How literature discussion shapes thinking: ZPDs for Teaching/Learning habits of the heart and mind

Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 289-316

  Miller, Suzanne M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925612862     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511840975.016     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Alvermann, D. E. (1996). Peer-led discussions: Whose interests are served? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39,282-289.
2. Applebee, A. N. (1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Bahktin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (C. Emerson & M. Helquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds.) (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
6. Barnes, D., Britton, J., & Rosen, H. (1969). Language, the learner, and the school. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
7. Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8. Bartholomae, D., & Petrosky, A. (1986). Facts, artifacts, counterfacts. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
9. Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swindler, A., & Tipton, S. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper & Row.
10. Bridges, D. (1979). Education, democracy and discussion. Winsor, England: NFER.
11. Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning: The importance of speech in children’s development. Penguin.
12. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
13. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to educative process. Boston: D.C. Heath.
16. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
17. Earthman, E. A. (1992). Creating the virtual work: Readers' processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 351-384.
18. Edwards, A. D., & Westgate, D. P. G. (1987). Investigating classroom talk. London: Falmer.
19. Eeds, M., & Wells, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(10), 4-29.
20. Fall, R., Webb, N. M., & Chudowsky, N. (2000). Group discussion and large-scale language arts assessment: Effects on students’ comprehension. American Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 911-941.
21. Friere, P. (1998). Pedagogy of hope. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
22. Gadamer, H. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics (D. Linge, Ed. and Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
23. Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideologies in discourses. London: Taylor and Francis.
24. Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Hoetker, J., & Ahlbrand, W. (1969). The persistence of recitation. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 145-167.
26. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
27. Hynds, S. (1989). Bringing life to literature and literature to life: Social constructs and contexts of four adolescent readers. Research in the Teaching of English,23, 30-61.
28. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
29. Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. LeCompte, M. D. & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Academic Press.
31. Lewis, C. (1997). The social drama of literature discussions in a fifth/sixth-grade classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 163-204.
32. Lotman, Y. M. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 26(3), 32-51.
33. McMahon, S. I., & Raphael, T. E. (Eds.) (1997). The book club connection: Literacy learning and classroom talk. New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Marshall, J. D., Smagorinsky, P., & Smith, M. W. (1995). The language of interpretation: Patterns of discourse in discussions of literature. NCTE Research Report No. 27, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
35. Miller, S. M. (1988). Collaborative learning in secondary-school discussion of expository texts (University Microfilms No. 89-05,229). Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
36. Miller, S. M. (1990). Critical thinking in classroom discussion of texts: An ethnographic perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
37. Miller, S. M. (1991a, March). Planning for spontaneity: Supporting the language of thinking. English Journal, 80 (3), 51-56.
38. Miller, S. M. (1991b, May). Room to talk: Opening possibilities with the “at risk.” English Leadership Quarterly, 13(2), 10-11.
39. Miller, S. M. (1992). Trying to understand together: Restructuring classroom talk about texts. In J. L. Collins (Ed.), Restructuring the English classroom (45-59). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
40. Miller, S. M. (1993). Why a dialogic pedagogy? Making space for possible worlds. In S. Miller & B. McCaskill (Eds.), Multicultural literature and literacies: Making space for difference. Albany: State University of New York Press.
41. Miller, S. M. (1994, September). Vygotsky and education: The sociocultural genesis of dialogic thinking in classroom contexts for open-forum literature discussions. In Selected Papers of the International Conference on L. S. Vygotsky and the Contemporary Human Sciences. Moscow, Russia. Available at: http://rantzj.hanover.edu/vygotsky/miller.html
42. Miller, S. M. (1996a, February). Open-forum text discussion as a zone of proximal development: Shaping which habits of mind? Presentation at the NCTE Research Assembly’s 1996 Vygotsky Centennial: Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research, Chicago.
43. Miller, S. M. (1996b, October 21-24). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development in a transformative pedagogy: Scaffolding multicultural discourse in integrated literature-history classes. In Conference Proceedings of the International Conference, In Celebration of L. S. Vygotsky, 1986-1996: A Cultural-Historical Approach to the Study of Education, Moscow.
44. Miller, S. M. (1996c). How literature learning shapes thinking in high school classes. In The Final Report of the National Research Center on Literature Teaching and Learning(Grant No. R117G10015), Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
45. Miller, S. M. (1996d). Making the paths: Constructing critical-narrative discourse in literature-history classes. Research Monograph Series. Albany: Center for English Learning and Achievement.
46. Miller, S. M. (1997). Language, democracy and teachers’ conceptions of “discussion”: What we know from literacy research. Theory and Research in Social Education, 25(2), 196-206.
47. Miller, S. M. (1998a, Spring). Missing links between self and society: What no literature discussion means for multicultural literacy. Language and Literacy Spectrum,8,16-29.
48. Miller, S. M. (1998b, Winter). Entering into multicultural conversations in English- history classes. Arizona English Bulletin, 40(2), 10-26.
49. Miller, S. M. (1998c, Fall). How literature learning shapes thinking in the secondary school. English Quarterly 30(1-2), 38-66.
50. Miller, S. M., & Legge, S. (1999, August). Supporting possible worlds: Transforming literature teaching and learning through conversations in the narrative mode. Research in the Teaching of English, 10-64.
51. Miller, S. M., & Trzyna, G. D. (2000). “They don’t want to hear it”: Ways of talking and habits of the heart in the multicultural literature classroom. In C. Cornbleth (Ed.), Curriculum politics, policy, practice: Cases in context. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
52. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261-290.
53. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative. London: Falmer Press.
54. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
55. Scholes, R. (1985). Textual Power: Literary Theory and the Teaching of English. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56. Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The psychology of art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Sauberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
60. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.