COMMUNICATIVE PLANNING

The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 93-104

  Sager, Tore ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85135676177     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315696072-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Allmendinger, P. (2001): Planning in Postmodern Times. London: Routledge.
2. Allmendinger, P. (2009): Planning Theory (Second Edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Bedford, T., J. Clark and H. Harrison (2002): ‘Limits to new public participation practices in local land use planning’, Town Planning Review 73(3): 311-31.
4. Bond, S. (2011): ‘Negotiating a “democratic ethos”: moving beyond the agonistic-communicative divide’, Planning Theory 10(2): 161-86.
5. Booher, D.E. and J.E. Innes (2002): ‘Network power in collaborative planning’, Journal of Planning Education and Research 21(3): 221-36.
6. Dworkin, G. (1983): ‘Paternalism: some second thoughts’, pp. 105-111 in R. Sartorius (Ed.): Paternalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7. Fainstein, N. and S.S. Fainstein (2013): ‘Restoring just outcomes to planning concerns’, pp. 32-53 in N. Carmon and S.S. Fainstein (Eds): Policy, Planning, and People: Promoting Justice in Urban Development. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8. Fainstein, S.S. (2014): ‘The just city’, International Journal of Urban Sciences 18(1): 1-18.
9. Flyvbjerg, B. and T. Richardson (2002): ‘Planning and Foucault: in search of the dark side of planning theory’, pp. 44-62 in P. Allmendinger and M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds): Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory. London: Routledge.
10. Forester, J. (1989): Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Forester, J. (1992): ‘Critical ethnography: on fieldwork in a Habermasian way’, pp. 46-65 in M. Alvesson and H. Wilmott (Eds): Critical Management Studies. London: Sage.
12. Forester, J. (1993): Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
13. Forester, J. (2013): ‘On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: deliberative practice and creative negotiations’, Planning Theory 12(1): 5-22.
14. Foucault, M. (1980): Power/Knowledge. Brighton: Harvester Press.
15. Friedmann, J. (1973): Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning. Garden City, New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
16. Gutman, A. and D. Thompson (2004): Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Habermas, J. (1977): ‘Hannah Arendt’s communications concept of power’, Social Research 44(1): 3-24.
18. Habermas, J. (1998): On the Pragmatics of Communication (Editor: Maeve Cooke). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
19. Harper, T.L. and S.M. Stein (2006): Dialogical Planning in a Fragmented Society. New Brunswick: CUPR Press, Rutgers.
20. Healey, P. (2006): Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Second Edition). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
21. Healey, P. (2009): ‘The pragmatic tradition in planning thought’, Journal of Planning Education and Research 28(3): 277-92.
22. Healey, P. (2012): ‘Communicative planning: practices, concepts and rhetorics’, pp. 333-58 in B. Sanyal, L. Vale and C.D. Rosan (Eds): Planning Ideas that Matter: Livability, Territoriality, Governance, and Reflective Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Hoch, C.J. (2007): ‘Pragmatic communicative action theory’, Journal of Planning Education and Research 26(3): 272-83.
24. Huxley, M. (2000): ‘The limits to communicative planning’, Journal of Planning Education and Research 19(4): 369-77.
25. Innes, J.E. (1995): ‘Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice’, Journal of Planning Education and Research 14(3): 183-89.
26. Innes, J.E. and D.E. Booher (1999): ‘Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: toward a theory of collaborative planning’, Journal of the American Planning Association 65(1): 9-26.
27. Innes, J.E. and D.E. Booher (2010): Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. London: Routledge.
28. Innes, J.E. and D.E. Booher (2015): ‘A turning point for planning theory? Overcoming dividing dis-courses’, Planning Theory 14(2): 195-213.
29. Levine, A. (1960): ‘Citizen participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners 26(3): 195-200.
30. List, C. and R.E. Goodin (2001): ‘Epistemic democracy: generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem’, Journal of Political Philosophy 9(3): 277-306.
31. Mansbridge, J., J. Bohman, S. Chambers, D. Estlund, A. Føllesdal, A. Fung, et al. (2010): ‘The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy’, Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 64-100.
32. Margerum, R.D. (2002): ‘Evaluating collaborative planning: implications from an empirical analysis of growth management’, Journal of the American Planning Association 68(2): 179-93.
33. Mees, P. (2003): ‘Paterson’s curse: the attempt to revive metropolitan planning in Melbourne’, Urban Policy and Research 21(3): 287-99.
34. Miraftab, F. (2004): ‘Invited and invented spaces of participation: neoliberal citizenship and feminists’ expanded notion of politics’, Wagadu 1(Spring): 1-7.
35. Mouffe, C. (1999): ‘Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism’, Social Research 66(3): 745-58.
36. Niemeyer, S. and J.S. Dryzek (2007): ‘The ends of deliberation: meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes’, Swiss Political Science Review 13(4): 497-526.
37. Norwegian Nobel Committee (2015): Announcement of the Nobel Peace Prize for 2015. www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2015/press.html?utm_source=twitterandutm_medium=socialandutm_campaign=twitter_tweet (accessed 19.04.2017).
38. Rader Olsson, A. (2009): ‘Relational rewards and communicative planning: understanding actor motivation’, Planning Theory 8(3): 263-81.
39. Sager, T. (1994): Communicative Planning Theory. Aldershot: Avebury.
40. Sager, T. (2013): Reviving Critical Planning Theory. London: Routledge.
41. Sandercock, L. (1998): Making the Invisible Visible. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42. Sandercock, L. and G. Attili (2010): ‘Digital ethnography as planning praxis: an experiment with film as social research’, Planning Theory and Practice 11(1): 23-45.
43. Scott, A.J. and S.T. Roweis (1977): ‘Urban planning in theory and practice: a reappraisal’, Environment and Planning A 9(10): 1097-1119.
44. Tag-Eldeen, Z.N. (2015): ‘Collaborative planning crossing borders: practice in the context of Egypt’, pp. 407-22 in J. Hillier and J. Metzger (Eds): Connections: Exploring Contemporary Planning Theory and Practice with Patsy Healey. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
45. Throgmorton, J.A. (2000): ‘On the virtues of skillful meandering: acting as a skilled-voice-in-the-flow of persuasive argumentation’, Journal of the American Planning Association 66(4): 367-79.
46. Van Dijk, T., N. Aarts and A. de Wit (2011): ‘Frames to the planning game’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35(5): 969-87.
47. Verma, N. (1998): Similarities, Connections and Systems. New York: Lexington.
48. Wang, F., Q. Chen, Y. Xu and Y. Liu (2012): ‘Communicative planning theory: introduction, criticism and inspiration’, Urban Planning International Issue 2012-06 (in Chinese).
49. Yingjie, H., G. de Roo and L. Bin (2013): '“Communicative turn” in Chinese spatial planning? Exploring possibilities in Chinese contexts’, Cities 35(1): 42-50.