Negotiating a 'democratic ethos': Moving beyond the agonistic - communicative divide

Planning Theory

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 161-186

  Bond, Sophie ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

agonism; antagonism; Chantal Mouffe; communicative planning theory; democracy; undecidability

Indexed keywords

DEMOCRACY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; PLANNING THEORY; THEORETICAL STUDY; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 79955692792     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095210383081     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Agger A,Löfgren K. Democratic assessment of collaborative panning processes.Planning Theory. 2008;7 (2): 145-164.
2. Alexander E. A mile or a millimetre? Measuring the planning theory-practice gap.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 1997;24 (1): 3-6.
3. Allmendinger P,Tewdwr-Jones M. The communicative turn in urban planning: unravelling paradigmatic, imperialistic, and moralistic dimensions.Space and Polity. 2002;6 (1): 5-24.
4. Barnett C. Deconstructing radical democracy: articulation, representation, and being-with-othersS.Political Geography. 2004;23 (5): 503-528.
5. Spaces of Democracy. Geographical Perspectives on Citizenship, Participation and Representation. Barnett C Low M, ed. London: Sage; 2004:.
6. Beaumont J,Loopmans M. towards radicalized communicative rationality: Resident involvement and urban democracy in Rotterdam and Antwerp.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2008;32 (1): 95-113.
7. Benhabib S Situating the Self. Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1992:.
8. Democracy and Difference. Benhabib S, ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1996:.s
9. Bond S,Thompson-Fawcett M. Public participation and new urbanism: a conflicting agenda?.Planning Theory and Practice. 2007;8 (4): 449-472.
10. Brand R,Gaffikin F. collaborative planning in an uncollaborative world.Planning Theory. 2007;6 (3): 282-313.
11. Bridge G. Rationality, ethics, and space: on situated universalism and the self-interested acknowledgement of difference.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2000;18 (4): 519-535.
12. The Terms of Political Discourse. 3rd edn. Connolly W, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993:.
13. Connolly W The Later Foucault. Politics and Philosophy. Moss J, ed. London: Sage; 1998:108-128.
14. Critchley S Laclau: A Critical Reader. Critchley S Marchart O, ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2004:113-122.
15. Davoudi S,Healey P. City challenge: sustainable process or temporary gesture?.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 1995;13 (1): 79-95.
16. Dryzek JS Discursive Democracy. Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
17. Dryzek JS. Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy.Political Theory. 2001;29 (5): 651-669.
18. Dyrberg TB Laclau: A Critical Reader. Critchley S Marchart O, ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2004:241-255.
19. Eagleton D Ideology. An Introduction. London: Verso; 1991:.
20. Featherstone D Resistance, Space and Political Identities: the Making of Counter-Global Networks. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008:.
21. Flyvbjerg B Rationality and Power. Democracy in Practice. London: University of Chicago Press; 1998:.
22. Flyvbjerg B,Richardson T Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory. Allmendinger P, ed. London: Routledge; 2002:44-62.
23. Forester J Planning in the Face of Power. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 1989:.
24. Forester J The Deliberative Practitioner. Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. London: MIT Press; 1999:.
25. Foucault M Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon; 1980:.
26. Foucault M Michel Foucault. Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Dreyfus HL Rabinow P, ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1983:208-226.
27. Foucault M The Foucault Reader. An Introduction to Foucault's Thought. Rabinow P, ed. New York: Pantheon; 1984:239-256.
28. Foucault M Michel Foucault: Ethics. Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984. Rabinow P, ed. London: Penguin; 2000:111-119.
29. Foucault M The Archaeology of Knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge Classics; 2002:.
30. Friedmann J. Why do planning theory?.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (1): 7-10.
31. Geras N. Post-Marxism?.New Left Review. 1987;I (163): 40-82.
32. Glynos J,Stavrakakis Y Laclau: A Critical Reader. Critchley S Marchart O, ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2004:201-216.
33. Gunder M. Passionate planning for the others desire: An agonistic response to the dark side of planning.Progress in Planning. 2003;60 (3): 235-319.
34. Habermas J The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, CA: Beacon Press; 1984:.
35. Habermas J The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston CA: Beacon Press; 1987:.
36. Habermas J On the Pragmatics of Communication. Cooke M, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998 1976:21-103.
37. Healey P Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Houndsmills: Macmillan; 1997:.
38. Healey P. Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society.Town Planning Review. 1998;69 (1): 1-20.
39. Healey P. The pragmatic tradition in planning thought.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2009;28 (3): 277-292.
40. Hillier J Shadows of Power. An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning. London: Routledge; 2002:.
41. Hillier J. Agonising over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be real.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (1): 37-59.
42. Howarth D Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000:.
43. Howarth D,Glynos J Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge; 2007:.
44. Discourse Theory in European Politics. Identity, Policy and Governance. Howarth D Stavrakakis Y, ed. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005:68-92.
45. Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. Identities, hegemonies and social change. Howarth D Norval A Stavrakakis Y, ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2000:1-23.
46. Huxley M. The limits to communicative planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2000;19 (4): 369-77.
47. Huxley M,Yiftachel O. New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2000;19 (4): 333-342.
48. Innes J,Booher D. Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1999;65 (1): 9-26.
49. Innes J,Booher D. Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century.Planning Theory and Practice. 2004;5 (4): 419-436.
50. Irazábal C. Realising plannings emancipatory promise: Learning from regime theory to strengthen communicative action.Planning Theory. 2009;8 (2): 115-139.
51. Laclau E,Mouffe C Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd edn. London: Verso; 2001:.
52. Massey D. Thinking radical democracy spatially.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 1995;13 (3): 283-288.
53. Massey D For Space. London: Sage; 2005:.
54. Mouffe C The Return of the Political. London: Verso; 1993:.
55. Mouffe C. Post-Marxism: democracy and identity.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 1995;13 (3): 259-65.
56. Mouffe C. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism.Social Research. 1999;66 (3): 745-758.
57. Mouffe C The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso; 2000:.
58. Mouffe C On the Political. Abingdon: Routledge; 2005:.
59. Mouzelis N. Marxism or post-Marxism?.New Left Review. 1988;I (167): 107-125.
60. Norris A. Against antagonism: On Ernesto Laclau's political thought.Constellations. 2002;9 (4): 554-73.
61. Norris A. Ernesto Laclau and the logic of the political.Philosophy and Social Criticism. 2006;32 (1): 111-34.
62. Norval A Aversive Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
63. Olsson AR. Relational rewards and communicative planning: Understanding actor motivation.Planning Theory. 2009;8 (3): 263-281.
64. Olson E,Sayer A. Radical geography and its critical standpoints: embracing the normative.Antipode. 2009;41 (1): 180-198.
65. Patton P The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Dryzek J Honig B Phillips A, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:125-141.
66. Ploger J. Strife: Urban planning and agonism.Planning Theory. 2004;3 (1): 71-92.
67. Pugh J. The disciplinary effects of communicative planning in Soufriere, St Lucia: Governmentality, hegemony and space-time-politics.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2005;30 (3): 307-321.
68. Purcell M. Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements?.Planning Theory. 2009;8 (2): 140-165.
69. Sandercock L. When strangers become neighbours: managing cities of difference.Journal of Planning Theory and Practice. 2000;1 (1): 13-30.
70. Sanyal B. Globalization, ethical compromise and planning theory.Planning Theory. 2002;1 (2): 116-123.
71. Schaap A. Agonism in divided societies.Philosophy and Social Criticism. 2006;32 (2): 255-277.
72. Schwandt T The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Denzin N Lincoln Y, ed. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage; 2000:.
73. Smith S. Everyday morality: where radical geography meets normative theory.Antipode. 2009;41 (1): 206-209.
74. Tewdwr-Jones M,Allmendinger P. Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaberative planning.Environment and Planning A. 1998;30 (11): 1975-1989.
75. Tewdwr-Jones M,Thomas H. Collaborative action in local plan-making: Planners' perceptions of planning through debate.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 1998;25 (1): 127-144.
76. Thomassen L. Reading radical democracy: A commentary on Clive Barnett.Political Geography. 2005;24 (5): 631-639.S
77. Torfing J New Theories of Discourse. Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999:.
78. Torfing J Discourse Theory in European Politics. Identity, Policy and Governance. Howarth D Torfing J, ed. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005:1-32.
79. Umemoto K,Igarashi H. Deliberative planning in a multicultural milieu.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2009;29 (1): 39-53.
80. Valentine J. The hegemony of hegemony.History of the Human Sciences. 2001;14 (1): 88-104.G
81. Young IM Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Benhabib S, ed. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press; 1996:120-135.
82. Young IM Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
83. Žižek S The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso: London; 1989:.