A turning point for planning theory? Overcoming dividing discourses

Planning Theory

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 195-213

  Innes, Judith E ^a   Booher, David E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

collaborative rationality; communication power; communicative planning theory; critique; discourse

Indexed keywords

LEARNING; PLANNING THEORY;

EID: 84928165353     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: 17413052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095213519356     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Argyris C,Schon DOrganizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Publishing; 1996:
2. Barabas J.How deliberation affects policy opinions.American Political Science Review. 2004;98 (4): 687-701
3. Baum HS.Why the rational paradigm persists: Tales from the field.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1996;15 (2): 127-135
4. BengsC (2005) Planning theory for the naive?European Journal of Spatial Development. Available at: http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Debate/debate050718.pdf
5. Bernstein RJThe Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1976:
6. Bohm DOn Dialogue. London: Routledge; 1996:
7. Bryson J,Crosby B.Policy planning and the design and use of forums, arenas and courts.Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design. 1993;20:175-194
8. Castells MThe Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1979:
9. Castells MThe City and the Grassroots. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1983:
10. Castells MThe Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers; 1996:
11. Castells MCommunication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009:
12. Connick SThe Sacramento Area Water Forum. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California; 2006:
13. Corburn JStreet Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005:
14. de Neufville JI.Planning theory and practice: Bridging the gap.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1983;3:35-45
15. de Neufville JI.Knowledge and action: Making the link.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1987;6:86-92
16. de Neufville JI,Barton S.Myths and the definition of policy problems: An exploration of homeownership and public-private partnerships.Policy Sciences. 1987;20:181-206
17. Duineveld M,Van Assche K.The power of tulips: Constructing nature and heritage in a contested landscape.Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 2011;13 (2): 79-98
18. Story and Sustainability: Planning, Practice, and Possibility for American Cities. Eckstein BThrogmorton JA, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003:
19. Fainstein S.New directions in planning theory.Urban Affairs Review. 2000;35 (4): 451-478
20. Fainstein SThe Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2010:
21. Feldman M.Can we talk? Interpretive planning theory as comedy.Planning Theory. 1997;17:43-64
22. Fischer FCitizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2000:
23. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Fischer FForester J, ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1993:
24. Fischer F,Gottweis HThe Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2012:
25. Forester J.Critical theory and planning practice.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1980;46 (3): 275-286
26. Forester J.Planning in the face of power.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1982;48 (1): 67-80
27. Forester JDealing with Differences: Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009:
28. Foucault MThe Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. London: Tavistock Publications; 1972:
29. Foucault MThe History of Sexuality: An Introduction. New York: Random House; 1978:
30. Gibbs LMLove Canal: My Story. Albany, NY: University of New York Press; 1982:
31. Giddens AThe Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1984:
32. Gunder M.A metapsychological exploration of the role of popular media in engineering public belief on planning issues.Planning Theory. 2011;10 (4): 325-343
33. Habermas JThe Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 1989:
34. Habermas JBetween Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996:
35. Hajer MAThe Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1995:
36. Hajer MA,Versteeg W.A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives.Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 2005;7 (3): 175-184
37. Harper TL,Stein SMDialogical Planning in a Fragmented Society: Critically Liberal, Pragmatic. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 2006:
38. Harvey DPlanning Theory in the 1980s. Burchell RSternlieb G, ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University; 1978:213-234.
39. Healey P.Collaborative planning in perspective.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (2): 101-123
40. Healey PCollaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: MacMillan; 2006:
41. Healey PPlanning Ideas that Matter: Livability; Territoriality, Governance and Reflective Practice. Sanyal BVale LJRosan C, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012:333-358.
42. Hillier J.Agon’izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be “Real”.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (1): 37-59
43. Hoch C.Pragmatic communicative action theory.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2007;26 (3): 272-283
44. Hoch CJ.Planning theorists taking the interpretive turn need not travel the political economy highway.Planning Theory. 1997;17:13-37
45. Howe E.Role choices of urban planners.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1980;46 (4): 398-409
46. Huxley M,Yiftachel O.New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2000;19:333-342
47. Innes JKnowledge and Public Policy: The Search for Meaningful Indicators. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 1990:
48. Innes J.Information in communicative planning.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1998;64 (1): 52-63
49. Innes J.Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics.Planning Theory. 2004;3 (1): 5-20
50. Innes J,Booher DPlanning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. Abingdon: Routledge; 2010:
51. Innes JE.Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1995;14 (3): 183-189
52. Innes JE.Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1996;62 (4): 460-472
53. Innes JE,Booher DE.Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1999a;65 (1): 9-26
54. Innes JE,Booher DE.Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1999b;65 (4): 412-423
55. Innes JE,Connick SThe Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. Susskind LMcKearnan SThomas-Larmer J, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1999:801-827.
56. Explorations in Planning Theory. Mandelbaum SJMazza LBurchell R, ed. Rutgers, NJ: CUPR Press; 1996:
57. Mantsalyo R.Dilemmas in critical planning theory.Town Planning Review. 2002;73 (4): 417-436
58. Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice. Marcuse PConnolly JNovy J, ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2009:
59. Urban and Regional Development Trajectories in Contemporary Capitalism. Martinelli FMoulaert FNovy A, ed. London: Routledge; 2013:
60. Mitroff IIThe Subjective Side of Science: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Psychology of the Apollo Moon Scientists. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company; American Elsevier Publishing Company; 1974:
61. Mouffe C.Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism.Social Research. 1999;66 (3): 745-753
62. Mozingo LPastoral Capitalism: A History of Suburban Corporate Landscapes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2011:
63. Overbye D.Einstein and the black hole.The New York Times. 2013;:D1-D3
64. Ozawa CRecasting Science: Consensual Procedures in Public Policy Making. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1991:
65. Perin CEverything in its Place: Social Order and Land Use in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1977:
66. Sager TReviving Critical Planning Theory: Dealing with Pressure, Neo-liberalism, and Responsibility in Communicative Planning. London and New York: Routledge; 2013:
67. Sandercock LCosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities in the 21st Century. New York: Continuum; 2003:
68. Schattschneider EEThe Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1960:
69. Susskind L,Field PDealing with an Angry Public: The Mutual Gains Approach. New York: Free Press; 1996:
70. The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. Susskind LMcKearnan SThomas-Larmer J, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1999:
71. Tewdwr-Jones M,Allmendinger P.Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning.Environment and Planning A. 1998;30:1975-1989
72. Throgmorton J.Learning through conflict at Oxford.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1999;18:269-270
73. Throgmorton JA.Planning as persuasive storytelling in a global-scale web of relationships.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (2): 125-151
74. Truman DBThe Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1951:
75. Wildavsky ASpeaking Truth to Power. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 1987:
76. Wilson DC.Examining the two cultures theory of fisheries knowledge: The case of bluefish management.Society & Natural Resource. 2003;16:491-508
77. Wynne BRationality and Ritual: The Windscale Inquiry and Nuclear Decisions. Bucks: British Society for the History of Science; 1982:
78. Yiftachel O.Planning theory at a crossroad: The third Oxford Conference.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1999;18:267-269
79. Young IMJustice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990: