Taking action in science classrooms through collaborative action research: A guide for educators

Taking Action in Science Classrooms Through Collaborative Action Research: A Guide for Educators

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-100

  Goodnough, Karen ^a  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85177061324     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (84)

1. Abbitt, J., & Ophus, J. (2008). What we know about the impacts of webquests: A review of research. AACE Journal, 16(4), 441-456.
2. Albanese, M. A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68, 52-81.
3. Angeli, C. (2002). Teachers' practical theories for the design and implementation of problem based learning. Science Education International, 13(3), 9-15.
4. APA Citation Style. (2010, August 20). Retrieved from http://library.concordia.ca/help/howto/-apa.php.
5. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
6. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
7. Barrows, H. S. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
8. Blaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (2001). How to research. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
9. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2010). Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/ policy-politique/tcps-eptc/ on June 4, 2010.
11. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer Press.
12. Carson, T. R., & Sumara, D. J. (Eds.) (1997). Action research as living practice. New York: Peter Lang.
13. Christians, C. G. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 139-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner researcher for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 45-58). New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data analysis: Complementary strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in Education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
18. Corey, S. (1962). Action research to improve school practices. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
19. Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49-51.
20. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
21. Dodge, B. (2001). FOCUS: Five rules for writing a great WebQuest. Learning and Leading with Technology, 28, 6-9, 58.
22. Dodge, B. (1995). WebQuests: A technique for internet-based learning. Distance Educator, 1(2), 10-13.
23. Drake, S. (2007). Creating standards-based integrated curriculum: Aligning curriculum, content assessment, and instruction.
24. Elliott, J. (1976-1977). Developing hypotheses about classrooms from teachers' practical constructs: An account of the work of the Ford Teaching Project. Interchange, 7(2), 1-22.
25. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes, PA: Open University Press.
26. Fichtman-Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Silva, D. (2003). The reflective educator's guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
27. Fogarty, R. (1991). The mindful school: How to integrate the curriculum. Pallantine, IL: Skylight.
28. Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 195-200.
29. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic books.
30. Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. London: Falmer Press.
31. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.
32. Hay, D., Kinchin, I., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2008). Making learning visible: The role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 295-311.
33. Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247-298.
34. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychological Review, 16(3), 235-266.
35. Holly, M. L., Arhar, J., & Kasten, W. C. (2005). Action research for teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Hopkins, D. (2002). A teacher's guide to classroom research. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
37. Inspiration Software. (2009). Kidspiration 2: Grades K-5. Beaverton, OR: Inspiration Software.
38. Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (1998). Multiple intelligences: The complete MI book. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing.
39. Kagan, S., Kagan, M., & Kagan, L. (2000). Reaching science standards through cooperative learning: Providing for all learners in general education classrooms. Port Chester, NY: National Professional Resources, Inc.
40. Kember, D., Ha, T., Lam, B., Lee, A., Ng, S., Yan, L., et al. (1997). The diverse role of the critical friend in supporting educational action research projects. Educational Action Research, 5(3), 463-481.
41. Korthagen, F. A. J. (with J. Kessels, B. Koster, B. Lagerwerf, T. Wubbels) (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Kysilka, M. L. (1998). Understanding integrated curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 9, 197-210.
43. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46.
44. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Lunenberg, M., & Korthagen, F. (2009). Experience, theory, and practical wisdom in teaching an teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 225-240.
46. March, T. (2006, January 1). The new WWW: Whatever, whenever, wherever. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 14-19.
47. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner. New York: St. Martin's Press.
49. McMillan, J. H. (2004). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
50. Meir, S. L., Nicol, M., & Cobbs, G. (1998). Potential barriers and limitations to integration. School Science and Mathematics, 98, 438-447.
51. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
53. Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
54. Noffke, S. E. (1997). Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. In M. Apple (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 305-343). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
55. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge.
57. Pate, E. (1996). Making integrated curriculum work: Teachers, students, and the quest for coherent curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
58. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. California: Sage Publications.
59. Peters, M., & Robinson, V. (1984). The origins and status of action research. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 20(2), 113-124.
60. Pohan C., & Mathison C. (1998). WebQuests: The potential of Internet-based instruction for global education. Social Studies Review 37, 91-93.
61. Rearick, M., & Feldman, A. (1999). Orientations, product, reflections: A framework for understanding action research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(4), 333-350.
62. Roblyer, M. D., & Knezek, G. A. (2003). New millennium research for educational technology: A call for a national research agenda. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 60-76.
63. Sagor, R. (2005). The action research guidebook: A four-step process for educators and school teams. Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.
64. Shanahan, T. (1997). Reading-writing relationships, thematic units, inquiry learning ... In pursuit of effective integrated literacy instruction. Reading Teacher, 51(1), 12-19.
65. Stenbacka, C. (2001). Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own. Management Decision, 39(7), 551-555.
66. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
67. Stinson, K., Harkness, S. S., Meyer, H., & Stallworth, J. (2009). Mathematics and science integration: Models and characterizations. School Science and Mathematics, 109(3), 153-161.
68. Stringer, E. (2004). Action research in education. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
69. Stringer, E. T. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
70. Sumaras, A. (2011). Self-study teacher research: Improving your practice through collaborative inquiry. London: Sage.
71. Torp, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-12 education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
72. Velasquez, M., Andre, C., Shanks, T. S. J., & Meyer, M. (2010). What is ethics? Retrieved May 25, 2010 from http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/whatisethics.html
73. Vernon, D. T. A., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work?: A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68, 550-563.
74. Vidoni, K., & Maddux C. (2002). WebQuests: Can they be used to improve critical thinking skills in students? Computers in the Schools, 19, 101-117.
75. Weitzman, E., & Miles, M. (1995). Computer programs for qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76. Weitzman, E. (2000). Software and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
78. Wenger, E., McDermotte, R., & Synder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
79. Williams, S. M., & Hmelo, C. E. (1998). Guest editors' introduction. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 3-4, 265-270.
80. Wineburg, S., & Grossman, P. (2000). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges to implementation. Teachers College Press: New York.
81. Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82. Wolcott, H. F. (1990). On seeking - and rejecting - validity in qualitative research. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 121-152). New York: Teachers College Press.
83. Zeni, J. (1998). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6 (1), 9-19.
84. Zheng, R., Perez, J., Williamson, J., & Flygare, J. (2008, August 1). WebQuests as perceived by teachers: implications for online teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 295-304.