, J.E. (1997). Tenure remains vital to academic freedom. The Chronicle of Higher Education 43(30): A48.
206. Perlez, J. (2000, Sept. 20). Suave rival has words for the U.S.: ‘En garde.' The New York Times International: A9.
207. Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the Public Services. Oxford: Blackwell.
208. Pollitt, C. (1993). Managerialism and the Public Services. The Anglo-American Experience.Oxford: Blackwell.
209. Polster, C. (2000). The advantages and disadvantages of corporate/university links: What’s wrong with this question? In D. Doherty-Delorme & E. Shaker (Eds.), Missing Pieces II: An Alternative Guide to Canadian Post-Secondary Education (180-185). Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
210. Porter, P. & Vidovich, L. (2000). Globalization and Higher Education Policy. Educational Theory 50(4): 449-65.
211. Press, E. & Washburn, J. (2000). The kept university. The Atlantic Monthly 285(3): 39-54.
212. Quadratin Multimedia. (2001). Enquete E-Learning Europe-Questionnaire. Retrieved June 3, 2001, from www.quadratin.fr/noirsurblanc/.
213. Ragin, C.C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
214. Rhoades, G. (1998). Managerial Professionals: Unionized Faculty and Restructuring Academic Labor. Albany: State University of New York Press.
215. Rhoades, G. & S. Slaughter. (1998). Academic capitalism, managed professionals, and supply-side higher education. In R. Martin (Ed.), Chalk Lines: The Politics of Work in the Managed University (33-68). Durham: Duke University Press.
216. Rifkin, J. (2000). The Age of Access. New York: J. Tarcher.
217. Rodrik, D. (1997). Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
218. Romzek, B.S. (2000). Dynamics of public sector accountability in an era of reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences 66(1): 21-A4.
219. Rooney, D. & Hearn, G. (2000). Of minds, markets, and machines: How universities might transcend the ideology of commodification. In S. Inayatullah & J. Gidley (Eds.), The University in Transformation: Global Perspectives on the Future of the University (91-102). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
220. Sassen, S. (2000). Spatialities and temporalities of the global: Elements for a theorization. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), Globalisation, Special Edition of Public Culture 12:215-232.
221. Scharpf, F. (1987). Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
222. Scholte, J. (2000). Globalization: A Critical Introduction. London: Macmillan.
223. Schwartz, H. (1994). Small states in big trouble: State reorganization in Australia, Denmark, New Zealand, and Sweden in the 1980s. World Politics 46: 527-555.
224. Scott, P. (1998). The Globalization of Higher Education. Buckingham: SHRE/Open University Press.
225. Seddon, T. & Marginson, S. (2001). The crisis trifecta: Education. In C. Sheil (Ed.), Globalization:Australian Impacts (202-218). Sydney: UNSW Press.
226. Senate Standing Committee on Education (2001). Universities in Crisis. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Office.
227. Shapiro, J. (2000, Aug.). Death in a tenured position. University of Chicago Magazine:15-18.
228. Singh, M. (2001, Mar. 27-29). Re-inserting the ‘public good’ into higher education transformation. Paper presented to the Globalisation and Higher Education: Views from the South Conference. Cape Town, South Africa.
229. Sklair, L. (2001). The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell.
230. Slaughter, S. (1993). Introduction to special issue on retrenchment. The Journal of Higher Education 64(3): 247-249.
231. Slaughter, S. (1998). National higher education policies in a global economy. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and Globalization: Critical Perspectives (45-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
232. Slaughter, S. & Leslie, L.L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
233. Smeby, J.-C. & Stensaker, B. (1999). National quality assessment systems in the Nordic countries: Developing a balance between external and internal needs? Higher Education Policy 12(1): 3-14.
234. Smith, A. & Webster, F. (1997). Conclusion: An affirming flame. In A. Smith & F. Webster (Eds.), The Postmodern University? Contested Visions of Higher Education in Society (99-113). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
235. Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive University Structures. An Analysis of Adaptation to Socioeconomic Environments of U.S. and European Universities. London: Jessica Kingsley.
236. Staropoli, A. (1996). Evaluating a French university. Evaluation and the Decision Making Process in Higher Education: French, German and Spanish Experiences (55-59). Paris: OECD.
237. Stensaker, B. (1997). From accountability to opportunity: the role of quality assessments in Norway. Quality in Higher Education 3(3): 277-284.
238. Stone, G. (2000, Aug.). Tracking tenure at Chicago. University of Chicago Magazine: 17.
239. Thomas, L. (2001, Jan. 31). Humanity is the essence. The Australian: 4.
240. Tjeldvoll, A. (1992). Evaluation of higher education research in Norway. In V Chinapah (Ed.), Evaluation of Higher Education in a Changing Europe (43-56). Stockholm:Stockholm University.
241. Tjeldvoll, A. (1998). The service university in service societies: The Norwegian experience. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and Globalization: Critical Perspectives (99-121). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
242. Tjeldvoll, A. & Holtet, K. (1998). A service university in a service society: The Oslo case. Higher Education 35: 27-48.
243. Tonder, J.-K. & Aamodt, P.O. (1993). Between the market and the welfare state: How to adjust Norwegian higher education to new principles. In United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (Ed.), European Centre for Higher Education Academic Freedom and University Autonomy. Papers on Higher Education Series (248-257). Bucharest: CEPES/UNESCO.
244. Trow, M. (1994). Managerialism and the academic profession: The case of England. Higher Education Policy 7(2): 11-18.
245. Trow, M. (1996). Trust, markets and accountability in higher education: A comparative perspective. Higher Education Policy 9(4): 309-324.
246. Tudvier, N. (1999). Universities for Sale: Resisting Corporate Control over Canadian Higher Education. Toronto: The Canadian Association of University Teachers/James Lormier and Company.
247. Turnbull, S. (1999, Oct. 30-31). Weekly, France bucks the toiling trend. The Weekend Australian: 32.
248. Turner, D. (1996). Changing patterns of funding higher education in Europe. Higher Education Management 8(1): 101-111.
249. University of Oslo. (1995). Strategisk Plan, 1995-99 [Strategic Plan 1995-99]. Oslo: The University of Oslo.
250. University of Twente. (1998). Annual Report. Enschede: University of Twente.
251. U.S. News & World Report. (1999). America’s Best Colleges: Exclusive Rankings.Retrieved September 2, 2000, from www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/r ankindex. htm.
252. Van de Graaff, J. & Furth, D. (1978a). Introduction. In J. Van de Graaff, B.R. Clark, D. Furth, D. Goldschmidt, & D.F. Wheeler (Eds.), Academic Power. Patterns of Authority in Seven National Systems of Higher Education (1-12). New York: Praeger.
253. Van de Graaff, J. & Furth, D. (1978b). France. In J. Van de Graaff, B.R. Clark, D. Furth, D. Goldschmidt, & D.F. Wheeler (Eds.), Academic Power. Patterns of Authority in Seven National Systems of Higher Education (49-66). New York: Praeger.
254. Van Dusen, G.C. (1997). The virtual campus: Technology and reform in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 25. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
255. Vangsnes, S. & Jordell, K. (1992). Norway. In B.R. Clark & G.R. Neave (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Higher Education (524-533). Oxford: Pergamon Press
256. van Vught, FA. (Ed.). (1989). Government Strategies and Innovation in Higher Education. London:Jessica Kingsley.
257. Vossensteyn, H.J.J. & Dobson, I.R. (1999). Hey, big spender! Institutional responsiveness to student demand. In B. Jongbloed, P. Maassen, & G. Neave (Eds.), From the Eye of the Storm: Higher Education’s Changing Institutions (189-210). Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
258. Vught, FA. van, (1997). Combining planning and the market: An analysis of the government strategy towards higher education in the Netherlands. Higher Education Policy 10(3/4): 211-224.
259. Wagner, A. (1996). Financing higher education: New approaches, new issues. Higher Education Management 8(1): 7-17.
260. Wagner, R.B. (1989). Accountability in Education. A Philosophical Inquiry. New York/London: Routledge.
261. Weert, E. de, & Tijssen, L. van vucht (1999). Academic staff between threat and opportunity:Changing employment and conditions of service. In B. Jongbloed, P. Maassen, & G. Neave (Eds.), From the Eye of the Storm: Higher Education’s Changing Institution (39-63). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
262. Wende, M.C. van der (2001). Internationalisation policies: about new trends and contrasting paradigms. Higher Education Policy 14(3): 249-259.
263. Wende, M.C. van der & Beerkens, H.J.J.G. (1999). Policy strategies on ICT in higher education. In B. Collins & M.C. Van der Wende (Eds.), The Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Higher Education: An Internatinal Orientation on Trends and Issues (21-50). Enschede: University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
264. Westerheijden, D.F. (1997). A solid base for decisions. Higher Education 33(4): 397-413.
265. Williamson, B. & Coffield, F. (1997). Repositioning higher education. In F. Coffield & B. Williamson (Eds.), Repositioning Higher Education (116-132). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
266. Wilson, N. (2001, Jan. 20-21). Selling off the farm. The Weekend Australian: 24.
267. Wolton, D. (2000). Internet, etApres? Une Theorie Critique des Nouveaux Medias. Paris:Flammarion, coll. ‘Champs
268. Yang, R. & Vidovich, L. (2001, Aug. 20). Globalisation, Higher Education and Murdoch’s Context: A Briefing Paper for Senate. Perth: Murdoch University.
269. Yarmolinsky, A. (1996). Tenure: Permanence and change. Change May/June: 16-20.
270. Yoneyazawa, A. & Yoshida, K. (2001). Financial Structure of Higher Education in Japan.Cheongu, Choonbuk, Korea: World Council of Comparative Education Societies.
271. Zernike, K. (1999, Nov. 18). Report. The Boston Globe: 1, A35.