Aesthetics in interactive products: Correlates and Consequences of Beauty

Product Experience

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 287-302

  Hassenzahl, Marc ^a  

^a University of Koblenz Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85147631468     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-008045089-6.50014-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. L. Alben (1996) Quality of experience: Defi ning the criteria for effective interaction design. Interactions 3 11-15.
2. T. Ben-Bassat, J. Meyer and N. Tractinsky (2006) Economic and subjective measures of the perceived value of aesthetics and usability. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13 210-234.
3. H. Bless, G.L. Clore, N. Schwarz, V. Golisano, C. Rabe and M. Wölk (1996) Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 665-679.
4. P.H. Bloch, F.F. Brunel and T.J. Arnold (2003) Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research 29 551-565.
5. K. Borcherding and M. Hassenzahl (2004) Hedonic aspects support the endowment effect. Proceedings of the 19. Conference on Subjective Probability and Utility in Decision-Making (SPUDM-19)
6. J.M. Carroll (1997) Human-computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46 501-522.
7. C.S. Carver and M.F. Scheier (1998) On the self-regulation of behavior Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
8. A. Chernev and G. Carpenter (2001) The role of market effi ciency institution in consumer choice: A case of compensatory inferences. Journal of Marketing Research 38 349-361.
9. F.D. Davis (1993) User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38 475-487.
10. A. De Angeli, A. Sutcliffe and J. Hartmann (2006) Interaction, usability and aesthetics: What infl uences users' preferences? Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems (DIS06) New York: ACM Press 271-280.
11. R. Dhar and K. Wertenbroch (2000) Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research 37 60-71.
12. K.K. Dion, E. Berscheid and E. Walster (1972) What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24 285-290.
13. A.H. Eagly, R.D. Ashmore, M.G. Makhijani and L.C. Longo (1991) What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin 110 109-128.
14. G.T. Ford and R.A. Smith (1987) Inferential beliefs in consumer evaluations: An assessment of alternative processing strategies. Journal of Consumer Research 14 363-371.
15. D.M. Frohlich (2004) Beauty as a design prize. Human Computer Interaction 19 359-366.
16. E.B. Goldstein (1989) Sensation and perception (3rd Ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
17. I.M. Handley, G.D. Lassiter, E.F. Nickell and L.M. Herchenroeder (2004) Affect and automatic mood maintenance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 106-112.
18. M. Hassenzahl (2002) The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13 479-497.
19. M. Hassenzahl (2003) The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A.F. onk, P.C. Wright (Eds) Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment Dordrecht: Kluwer 31-42.
20. M. Hassenzahl (2004) The interplay of beauty, goodness and usability in interactive products. Human Computer Interaction 19 319-349.
21. M. Hassenzahl (2004) Beautiful objects as an extension of the Self. A reply. Human Computer Interaction 19 377-386.
22. Hassenzahl, M., Borcherding, K., (in preparation). The endowment effect for hedonic and utilitarian objects.
23. M. Hassenzahl, A. Platz, M. Burmester and K. Lehner (2000) Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. T. Turner, G. Szwillus (Eds) Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing New York: ACM, Addison-Wesley 201-208.
24. M. Hassenzahl and N. Tractinsky (2006) User experience - a research agenda [Editorial]. Behavior and Information Technology 25 91-97.
25. P. Hekkert (2006) Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science, 48, 157-172. Isen, A.M., Ashby, F.G., Nygren, T.E. (1988). Infl uence of positive affect on subjective utility of gains and losses: It is just not worth the risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 710-717.
26. A.M. Isen and R. Patrick (1983) The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: When the chips are down. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 31 194-202.
27. T. Jacobsen, K. Buchta, M. Köhler and E. Schröger (2004) The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects. Psychological Reports 94 1253-1260.
28. R.D. Johnson and I.P. Levin (1985) More than meets the eye: The effects of missing information on purchase evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 12 169-177.
29. D. Kahneman, J.L. Knetsch and R.H. Thaler (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98 1325-1348.
30. F.R. Kardes, S.S. Posavac and M.L. Cronley (2004) Consumer inference: A review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts. Journal of Consumer Research 14 230-256.
31. M. Kurosu and K. Kashimura (1995) Apparent usability vs. inherent usability. Proceedings of the CHI 1995 Conference on Human Factors in Computing. Extended abstracts New York: ACM Press, Addison-Wesley 292-293.
32. M.J. Lalomia and J.B. Sidowski (1990) Measurements of computer satisfaction, literacy, and aptitudes: A review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2 231-253.
33. J.H. Langlois, L. Kalakanis, A.J. Rubenstein, A. Larson, M. Hallam and M. Smoot (2000) Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 126 390-423.
34. T. Lavie and N. Tractinsky (2004) Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60 269-298.
35. H. Leder, B. Belke, A. Oeberst and D. Augustin (2004) A model of aesthetic appeciation and aesthetic judgements. British Journal of Psychology 95 489-508.
36. G. Lindgaard, G. Fernandez, C. Dudek and J. Brown (2006) Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good impression. Behavior and Information Technology 25 115-126.
37. G. Lindgaard and C. Dudek (2002) User satisfaction, aesthetics and usability: Beyond reductionism. Proceedings 17th. IFIP (International Federation for Information Processing) World Computer Congress Dordrecht: Kluwer 231-246.
38. G. Lindgaard and T.W.A. Whitfield (2004) Integrating aesthetics within an evolutionary and psychological framework. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5 73-90.
39. J.H. Lingle and T.M. Ostrom (1979) Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 180-194.
40. S. Lyubomirsky, L. King and E. Diener (2005) The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin 131 803-855.
41. S. Mahlke (2002) Factors infl uencing the experience of web site usage. Proceedings of the CHI 2002 Conference on Computer-Human Interaction New York: ACM Press, Addison-Wesley 846-847. Extended Abstracts
42. J. McCarthy and P.C. Wright (2004) Technology as Experience Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
43. J.E. McGrath and F. Tschan (2004) Temporal matters in social psychology Washington, DC: APA
44. A. Monk (2004) The product as a fi xed-effect fallacy. Human-Computer Interaction 19 371-375.
45. D.C.L. Ngo and J.G. Byrne (2001) Application of an aesthetic evaluation model to data entry screens. Computers in Human Behavior 17 149-185.
46. J. Nielsen (1993) Usability engineering Boston, San Diego: Academic Press
47. D. Norman (2004) Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things New York: Basic Books
48. D. Norman (2004) Introduction to this special section on beauty, goodness, and usability. Human-Computer Interaction 19 311-318.
49. E.M. Okada (2005) Justifi cation effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research 42 43-53.
50. C.J. Overbeeke and S.A.G. Wensveen (2004) Beauty in use. Comment on Hassenzahl's ‘The interplay of beauty, goodness and usability in interactive products’. Human-Computer Interaction 19 367-369.
51. S. Park, D. Choi and J. Kim (2004) Critical factors for the aesthetic fi delity of web pages: empirical studies with professional web designers and users. Interacting with Computers 16 351-376.
52. M.T. Pham, J.B. Cohen, J.W. Pracejus and G.D. Hughes (2001) Affect monitoring and the primacy of feelings in judgment. Journal of Consumer Research 28 167-188.
53. D. Prelec and G. Loewenstein (1998) The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science 17 4-28.
54. J.A. Russell (2003) Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review 110 145-172.
55. B. Russo and A. De Moraes (2003) The lack of usability in design icons: an affective case study about Juicy Salif. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces New York: ACM Press 146-147.
56. B.N. Schenkman and F.U. Jönsson (2000) Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behaviour and Information Technology 19 367-377.
57. D.J. Schneider (1973) Implicit personality theory. A review. Psychological Bulletin 79 194-309.
58. N. Schwarz and G.L. Clore (1983) Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 513-523.
59. N. Schwarz (2001) Feelings as information: Implications for affective influences on information processing. L.L. Martin, G.L. Clore (Eds) Theories of mood and cognition Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 159-176.
60. E.L. Thorndike (1920) A constant error on psychological rating. Journal of Applied Psychology 4 25-29.
61. N. Tractinsky (1997) Aesthetics and apparent usability: empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. Proceedings of the CHI 1997 Conference on Human Factors in Computing New York: ACM, Addison-Wesley 115-122.
62. N. Tractinsky, A. Cokhavi, M. Kirschenbaum and T. Sharfi (2006) Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(11), 1071-1083.
63. N. Tractinsky, A. Cokhavi and M. Kirschenbaum (2004) Using ratings and response latencies to evaluate the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS 40-44.
64. N. Tractinsky, A.S. Katz and D. Ikar (2000) What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13 127-145.
65. N. Tractinsky and D. Zmiri (2006) Exploring attributes of skins as potential antecedents of emotion in HCI. In: P. Fishwick (Ed.) Aesthetic computing, pp. 405-421. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors infl uencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information and Management 40 541-549.
66. V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis and F.D. Davis (2003) User acceptance of information technology. Towards a unifi ed view. MIS Quarterly 27 425-478.
67. D.T. Wegener and R.E. Petty (1997) The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. M.P. Zanna (Eds) Advances in experimental social psychology San Diego: Academic Press 141-208.
68. P. Zhang and N. Li (2005) The importance of affective quality. Communications of the ACM 48(9), 105-108.