Reading-writing relationships, thematic units, inquiry learning...In pursuit of effective integrated literacy instruction

Reading Teacher

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 12-19

  Shanahan, Timothy ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040783894     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Beane, J.A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 616-622.
2. Berlin, D.F., & Hillen, J.A. (1994). Making connections in math and science: Identifying student outcomes. School Science and Mathematics, 94, 283-290.
3. Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (1991). A caveat: Curriculum integration isn't always a good idea. Educational Leadership, 49, 66.
4. Chall, J.S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
5. Clarke, L.K. (1988). Invented versus traditional spelling in first graders' writings: Effects on learning to spell and read. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 281-309.
6. Dyson, A.H. (1989). Multiple worlds of child writers. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Friend, H. (1985). The effect of science and mathematics integration on selected seventh grade students' attitudes toward and achievement in science. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 453-461.
8. Kain, D.L. (1993). Cabbages-and kings: Research directions in integrated/interdisciplinary curriculum. Journal of Educational Thought, 27, 312-331.
9. Lehman, J.R. (1994). Integrating science and mathematics: Perceptions of preservice and practicing elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 94, 58-64.
10. Lipson, M., Valencia, S., Wixson, K., & Peters, C. (1993). Integration and thematic teaching: Integration to improve teaching and learning. Language Arts, 70, 252-263.
11. Mansfield, B. (1989). Students' perceptions of an integrated unit: A case study. Social Studies, 80, 135-140.
12. McGee, L.M., & Richgels, D.J. (1990). Learning from text using reading and writing. In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Reading and writing together (pp. 145-169). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
13. McGinley, W., & Tierney, R.J. (1989). Traversing the topical landscape: Reading and writing as ways of knowing. Written Communication, 6, 243-269.
14. Nauman, A. (1990). Structure and perspective in reading and writing. In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Reading and writing together (pp. 57-76). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
15. Nissani, M. (1995). Fruits, salads, and smoothies: A working definition of interdisciplinarity. Journal of Educational Thought, 29, 121-128.
16. Olarewaju, A.O. (1988). Instructional objectives: What effects do they have on students' attitudes towards integrated science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 283-291.
17. Olson, D.R. (1994). The world on paper. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Schell, J.W., & Wicklein, R.C. (1993). Integration of mathematics, science, and technology education: A basis for thinking and problem solving. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 18, 49-76.
19. Schmidt, W.H., Roehler, L., Caul, J.L., Buchman, M., Diamond, B., Solomon, D., & Cianciolo, P. (1985). The uses of curriculum integration in language arts instruction: A study of six classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17, 305-320.
20. Shanahan, T. (1984). The reading-writing relation: An exploratory multivariate analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 466-477.
21. Shanahan, T. (1987). Shared knowledge of reading and writing. Reading Psychology, 8, 93-102.
22. Shanahan, T. (1988). Reading-writing relationships: Seven instructional principles. The Reading Teacher, 41, 880-886.
23. Shanahan, T. (1992). Reading comprehension as a dialogic process. In M. Pressley, K.R. Harris, & J.T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy: Cognitive research and instructional innovation (pp. 129- 148). New York: Academic Press.
24. Shanahan, T., & Lomax, R. (1986). An analysis and comparison of theoretical models of the reading-writing relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 116-123.
25. Shanahan, T., & Lomax, R. (1988). A developmental comparison of three theoretical models of the reading-writing relationship. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 196-212.
26. Shanahan, T., Robinson, B., & Schneider, M. (1993). Integration of curriculum or interaction of people? The Reading Teacher, 47, 158-160.
27. Shanahan, T., Robinson, B., & Schneider, M. (1995). Avoiding some of the pitfalls of thematic units. The Reading Teacher, 48, 718-719.
28. Shanahan, T., & Tierney, R.J. (1990). Reading-writing connections: The relations among three research traditions. In J. Zuteil & S. McCormick (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analyses from multiple paradigms (pp. 13-34). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
29. Spivey, N.N., & King, J.R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 7-26.
30. Tierney, R.J., & Pearson, P.D. (1983). Toward a composing model of reading. Language Arts, 60, 568-580.
31. Tierney, R.J., & Shanahan, T. (1991). Reading-writing relationships: Processes, transactions, outcomes. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 246-280). New York: Longman.
32. Vacca, R.T., & Vacca, J.L. (1993). Content area reading (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
33. Wasserstein, P. (1995). What middle schoolers say about their schoolwork. Educational Leadership, 53(1), 41-43.