DISCOURSE CHARACTERISTICS OF WRITING AND SPEAKING TASK TYPES ON THE TOEFL IBT® TEST: A LEXICO-GRAMMATICAL ANALYSIS

ETS Research Report Series

Volumn 2013, Issue 1, 2013, Pages i-128

  Biber, Douglas ^a   Gray, Bethany ^b  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

grammatical variation; multi dimensional analysis; proficiency levels; spoken written differences; task variation; vocabulary

Indexed keywords

EID: 85164505181     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23308516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02311.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Altenberg, B., & Granger, S. (2001). The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 173–195.
2. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Biber, D. (1990). Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5, 257–269.
4. Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8, 243–257.
5. Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
7. Biber, D. (2009). Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 75–91). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Biber, D., & S. Conrad. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405.
10. Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, M. (2002). Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 9–48.
11. Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., Helt, M., Clark, V., …, & Urzua, A. (2004). Representing language use in the university: Analysis of the TOEFL 2000 Spoken and Written Academic Language Corpus (TOEFL Monograph Series No.MS-25). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
12. Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2–20.
13. Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35.
14. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London, UK: Longman.
15. Biber, D., & Jones, J. (2009). Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 1286–1304). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
16. Brown, A., Iwashita, N., & McNamara, T. (2005). An examination of rater orientations and test-taker performance on English-for-academic-purposes speaking tasks (TOEFL Monograph Series No. MS-29). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
17. Chapelle, C., Enright, M., & Jamieson, J. (2008). Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York, NY: Routledge.
18. Coffin, C. (2004). Arguing how the world is or how the world should be: The role of argument in IELTS tests. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 229–246.
19. Cooper, T. C. (1976). Measuring written syntactic patterns of second language learners of German. Journal of Educational Research, 69, 176–183.
20. Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 397–423.
21. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.
22. Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., & James, M. (2005). Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10, 5–43.
23. Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., & James, M. (2006). Analysis of discourse features and verification of scoring levels for independent and integrated prototype written tasks for the new TOEFL (TOEFL Monograph Series No. MS-30). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
24. Cumming, A., Kantor, R., & Powers, D. (2002). Decision making while rating ESL/EFL writing tasks: A descriptive framework. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 67–96.
25. Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 59–84.
26. Engber, C. (1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), 139–155.
27. Enright, M., & Tyson, E. (2008). Validity evidence supporting the interpretation and use of TOEFL iBT scores. TOEFL iBT Research Insight. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/s/toefl/pdf/toefl_ibt_insight_s1v4.pdf.
28. Ferris, D. (1994). Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 414–420.
29. Ferris, D., & Politzer, R. (1981). Effects of early and delayed second language acquisition: English composition skills of Spanish-speaking junior high school students. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 263–274.
30. Flahive, D., & Snow, B. (1980). Measures of syntactic complexity in evaluating ESL compositions. In J. W. Oller, Jr. & K. Perkins (Eds.), Research in language testing (pp. 171–176). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
31. Gipps, C., & Ewen, E. (1974). Scoring written work in English as a second language. Educational Research, 16, 121–125.
32. Grant, L., & Ginther, A. (2000). Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 123–145.
33. Hirose, K. (2003). Comparing L1 and L2 organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of Japanese EFL students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 181–209.
34. Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 24–44.
35. Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 4–21.
36. Jarvis, S. (2002). Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19(1), 57–84.
37. Jarvis, S., Grant, L., Bikowski, D., & Ferris, D. (2003). Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 377–403.
38. Kubota, R. (1998). An investigation of L1–L2 transfer in writing among Japanese university students: Implications for contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), 69–100.
39. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619.
40. Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322.
41. Li, Y. (2000). Linguistic characteristics of ESL writing in task-based e-mail activities. System, 28, 229–245.
42. Lumley, T. (2002). Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: What do they really mean to the raters? Language Testing, 19(3), 246–276.
43. Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle ELT.
44. Nelson, N. W., & Van Meter, A. M. (2007). Measuring written language ability in narrative samples. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 287–309.
45. Norrby, C., & Håkansson, G. (2007). The interaction of complexity and grammatical processability: The case of Swedish as a foreign language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 45–68.
46. Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518.
47. Partington, A. (1998). Patterns and meanings. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
48. Purpura, J. (2004). Assessing grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49. West, M. (1953). General service list of English words. London, UK: Longman.
50. Willis, D. (2003). Rules, patterns and words: Grammar and lexis in English language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity (Technical Report No. 17). Honolulu: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii.