The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 481-499

  Hassenzahl, Marc ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

USER INTERFACES;

BROAD DEFINITIONS; HEDONIC QUALITY; INNOVATIVENESS; QUALITY ASPECTS; TASK-ORIENTED; USER PERCEPTIONS; USER SATISFACTION; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 18244368219     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1304_07     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2. Arnold, A. G. (1999). Mental effort and evaluation of user interfaces: A questionnaire approach. In Proceedings of the HCI International 1999 Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 1003-1007). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Atyeo, M., Sidhu, C., Coyle, G., & Robinson, S. (1996). Working with marketing. In Proceedings of the CHI 1996 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common ground (pp. 313-314). New York: ACM, Addison-Wesley.
4. Bevan, N. (1995). Usability is quality of use. In Proceedings of the HCI International 1995 Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 349-354). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Bevan, N., & Macleod, M. (1994). Usability measurement in context. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23, 132-145.
6. Brewster, S. A. (1998). Using nonspeech sounds to provide navigation cues. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 5, 224-259.
7. Carroll, J. M., & Thomas, J. C. (1988). Fun. SIGCHI Bulletin, 19(3), 21-24.
8. Coovert, M. D., & McNelis, K. (1988). Determining the number of common factors in factor analysis: A review and program. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 687-693.
9. Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12, 259-274.
10. Dougherty, M. R. P., & Shanteau, J. (1999). Averaging expectancies and perceptual experiences in the assessment of quality. Acta Psychologica, 101, 49-67.
11. Eilers, K., Nachreiner, F., & Hänecke, K. (1986). Entwicklung und Überprüfung einer Skala zur Erfassung subjektiv erlebter Antrengung [Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess subjectively experienced effort]. Zeitschrifi für Arbeitswissenschaft, 40, 215-224.
12. Ekman, P., & Davidson, R. J. (1994). The nature of emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Gediga, G., Hamborg, K.-C., & Duntsch, I. (1999). The IsoMetrics usability inventory: An operationalization of ISO 9241-10 supporting summative and formative evaluation of software systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, 151-164.
14. Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 532-560.
15. Harrison, A. W., & Rainer, R. K. (1996). A general measure of user computing satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(1), 79-92.
16. Hassenzahl, M. (2000). Prioritising usability problems: Data-driven and judgement-driven severity estimates. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19, 29-42.
17. Hassenzahl, M., Beu, A., & Burmester, M. (2001). Engineering joy. IEEE Software, 1&2, 70-76.
18. Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Sandweg, N. (2000). Perceived novelty of functions - A source of hedonic quality. Interfaces, 42, 11.
19. Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., & Lehner, K. (2000). Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. In Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (pp. 201-208). New York: ACM, Addison-Wesley.
20. Hassenzahl, M., Wessler, R., & Hamborg, K.-C (2001). Exploring and understanding product qualities that users desire. In Proceedings of the IHM/HCI Conference on human-computer interaction, Volume 2 (pp. 95-96). Toulaise, France: Cépadinès.
21. Igbaria, M., Schiffman, S. J., & Wieckowski, T. J. (1994). The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13, 349-361.
22. ISO. (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability (ISO No. 9241). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
23. Zijlstra, R. (1993). Efficiency in work behaviour: A design approach for modern tools. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University Press.
24. Zijlstra, R., & van Doom, L. (1985). The construction of a scale to measure subjective effort. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences.