DEVELOPING TRAINING STRATEGIES WITH AN HCI PERSPECTIVE

Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 258-283

  Olfman, Lorne ^a,b   Bostrom, Robert P ^c   Sein, Maung K ^d  

^a School of Information Systems and Technology   (United States)

^b CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

End User Training; Knowledge Levels; Learning Strategy; Software Training; Training Strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139600074     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315703626-22     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Adkins, S. Introduction to workflow learning. Workflow Learning Institute, 2003 (available at http://www.internettime.com/workflow/intro_wfl.htm, accessed on October 23, 2004).
2. Andrews, A., and Niederman, F. A firm-level model of IT personnel planning. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research. New York: ACM Press, 1998, pp. 274-285.
3. Bostrom, R.P. Tutorial: e-learning: facilitating learning through technology. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa, FL, 2003, 3159-3164.
4. Bostrom, R.P.; Olfman, L.; and Sein, M.K. Learning styles and end-user training: A first step. MIS Quarterly, 17, 1 (1993), 118-120.
5. Bostrom, R.P.; Olfman, L.; and Sein, M.K. The importance of learning style in end-user training. MIS Quarterly, 14, 1 (1990), 101-119.
6. Carroll, J.M., and Rosson, M.B. Managing evaluation goals for training. Communications of the ACM, 38, 7 (1995), 40-48.
7. Compeau, D.; Gravill, J.; Haggerty, N.; and Kelley, H. Computer self-efficacy: a review. P. Zhang and D. Galletta (eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations. Advances in Management Information Systems, Volume 5, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2006.
8. Compeau, D.; Olfman, L.; Sein, M.; and Webster, J. End-user training and learning. Communications of the ACM, 38, 7 (1995), 24-26.
9. Coulson, T.; Shayo, C.; Olfman, L. and Rohm, C.E.T. ERP training strategies: conceptual training and the formation of accurate mental models. In 2003 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference. New York: ACM Press, 2003, pp. 87-97.
10. Davis, S.A., and Bostrom, R.P. Training end users: an experimental investigation of the roles of the computer interface and training methods. MIS Quarterly, 17, 1 (1993), 61-85.
11. Desai, M.S. A field experiment: Instructor-based training vs. computer-based training. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27, 4 (2000), 239-244.
12. Gist, M.E. The influence of training method and trainee age on acquisition of computer skills. Personnel Psychology, 41, 2 (1988), 255-265.
13. Gravill, J., and Compeau, D. Self-regulated learning strategies and computer software training. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Information Systems, Seattle, WA, 2003, 788-793.
14. Gravill, J.; Compeau, D.; and Marcolin, B. Metacognition and IT. The influence of self-efficacy on selfawareness. In Proceedings of the Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, 2002, 1055-1064.
15. Gupta, S., and Bostrom, R.P. Collaborative e-learning: information systems research directions. In Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, 2004, 3031-3039.
16. Kutzschan, A.O., and Webster, J. HCI as MIS. In D. Galletta and P. Zhang (eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2006.
17. Lacity, M.; Willcocks, L.; and Feeny, D. The value of selective IT sourcing. Sloan Management Review, 37, 3 (1996), 13-25.
18. Longmire, W. A primer on learning objects. Learning Circuits (available at http://www.learningcircuits.org/2000/mar2000/longmire.htm, accessed on October 23, 2004).
19. Martocchio, J.J. Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 6 (1994), 819-826.
20. Masie Center. Top learning decisions for 2000. Learning Decisions Interactive Newsletter, January (2003).
21. Nelson, R.R.; Whitener, E.M.; and Philcox, H.H. The assessment of end-user training needs. Communications of the ACM, 38, 7 (1995), 27-39.
22. Nilsen, H., and Sein, M.K. Determinants of user satisfaction with the support function. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, New York, NY: ACM Press, 2002, pp. 47-51.
23. Olfman, L., and Mandviwalla, M. Conceptual versus procedural software training for graphical user interfaces: a longitudinal field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 18, 4 (1994), 405-426.
24. Olfman, L.; Bostrom, R.P.; and Sein, M.K. Training with a business focus: a best practice. In Proceedings of the BITWORLD 2001 Conference. CD-ROM. 2001.
25. Olfman, L.; Bostrom, R.P.; and Sein, M.K. A best-practice based model for information technology learning strategy formulation. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research. New York: ACM Press, 2003, pp. 75-86.
26. Olfman, L., and Sein, M.K. Ten lessons for end-user trainers. In Information Systems Management Series. Boston: Auerbach, 1997, no. 94-00-07, 10 pp.
27. Robey, D.; Boudreau, M.-C.; and Rose, G.M. Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10, 2 (2000), 125-155.
28. Rosenberg, M.J. e-Learning Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.
29. Ruble, T.L., and Stout, D.E. Learning styles and end-user training: an unwarranted leap of faith. MIS Quarterly, 17, 1 (1993), 115-117.
30. Sein, M.K., and Bostrom, R.P. Individual differences and conceptual models in training novice users. Human-Computer Interaction, 4 (1989), 197-229.
31. Sein, M.K.; Bostrom, R.P.; and Olfman, L. Training end-users to compute: cognitive, motivational and social issues. INFOR, 25, 3 (1987), 236-255.
32. Sein, M.K.; Bostrom, R.P.; and Olfman, L. Rethinking end-user training strategy: applying a hierarchical knowledge-level model. Journal of End User Computing, 11, 1 (1999), 32-39.
33. Simonsen, M. Conceptual Frameworks in Practice: Evaluating End-User Training Strategy in Baker Hughes. Master’s thesis, University of Bergen, 2003.
34. Simonsen, M., and Sein, M.K. Conceptual frameworks in practice: evaluating end-user training strategy in an organization. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research. New York: ACM Press, 2004, pp. 14-24.
35. Sketch, E. Ford’s drive toward quality education. Chief Learning Officer Profile (available at http://www.clomedia.com/content/templates/clo_cloprofile.asp?articleid_180andzoneid_4, accessed on October 23, 2004).
36. Snell, N. Why Johnny can’t do client server. Inside Technology Training, 1, 7 (1997), 21-26.
37. Webster, J., and Martocchio, J.J. The differential effects of software training previews on training outcomes. Journal of Management, 21, 4 (1995), 757-788.