The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 411-431

  Alexander, F King ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034215180     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2000.11778843     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alexander, F. K. (1998). Private institutions and public dollars: An analysis of the effects of federal direct student aid on public and private institutions of higher education. Journal of Education Finance, 23, 390-416.
2. Ashby, E. (1966). Universities: British, Indian, African. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Barnett, R. (1992). Improving higher education: Total quality care. London: The Society for Research into Higher Education and The Open University.
4. Barnett, R., & Bjarnason, S. (1999). The reform of higher education. In D. Teather (Ed.), Higher education in a post-binary era: National reforms and institutional responses. London: Jessica Kingsley.
5. Barnetson, R. (1999). A review of Alberta's performance-based funding mechanism. Quality in Higher Education, 5(1), 37-50.
6. Bender, T. (1997). Politics, intellect, and the American university, 1945-1995. Daedalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 126, 1-38.
7. Berdahl, R. (1990). Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15, 169-180.
8. Breneman, D. (1993). Higher education: On a collision course with new realities. Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges.
9. Brennan, J. (1999). Evaluation of higher education in Europe. In M. Henkel & B. Little (Eds.), Changing relationships between higher education and the state. London: Athenaeum Press.
10. Burke, J. C., & Serban, A. M. (1997). Performance funding and budgeting for public higher education: Current status and future prospects. Albany, NY: The Nelson Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York.
11. Burke, J. C., & Serban, A. M. (1998). Funding public higher education for results: Fad or trend? Results from the second annual survey. Albany, NY: The Nelson Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York.
12. Cave, M., Hanney, S., Henkel, M., & Kogan M. (1997). The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenge of the quality movement. London: Jessica Kingsley.
13. Committee of Public Accounts. (1990). London, England: Department of Education and Science.
14. Cowen, R. (1996). The evaluation of higher education systems. London, England: Kogan Page.
15. Davies, G. (1995). Higher education funding, performance, and accountability. Paper presented at the Oxford Round Table on Educational Policy, Oxford, England.
16. Digest of Education Statistics. (1997, October, 1997). National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education.
17. Dill, D., & Sporn, B. (1995). Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Through a glass darkly. Oxford, England: International Association of Universities and Pergamon Press.
18. Economist, The. (1997, October 4-10). A survey of universities: The knowledge, pp. 4-8.
19. Eicher J. C. (1998). The costs and financing of higher education in Europe. European Journal of Education, 33, 31-33.
20. El-Khawas, E., & Massey, W. F. (1996). Britain's "performance-based" system. In W. F. Massey (Ed.), Resource allocation in higher education (pp. 223-240). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
21. European Community Commission. (1991). Memorandum on higher education in the European Community. Strasbourg, France: The Council of Europe.
22. Ewell P. T., & Jones, D. P. (1994). Pointing the way: Indicators as policy tools in higher education. In S. Rupert (Ed.), Charting higher education accountability: A sourcebook on state-level performance indicators. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
23. Gilbert F (1999) The response in North America to government expectations for greater accountability in the university sector: Examples from three jurisdictions. Paper presented at the 1999 Oxford International Round Table on University Leadership.
24. Goedegebuure, L., Kaiser, F., Maassen, P., Meek, L., Van Vught, F., & de Weert, E. (1996) International perspectives on trends and issues in higher education policy. In L. Goodchild & E. Hines (Eds.), ASHE reader series on public policy. Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
25. Gumport, P. J., Iannozzi, M., Shaman, S., & Zemsky, R. (1997). Trends in higher education from massification to post-massification. Academic reforms in the world: Situation and perspective in the massification stage of higher education. RIHE International Seminar Reports. Hiroshima, Japan: Research Institute for Higher Education.
26. Hamalainen, K., & Moitus, S. (1999). High-quality education as the criteria for university funding in Finland. Quality in Higher Education, 5(1), 51-60.
27. Hauke, R. (1994). An update on faculty workload activities among state higher education systems. Unpublished manuscript.
28. Holtta, S. (1998). The funding of universities in Finland: Towards goal-oriented government steering. European Journal of Education, 33, 55-63.
29. Jongbloed, B., & Koelman, J. (1996). Funding mechanisms for higher education: A five-country based survey with special reference to performance-based funding approaches. CHEPS working paper for Higher Education Council, National Board of Employment, Education and Training (NBEET), Canberra, Australia. Enschede, The Netherlands: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente.
30. Karabell, Z. (1998). What's college for? New York: Basic Books.
31. Layzell, D. T. (1996). Faculty workload and productivity: Recurrent issues with new imperatives. Review of Higher Education, 19, 267-281.
32. Layzell, D. T. (1998). Linking performance to funding outcomes for public institutions of higher education: The U.S. European Journal of Education, 33, 103-111.
33. Levine, A. (1997, January 1). Higher education's new status as a mature industry. Chronicle of Higher Education.
34. London Free Press. (1998, December 16). Ontario links college funding with performance. London, Ontario.
35. Marshall, R. (1995). The global jobs crisis. Foreign policy: The U.N. in crisis. Washington, DC: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
36. Marcus, L. (1997). Restructuring state higher education governance patterns. Review of Higher Education, 20, 399-418.
37. McGuinness, A. C. (1994). The States and Higher Education. In P. G. Altbach, R. O. Berdahl, & P. G. Gumport (Eds.), Higher education in American society (3rd ed., pp. 155-180). Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books.
38. McKeown, M. P. (1996). State funding formulas for public four-year institutions. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
39. Mora, J.,& Nugent, M. (1998). Seeking new resources for European universities: The example of fund-raising in the U.S. European Journal of Education, 33(1), 113-130.
40. Mortenson, T. (1998). College continuation rates for 1997 high school graduates. Post-secondary Education Opportunity, 71, 1-6.
41. National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, The. (1997). Higher education in the learning society. Norwich, England: HMSO.
42. Neave, G. (1995). On perspectives and vision: The role of the CC-PU in the higher education policies of Europe, 1986-1994. Strasbourg, France: The Council of Europe, Higher Education Section Directorate of Education, Culture, and Sport.
43. Partington, P. (1994). Human resources management and development. CRE-action: A university policy for Europe. Journal of the Standing Conference of Rectors, Presidents, and Vice Chancellors, 104, 146-147.
44. Peters, M. (1992). Performance and accountability in 'post-industrial society': The crises of British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 17, 123-139.
45. Piper, D. W., & Issacs, G. (1992). Approaches to performance related funding for higher education in Europe and North America. A Report for the Commonwealth Department of Employment, Education and Training. The Tertiary Education Institute, The University of Queensland, October, 1992.
46. Presley, J. B., & Englebride, E. (1998). Accounting for faculty productivity in the research university. Review of Higher Education, 22(1) 17-37.
47. Salter, B., & Tapper, T. (1994). The state and higher education. Essex, England: The Woburn Press.
48. Schmidtlein, F. (1999). Assumptions underlying performance-based budgeting. Tertiary Education and Management, 5, 159-174.
49. Scott, P. (1989). The British universities' response to institutional diversification. Higher Education Management, 1(3) 298-313.
50. Shattock, M. (1994a). Optimizing university resources. CRE-action: A university policy for Europe. Journal of the Standing Conference of Rectors, Presidents, and Vice Chancellors, 104, 182.
51. Shattock, M. (1994b). The UGC and the management of British universities. London: Society for the Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
52. Slaugther, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
53. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (1996). The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 21, 302-340.
54. Trow, M. (1974). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Policies for higher education. The General Report of the Conference on Future Structures of Post-secondary Education. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
55. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (1998). UNESCO statistical yearbook. Paris: UNESCO Publishing Company.
56. Van Vught, F. (1994). Towards a quality management approach for higher education. CRE-action: A university policy for Europe. Journal of the Standing Conference of Rectors, Presidents, and Vice Chancellors, 104, 40-41.
57. Williams, G. L. (1998). Current debates on the funding of mass higher education in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Education, 33(1).
58. World Bank, The. (1996). Higher education: Lessons of experience. Washington DC: Education and Social Policy Department.