TEACHER LEARNING FOR NEW TIMES: REPURPOSING NEW MULTIMODAL LITERACIES AND DIGITAL-VIDEO COMPOSING FOR SCHOOLS

Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy Through the Communicative and Visual Arts: Volume II

Volumn 2, Issue , 2015, Pages 441-453

  Miller, Suzanne M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145850329     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315759616-58     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Albers, P. (2006). Imagining possibilities in multimodal curriculum design. English Education, 38(2), 75-101.
2. Alvermann, D. E. (Ed.). (2002). Adolescents and literacies in a digital world. New York: Peter Lang.
3. Apple Classroom of Tomorrow (ACOT). (1995). Changing the conversation about teaching, learning & technology: A report of 10 years of ACOT research. Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer. Retrieved May 16, 2006, from http://images.apple.com/edu/education/k12/leadership/acot/ pdf/10yr.pdf
4. Apple Education. (2004). The evolution of thought and practice. Technology planning guide: Professional development. Retrieved May 14, 2006, from http://www.apple.com/education/planning/profdev/index4.html
5. Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Bailey, N. (2006). Designing social futures: Adolescent literacy in and for new times. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
7. Blondell, M. (2006). Teachers’ perceptions of DV composing in English classrooms:Blurring boundaries for understanding lives and curriculum. Unpublished manuscript, University at Buffalo.
8. Bloome, D. (1986). Building literacy and classroom community. Theory into Practice, 25(2), 71-76.
9. Borowicz, S. (2003). Poetry in motion: Collaborative inquiry into digital video authoring in an urban school. Unpublished manuscript, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
10. Borowicz, S. (2005). Embracing lives through the video lens: An exploration of literacy teaching and learning with digital video technology in an urban secondary English classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo.
11. Brand, G. A. (1997). What research says: Training teachers for using technology [Electronic version]. Journal of Staff Development, 19(1), 10-13. Retrieved May 20, 2006, from http://www.nsdc.org/library/ jsd/brand191.html
12. Brandsford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
13. Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., & Hammerness, K., with Beckett, K. L. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
14. Buckingham, D. (2003). Digital literacies: Media education and new media technologies. In B. Duncan, & K. Tyner (Eds.), Visions/revisions:Moving forward with media education. Madison, WI: National Telemedia Council.
15. Burnes, A., & Parker, D. (2003). Tiger’s big plan: Multimodality and the moving image. In C. Jewitt, & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
16. Chandler-Olcott, K., & Mahar, D. (2003). Adolescents’ anime-inspired “fanfictions”: An exploration of multiliteracies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(7), 556-566.
17. Coiro, J. (2005). Every teacher a Miss Rumphius: Empowering teachers with effective professional development. In R. A. Karchmer, M. H. Mallette, J. Kara-Soteriou, & D. J. Leu. (Eds.), Integrating approaches to literacy education: Using the internet to support new literacies (pp. 199-219). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Retrieved on May 15, 2006, from http://ctell1.uconn.edu/ coiro/missrumphius.pdf
18. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: The beginning of an idea. In B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 3-8). London: Routledge.
19. Costello, A. (2006). Digital video and drama production as literacy learning tools in English classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
20. Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experiences. New York: Harper & Row.
21. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.) (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
22. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
23. diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.
24. Finn, P. (1999). Literacy with an attitude: Educating working class students in their own self-interest. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
25. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
27. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.
28. Goodman, S. (2003). Teaching youth media: A critical guide to literacy, video production. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Grabill, J. T., & Hicks, T. (2005). Multiliteracies meet methods: The case for digital writing in English education, English Education, 37(4), 301-311.
30. Hagood, M. C., Stevens, L. P., & Reinking, D. (2002). What do THEY have to teach US? Talkin’ ‘cross generations! In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in digital world. New York: Peter Lang.
31. Heath, S. B. (2004). Learning language and strategic thinking through the arts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(3), 338-342.
32. Heath, S. B. & Smyth, L. (1999). ArtShow: Youth and community development. Washington, DC: Partners for Livable Communities.
33. Huber, G. (2006). Popular culture in student digital video production. Unpublished Reflective Inquiry Project, University at Buffalo.
34. Hull, G. (2003). Youth culture and digital media: New literacies for new times. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 229-233.
35. Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005) Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224-261.
36. Hull, G. A., & James, M. A. (in press). Geographies of hope: A study of urban landscapes, digital media, and children’s representations of place. In P. O’Neill (Ed.), Blurring boundaries: Developing writers, researchers and teachers. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
37. Ikpeze, C. (2006). Bringing together the bits: Web-based literacy learning in a fifth-grade classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
38. International Reading Association. (2001). Integrating literacy and technology in the curriculum: A position statement. Retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://www.reading.org/resources/issues/positions_technology.html
39. Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (Eds.). (2003). Multimodal literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
40. King, J. R., & O’Brien, D. G. (2002). Adolescents’ multiliteracies and their teachers’ needs to know: Toward a digital détente. In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 40-50). New York: Peter Lang.
41. Kist, W. (2002). Finding “new literacy” in action: An interdisciplinary high school western civilization class. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(5), 368-377.
42. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94-102.
43. Kress, G. (1999). “English” at the crossroads: Rethinking curricula of communication in the context of the turn to the visual. In G. E. Hawisher & C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies & 21st century technologies. Urbana-Champaign, IL: NCTE
44. Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies:Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182-202). London: Routledge.
45. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge.
46. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491
47. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
48. Lauricella, A. M. (2006). Digital video production as a tool for learning:Exploring multiple text documents in an urban social studies classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
49. Leu, D. J. Jr. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the Internet. In A. E. Farstrup, & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 310-336). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
50. Leu, D. J. Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell, & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
51. Luke, A. (2002). What happens to literacies old and new when they’re turned into policy. In D. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in digital world (pp. 186-203). New York: Peter Lang.
52. Malley, J. (2004). Pitch it to me: The role of talk and inquiry in the iMovie classroom. Unpublished manuscript, University at Buffalo.
53. McMaster, R. (2004). Collaborating for curricular change: Arts-based authentic assessments in the English classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
54. McVee, M. B., Bailey, N., & Shanahan, L. (2006, February). Literacy teachers and the (artful) deception of technology integration. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Ethnography in Education Research Forum, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
55. Miliken Exchange on Education Technology. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? Retrieved May 14, 2006, from http:// www.mff.org/publications/publications.taf?page=154
56. Miller, S. M. (2003). How literature discussion shapes thinking: Teaching/ learning habits of the heart and mind. In A. Kozulin, V. Ageyev, S. Miller, & B. Gindis (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 289-316). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
57. Miller, S. M. & Borowicz, S. (2005). City Voices, City Visions: Digital video as literacy/learning supertool in urban classrooms. In L. Johnson, M. Finn & R. Lewis (Eds.), Urban education with an attitude. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
58. Miller, S. M. & Borowicz, S. (2006). Why multimodal literacies? Designing digital bridges to 21st century teaching and learning. Buffalo, NY: GSE Publications & SUNY Press.
59. Miller, S. M. & Borowicz, S. (2007). New literacies with an attitude: Transformative teacher education through digital video learning tools. In Finn, M. & Finn, P. (Eds.), Teacher education with an attitude. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
60. Miller, S., Meier, E., Payne-Bourcy, L., Shablak, S., Newman, D. L., Wan, T. Y., et al. (2003, October 20). Technology as a catalyst for change: A leadership model for transforming urban teacher preparation (ISSN 1206-9620). The International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 7(12). Retrieved April 25, 2006, from http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll/volume7/miller.htm
61. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2004). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http://punya.educ.msu.edu/PunyaWeb/publica tions/inpress/MishraKoehler_TPCK.pdf
62. National Council of Teachers of English (2003). NCTE position statement:On composing with nonprint media. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://www.ncte.org/about/over/positions/category/media/114919.htm
63. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
64. New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies:Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
65. O’Brien, D. G. (2003). Juxtaposing traditional and intermedial literacies to redefine the competence of struggling adolescents. Reading Online. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/obrien2/
66. O’Brien, D. G., & Bauer, E. B. (2005). New literacies and the institution of old learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(1), 120-131.
67. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2006). Results that matter: 21st century skills and high school reform. Retrieved May 20, 2006, from http:// www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/RTM2006.pdf
68. The Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: United States Department of Labor. Retrieved May 20, 2006, from http://wdr.doleta.gov/opr/fulltext/document.cfm?docn= 6140
69. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005, May). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14-22.
70. Shanahan, L. E. (2006). Reading and writing multimodal texts through information and communication technologies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
71. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
72. Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.
73. Swenson, J., Rozema, R., Young, C. A., McGrail, E., & Whitin, P. (2006). Extending the conversation: New technologies, new Literacies, and English education, English Education, 38(4), 349-367.
74. Thompson, M. (2005). Slut, warrior, princess: Three gender identities in one students’ fan-fiction writing. Unpublished manuscript State University of New York at Buffalo.
75. United States Census Bureau. (2004). State and county quick-facts. Retrieved June 5, 2006, from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36/3611000.html
76. United States Department of Education. (1999). Getting America’s students ready for the 21st century: Meeting the technology literacy challenge. Retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ os/technology/plan/national/index.html
77. Weiner, L. (2000). Research in the 90s: Implications for urban teacher preparation. Review of Education Research, 70(3), 369-406.
78. Wlodkowski, R. J. & Ginsberg, M. B. (1995). A framework for culturally responsive teaching. Educational Leadership, 53(1), 17-21.