Pragmatic communicative action theory

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 272-283

  Hoch, Charles J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Communicative planning; Comprehensive planning; Critical realist; Planning theory; Pragmatism

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147140850     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X06295029     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alexander, Ernest. 2003. Response to "Why do planning theory?" Planning Theory 2 (3): 179-82.
2. Ali, Saleem H. 2003. Environmental planning and cooperative behavior: Catalyzing sustainable consensus. Journal of Planning Education and Research 23 (2): L65-76.
3. Allmendinger, Phillipo. 2002. Planning Theory. New York: Palgrave.
4. Beauregard, Robert. 1996. Advocating preeminence: Anthologies as politics. In Explorations in Planning Theory, edited by S. J. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R. W. Burchell, 105-12. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers State University.
5. Beauregard, Robert. 1996. Advocating preeminence: Anthologies as politics. In Explorations in Planning Theory, edited by S. J. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R. W.
6. Blanco, Hilda. 1994. How to think about social problems: American pragmatism and the idea of planning. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
7. Blumenberg, Evelyn. 2002. Planning for the transportation needs of welfare participants: Institutional challenges to collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 (2): 152-63.
8. Bohman, James. 1996. Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Davidson, Donald. 1989. The myth of the subjective. In Relativism: Interpretation and confrontation, edited by Michael Krausz, 165 - 9, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
10. Davidson, Donald. 2000. Objectivity and practical reason. In Reasoning Practically, edited by Edna Ullman-Margalit, 17-26, New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Fainstein, Susan S. 1997. Justice, politics, and the creation of urban space. In The urbanization of injustice, edited by Andy Merrifield and Erik Swyngedouw, 18-44. New York: New York University Press.
12. Fainstein, Susan S. 2001. The city builders: Property development in New York and London, 1980-2000. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
13. Fainstein, Susan S. 2005. Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25: 121-30.
14. Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Flyvberg, Bent. 1998. Rationality and power: Democracy in action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Flyvberg, Bent. 2002. Bringing power to planning research: One researcher's praxis story. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21 (4): 353-66.
17. Forester, John. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Forester, John. 1999. The deliberative practitioner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Forester, John. 2004. Responding to critical moments with humor, recognition and hope. Negotiation Journal. 20 (2): 221-37.
20. Forester, John. 2000. Conservative epistemology, reductive ethics, far too narrow politics: Some clarifications in response to Yiftachel and Huxley. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (4): 914-16.
21. Friedmann, John. 1987. Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Friedmann, John. 2003. Why do planning theory. Planning Theory 2 (1): 7-11.
23. Habermas, Jurgen. 1971. Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon.
24. Habermas, Jurgen. 1993. Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Hajer, Maarten. A., and Hendrik Wagenaar, eds. 2003. Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Halton, Eugene. 1995. Bereft of reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Harper, Thomas, and Stanley Stein. 2003. Dialogical planning in a fragmented society. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
28. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
29. Healey, Patsy, Claudio De Magalhaes, Ali Madanipour, and John Pendlebury. 2003. Place, identity and local politics: Analyzing initiatives in deliberative governance. In Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society, edited by Maarten A. Hajer and Hendrik Wagenaar, 60-88. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hoch, Charles. 1984 a. Doing good and being right: The pragmatic connection in planning theory. Journal of the American Planning Association 50 (3): 335-45.
31. Hoch, Charles. 1984 b. Pragmatism, planning and power. Journal of Planning Education and Research 4 (2): 86-5.
32. Hoch, Charles. 1992. The paradox of power in planning practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 11 (3): 206-15.
33. Hoch, Charles. 1994. What planners do. Chicago: Planners.
34. Hoch, Charles. 2002. Evaluating plans pragmatically. Planning Theory 1 (1): 53-76.
35. Hoch, Charles. Forthcoming. Making plans: Representation and intention. Planning Theory 6.
36. Hoffman, Lilly. 1989. The politics of knowledge: Activist movements in medicine and planning. Albany: SUNY.
37. Hopkins, Lew. 2000. Urban development: The logic of making plans. Washington DC: Island.
38. Huxley, Margo. 1997. Necessary but by no means sufficient: Spatial political economy, town planning and the possibility of better cities. European Planning Studies 5 (6): 741-51.
39. Huxley, Margo, and Oren Yiftachel. 2000. New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 19: 333-42.
40. Innes, Judith. 1995. Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14 (3): 183-90.
41. Innes, Judith, and J. Gruber. 2005. Planning styles in conflict: The Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (2): 177-88.
42. Jamal, Tazim B., Stanley M. Stein, and Thomas L. Harper. 2002. Beyond labels: Pragmatic planning in multistakeholder tourism-environmental conflicts. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22(2): 164-77.
43. Kohl, Benjamin. 2003. Democratizing decentralization in Brazil: The law of popular participation. Journal of Planning Education and Research 23 (2): 153-64.
44. Laurian, Lucie. 2004. Public participation in environmental decision making. Journal of the American Planning Association 70 (1): 53-66.
45. Lindblom, Charles. 1979. Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46. Mandelbaum, Seymour. 2000. Open moral communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Margerum, Richard D. 2002. Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct model of practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 21 (2): 237-53.
48. Marris, Peter 1987. Meaning and action: Community planning and conceptions of change. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
49. Marris, Peter. 1996. The politics of uncertainty: Attachment in private and public life. New York: Routledge.
50. Menand, Louis. 2001. The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America. New York: Farra, Straus, & Giroux.
51. Rorty, Richard. 1991. Objectivity, relativism and truth. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Sanyal, Bish. 2002. Globalization, ethical compromise and planning theory. Planning Theory 1 (2): 116-23.
53. Schon, Donald 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
54. Stein, Stanley, and Thomas Harper. 2003. Power, trust and planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 23 (2): 125-39.
55. Takahashi, Lois M., and Gayle Smutny. 2001. Collaboration among small, community-based organizations: Strategies and challenges in turbulent environments. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 21 (2): 141 - 53.
56. Taylor, Nigel. 1998. Mistaken interests and the discourse model of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 64 (1): 64-75.
57. Throgmorton, James A. 1996. Planning as persuasive storytelling: The rhetorical construction of Chicago's electric future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Umemeoto, Karen, and Krisnawati Suryanata. 2005. Technology, culture, and environmental uncertainty: Considering social contracts and adaptive management. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 (3): 264-73.
59. Van Eetern, Michel, and Emery Roe. 2000. When fiction conveys truth and authority: The Netherlands Green Heart planning controversy. Journal of the American Planning Association 66 (1): 58-67.
60. Van Herzle, Ann. 2004. Local knowledge in action: Valuing non-professional reasoning in the planning process. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (2): 197-212.
61. Verma, Niraj. 1998. Similarities, connections and systems. New York: Lexington Books.
62. Verma, Niraj, and HaeRan Shin. 2004. Communicative action and the network society: A pragmatic marriage? Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (2): 131-40.
63. Walzer, Michael, 1994. Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
64. Watson, Vanessa. 2002. Do we learn from planning practice? The contribution of the practice movement to planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22: 178-87.
65. Wilson, R., M. Payne, and E. Smith. 2003. Does discussion enhance rationality? A report from transportation planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (4): 354-67.
66. Yiftachel, Orem. 1995. Planning as control: Policy and resistance in a deeply divided society. Progress in Planning 44: 116-87.